M.F. Luder March 2, 2015 Share March 2, 2015 I found a working (at least for now) youtube video of her interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57I0L9Pffp4 1 Link to comment
M.F. Luder March 10, 2015 Share March 10, 2015 Gillian was nominated for an Olivier award for Streetcar Named Desire. The play was also nominated for Best Revival. Congrats to Gillian! I saw the play in London and was blown away by her performance. 4 Link to comment
smrou March 10, 2015 Share March 10, 2015 In other Gillian news, The Fall has officially been renewed for a third season. Yay! I wasn't ready to say goodbye to Stella Gibson yet. Link to comment
Bastet March 10, 2015 Share March 10, 2015 I walked out of Streetcar saying, "She'd damn well better get an Olivier nomination for this," so I'm glad to hear she did! Also good news about The Fall. I don't watch it until it comes out on DVD, so I haven't seen the second season yet, but I loved the first. Link to comment
joelene March 11, 2015 Share March 11, 2015 Fantastic! I'm so glad I caught Streetcar while I had the chance even if I had to spend my last pennies on it. So worth it. I've seen The Fall season 2 and I'm very happy to hear there's gonna be a 3rd. Am I the only one on this board that watches Hannibal, btw? They've released the first poster for season 3 and it's all about Bedelia Du Maurier. https://twitter.com/BryanFuller/status/573957006345682944/photo/1 1 Link to comment
M.F. Luder March 11, 2015 Share March 11, 2015 I've been catching up on Hannibal. I saw the season 2 finale when it originally aired and was so shocked and intrigued that I decided to go back and watch the entire series. I'm planning on finishing up season 2 in time for the season 3, which seems like it'll be awesome. I'm so glad we'll get to see more of Gillian's character. 1 Link to comment
joelene March 11, 2015 Share March 11, 2015 The season 2 finale was truly one of the most tense things I have ever seen on television. I was holding my breath a lot during the last half. Anyway, glad to hear you're catching up! Too bad Gillian had to miss so much of season 2 (Bryan Fuller wanted her as a regular even then) because of her commitment to Crisis. 1 Link to comment
smrou March 11, 2015 Share March 11, 2015 I haven't watched Hannibal in part because I'm a little worried about the gore element and in part just because I already watch too much stuff, but I might check it out over the summer because I hear good things about it. But I do think it's a riot that Hannibal and Aquarius are going to be back-to-back. 3 Link to comment
Bastet March 11, 2015 Share March 11, 2015 I bought the first season on Hannibal on Blu-ray after I heard people whose tastes often align with mine raving about the show, and GA's character/performance in particular (of course), but I still haven't watched it. Link to comment
joelene March 11, 2015 Share March 11, 2015 The show can be gruesome but it's all very operatic and kind of fantastical with the murder tableaus. Then there's all the food porn. Even though you wouldn't want to eat Hannibal's cooking, watching it, you really do want to eat Hannibal's cooking. He'd win Top Chef hands down (and not just because he'd cook his competition...). Link to comment
mledawn March 13, 2015 Share March 13, 2015 smrou, I am not a fan of horror or gore at all myself, but Hannibal is one of my go-to shows. I started watching it because of Mads and then Gillian was in it so it was a lovely bonus. Its a beautifully shot show as joelene has alluded - the cinematography is very well done. It's shot in Toronto, so I do have a slight bias... 1 Link to comment
M.F. Luder June 2, 2015 Share June 2, 2015 Trust me, if you have the opportunity to see this play, you should take it! Link to comment
queequeg June 2, 2015 Share June 2, 2015 Trust me, if you have the opportunity to see this play, you should take it! I saw it through National Theatre Live last year... not sure if I can survive it again... but, Gillian Anderson! Live! 1 Link to comment
M.F. Luder June 2, 2015 Share June 2, 2015 I saw it both live and through NT Live, and they were both great experiences. NT Live gave you a better view of the actors' facial expressions, which I thought heightened the impact of the climactic end scene. But seeing it in the flesh is the ultimate experience. Link to comment
smrou June 2, 2015 Share June 2, 2015 I'm definitely going to try to see this in person. 1 Link to comment
M.F. Luder June 2, 2015 Share June 2, 2015 I'm definitely going to try to see this in person. Me too. Also, she just won the Glamour UK Theatre Actress of the Year award. This adds to the Evening Standard Award she won earlier this year. I'm still disappointed she didn't win the Olivier as well. 2 Link to comment
appledown June 25, 2015 Share June 25, 2015 I also saw Streetcar through NTL and have never been so stunned by a performance. So when I saw Gillian at a Q&A recently at my local comic con deal, and she mentioned bringing it to NY, I almost fell out of my chair. I looked at my best friend (mouth probably gaping open) and she said "Oh no, I think I see another trip to NY in my future!" LOL Not that it's a hardship for her...she loves NY. ;) So when I saw dates were posted recently, I brought it back up and she laughed a bit and said "Yeah, I can do that." My outside, in public reaction was "Awesome. Will be fun!" but inside? I was screaming and jumping up and down like a crazy person. ;) I. Cannot. Wait. 2 Link to comment
Bastet June 25, 2015 Share June 25, 2015 I pondered going because I enjoy NYC and haven't been for several years, but it's running during what will probably be such a busy time I'd have to go for just the weekend. And not even for Gillian will I fly from coast to coast twice in 48 hours, spend that kind of money on a trip in which I won't get to do much, etc. So we'll see as it gets closer, but I don't think I'll be able to go. Boo! Because it was such a stunning performance, I'd love to see it in person. Link to comment
appledown June 26, 2015 Share June 26, 2015 Aww, that's too bad! Maybe things will change or work out when it gets closer. I think our tentative plan is to fly out on a Friday (early early if I have any say in it), and fly back late Sunday. So we get as much time as possible and we don't go completely broke paying for a hotel. lol We did a 7 day trip not even 2 years ago (got really lucky and a relative of my friend loaned us his apartment for the week since he would be out of town so we extended our trip because you gotta take full advantage of free lodging in NYC! lol) and got to do a lot of stuff so I won't feel terribly deprived this one will be pretty quick. Plus...Gillian. I admit, I will fly crazy distances and pay lots of money for the sole purpose of getting to see on stage for a mere couple hours. lol I am insane...I admit it. LOL Link to comment
sgirl July 2, 2015 Share July 2, 2015 I am going on May 3 and will be in town til the 7th. I am so excited to finally see her live. I didn't even get the see the NT live showing, so it will all be new to me. If anyone is around I'd love to meet up. Link to comment
DaynaPhile December 12, 2015 Share December 12, 2015 OH MY GOSH GILLIAN WILL BE AT SALT LAKE COMIC CON FAN EXPERIENCE IN MARCH OF 2016!!!!!!! I don't know if I can handle not being there. Link to comment
SparklesBitch January 25, 2016 Share January 25, 2016 Streetcar is coming to NYC... OMG YAY!! I definitely need to go to this! Link to comment
fourPLUSseven January 25, 2016 Share January 25, 2016 Gillian remains a flawless beauty. Not aged one day - that's annoying. 2 Link to comment
WAnglais1 January 28, 2016 Share January 28, 2016 I believe she's in NYC with STREETCAR! the same time David Tennant is doing RICHARD II. As usual, I'm too broke to go to either. That would be the ultimate geekout. Link to comment
SlackerInc February 10, 2016 Share February 10, 2016 Gillian remains a flawless beauty. Not aged one day - that's annoying. I was amazed by how young she looked in the X-Files revival, assuming she was well into her 50s. But then I looked it up and she was actually only 24 or 25 when the show started. I guess she was playing older? Given that she was a surgeon and FBI agent, it's either that, or she was supposed to be some sort of Doogie Houser case. Link to comment
sharinlilbit February 10, 2016 Share February 10, 2016 Well, Scully was 29 when the show started, according to her birthday on the show, so yeah, Gillian was playing older. Plus, she was a pathologist, not a surgeon, so I don't think her residency would have been *quite* as long. And it seems as though I remember GA lied about her age when she first auditioned for the role. Link to comment
Tardislass February 10, 2016 Share February 10, 2016 Scully is supposed to be 50 on the show and GA is 47. But she looks good either way. Link to comment
Bastet February 10, 2016 Share February 10, 2016 (edited) Scully is about to turn 52; she was born Feb. 23, 1964. Edited February 10, 2016 by Bastet Link to comment
sharinlilbit February 10, 2016 Share February 10, 2016 Feb 23, actually. (I can't believe I know this.) Link to comment
Bastet February 10, 2016 Share February 10, 2016 I do, too, sadly - that was a typo. Oops! I'll fix it. 1 Link to comment
Baby Button Eyes February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 (edited) Oh, this girl. I remember it did not take long for me to develop my first girl crush ever on Gillian Anderson/Scully before there was an official name & description for "girl crush", lol. In 1994, it was really difficult to learn much about her back then without the internet so I only got to see her through the show as Scully and buying behind the scenes magazine articles about DD and GA. I especially liked the idea she used to be a punk kid in real life, compared to Dr. Scully. I had completely forgotten about her after I stopped watching the show around 6th season. However, with the revival episodes, it just brought back the old girl crush that apparently never went away, just stayed dormant. Wow, she's always been a great actress, but also still beautiful. I also look at old bloopers of X-Files and she has the most contagious laugh and smile, again finding it fascinating just how unlike Scully she really is. I'm fangirling! Oh, I forgot to add, a couple of years after I watched the show I found myself at age 25 working in a men's prison. I was basically a 5 foot tall woman spending my days in a portable building (alone!) with inmates. It felt precarious everyday at work and I was a contractor so I wasn't trained in criminal or legal things. But subconsciously, I went back to Gillian's portrayal of Scully. A small woman who worked in the big men's club in dangerous situations, and I took upon a lot of Scully's mannerisms and examples when I myself was taking to or dealing with the inmates on my own. I must say, it helped with the posturing, lol. I feel like I should thank her for the example I used in my unexpected life twist. When other female staff got conned, etc, I sometimes thought "didn't they watch the X-Files?" Edited February 17, 2016 by Baby Button Eyes 4 Link to comment
festivus February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 (edited) She's not my first girl crush, when I was a kid my first was Cher and then Kate Jackson. But she is definitely my biggest crush, girl or guy. I watch almost everything she does but that Crisis show. Just couldn't with that. ETA: Okay, I know this is weird but I have no idea what she's like in real life. I've never watched any interviews, only read them. Just from reading here it seems like she's quite giggly and girly not much like any of her more famous characters. Edited February 17, 2016 by festivus 1 Link to comment
madam magpie February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 (edited) I wouldn't say "girly," but she comes across as joyful, irreverent, and fun. She laughs a lot and makes jokes. She also seems pretty lighthearted, in contrast from all the serious characters she plays. I also get the impression that she's very smart, not so much in contrast with the characters she plays. Edited February 17, 2016 by madam magpie Link to comment
festivus February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 (edited) Oh I didn't mean that she's not smart, I've read plenty of interviews just never watched any. I just meant in contrast to the more serious characters she plays that I'm getting the impression she's more lighthearted in real life. Which is exactly what you said, lol. Just trying to clarify. Edited February 17, 2016 by festivus 1 Link to comment
madam magpie February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 (edited) I didn't think you meant that. :) But yes, she's definitely more lighthearted in interviews than the characters she plays. She seems like a lot of fun, actually. Which, to be fair, Scully could probably be fun if she weren't always getting abducted by aliens or losing her kid or getting cancer or dealing with a guy who's full of crazy theories... Edited February 17, 2016 by madam magpie Link to comment
Bastet February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 (edited) She's an interesting mix of serious and goofy. When she’s serious, she is deadly serious, and when she’s goofy – look out. Edited February 17, 2016 by Bastet Link to comment
eleanorofaquitaine February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 It was always really striking to see interviews with her in the 1990s because she was so giggly/goofy - it was hard to reconcile with the Scully persona. But I think that in this day and age, what with social media and all, viewers tend to see the real personalities of actors a lot more than they did 20 years ago, so it feels less disconcerting than it did then. I find watching the real life interactions between GA and DD fascinating. I mean, I know all of the rumors about their current relationship (and personally, I believe that there is something between them) but even if they aren't in a relationship, they are certainly very comfortable with each other. Which, hey, is probably a good thing if you've been working with the same person for the better part of 20 years. Link to comment
madam magpie February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 (edited) Definitely a good thing. It's obvious that they like each other a lot and, like you say, are very comfortable with one another. I've only seen two interviews where she was asked point blank about a relationship with Duchovny, and her reaction was different each time. In one, it seemed to annoy her...maybe make her angry, but that might be me projecting (it would make me angry). In the other, it seemed to embarrass her. Either way, she clearly didn't want to talk about it, which I get and prefer, honestly. It's all so intrusive and I'd rather just accept what they say. I don't remember a lot about the old Scully interviews, but for me, the dichotomy between what seems like her real personality and Stella, the character she plays in The Fall, is most striking. Stella's got a lot of compassion, but she'll cut you where you stand and we don't see her heart very often. (As opposed to Scully, I mean, who's all heart.) I think Stella is the most interesting character she's ever played. So to watch Gillian be Stella and then watch her talk about Stella fascinates me because in those interviews, she seems a lot more serious than usual, which matches the character. It's almost like she sort of puts Stella on (I don't mean in a phony way at all) to talk about her. Edited February 17, 2016 by madam magpie 1 Link to comment
ElleBee February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 Definitely a good thing. It's obvious that they like each other a lot and, like you say, are very comfortable with one another. I've only seen two interviews where she was asked about a relationship with Duchovny, and her reaction was different each time. In one, it seemed to annoy her...maybe make her angry, but that might be me projecting (it would make me angry). In the other, it seemed to embarrass her. Either way, she clearly didn't want to talk about it, which I get and prefer, honestly. It's all so intrusive and I'd rather just accept what they say. It is intrusive, but they (and especially GA, IMO) have been showboating some massive flirtation during interviews this go-around. I definitely feel for actors who have natural onscreen chemistry that makes fans wonder and speculate when there's nothing there (and especially when they're in relationships with other people), but you can't be hanging all over your costar and dropping flirty innuendos on Twitter and during interviews and then also be incensed when people read into it. Pick a lane, GA. ** ** Non-snarky intent--I like GA. 1 Link to comment
festivus February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 Oh shit, I love Stella. Can't wait to see season 3. I think I need to watch season 1 & 2 again. Where am I going to find the time between this rewatch of the X-Files and not to mention the many other things I watch. I truly have no life. :) I would like to watch interviews but I have eye problems that keep me from watching things on my computer. I did watch a few clips on Hulu on my tv but they were short and she was mostly in Scully mode. I don't do twitter but I've checked out the things that have been linked here and yeah there is flirting going on fo sho. 1 Link to comment
madam magpie February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 (edited) It is intrusive, but they (and especially GA, IMO) have been showboating some massive flirtation during interviews this go-around. I definitely feel for actors who have natural onscreen chemistry that makes fans wonder and speculate when there's nothing there (and especially when they're in relationships with other people), but you can't be hanging all over your costar and dropping flirty innuendos on Twitter and during interviews and then also be incensed when people read into it. Pick a lane, GA. ** ** Non-snarky intent--I like GA. Well, first, I wouldn't say anyone was incensed. But second, I mean...why not? Why is it her fault or responsibility that the public is intrusive?? The big thing is that he kissed her during that show with his band or something, right? So he kissed her...I mean, big deal. It's not like they got naked and had sex on the stage...which might have been worthy of comment, but probably inappropriate for the venue. I guess I feel like this: If something is going on, I'll give them the benefit of the doubt. Maybe it's early and undefined. He was still married as of a year or two ago, anyway. Plus, I like them both a lot, especially her. Why do I want to participate in something that makes her uncomfortable? That would kind of make me a jerk.And if nothing more is going on and we take what they say as fact, why keep beating the dead horse? Or maybe it's all a game and they're playing along to dupe everyone and rile up the Internet. Who knows! I personally don't care either way. They're fun. I dig fun. I hope they're happy whatever they are or aren't doing together. And they look pretty in pictures together. I'm easy. The gossip just isn't my bag. Oh shit, I love Stella. Can't wait to see season 3. I think I need to watch season 1 & 2 again. Where am I going to find the time between this rewatch of the X-Files and not to mention the many other things I watch. I truly have no life. :)Right?! Stella is so, so awesome! I've watched both seasons twice now and wait for season three with much less patience than I want to admit! And can we just talk about her clothes?? Those silk blouses and wool coats...totally fabulous! Edited February 17, 2016 by madam magpie 1 Link to comment
eleanorofaquitaine February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 (edited) It is intrusive, but they (and especially GA, IMO) have been showboating some massive flirtation during interviews this go-around. I definitely feel for actors who have natural onscreen chemistry that makes fans wonder and speculate when there's nothing there (and especially when they're in relationships with other people), but you can't be hanging all over your costar and dropping flirty innuendos on Twitter and during interviews and then also be incensed when people read into it. Pick a lane, GA. ** ** Non-snarky intent--I like GA. I was going to say something similar. If they are in a relationship (even if it is just a friends with benefits situation), I don't begrudge them keeping silent on it because given the ardency of fan's attachment to their characters, I think they'd want to keep that all on the down low. But on the other hand, don't play it up for the ratings, then. That being said, the only interview I've seen where she addressed it (a HuffPost Live interview), she seemed more flustered about the question than angry. My conclusion from my own two eyes, just looking at their body language, is that there is something there, but neither of them owe it to anyone to acknowledge it publicly. The big thing is that he kissed her during that show with his band or something, right? No, that's not been it for me. I know that is when a lot of people started paying attention again, but I've thought that something was up between them since post-IWTB (mostly based on their body language). Which is why I really do find watching them really interesting when they aren't playing it up. To be honest, they seem like an old married couple more when people aren't looking then when they are. (I was watching the San Diego CC panel from 2013 on YouTube last night). The gossip just isn't my bag. I happen to be a big fan of celebrity gossip, so long as it isn't hurting anyone. But these two are the only ones who I actually do think should be together in real life. But I also recognize that their real lives are their own and that they truly should be able to have private lives. I haven't watched The Fall (or Hannibal) because - The X-Files aside - I am actually quite squeamish. I think that the supernatural elements of the show allowed me to ignore the gore, etc. So I believe she did quite well in those roles, I am just not going to be able to watch it. Edited February 17, 2016 by eleanorofaquitaine Link to comment
madam magpie February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 I see what you mean, but they could easily just be old friends. I have a guy friend like that. No matter where we go, people assume I'm his wife...even if his actual wife is right there! We've never dated, never would date, and certainly never would have an affair. But we know each other really well and get along really well, and people can see that in how we interact. So for me, it seems totally plausible that there's absolutely nothing romantic between these two and the constant asking would be very uncomfortable. Plus, why should they adjust the behavior of their friendship so that you or I or whoever doesn't constantly ask if they're secretly sleeping together? I don't feel like they (or anyone) owes that. On the other hand, I do think we all owe it to everyone to be respectful of other people's privacy. They're real people who don't belong to us and should be allowed to be whoever they are. They just entertain us. 1 Link to comment
eleanorofaquitaine February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 I see what you mean, but they could easily just be old friends. I have a guy friend like that. No matter where we go, people assume I'm his wife...even if his actual wife is right there! We've never dated, never would date, and certainly never would have an affair. But we know each other really well and get along really well, and people can see that in how we interact. So for me, it seems totally plausible that there's absolutely nothing romantic between these two and the constant asking would be very uncomfortable. Plus, why should they adjust the behavior of their friendship so that you or I or whoever doesn't constantly ask if they're secretly sleeping together? I don't feel like they (or anyone) owes that. On the other hand, I do think we all owe it to everyone to be respectful of other people's privacy. They're real people who don't belong to us and should be allowed to be whoever they are. They just entertain us. I don't think that they should adjust their behavior. I do think that they like playing a little coy with it all, and that's fine, but on the other hand, by doing so, they are of course aware that they will get people speculating about them. But that's also fine, so long as they are comfortable with that. But they should do what they are comfortable doing. At the end of the day, picking up on what is there publicly is not IMO being disrespectful of their privacy. Link to comment
madam magpie February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 (edited) I don't so much think what you're saying is, no. But I've read A LOT elsewhere that is. It's a fine line, I guess. And to be fair and honest, I do get it...the interest. And I can get in the trenches and gossip about trash with the rest of them. (What are the Kardashians up to these days?) But I don't feel like anyone is doing anything wrong here, and I also think the gossipers really miss the implication of what they're saying. I mean, if you're saying (not you, one) that it looks like something's been up with them since 2008 when that movie came out, that's kind of a huge accusation. David was married, Gillian was in a relationship and pregnant. That just crosses a huge invasion of privacy line for me. Plus, I really like everyone involved, including Tea Leoni, so...it icks me out and feels super invasive. Now back to Kanye and his money woes... Edited February 17, 2016 by madam magpie 1 Link to comment
eleanorofaquitaine February 17, 2016 Share February 17, 2016 I mean, yes, I agree that some of the speculation - especially around the time when both were married - can get pretty gross and invasive and I'm not down with that. Whatever happened in each of their respective marriages is definitely private. Link to comment
madam magpie February 18, 2016 Share February 18, 2016 I imagine, though, that for them, it would all be gross and invasive. Imagine going to work every day and having people speculating or whispering or flat-out asking you in every single meeting if you were secretly sleeping with a coworker. Oh, but come on...aren't you? Oh, but you're so cute together. Oh, but you belong together. Oh, but you work so well together. Oh, but I saw him kiss you hello. And so on. It would make me nuts! Acting and interviews and panels are just their job. And I know entertainment is much more voyeuristic than sitting in a cubicle...and the public tends to view celebrities as possessions...but still. They're also human beings with feelings and lives and kids, etc. 1 Link to comment
eleanorofaquitaine February 18, 2016 Share February 18, 2016 (edited) I honestly don't have to imagine it, because I lived it (on a much smaller scale, obviously). I didn't care that people were speculating because I knew what was going on and what wasn't going on (and when it was going on). I mean, I didn't love it but I also understood why people were speculating. I think that for anyone in a public role, you just have to accept that some parts of your life will be speculated on and you have to find ways to carve out your privacy. Obviously, some people are able to handle that better than others (and to be fair, I think both of them handle it fine). Edited February 18, 2016 by eleanorofaquitaine Link to comment
madam magpie February 18, 2016 Share February 18, 2016 Well, sure. We all have to accept annoying things in life. But I do think the brazenness with which we go after celebrities is much more so than anything "regular" people face. No one would ever show up to a meeting I was running or an interview or presentation I was giving and quiz me on my personal relationships. They might talk about me at lunch; that's just human nature. But no way would it happen publicly to my face. Not only would that be considered super inappropriate in a business setting, it would flirt with illegal. I think it's a shame that celebrities don't have that luxury of forced personal privacy. But I know plenty of people disagree. Such is life. And in some ways, the benefits of money and fame may soften the blow. But still. Ethically? I find it troublesome. I also think they both handle it all fine, better than many actually. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts