Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

General True Crime Shows


Jaded
  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Maizie131 said:

Last night's episode of Suspicion on I.D. was pretty riveting about the young Mormon family.  Won't ruin it for anyone who hasn't watched yet, but I recommend it.  Thought I'd mention because there's so little on I.D. worth watching of late, it's always a surprise when I find a show I like.

 

I couldn't enjoy it because I almost immediately recognized the case, and had already seen it on another show.

  • Love 1
1 hour ago, tobeannounced said:

Yeah, don't see easily being able to insert some steamy sex scenes into that case.

I think they can always do that. 
     An old lady is found dead after a street mugging.  "Was it really a stranger, or was it a lover from long ago, who left her after a torrid affair."  Cue torrid tape.

  • Love 13
On 11/18/2016 at 1:48 AM, AKraven said:

I'll be heading into town (Anchorage) and I could start the leg work on this case, perhaps produce a show/program myself.  Oh, wait.  I'm lazy and don't have a clue.  Never mind.

Lazy and clueless is a requisite for being an ID show writer.  Careful, or you might talk youself right into a job with them  ;-)

  • Love 11

I've missed all of you!  I know the reason is there hasn't been shit on I.D. channel to talk about, but tomorrow night will be fun, right?  (A Crime to Remember!)  I do wish they were featuring a case I'd never heard of, but just the same I'll watch for sure because the show is just so well done.   

Anyhow, I've really been enjoying Cold Case Files (with Bill Kurtis) on the Reelz channel.  The last couple I've watched are from 2002 and even though I'm certain I'd seen them 10-12 years ago because I never missed that show, they're new to me again because I don't remember them (recall....I have C.R.S. disease:  Can't Remember Shit).  In any event, if you get Reelz, it's on Mon.-Fri. @ 2:00 p.m. -- that's when Comcast airs it, anyhow.

Hope everyone is good & I'm looking forward to talking about A Crime to Remember with you! 

  • Love 7
26 minutes ago, AKraven said:

Ha!  What a coincidence, I'm watching Cold Case Files right now on The Justice Network!

I also look forward to watching A Crime to Remember.  I can't remember the exact titles, but I'm not hating the 80s and People Magazine shows.  Better than that bad soft porn shit we are usually served.

Good to hear from you, Maizie!  I've been thinking I may have to hire Kenda to find you all!  As for myself, I'm getting an early start on the holidays by baking cookies for the out-of-state kinfolk - my one other contribution to the festivities besides alcohol and rage.

Great to hear from you, too, AKraven!  I agree w/you about the 80s & People Magazine shows - I've watched them & they're not too bad.  Dontcha just love Bill Kurtis?!  I think the reason why we love Cold Case Files and Forensic Files is their half-hour format to tell the story, instead of muddling through an entire hour of horrible acting & ridiculous "filler."

...And I can certainly identify with you re: holidays --- good news is that, for me, anyhow, the alcohol goes a long way to tame the rage.  However, I don't drink any more.  I don't drink any less, either!  (Ha!  I love that line from "While You Were Sleeping"!)

  • Love 3
25 minutes ago, tobeannounced said:

Alcohol and rage, Akraven, lol.

I'm also not hating '80s and People.  I keep thinking I'll comment, and then I just can't seem to be bothered to click my way to this thread.  Always glad when a post pops up in my notifications though.  

I understand, tobeannounced when you mention it's a bother to comment.  Many times I'm "too pooped to participate" as my dear ole' Dad used to say. 

Wow!  We're finally getting some action on this thread - so great to see you. 

Brattinella - I KNOW you must have something to say.  C'mon girl!  Enlighten us with your witty comments.  You, too, Walnutqueen.  (And all my other "friends" on this forum.) 

  • Love 3

Hey there, Maizie!  Good to see you!  I have been so busy ordering crap online, and tracking said crap, it has been exhausting.  I don't even think I am finished yet, either.  You guys have channels we don't get, Justice channel and Reelz.  We have ID and Chiller (which is a pretty cool channel for horror movies).  No Bill Kurtis for me :(  I've also been caught up in the Oakland tragedy and watching the fallout from the election.  Unluckily for me, I don't drink anymore, so there is no numbing allowed.  Hope you and yours are doing good!  Hugs!

  • Love 5

I'm also glad to see some action on this thread. I don't comment much because I travel a lot and only watch TV on the treadmill when I'm home (I must justify my guilty pleasure), but I always enjoy coming here when there's something interesting to talk about. I just watched my first People Magazine Investigates and the 80s show, and I think they're surprisingly interesting and well done. I'd never heard of the cabin murders, that was freakish, and the Charles Stuart story, even though I know all about it, is always compelling. Sad, but compelling. I'm pretty picky about what I watch, but both shows kept my interest all the way through. I'm also looking forward to A Crime to Remember, it's well-done too. 

  • Love 6

Anyone else visiting the forum for the People Magazine show? I dropped into it yesterday, and it was dead. I am much more impressed with it than I expected, but I am having difficulty watching ID right now.  The mad grasp for ratings by suggesting OJ is really innocent is pissing me off. Those ads make me want to throw things . 

  • Love 7
3 hours ago, walnutqueen said:

so all I can says is "Go fuck yourself, 2016".

I'm in.  In fact I used that word in my Facebook "status" the other day.
The shows mostly cover crimes that have been done elsewhere, and if you watch many shows, it's hard to keep track.
Hate it when the fun is sucked out of something, 'cause there not much fun left recently.

  • Love 4
15 hours ago, AKraven said:

What?!  That's separate, too?  I'm gonna get dizzy from jumping around so much.  Hell, no wonder this place hasn't seen much action.  I'm stayin' here, people.  GENERAL TRUE CRIME - that should encompass everything that isn't specific already.  Stop it!

It's here: http://forums.previously.tv/forum/2852-people-magazine-investigates/

I don't have a huge problem with very popular shows, like Kenda, having their own forums. I am just not sure what makes one qualify, but not another. It seems like it would be best to see how much demand there is. Although, maybe someone saw talk about it here and requested one. I just don't know why it would merit one, but A Crime to Remember wouldn't. 

  • Love 4
5 hours ago, azshadowwalker said:

It's here: http://forums.previously.tv/forum/2852-people-magazine-investigates/

I don't have a huge problem with very popular shows, like Kenda, having their own forums. I am just not sure what makes one qualify, but not another. It seems like it would be best to see how much demand there is. Although, maybe someone saw talk about it here and requested one. I just don't know why it would merit one, but A Crime to Remember wouldn't. 

I don't think it is based on merit; it would seem that the only "qualification" for a show forum is someone requesting it.

  • Love 5

Just finished watching the new Crime to Remember. It was well-done, but sort of disappointing that it was such a well-known story. The only thing that I find odd is the female narrator they always have who is peripherally connected to the crime -- an unnamed neighbor, former classmate, whatever. She always has that same dreamy monotone. Is it the same woman on each show? I don't think they really need that element. 

I also watched Married with Secrets for the first time today. Part of it anyway, it was sort of boring. It was the one about the scientist (or professor) who was obsessed with the prostitute. When I realized is was a 33-year-old crime, plus not all that interesting to begin with, I gave up on it. Seriously, a fairly banal crime from 1983? I think they can do better than that. 

  • Love 6

I really didn't like A Crime to Remember doing the Starkweather case at all. It didn't bring anything new to the case, and I, too, found the narrator annoying. Having watched essentially a marathon of the older episodes, I was already starting to get annoyed by the narration, but this one bothered me even more. The hokey accents and slow speech patterns they give everyone is starting to bug me. I started feeling that way with the Pied Piper episode, because I am from Tucson and no one here has ever spoken like that. This one was probably worse because I wasn't even hearing anything new. The Starkweather case doesn't offer anything new for a true crime show fan, so I focused on the bad narration. 

  • Love 2

I still feel strongly that Caril Ann should have been sitting on Charlie's lap when Ol' Sparky was fired up.  She killed her little sister and most likely a couple others, and she sexually mutilated the teenage girl (which was new info to me).  Maizie, did you get the gist of the preview for next week?  Maybe it will be more interesting.

  • Love 8

You would execute a 14 year old, especially based on nothing more than the word of Charles Starkweather? Alrighty, then. There is zero proof of that, except old Charlie hoping that turning on the kid he was fucking would get him some sympathy and save his life. If she was so dangerous, she had decades to show it after she was released. Strangely enough, once the childfucker was dead, no one had any problems with Carol Anne, in prison or out.

  • Love 3
21 hours ago, hoosiermom said:

Barbara Walters' eyes are pulled pretty tight too. She could barely blink!

A woman at the beauty parlor I used to go to had a permanent smile.  Right then, I knew that wrinkles wouldn't be the worst thing that could happen to you.

And I watched the Starkweather, and thought that Carill Ann should have done some more time, but not life.

  • Love 2
6 hours ago, Brattinella said:

I still feel strongly that Caril Ann should have been sitting on Charlie's lap when Ol' Sparky was fired up.  She killed her little sister and most likely a couple others, and she sexually mutilated the teenage girl (which was new info to me).  Maizie, did you get the gist of the preview for next week?  Maybe it will be more interesting.

Absolutely she should've been sittin' on his lap!  And would you believe that bitch actually chose to live in MY State of Michigan after she was so wrongfully let out of prison?!?  Unreal.  Are teenagers fucked up?  You betcha, but what she did goes far beyond the pale.  Brattinella - I was tempted to look up the name given in the description of next week's A Crime to Remember but I won't.  Doesn't sound familiar to me, tho, so this is good. 

  • Love 3

This isn't related to any particular case, but in general, I absolutely hate when relatives are made to go on TV after a kidnapping or missing persons case and beg the perpetrator to let the victim go. Both in real life and fiction.

What's the point, exactly, except for bleed-and-lead TV ratings? The kidnapper never complies.

It does provide a loop of constantly re-aired footage if the pleading relative is later found to be culpable, eg. Susan Smith.

  • Love 8
On 12/7/2016 at 6:37 PM, KellsBells said:

Just finished watching the new Crime to Remember. It was well-done, but sort of disappointing that it was such a well-known story. The only thing that I find odd is the female narrator they always have who is peripherally connected to the crime -- an unnamed neighbor, former classmate, whatever. She always has that same dreamy monotone. Is it the same woman on each show? I don't think they really need that element. 

I've been keeping up with true crime stuff for 3 years so alot of the cases when it comes to A Crime to Remember I don't recognize, but this Starkweather one I recognize immedately, and that's because I first saw this case on American Justice (I think the title was Spree Killer)

 

On 12/7/2016 at 6:37 PM, KellsBells said:

I also watched Married with Secrets for the first time today. Part of it anyway, it was sort of boring. It was the one about the scientist (or professor) who was obsessed with the prostitute. When I realized is was a 33-year-old crime, plus not all that interesting to begin with, I gave up on it. Seriously, a fairly banal crime from 1983? I think they can do better than that. 

Scorned: Love Kills already did this story. I recognized it immediately as soon as I saw the preview on my DirecTV and the first few minutes of the show. Married with Secret has done to my knowledge 2 rehashes in a row. This story then the previous week the Shawna Nelson case which Deadly Affairs, On the Case with Paula Zahn, and Snapped already did.

  • Love 1

This week's A Crime to Remember was interesting, I'd never heard of that story before. It was crazy. Still hate that stupid narration thing, though (I didn't know him/her but my older sister's friend's cousin's brother did). I mean, I know its supposed to be someone "remembering" this crime as a random member of the community, but it's poorly done. 

  • Love 5
On 12/7/2016 at 6:37 PM, KellsBells said:

Just finished watching the new Crime to Remember. It was well-done, but sort of disappointing that it was such a well-known story. The only thing that I find odd is the female narrator they always have who is peripherally connected to the crime -- an unnamed neighbor, former classmate, whatever. She always has that same dreamy monotone. Is it the same woman on each show? I don't think they really need that element. 

I also watched Married with Secrets for the first time today. Part of it anyway, it was sort of boring. It was the one about the scientist (or professor) who was obsessed with the prostitute. When I realized is was a 33-year-old crime, plus not all that interesting to begin with, I gave up on it. Seriously, a fairly banal crime from 1983? I think they can do better than that. 

i saw that show Kell's, what i I thought was strange was the girl's father was African American and the real father was not.  I am all for diversity but at least get the race right. Did anyone else notice that?  It also happened on an Evil Stepmother show where the actress appeared Aisan and the real person was not.

  • Love 2

Watched last night's Pandora's Box "Tainted Love" episode about the grade school principal & little kid in his school that was kidnapped (along w/the principal).  Question:  Did I just have one too many rum & cokes or was this a really confusing story to follow?  I gave up after about a half hour.  I don't wanna think that hard when I'm watching these shows!  Shit!

  • Love 4

I was going to post about Pandora's Box. That was a crazy story! So many twists and turns. My heart just broke for the woman who was kidnapped as a child and then ended up marrying her kidnapper.  What an evil man.  So was he the one that ran over her and killed her, or was it an accident? I was in and out of sleep during this even though I thought it was really interesting.

  • Love 7

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...