Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Why Grammar Matters: A Place To Discuss Matters Of Grammar


Message added by JTMacc99,

Nbc Brooklyn 99 GIF by Brooklyn Nine-Nine

  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

It's hard to hear most times as it can sound like "have" is being used.  I hate it, though...almost as much as I loathe hearing & reading, "try and" instead of "try to". This one is fingernails on a blackboard for me 😬.

  • Like 6
  • LOL 2
Link to comment
(edited)

I recently heard a person say "Valentimes Day".   I thought I misheard, but she said it 2 more times.  

I wanted to ask "How do you spell that?  When you see greeting cards in the store, do you wonder why Hallmark made a spelling mistake?"  

Edited by Quof
  • Like 4
  • Mind Blown 2
  • LOL 3
Link to comment
18 hours ago, Bastet said:

I don't hear it, but I go ape shit when I see it written.

Can I sit with you? You know that this also drives me batshit crazy and I've posted previously the others that make me want to bash my head into a wall: typing "your" when they obviously mean "you're" as in you are. NOT the possessive!

  • Like 6
Link to comment

I just did some online training for work, which was clearly written by ChatGPT.   The grammar made me want to scream (as well as click "none of the above" for every question, since neither the questions nor answers were written correctly.)

  • Like 2
  • Sad 4
Link to comment
10 hours ago, Quof said:

I recently heard a person say "Valentimes Day".   I thought I misheard, but she said it 2 more times.  

I wanted to ask "How do you spell that?  When you see greeting cards in the store, do you wonder why Hallmark made a spelling mistake?"  

In my husband's home town, he heard people say, "assalete" instead of athlete. I think this is another example of immigrants from countries that do not pronounce "th" trying to use an English word. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
20 hours ago, annzeepark914 said:

I think this is another example of immigrants from countries that do not pronounce "th" trying to use an English word. 

If that were true, you would find pronunciations like that around the country, not just in one town. And with other words too.

Link to comment

Our School District has a Foundation that gives Grants to teachers. They sent out their quarterly newsletter. Item #4: “The Foundation Excepting Applications for $26,000 in 2024 Scholarships.” Excepting?

  • Mind Blown 6
  • Sad 9
Link to comment

Read this headline today:

"MDTA maintenance crew picking up litter alongside I-95 injured in tractor-trailer crash"

The litter was injured in the crash? or was I-95 Injured? I'm not quite sure.

 

Also: I can't find the other grammar thread. Does anyone know what happened to it?

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
(edited)
4 minutes ago, SweetieDarling said:

Also: I can't find the other grammar thread. Does anyone know what happened to it?

The one on grammar in tv shows? I think it got merged into this one. I guess there was a lot of crossover?

Edited by SoMuchTV
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
(edited)
3 hours ago, SweetieDarling said:

Read this headline today:

"MDTA maintenance crew picking up litter alongside I-95 injured in tractor-trailer crash"

The litter was injured in the crash? or was I-95 Injured? I'm not quite sure.

 

Also: I can't find the other grammar thread. Does anyone know what happened to it?

 

I don’t know of another grammar thread unless it was one of the TV threads?  
That’s a great copy editor nerd joke.  We used to laugh at those when I was a copy editor. 

Edited by EtheltoTillie
Link to comment
(edited)
7 hours ago, SoMuchTV said:

The one on grammar in tv shows? I think it got merged into this one.

Yes, shortly after this one was created that one was merged into it, which is why it's so large -- it has the newer thread's title and the older thread's start date, with all the posts from both.

Edited by Bastet
  • Mind Blown 1
  • Useful 4
Link to comment

Fascinating article by a superb writer on why the prescriptivism vs. descriptivism debate is a red herring. Short answer: Because descriptivism actually is prescriptivism in descriptivist clothing.

Link.

 

  • Useful 1
Link to comment
(edited)

That article was a lot. And I am not sure which side of the convoluted debate he is on, even after ready the whole thing. Maybe that was the point?

 

I am going to check out his 90’s one. Even though the 70’s and 80’s ruled, lol

Edited by stewedsquash
Link to comment

Since I'm a linguist by trade, I have to add a correction as the beleaguered minority. Descriptivist linguists don't think teaching grammar is useless. There is nothing I would love to see more of in schools is grammar teaching. Just not, you know, teaching kids that having prepositions at the end of a sentence is wrong and similar nonsense.

I love teaching my students that English is quite interesting in that it allows such a thing under certain circumstances. THAT is grammar teaching from a descriptivist's perspective. That formal language has certain conventions and spoken language has other conventions. That there are instances where you can leave the preposition at the end but probably wouldn't in formal writing and there are instances where you HAVE to leave it at the end, regardless of the style of writing.

Where you have to leave it: I wish I remembered where she was FROM.

Most speakers would be unlikely to say: I wish I remembered FROM where she was.

Where you cannot leave it behind: I can tell you IN what order the words go.

But not for most variants of English: I can tell you what order the words go IN.

I don't know what kind of descriptivists this person talks about, but maybe it's better to talk to a linguist instead.

There is teaching grammar as a part of human language and there is teaching the tools of grammar to write. These are very different things. And they have very little to do with the difference between prescription and description. English majors and educators tend to confuse the two. And often make students worry so much about this grammar monster, they forget that they have grammar that they use every day. Language doesn't exist without a rule system. 

  • Like 8
  • Love 1
Link to comment

Here's a gift link to an opinion piece in yesterday's NYT:
“‘Little Women’ and the Art of Breaking Grammatical Rules”
nytimes.com/2024/04/04/opinion/little-women-grammar-rules.html?unlocked_article_code=1.ik0.cwHC.YJzs6bqKrXr0&smid=url-share

He echos a lot of what has been said here.
He also suggests this 2024 book by linguist Anne Curzan:
“Says Who? A Kinder, Funner Usage Guide for Everyone Who Cares About Words”

It's available from Amazon:

And also from your local library:
(scroll down the linked pages to see your local libraries that have the book)

  • Like 1
  • Applause 1
  • Useful 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...