Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

S04.E22: The Devil Went Down to Woodstone


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Orbert said:

Crash was there!  And of course he didn't have any lines, but hey, he was there. 😀

So were Baxter and Jenkins. No Carol though.

The actress who plays Carol had a recurring role on Curb Your Enthusiasm. I recently caught an old episode of that and it was driving me crazy trying to remember where I knew her from. Then I realized, it was Carol! And that was about 20 years ago.

  • Like 2
  • Useful 2
6 hours ago, Chit Chat said:

Sadly, for Patience, she's a product of her upbringing & environment.  I'm not making excuses for that particular group, but as for Patience, she probably knows nothing different.  I can cut her some slack for that.  

I was hoping when they brought her character on board that she would be on the show a little more.  I would've liked to have seen her interact with the other ghosts and possibly learned to like the modern world, at least a little bit!  Instead, she's a scared soul who is trapped by ages old thinking.  I'd like her to find peace and then get "sucked off."  

We've already been given a small glimpse of a possible rebellious streak in Patience when she did her little dance moves, remember?  Also, when she decided to return to the dirt, didn't she say something to the effect that she didn't belong in the mansion?  Whatever she actually said, I remember thinking she sounded sad, which led me to think that actually she was quite lonely.  I think she can't understand why people don't like her--remember, even her fellow Puritans told her to get lost--but she wants to belong like everyone else.  So I think we might eventually see her shed some of her extreme rigidity if the writers keep her around next season.  But she seems to be the sort of person who runs to extremes and has no sense of proportion, so if she does loosen up she might go hog-wild, rather like the pervy Farnsworth Puritan who reconsidered his views after he didn't go directly to heaven.

  • Like 6
9 minutes ago, iMonrey said:

So were Baxter and Jenkins. No Carol though.

The actress who plays Carol had a recurring role on Curb Your Enthusiasm. I recently caught an old episode of that and it was driving me crazy trying to remember where I knew her from. Then I realized, it was Carol! And that was about 20 years ago.

She was in an Off-Broadway play that just closed at the end of April, so that's possibly why she wasn't available for this episode.

  • Like 1
  • Useful 5
11 hours ago, Bastet said:

I think AI is a huge deal, one we as a society are going to pay for dearly, and using it to replace artists disgusts me in a particular way (and I'm not even an artist).

Ok but like, this is the most natural thing in the world. New technologies always replaced human labor.

  • Pinsetters in Bowling Alleys were phased out by automatic pinsetting machines. In the past the pins were replaced manually. 
  • Switchboard Operators: Automated telephone exchanges made manual connection of calls obsolete.
  • Factory Workers: Robots and automated machinery now perform many assembly line tasks more efficiently.

And the list goes on. In the past people thought using cars instead of horses was immoral and bad, but nobody would say that today. 

In this case people are acting like the ghosts in this show, stuck in their old way of thinking and applying the standards of their past ideology to current times. Like when Hetty criticized Sam's make-up which was conservative by today's standards.

19 hours ago, iMonrey said:

There are a few plot holes here. If Patience is a threat to ruin a social function, Sam can ask Thor to put her in the vault for the duration. This is exactly what she threatened to do to Elias in an earlier episode when he was threatening to make trouble. Now they seem to have conveniently forgotten about it.

Well, it wouldn’t have really solved the problem anyway.  If you lock her in the vault just for the duration, you run the risk that she will come out all aggravated and wanting revenge and looking to ruin some other guests’ experience.  So you get the same problem, only later.  You could keep her in the vault forever, I suppose, but that seems excessive.  I say just paint the walls red, it’s not like it’s going to wreck the barn ambiance of their fine establishment that much.

10 hours ago, Katy M said:

How stupid is Baela?  she knows that the ghosts are in the house distracting Patience and she goes to the house and just loudly proclaims the plan. 

Yes, that was not her proudest moment.  In her defense, she couldn’t know that they were in that particular room, or even if they were still in the house.  It’s hard if you cannot see ghosts, you almost have to assume that they are always around and you never can say anything you wouldn’t want them to hear.  That Latvian company should develop and sell a ghost detector, maybe a lapel pin that glows when they are nearby, or something.  

  • Like 2
  • LOL 3

I think Patience is a hoot.  Like Nancy, if used sparingly and purposefully to where their character and personality fit the plot, it's very successful.

Not crazy about the Pete/Alberta coupling.  I guess...why?  I don't understand why the writers forced them together when Pete had a thing going with Donna

  • Like 7
  • Useful 1
4 hours ago, shura said:

Well, it wouldn’t have really solved the problem anyway.  If you lock her in the vault just for the duration, you run the risk that she will come out all aggravated and wanting revenge and looking to ruin some other guests’ experience.  So you get the same problem, only later.  You could keep her in the vault forever, I suppose, but that seems excessive.

There could be consequences, sure, but it bugs me that they didn't even consider it. They have options. They don't need to act like Patience is omnipotent and holds all the cards. I liked when Sam referred to Thor as her "muscle." I wish she would remember that.

  • Like 5
2 hours ago, ctbookkeeper said:

Not crazy about the Pete/Alberta coupling.  I guess...why?  I don't understand why the writers forced them together when Pete had a thing going with Donna

If it was a choice between Pete & Donna or Pete & Alberta, the show's casting demands Alberta. 
Hopefully Pete & Alberta can get their yayas out over the break, and then come back in the fall as friendly exes.

  • Like 3

I am generally someone who balks at every show having to have everyone nicely coupled off.  But I'm ok with it on this show, simply because the ghosts are capable of having ghost sex.  (Even if we're not quite sure to what level of satisfaction.)  For most of us, living an eternity without sex would be awful.  They only have each other to couple (or throuple) up with, so why wouldn't they be coupling off, breaking up, recoupling, etc.?  This is a group that uses backrubs as currency, after all.  It would make sense if Trevor and Flower hooked up soon after Trevor's death, and continued as friends with benefits this whole time. 

So Pete & Alberta?  Yeah, I'm on board with that.  She deserves a little somethin' somethin' after almost 100 years.   

  • Like 3
  • Useful 1
20 hours ago, ams1001 said:

I always roll my eyes when I see people talking about the Founders and religious freedom and then cite the Puritans. The Puritans came for their own religious freedom, not anyone else's, and they weren't the Founding Fathers.

 

 

The Founding Fathers were almost all Deists which is a belief in "rationality" instead of religion.

They were probably atheists but at that time it was acceptable to be a Deist versus being a complete apostate. 

  • Like 4
  • Applause 1
  • Useful 2
3 minutes ago, Phebemarie said:

It would have been nice to draw out Alberta's crush on Pete a little longer.  She's only acknowledged feelings for him an episode ago.  Maybe the chemistry would be stronger if there was a little more of a build up.  

It was enough for me. I'm glad Alberta's hots for Pete didn't become the new go-to for ghost-sex joke now that Sass is no longer a virgin. 
And I am so glad the show doesn't do embarrassing (to me) voyeuristic sex scenes — even if they're only skipping them because the show's only got 20 minutes per week.

  • Like 1
On 5/9/2025 at 4:48 PM, Orbert said:

Crash was there!  And of course he didn't have any lines, but hey, he was there. 😀

Well to be fair he would have had to have found his head again to have any lines.  😁

In one of the interviews above the person asked if Elias chasing Jay around next season would be a Wile E. Coyote / Road Runner thing.  The producer laughed and said he hadn't thought of that and the story arc hasn't begun on Season 5's start yet.

But now I can't get that image out of my head.  Jay would be so cool going "Beep! Beep!" every time Elias fails.

Edited by Skooma
  • LOL 5
11 hours ago, chaifan said:

I am generally someone who balks at every show having to have everyone nicely coupled off.  But I'm ok with it on this show, simply because the ghosts are capable of having ghost sex.  (Even if we're not quite sure to what level of satisfaction.)  For most of us, living an eternity without sex would be awful.  They only have each other to couple (or throuple) up with, so why wouldn't they be coupling off, breaking up, recoupling, etc.?  This is a group that uses backrubs as currency, after all.  It would make sense if Trevor and Flower hooked up soon after Trevor's death, and continued as friends with benefits this whole time. 

So Pete & Alberta?  Yeah, I'm on board with that.  She deserves a little somethin' somethin' after almost 100 years.   

The Ghosts died when they were young and some of them never found love so why not in the afterlife? They are so limited in what they can do but they can touch each other. 

5 hours ago, kav said:

So she could be the Woodstone soul that he gets?

I want Hetty to defeat Elias. He cheated on her and was indirectly responsible for her suicide.

  • Like 8
  • Applause 1

Hey, did we ever find out what the cherry pie in the opening titles meant? I can't remember.

All the ghosts chanting "Shame. Shame. Shame." at Alberta - very Game of Thrones.

Bela, seeing the walls bleed for the first time: "Where does the blood come from?" Jay: "We don't ask that question." I mean, but yeah - where does it come from? 

  • Like 3
  • LOL 1

This is the most recent article I could find discussing the easter eggs in the opening credits.   And...  it doesn't say what the cherry pie is all about!  

https://www.cinemablend.com/television/most-ghosts-season-4-opening-credits-easter-eggs-been-revealed-im-super-curious-about-reveal-to-come#viafoura-comments

Anyways...  I'm really not prudish, but I've always thought the "cherry" reference to losing one's virginity is crude.  So if that's what this is in reference to, I'm disappointed in the show that they couldn't come up with anything more clever.  (Like a family of hedgehogs.)  Or, tied in an actual cherry pie, with Jay baking a cherry pie that same episode, not knowing what was happening with Sass.  

 

  • Like 4
2 hours ago, chaifan said:

Anyways...  I'm really not prudish, but I've always thought the "cherry" reference to losing one's virginity is crude. 

Thank you.

My first guess for the pie is a George Washington reference to the myth of his having told his father "I cannot tell a lie" when he chopped down the cherry tree. 
Could Isaac have chopped down the cherry tree? 
Or would he have been a lad in England at that time? 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...