Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

All Episodes Talk: All Rise


Message added by Meredith Quill

Community Manager Note

Official notice that the topic of Sean DeMarco is off limits. If you have 1-on-1 thoughts to complete please take it to PM with each other.

If you have questions, contact the forum moderator @PrincessPurrsALot.  Do not discuss this limit to this discussion in here. Doing so will result in a warning. 

 

  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

Today:

 

Sploding Gas Rental: This was boring until we find out that while the plaintiff went on craigslist looking for cheap legal assistance, some scammers took the information to extort $725 from the landlords.  Texting lawyers, LOL. 

 

Baytches Bay Crayzay!!! Meh, the plaintiffs probably had as much 'tude as the defendant, but it was pretty obvious that JJ had no love at all for the latter.

  • Love 1
Link to comment

 

Yes, they were. I know laws vary from state to state but, where we live, you have the right to shoot a dog if it's on your property. And, the animal control agency here asks that you catch the dog if you can do so without putting yourself in danger and hold it until they can get there.  I didn't catch where the chicken guy lived but it sounds like he did exactly what he was supposed to do.

My neighbor's husky gets loose all the time and has come into my house three different times through my doggy door. One time, I awoke to it just staring at me in my bedroom. I'm always able to chase it out, but if it tried to hurt me or my dog, I'd shoot it in a heartbeat. It's gorgeous dog, but it has really shitty owners.

 

I found out yesterday whose dog it is and called animal control. It has been, apparently, running wild throughout the neighborhood for weeks. With no collar on it, nobody knew whose dog it was.

Link to comment

Most states have laws regarding "Marauding Animals", usually attacking livestock.  It is perfectly legal to kill a marauding animal that is killing your chickens or rabbits or whatever.  You can also kill vermin that are attacking your crops, boars, for example.  That couple are very lucky they didn't get a carcass back.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

Yes, yes! A trifecta of utter stupidity that makes me weep.

 

"But this is the first time I see a tattoo gracing a single side of a double chin pumped to 45 psi."

When I went to the My Recordings section on the DVR yesterday and saw these two JJ segment titles:  "Bicyclist Lands on Head!" and "Chicken Coop Massacre!" (both titles complete with exclamation points) I could hardly believe my good fortune.  I don't remember any previous JJ episode where the people who write the program summaries have so actively mocked the show.  Delicious.

  • Love 5
Link to comment

JJ seemed rather unsympathetic to the bicyclist at first, but 5 days in the hospital and 30k in bills... he wasn't exaggerating his injuries. I did like her mocking the witness statements though. " I seen a car"  

  • Love 4
Link to comment
QuoteBaytches Bay Crayzay!!! Meh, the plaintiffs probably had as much 'tude as the defendant, but it was pretty obvious that JJ had no love at all for the latter

 

.*Sigh* Bitches keying cars, assaults..blah blah. The only thing that perked me up was my fear that plaintiff was going to rip a hole in Byrd's TV with those hideous, hooked claws on the ends of her fingers.

 

I enjoyed the landlord case, especially the def.'s useless and annoying children and the fact that they all got so easily scammed by the fake lawyer.

 

Then we had a rerun, but that's okay since it was Ricardo Buffington, 21 (Tweedledum) and his 35 year old momma (Tweedledee) , who likes to get drunk with the kiddies and feels that throwing a drunken young girl off a bus in the middle of the night is just peachy keen.

Edited by AngelaHunter
  • Love 3
Link to comment

I am soooooooo dying my hair to match my underwear. That is just awesome. Join me, won't you?

The Sploding Gas Rental (tm Toaster Strudel) case was bizarro. That whole lawyer/legal services thing was weird. I thought the kids were horrible. "Get your stories straight!" indeed. In the halterviews, it sounded more like the whole thing was hinky. Again, I sometimes wish we got a less edited version. Me thinks there might have been more to this.

 

Craigslist (drink!) car case - "Can I just say what an honor it is to be here!" "NO!" We laughed and laughed. And she was an idiot. This is not Chopped. You don't win because you have the most elaborate sob story.   And I hope Party Bus Mom does get sued. Unbelievable. (My son perked up - wondering if he was the only one who noticed Mom was only 15 years older than the birthday boy. Nope,)

 

Hey, Angela, that would be Tweedledum and TweedleDumber.  ;-)

Edited by SandyToes
  • Love 5
Link to comment

I can't tell you how much I love when people get pissed off with the ruling and storm off in the wrong direction only to be told to turn around by Byrd.

And what on earth was Keisha Davis wearing?! The see through black shirt with a red bra. How did JJ let her get away with that?

  • Love 3
Link to comment

 

I can't tell you how much I love when people get pissed off with the ruling and storm off in the wrong direction only to be told to turn around by Byrd.

 

This tickles me SO MUCH!  I just love it!

 

And really, matching red bra and hair?  Yeesh.

Link to comment

I watched an episode over the weekend from last week and JJ did the It's sushi thing. But then she had a little thing with Byrd and said (paraphrasing) It's not sushi, Byrd. It's not. It was like it was a private joke or something. Anyone know what it was about?

,,

Byrd is not a sushi fan.

  • Love 1
Link to comment

The litigants in the car keying case looked like they came straight from a competition organised by their building complex for ugliest upper torso tattoo and most unfortunate use of color, either in hair or clothing.

 

Who in their right mind thinks that dyeing your hair an awful shade of red and using a clothes iron to plaster it flat over your eye is an attractive look?

 

The plaintiff in the gas leak case was a bit of an idiot, revealing so much information to that "legal advice" Web site that they could write directly to her former landlord to scam him. It probably had no physical storefront, a pretty good indication you should not trust such an outfit with sensitive facts.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

Imogen needs to up her faux aristocratic accent game. During the hallterview, she went from sounding like the Queen to sounding in the span of a single sentence.

Then we had a rerun, but that's okay since it was Ricardo Buffington, 21 (Tweedledum) and his 35 year old momma (Tweedledee) , who likes to get drunk with the kiddies and feels that throwing a drunken young girl off a bus in the middle of the night is just peachy keen.

Those two were quite the trashy pair but I had to laugh when JJ was all, "If I were her parents, I'd sue you!" Two things: the girl was 21 and her parents would have no standing. The other--if she did sue on JJ, JJ would have ripped her for her behavior and told her she deserved it for being so drunk since we all know how much JJ loves drunkards.

And what's with only getting one new episode per day? JJ makes 400 billion dollars a year, earn your keep lady, I can't entertain myself!

Link to comment

When I went to the My Recordings section on the DVR yesterday and saw these two JJ segment titles:  "Bicyclist Lands on Head!" and "Chicken Coop Massacre!" (both titles complete with exclamation points) I could hardly believe my good fortune.  I don't remember any previous JJ episode where the people who write the program summaries have so actively mocked the show.  Delicious.

Wait a minute, wait a minute, how do you get such nice program summaries?

 

For a long time I have been extremely annoyed by what I get. Every program description must have a circular word in it;

 

Lititgation swirls around...

 

A case centers around...

 

A marauding pooch causes testimony to revolve...

 

A case centers on bad rent cheques...

 

I hate it so bad - almost as bad as TPC litigator I hardly knew her. 

 

Has this person been told to write these up like this or are they just horrible at their job?  Does everyone get these horrible case descriptions?

 

You know they get paid to write this crap and anyone of the snarkers here could come up with better ones. 

  • Love 1
Link to comment

I don't remember any previous JJ episode where the people who write the program summaries have so actively mocked the show.  Delicious.

 

Maybe not, but the people who write the titles under the litigants used to use delicious snark. Do they still do that? I haven't noticed things like "SAYS he's a musician", or "21 year old mother of four", or "18 year old stay-at-home-mom"  lately.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

Maybe not, but the people who write the titles under the litigants used to use delicious snark. Do they still do that? I haven't noticed things like "SAYS he's a musician", or "21 year old mother of four", or "18 year old stay-at-home-mom"  lately.

They still do it, and it's hilarious. You guys were the ones who told me I needed to pay attention to the captions. I used to be silly enough to attempt to do other things while watching, like cooking or surfing the net. Now I watch for the wonderful snark in the captions.

 

 

Wait a minute, wait a minute, how do you get such nice program summaries?

 

For a long time I have been extremely annoyed by what I get. Every program description must have a circular word in it;

 

Lititgation swirls around...

 

A case centers around...

 

A marauding pooch causes testimony to revolve...

 

A case centers on bad rent cheques...

 

I hate it so bad - almost as bad as TPC litigator I hardly knew her. 

 

Has this person been told to write these up like this or are they just horrible at their job?  Does everyone get these horrible case descriptions?

 

You know they get paid to write this crap and anyone of the snarkers here could come up with better ones. 

My problem was that, for a long time, the descriptions I got didn't match the cases at all. So I never knew what the heck I was going to get until I watched the episode. They seem to have fixed this starting with the new season.

 

Regarding the "Sploding Gas Rental" I would like a follow-up on that one. Wouldn't it be great if JJ heard the case that occurs when the landlords sue the scammer legal advice people? We need more follow-up in general on JJ. Sometimes she'll pend a verdict while awaiting more info from a litigant, but then we never find out the resolution of it. For as much as I despise Harvey Levin on TPC, at least he gives us updates after a case has been aired.

Mr. Ouisch commented after watching the man-dressed sister suing her brother (The Second) over the sale of dad's motorcycle that any male that came into JJ's court wearing a dress or a skirt would probably be mocked and ultimately escorted out of the room by Byrd.

There was a transexual woman on Hot Bench yesterday (I know, I'm the only one still watching that train wreck!), and the judges handled it well. They didn't comment or ask her if she was a man or do anything else I was worried they might do. I'd like to think JJ would do the same.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

About grammar lessons, I remember the day she turned to Byrd and said how she used to correct "I axed" and got tons of emails that it was acceptable.  If there was one mistake I could eliminate, that would be it.

 

 

Saying "axed" instead of "ask" isn't illiteracy, it's called metathesis.  Some words roll off the tongue better than others.  It's interesting that it's the one thing you would change.  It's no different than people saying "jewlery" instead of "jewelry" or "realator" instead of "realtor".  I remember some of my teachers saying "warsh" instead of "wash".  Some people on the east coast also put an "r" sound in some words.  If it's understood what people mean, whether the deviation from English is cultural, regional, etc., I don't see what the big deal is.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

For as much as I despise Harvey Levin on TPC, at least he gives us updates after a case has been aired.

 

He just does that so we can see yet more of his ugly fucking face and listen to his high-pitched screechy voice. I hate that slimebucket - even more than The Creep in the Hall -  with the heat of a thousand suns and never ever listen to a word out of his "flapping gums". He brings that show down to tabloid level.  FF and Mute are my best friends when watching TPC.

 

"realator" instead of "realtor".

 

 

That one really annoys me. There's only one "a" in that word. It's "real estate" and not "realA estate."

 

 

  • Love 2
Link to comment

 

He just does that so we can see yet more of his ugly fucking face and listen to his high-pitched screechy voice. I hate that slimebucket - even more than The Creep in the Hall -  with the heat of a thousand suns and never ever listen to a word out of his "flapping gums". He brings that show down to tabloid level.  FF and Mute are my best friends when watching TPC.

I don't disagree with you, in fact I couldn't have said it better myself. But I do appreciate getting updates on cases where things are left in the air. 

  • Love 2
Link to comment

Those two were quite the trashy pair but I had to laugh when JJ was all, "If I were her parents, I'd sue you!" Two things: the girl was 21 and her parents would have no standing

Did they flat out say the girl was 21? I know he claimed he was the only one underage but I don't think JJ bought that and I didn't either. I got the impression, from how angry JJ was, that the girl was a teenager.

Edited by WhoaWhoKnew
  • Love 2
Link to comment

Cannot believe gas-leak homeowner got scammed by those lawyers!  Laywers texting you?  I think not.  I just had to deal with 2 different estate lawyers and texting was never done.  So glad JJ told them to go sue those lawyers.  Good luck finding them.  Idiots!

Link to comment
That one really annoys me. There's only one "a" in that word. It's "real estate" and not "realA estate."

 

 

Quick anecdote: Years ago I worked with a woman who was very nice but not always very sharp. One day she answered the phone and then told me "Here, make sure Ernie gets this message; it's from Earl Keim 'Realaty'." Having just read an article on the most mispronounced words in the English language, I commented to her "Did you know that that's one of the 10 most mispronounced words in the English language?" She cocked her head in surprise and asked in all sincerity, "Really? 'Earl Keim' is?"

 

I would love to see a follow-up on the scammers-that-were-scammed-themselves landlords....they were so busy impugning the plaintiff's character that I don't think they caught on that they'd been duped by that "legal services" company. (And the son going on about what a mess plaintiff had left the place - "You didn't see the bathroom!!" - my goodness, she lived there for five days! I'm no slave to Pine-Sol and even I can't pigsty-ify a dwelling that quickly.)

  • Love 3
Link to comment

I would love to see a follow-up on the scammers-that-were-scammed-themselves landlords....they were so busy impugning the plaintiff's character that I don't think they caught on that they'd been duped by that "legal services" company. (And the son going on about what a mess plaintiff had left the place - "You didn't see the bathroom!!" - my goodness, she lived there for five days! I'm no slave to Pine-Sol and even I can't pigsty-ify a dwelling that quickly.)

I don't know if it was on this board, but someone suggested that's what Hot Bench should have been - a bit of an appellate court for JJ or just one that ties in to her show. I think they missed an opportunity there.

 

There's one thing they do on HB that I wish they did on JJ; the litigants are together for the hallterview. Considering some of the more memorable hallterviews we've had on JJ, I can only imagine the Jerry Springer-esque levels of fisticuffs we could get if the litigants were together for the hallterview. I don't think we've had a fight break out on HB, but it's bound to happen.

  • Love 1
Link to comment

Today:

 

Your Claim Denied In 15 Minutes Or Less: What shitty insurance doesn't pay for someone's physical injuries?  So what if he was speeding at night and weaving between cars, they chose to insure him, they should pay.  Someone should pay.  They were both insured!  They must have been aristocrats, barons or higher.  I hope you all said a prayer for me to keep my temper cool when you heard the plaintiff blurt out "rate of speed."  Preppy blue blood defendant even took responsibility for his actions.  What a noble, almost fully-insured, upper-cruster.  He should give seminars on civic responsibility to the other litigants, especially the dog-owning types.

 

The Intervention Crew Was Waiting In The Hallterview: Never have I been so certain that a litigant had shot up heroin in JJ's bathrooms moments before walking down the court hall.  Her eye movements were sluggish and she was fighting their will to roll up in their orbits.  When she said in the hallterview that her problems started when the boyfriend Bald Billy Bob Thornton moved in, it corroborated the landlady's claims that she was trying to get clean, and he led her right back to to the needle.  It's a good thing the audience was short, or she would have started to get the "super flu" and puke all over the carafe.

  • Love 4
Link to comment

Oh man, I missed another great one, I see!  I do hope they will rerun it later today.

 

 

 

teebax

 

My neighbor's husky gets loose all the time and has come into my house three different times through my doggy door. One time, I awoke to it just staring at me in my bedroom.

 

 

Good Lord, I missed your post earlier!  What a horrific thing to wake up to, nice doggie or not.  I hope those irresponsible dicks take care of their dog better now.

Edited by Brattinella
  • Love 2
Link to comment

I don't know if it was on this board, but someone suggested that's what Hot Bench should have been - a bit of an appellate court for JJ or just one that ties in to her show. I think they missed an opportunity there.

 

There's one thing they do on HB that I wish they did on JJ; the litigants are together for the hallterview. Considering some of the more memorable hallterviews we've had on JJ, I can only imagine the Jerry Springer-esque levels of fisticuffs we could get if the litigants were together for the hallterview. I don't think we've had a fight break out on HB, but it's bound to happen.

 

That was I in the Hot Mess Forum. :-)

 

Last night's repeat--Buffalo Cellphone Murder---artsy girl suing ex-room mate because he threw her cellphone out of the car. JJ sent her back to the small claims court. Frankly, I think they were faking it. But I could see them on Hot Mess!

  • Love 1
Link to comment

 

Your Claim Denied In 15 Minutes Or Less: What shitty insurance doesn't pay for someone's physical injuries?  So what if he was speeding at night and weaving between cars, they chose to insure him, they should pay.  Someone should pay.  They were both insured!  They must have been aristocrats, barons or higher.  I hope you all said a prayer for me to keep my temper cool when you heard the plaintiff blurt out "rate of speed."  Preppy blue blood defendant even took responsibility for his actions.  What a noble, almost fully-insured, upper-cruster.  He should give seminars on civic responsibility to the other litigants, especially the dog-owning types.

I won't get to see this until late tonight, since my JJ episodes don't come on until 6 pm. I can't wait to see it - sounds like it's right up my alley!

Link to comment

Fun fact (at least for an insurance nerd like me): The General is owned by American Family Insurance. A lot of the non-standard carriers are owned by perfectly respectable, standard carriers. Titan is owned by Nationwide. Farmers owns 21st Century, and the list goes on.

Insurance companies wanted a piece of that sweet, lucrative non-standard insurance business but weren't going to sully their good names to get in on it. So they write drivers with bad credit, DUIs, and bad driving records under these alternative names. Since, as JJ has shown us, often these drivers go into cancellation before they have an accident, it's a win-win for them!

 

 

I see your point. I guess it's the people who can only qualify for that type of insurance, not the insurance company themselves, that are the real problem! 

  • Love 1
Link to comment

JJ was reading a facebook posting on today's show and the litigant had written "stold". JJ said, "The word is "stole".

So I am about 99% sure that they actually did mean to write "stold," but D and E are next to each other on the keyboard, so maybe it was a typo. Probably not, but I'm willing to let that one slide.

Link to comment

I can't tell you how much I love when people get pissed off with the ruling and storm off in the wrong direction only to be told to turn around by Byrd.

 

Who remembers the pissy little boy who, in a fit of pique, tried storming off in high dudgeon and ended up nose-first in the cardboard corner of the set to the left of Byrd and paddling his little arms uselessly? HIs drama certainly fell flat.

 

ToasterStrudel - you weren't joking around about Amy Skankey, I mean SANKEY. She appeared as though she were minutes away from major withdrawal symptoms, yet I couldn't help feeling a certain sympathy for her. She was pitiful and her short, fireplug "Gym-boy" boyfriend is probably a factor in the Mess that is Amy.

 

"Here, make sure Ernie gets this message; it's from Earl Keim 'Realaty'." Having just read an article on the most mispronounced words in the English language, I commented to her "Did you know that that's one of the 10 most mispronounced words in the English language?" She cocked her head in surprise and asked in all sincerity, "Really? 'Earl Keim' is?"

 

I wish I could say that surprises me, but....*sigh*

  • Love 1
Link to comment

 Your Claim Denied In 15 Minutes Or Less[/i]: What shitty insurance doesn't pay for someone's physical injuries?  So what if he was speeding at night and weaving between cars, they chose to insure him, they should pay.  Someone should pay.  They were both insured!  They must have been aristocrats, barons or higher.  I hope you all said a prayer for me to keep my temper cool when you heard the plaintiff blurt out "rate of speed."  Preppy blue blood defendant even took responsibility for his actions.  What a noble, almost fully-insured, upper-cruster.  He should give seminars on civic responsibility to the other litigants, especially the dog-owning types.

My guess is that they both were only carrying liability. If you heard otherwise, please correct me. If he had medical payments (or PIP in some states), that's a no-fault coverage and would have helped with his medical bills,even if he were deemed to have been riding recklessly. So my guess is that he just didn't have the right coverage. It's a shame becuase med pay / PIP are usually the cheapest part of the policy, unless you live In a true no-fault state. I won't even sell a policy without it.

As far as her insurance is concerned, if she had collision coverage, they should have paid to repair her car and then subrogated back to his coverage if they thought he was at fault. Since that didn't happen, she either didn't have collision coverage, or she had a really crappy adjuster. And I've never heard of denying a claim via a voice mail. You might get a message that the claim is denied, but it should be followed up in writing via certified mail. That's almost as crazy to me as texting lawyers! Even if they didn't mail her a denial, which I highly doubt, she could have gotten a formal declination from her carrier.

I wish insurance education were part of drivers' education. I think if people understood it better, they would make better choices. The people who need the broadest coverage are rarely the ones who buy it. They get minimum limits from a non-standard carrier, and it ends up costing them more in the long run when they have a claim.

  • Love 2
Link to comment

Yay for Teebax using my favourite word - subrogate.  

 

I was beginning to think that Canadians wouldn't need to have car insurance that covers medical because our health care would cover it - but then I do know that OHIP subrogates.  

 

I am not sure if they jump in on every accident with injuries. 

 

I am just not sure if they only do it for major, major amounts for example a friend of mine who worked on subrogation for a plane crash with millions of dollars in damages.   

 

Back in my brain I am thinking Teebax is Canadian so please enlighten if you know this.

 

Being in a car that was hit by a motorcycle that swerved out of the line of traffic and hit our car at high speed while we were making a left turn, I really felt that this fellow today was pretty responsible - he is going to drive as fast as he can until he hits something WTF!

 

In our case we were responsible for him hitting us even because we were turning left even though the motorcyclist had only got his bike that day, racked up 2 accidents that first day and my husband was 30 years no accidents.

 

There are hard and fast rules but maybe they should be a little softer and a little slower when picking the guilty driver.

Link to comment

Did you all catch the stunned look on heroin boyfriend's face when JJ announced the $5000 verdict?

 

Yes, and it was awesome. Amy just stood there like, "Huh? Wha...? Where am I?"

 

He probably convinced Amy to appear on the show by cackling, "We'll get lots of money babe. No way can we lose."

Link to comment

 

Back in my brain I am thinking Teebax is Canadian so please enlighten if you know this.

I'm not Canadian, but I did sleep in a Holiday Inn Express last night!

 

I think there are similarities between American and Canadian insurance laws. And, yes, you're correct that health insurance can be used to pay for medical bills if the party doesn't have medical payments coverage on their auto insurance. I like med pay coverage because: 1. It doesn't cost a lot; 2. It covers yourself AND your passengers. So even if you have medical insurance, your passenger(s) may not. And if they're injured in a car accident they could come after you for their injuries. This no-fault coverage makes settling claims fairly easy, provided you have a high-enough limit to cover the injuries.

  • Love 1
Link to comment

I'm not Canadian, but I did sleep in a Holiday Inn Express last night!

A fair approximation, I grant you.

 

I think there are similarities between American and Canadian insurance laws.

There are of course differences between the two countries, as well as substantial  variations between provinces. Some have no-fault programs, to varying degrees. I think Québec is the only one with a state-run program that completely covers bodily injuries. You are still obligated under law to get private insurance for material damages, on both sides. The fact that there are differences between provinces is highlighted by disclaimers in some TV advertisements for age-privilege programs which mention that they cannot be offered in about 4 or 5 provinces last time I noticed.

 

What a charming pair that Sanky couple was; they would be the highlight of any elegant afternoon tea. Although conversation would probably be non-existent as everyone would be fascinated by her lone hair lock falling smack down in the middle of her face, neatly separating her eyes. Her husband's surprise in the end, real or simulated, was the best part of that case.

 

In yesterday's repeat show, one case involved a man accusing his ex of vandalising his car. He waited until the last second to pull out a text message in which she threatened to do just that; JJ was just about ready to rule, obviously against him, but that changed her mind on a dime. I wonder if he had been advised by the production team to keep the document for the very end, otherwise they would have lucked out on 15 minutes of "good television" in which that family's dysfunctional relationships (her own sister testified against her) were laid out bare for all to see.

  • Love 5
Link to comment

Did they flat out say the girl was 21? I know he claimed he was the only one underage but I don't think JJ bought that and I didn't either.

I'm pretty sure they mentioned her age as 21. Then again, that pair was stank so it's conceivable they dumped a 17-year old girl off a bus at two in the morning. (Cause her parents will couldn't sue if she was over 18.)

I don't watch People's Court, but I do read TMZ. I have no real opinion on Harvey Levin but I read this:

He just does that so we can see yet more of his ugly fucking face and listen to his high-pitched screechy voice. I hate that slimebucket - even more than The Creep in the Hall - with the heat of a thousand suns and never ever listen to a word out of his "flapping gums"

...and literally laughed out loud. That is some awesome level of hatred! :)
Link to comment

but I do read TMZ.

 

Just take what you read with a grain of salt. That nasty little bitch has been busted for lying before, like during the O.J. Simpson trial. He should stick to sending his teenage posse out to dig through Britney Spear's garbage. More his level.

  • Love 1
Link to comment

A woman sues a man for damages resulting from assault and battery.

 

This is JJ.  You know this isn't going to go well for the woman.  Her story was barbecued, grilled, turned over, basted, and pricked with a meat thermometer.  His was boiled for 5 minutes.

 

90% of the time, when there is an assault, JJ rules for the man.  The women never seem to behave rationally enough to be believed when they get beaten, so they get smacked in court, too.

  • Love 3
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...