CrazyInAlabama

4 p.m. reruns- First (2013)- Rent Free and Smoking Pot? -Plaintiff/ex-tenant/daughter Kristina Gach suing defendant/mother Kathleen Gach for return of rent. Plaintiff claims she cleaned defendant’s house for $80 a day, and rent was $400 but the rent would be returned after plaintiff and boyfriend moved out. Plaintiff, boyfriend, and their baby. Defendant is counter claiming for missing property, rent, and other stuff. After plaintiff, boyfriend (Ted Altizer), stayed at defendant’s house for five or six months to qualify for low-income housing. They moved into the downstairs 1 bed, 1 bath apartment in defendant’s house. Plaintiff claims clients pay her from $80 to $145 a day for house cleaning. Defendant says plaintiffs were deadbeats, never paid rent, smoked pot in her house, and she finally kicked them out. JJ tells the plaintiff daughter that her mother will always be in her life, after deadbeat boyfriend in long gone. If mother is smart, she’ll change the locks, and never let plaintiff or her deadbeat boyfriend in her house again. Plaintiff gets $800. Defendant case dismissed. Ex-Fiance Fiasco -Plaintiff Bryan McClarnan suing defendant/ex-fiance Janine Crosswhite for missed car payments and damages on a car plaintiff took loan out on for defendant. Defendant never made any payments, apparently no maintenance either, and finally gave car back to plaintiff. She’s now driving a 1996 Honda Prelude, purchased for $800. When car became undrivable, defendant dumped car on plaintiff. Defendant deferred eight payments (unpaid), and transmission repair was over $300. The original car was on a six year payment plan. $ 2998 to plaintiff. Second (2013)- Pit Bull Attack! -Plaintiff Sandy Glick (mother) and David Glick (son, 13) suing defendant/Pit Bull owner Gloria and Mario Holguin for an attack by defendant’s dog. Plaintiffs want medical bills, and pain and suffering. The litigants are neighbors, with a fenced vacant lot in between. Plaintiff son, and friends play ball on the vacant lot. David Glick says he was hitting balls from his yard to the vacant lot. Defendant wife claims dog is an American Bulldog/mutt mix (aka, it’s a Pit Bull mix). David Glick claims he was picking the balls up in the vacant lot, when defendant’s dog came under their fence, and attacked him three times. David Glick’s father rescued him from the dog. Plaintiff witness is a neighbor who was washing dishes, looking out the back window, and saw the plaintiff son picking up balls in the vacant lot. Then, witness saw defendant’s dog attacking the son in the vacant lot. Medical records are presented. Plaintiff mother’s insurance company said that if plaintiff is paid for any bills, that the company will have to be reimbursed for bills. Photos of plaintiff son’s bite marks are bad. Son had to be kept home from school for a week, and no strenuous activities for another week. Defendant man’s story is a lie. Defendant claims it’s not his dog. Defendant claims the dog belongs to his son, who lives in his home. Defendant man says the kid was trespassing on vacant lot, and besides his dog didn’t bite anyone. Defendant claims dog protects the vacant lot, but he’s not the owner. Defendant man says plaintiff son instigated the attack. Defendant claims dog is protecting the other property, and says no one can go on the vacant lot owned by someone else, play ball or walk there. I think the dog should be put down, along with defendant, his awful wife, and their stupid son. Defendant wife talks about the vicious and dangerous dog hearing. Hearing notes redacted the addresses. Dog was judged potentially dangerous, has to constantly watched outside, and other restrictions. Defendant claims someone sabotaged their fence. Dog has a bite history too. Dog’s owner, the defendant son actually tells the truth. Dog is not covered under homeowner’s insurance. Defendant son had to buy special insurance to cover the dog after the vicious/dangerous dog hearing. Defendant wife claims the kids throw the balls at their yard, and antagonize the dog. Defendants are despicable, and I hope animal control kept a close eye on how they controlled the animal. Plaintiff gets $2,500 , and insurance will receive their share. College Car Confusion -Plaintiff Angela Walker (daughter) and Roderick Walker (father) suing defendant /mechanic Douglas Stevenson over the car purchased for daughter, $1,000 deposit on total price of $1800. Plaintiff father says the second they bought the car, the defendant took car to work on it. When mechanic went to do the timing chain or timing belt, he ran into issues, and had to replace the motor. Then, plaintiffs backed out of the deal after more than a month. Defendant has the car, and it’s running. JJ tells defendant to sell car. plaintiffs get their $1,000 deposit returned 5 p.m. reruns- First (2016)- Italian Mastiff Mating Mess-Plaintiff Juanita Phillips was stud owner of Cane Corso/Italian Mastiff (an aggressive guard breed, not for amateurs) who wants money from defendant Michael Stevens after he didn't pay a stud fee. Defendant says all of the puppies died within three days of birth. Defendant claims there was no stud fee, just two puppies to plaintiff. Plaintiff claims this was the only breeding, but plaintiff has a breeding pair, and out of her 12 puppies, 9 died by four months, of parvo. The other three sold for $1,000 each, and plaintiff claims they were healthy. Defendant also bought two puppies from plaintiff, for $400 each, and puppies got sick, and plaintiff picked them up. Puppies had parvo, according to defendant, but defendant says one was put down, and the other was given back to defendant. (I hate both of these litigants, they sell to anyone who pays them the money. And that garbage about first litter, was just that, garbage. No screening of homes). Defendant had a previous stud he got rid of. Plaintiff's son claims there was a $900 stud fee agreement. Text messages say $800. Plaintiff gets $800. It sounds like the plaintiff's home is infected with parvo, and has never been cleaned properly. Plaintiff’s son is her witness and explains the real story, but it’s still confusing. Plaintiff had the male and female Cane Corso, they had 12 puppies, and defendant bought two of them for $400 each. The agreement was $400 each for two puppies. I don’t know why it’s a stud fee, because it’s really a puppy selling fee. $800 to plaintiff. Family Friendly Drinking-Plaintiff Mary Anderson suing defendant/daughter's former friend Samantha Salazar for car repairs, rental fees, and lost wages. Daughter of plaintiff and defendant were drinking shots at plaintiff's house, and then plaintiff went to bed. Then there is a phone call from plaintiff's daughter saying plaintiff's car was in a bad accident, says defendant was driving, and the accident happened. Defendant was driving, with a suspended license, and was driving because she was more sober than plaintiff's daughter. Car only had liability insurance, and car is drivable. Defendant claims plaintiff daughter grabbed her hand, and caused the accident. Defendant was arrested, for driving on a suspended license, (for failure to appear defendant's lying about why she was suspended), and DUI. Defendant actually was suspended for moving violations. As usual, defendant does home health care. $2100 to plaintiff, and plaintiff daughter will pay the other $1,000+. I wouldn’t have paid the plaintiffs a penny. Second (2016)- Teen Basketball Player vs. Tough Coach-Plaintiff grandmother suing basketball travel league owner for refund of league dues. Former basketball coach says he's hard on players, but he expects them to put out effort, and show up for all practices. (I remember this, and eventually the granddaughter did play for a college team). Granddaughter received a discounted rate for 7th and 8th grade, and then in ninth grade grandmother was charged nothing. League owner says he knew the grandmother couldn't afford full price, and granddaughter had a lot of potential. This last year grandmother was charged $1400 ($500 off the full price, and the only player on the team with a discount). Coach is a yeller, and so granddaughter quit, and after she was pulled from a game. Granddaughter didn't want to go to last minute practice, and then she quit soon after. The reason granddaughter wants to be on the travel league is to show her skills to college scouts. Granddaughter had played for the same coach before, without issues. Plaintiff gets $1,000. (I wouldn’t have given the plaintiff a penny. The grandmother had reduced fees for the entire playing career of granddaughter.)

I'm suspicious about Tammy always getting a new boyfriend. They only stay long enough to shoot a few episodes, and then they're gone. I'm also not believing that someone across the country is harassing her, at least anywhere but online. I'm suspecting a lot of storylines, on this show are just that, stories for the show, and totally fake.

I was watching an OWN rerun, of Dateline: Secrets Uncovered, about a nearly fatal beating of a 19 year old in Albuquerque. She was beaten almost to death, and her mother walked into the house, found her, and ran for help with the attacker chasing her with a butcher knife. Some passing good samaritan stopped, helped the mother, and chased the attacker away. It was 10 years later the police actually identified the attacker, and had DNA proof. So, he took a plea deal, and had a sentence of 18 years. No one brought up on the show the possibility that this wasn't his only attack, and if there could be other cases unsolved too. I find it unbelieveable that someone did one brutal attack, was chasing the mother with a knife, and then wasn't discovered and arrested until 10 years later, and it was the only time he did anything criminal.

I think they should have given them more time. Five hours seems like a lot of time to bake and decorate, but it really isn't enough. I can't believe Jody didn't use dowels to support the cake. Adam was the right choice, but I still think that more time would have been better. I really think they should let all four compete too.

I know people who work out, and want to workout when they're traveling, but don't want to use the fitness center. It may not have what they want to use, or it's not the equipment they like, or the hours don't work for them. So, in the bigger motel rooms, something like the Max Pro would work for them. The banana stuffer seems useless to me. I can see someone using it a few times, but never again. The tenticle mount could be useful I think.

Amy did say when she was talking about skin removal, that she wanted her huge stomach area reduced. I think she's thinking she'll find a surgeon that wants the publicity, and will agree to do the skin removal, and plastic surgery for free. Amy seems to think the surgeon would remove her entire huge stomach area, and that's not possible. I'm hoping no surgeon will agree to doing the massive amount of work Amy says she wants done. I guess it never dawned on her that the scars will be all over too, and healing will be painful, and take a long time. Also, she seems to think that skin removal, and plastic surgery will turn her into a beauty queen. That's never going to happen. I don't like that they showed Chris weighing in, and not the results.

For once I agree with Tammy, when the therapist asked if she eats in the evening, or morning, and Tammy said she obviously eats all day long.

I wish the show would outline every requirement of the final showpiece for each episode at the beginning, instead of doing some twist in the middle of baking.

So, Amy wants a boob lift, and probably enhancement, and skin removal, but says she can't wait to have more kids? There's no logic in that line of thought. There is no way anything surgical will happen at her weight, so I'm guessing they've run out of story lines.

I'm getting a very bad feeling about Ximena, and her kids, coming to the U.S. I think she's just using Mike for every penny she can get. I'm hoping I'm wrong.

You can buy large quantities of Viagra, and other medications from other countries, without a prescription. It's dangerous, and you don't know if the pills are actually the right ingredients, but it can be done if you're as desperate as Gino.

4 p.m. reruns- First (2013)- Video Game Pile-Up -Plaintiffs Alicia Koeb and Sarah Wood are suing temporary housing landlady / defendants Aleeyah Davis(daughter, 17 years old) and (mother) Lorraine Levine for the despicable expo housing room share. The defendant daughter , Aleeyah, rented the apartment off of a web site, to re-rent to Boston video game convention goers. Plaintiffs signed up for the housing share, and when they arrived there were over a dozen men in the apartment also. $85 each for three nights. Daughter defendant says she wasn’t making any money, but she was. Ad says everyone gets a bed, and breakfast supplied, for three people, plus three others. Instead, the place was packed when the plaintiffs showed up. It was advertised as a 3 bedroom, but it was actually a 1 bedroom, with 12 men in it, plus Aleeyah. Defendant admits the apartment had 8 already there, plus another woman arriving soon, plus two plaintiffs, so 11, and later 12. Plaintiff says the apartment reeked of “Man”. Did Aleeyah and her mom go to the hairdresser from hell? Bad wig on daughter. Plaintiffs slept at the convention center parking lot in their car. Daughter Aleeyah has been doing this for years. My guess is mother actually does the rental, who would rent anything to a 17-year-old? Plaintiffs get $170. Child Support Scammer -Plaintiff/SSMOT-(Sainted Single Mother of Two with defendant) Lauren Marquis suing defendant/baby daddy Angelo Soares for a loan to defendant to pay his bills, $4,100. Plaintiff claims the defendant didn’t pay her back. Defendant claims he was paying child support for the first year to plaintiff in cash. Plaintiff denies defendant paid her $125 a week for child support in cash. When plaintiff went to court for a child support order, the garnished amount includes insurance too, and court charges him arrearages. However, the arrearage was only because plaintiff lied about defendant paying her child support for that first year. Defendant says the gift only became a loan when the litigants’ plans to get back together fell through. Plus, the litigants’ kids are cared for by defendant’s mother, and always have been. Plaintiff claim dismissed. Second (2013)- Friends Turned Enemies -Plaintiff Deborah Lipinski suing defendant Sandra Hyla (SSMOT-Sainted Single Mother of Two) for repayment of a credit card charge for defendant’s child’s school clothes, loans. Defendant says she never could have repaid plaintiff, and charges to credit card were gifts. The twist is plaintiff claimed the credit card charges were theft, and had the charges reversed the charges with her credit card, and credit card company wrote the charges off. So, plaintiff wants to be paid for something she lied to the credit card company, to get the charges reversed. Cable company bill was reversed off of credit card, so that is still owed by defendant to the cable company. After the reversals of $1300+, and $517 is left. Rent-A-Center purchase was $51, and $247 for car insurance for defendant. Plaintiff claims another loan for rent, $500+. Plaintiff claims defendant spent her rent money at the casino. (Casino is in Buffalo, NY). Defendant claims the loan was when she was out of work, for rent, and she didn’t spend it at the casino. $1315 to plaintiff Live-In Boyfriend or Not? -Plaintiff Tiffany Dixon suing defendant Seneca Malone for moving out of their apartment. Plaintiff moved her boyfriend in to their apartment, never paid for him, and didn’t have permission to move him in from the landlord, or signed the lease. Plaintiff has two kids, and defendant has one child. Boyfriend stayed with Plaintiff, and sleeps over in her room, and as JJ says that’s not helping her with the children. Defendant says plaintiff moved boyfriend in the day they moved into the apartment, he never left, never paid rent, and wasn’t on the lease. Plaintiff claims boyfriend helps with her kids. Lease says only litigants, their children, and no one else could live there without being on the lease. Boyfriend of plaintiff was there 3 to 4 days a week. Then there was an argument between boyfriend, and defendant, because man was smoking weed in the apartment, and had all kinds of strangers visiting the apartment, and rent/utilities were only paid by litigants. Plaintiff broke the lease, moved in an illegal tenant, and will get nothing. Plaintiff case dismissed. 5 p.m. reruns- First (2016)- Seizure Shakedown-Plaintiff Alyssa White suing former friend/defendant Isaiah Akbar for an unpaid loan to pay for his court fines, clothing costs, airline ticket, and something else I didn't catch. Defendant claims it was a gift. The defendant's witness is his new girlfriend, but both litigants say plaintiff and defendant were just friends. New girlfriend told plaintiff about defendant's money for plane ticket needs, and as usual, new girlfriend denies saying this. Defendant was in California, and needed money to go back to New Jersey, after defendant had seizure, and no money to get home. Defendant claims to have a seizure, but no confirmation from medical records, and had to pay his own way back to New Jersey. While in California, defendant missed a court date for speeding, and the plaintiff paid his bail, and court costs, $210 (for speeding). $428 for plaintiff. Valentine's Day Forgiveness-Plaintiff Tina Corley suing defendant/ex-boyfriend Daniel Fobes for car loan (2004 Toyota Corolla), and repairs. Plaintiff still owed $1,000 on car, so the defendant repo'd the car. Defendant sold others cars to plaintiff over the years, and always paid for them in full. Plaintiff claims defendant forgave the $1,000 car loan as a present for Valentine's Day. Plaintiff claims the car repo was because they had a fight. $1500 to plaintiff, and defendant keeps his car. Plaintiff signs title over to defendant. Second (2016)- Bloody Break-In-Plaintiff Anita Leach suing ex-fiance/defendant Robert Johnson, for security deposit, and unpaid bills. Defendant says plaintiff left a date, walked home, and broke the window, and cut herself badly. Plaintiff claims she lost her part of the security deposit because defendant moved out suddenly, but he claims she locked him out. Defendant claims plaintiff kept telling him to leave, and he finally did. Defendant is counter suing for car vandalism that he's blaming on plaintiff, that he says happened before he moved out. Case dismissed for both litigants. Don't Block My Number-Plaintiff Stephen Gowers claims defendant/ex-girlfriend Rebecca Preston blocked him on all social media, and phones, and was cheating on him, and he wants the lease breaking fee he paid to get them out of their lease. Litigants still shared the house, but separate bedrooms. Plaintiff claims defendant owes him for utilities. Defendant sent him a message that her adult kids were going to move in with her, but plaintiff should stay on the lease because he had good credit. Plaintiff paid all of the utilities, and security ($1500). Defendant couldn't qualify for the apartment lease, and neither could her adult children. Defendant said in text that her adult children were going to move in, and pay security and utilities. Plaintiff had to pay the judgment for lease breaking, $2,580. Plaintiff gets $2580.

I don't know about the prosthetic, but didn't he grab someone's amputated finger? The ER staff were looking everywhere for the finger to try reattachment, but there was Alex running around with it. There was also the burning down an apartment house by ALex. I couldn't stand the character.

My guess is that Britney's money went to her family, and the managers and others they hired. Everyone was raking in big bucks, the father's legal bills came out of her money, I bet everyone in the family had everything paid by Britney all along. I'm guessing the financial people were directed by the father, and made a lot of bad investments, and expensive purchases, all financed by her too. The father (according to the NY Post) is trying to get Britney to keep paying his legal bills. I bet over the years, that had added up to millions.

My guess is the small store wants the publicity, and will close down for filming. The big stores won't do that, and probably won't let them film and disrupt everything. I was at the big "W" today, and even though it wasn't crowded, I wouldn't have been happy about having to detour around some idiots with a camera. Actually, I probably would be so steamed at having someone block my path, I would 'accidentally' whack them with my cart a few times.

So now we have the true story for Mike, his girlfriend really isn't, and she's using him to get the two kids here. Texting someone for a year isn't a relationship. His friend with the lip tattoo on his neck is right.

They're volunteers, so it's probably not required. They also need people who keep all of the technical equipment in shape too, so I bet Mike's good at that. I'm hating Caleb, all he's in it for is the sex.

Memphis is signing up for a lot of grief. Her foster mother is right, don't keep secrets that will be a huge deal when someone tells, because someone always does. And don't figure every man will be a good stepfather.

So Usman's just on here for publicity, unless he can get Kim to import him. Caleb looks like the neuroscientist on Big Bang, and Caleb still has to get permission from Mommy and Daddy to go to meet Alina? And their only questions are things that are between their son and Alina. How many more people is Kim going to ask about Usman/ Sojaboy (?), be told she's nuts for going, and still go? Jasmine and Caleb are making me regret eating anything this evening with the ridiculous baby talk. I'm picturing Jasmine in leather with a whip, and Caleb running like Pole.

So if Caleb is Pole 2.0, and Mike is Pole 3.0, then I guess Jasmine is Larissa 2.0. I am loving seeing some of Panama though. So, we've only seen five couples so far? All of them look like train wrecks.

This is coming back next week, on the 27th on Lifetime, starting with season 1, episode 1 starting early in the morning.

If the MaxPro takes off, I bet a lot of the big hotels will have them available to use in your room, so no carrying.

The ornament anchors were about $25 a set, and are now less than $20. I still think they're useless. The gnome shop is sold out of the Shark gnome.

I am tired of the people who are only on the show to get publicity, or are so delusional that they have ridiculous valuations, and think a Shark will invest anyway, at the price and % of equity that the seller wants. I'm also sick of the family that pitched the wrist bands, and now the Ornament Anchors, and their kid (by the way, the Anchors are reduced in price, so about $20, instead of almost $25)

I wish they would just show the houses, and stop with the staged feuds, and other 'drama' that adds nothing to the show. I bet Sue Wong had no intention of selling the estate, The Cedars, and it was just a storyline to show her designs, and then promote her other homes in the area that she's flipping and selling in Los Feliz. I like the one that's on the market, it's really a home, not a museum, and is lovely, without all of the over-the-top design elements.