Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Social Media: What's Up With Her?


  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

Her dancing. Psh. This is a professional dancer. I love to dance but am by no means ‘a dancer,’ like our Whit claims. I recently attended an African dance workshop and holy crap, it kicked my butt. I seriously burned almost a thousand calories in an hour and a half. The instructor and the other dancers were all in amazing shape—lean, strong, healthy-seeming—because being a dancer is HARD WORK. When I see Whitney ‘dancing,’ that is, swaying back and forth and gyrating while flinging her arms about, that’s all I can say: psh. 

Dance however you want. What I love about dance is how it’s accessible to everyone, no matter your age, skill level, ability, whatevs. But Whitney, I know professional dancers, with passion for and dedication to their art. You, sister, are NOT this kind of dancer.

  • Love 16
4 hours ago, ClareWalks said:

Seeing her move in sped-up video is so...gross. It makes her look even more cartoonish than she already does.

I know, right? Twit really should film her gym visits in black & white since they look so much like a Charlie Chaplin movie.

I can't understand why Twit & Tal are spending an entire week in Manila and only filming themselves doing stuff they could do in Greensboro: drinking coffee, swimming in the hotel pool, exercising. If I were in a new place on the other side of the globe, I'd be going to museums, etc., and soaking in the local culture.

  • Love 7
5 minutes ago, Dot said:

If I were in a new place on the other side of the globe, I'd be going to museums, etc., and soaking in the local culture.

So . . . you'd still NEVER do anything Twit does, right?  No running around in public in your undies, sexually harassing everyone in sight, and taking advantage of opportunities for personal growth.  

I like you, Dot!

  • Love 5
1 hour ago, 3girlsforus said:

NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!!!!! Please tell me she is lying when she says she is considering bringing that poor dog home!!!! vNO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!!!

That's probably not an option for her. The U.S. & many other countries have rules about transporting animals, including a 6-mo quarantine. It depends on the country, I think, but I would guess the Philippines require the more stringent rules.

Twit is still talking about it in her profile story, however.

Edited by Dot
  • Love 1
38 minutes ago, Dot said:

That's probably not an option for her. The U.S. & many other countries have rules about transporting animals, including a 6-mo quarantine. It depends on the country, I think, but I would guess the Philippines require the more stringent rules.

Twit is still talking about it in her profile story, however.

This is my assumption, and fervent prayer, as well but I’m going to worry until she confirms she didn’t do it. 

  • Love 1

In addition to Donna, I now wonder "where's Steve Purrwin"? He's obviously no longer a part of the Twit-Tal household, confirmed today by a comment Twit made about bringing Katie the dog home with her.

Is he dead, like that sad pig? Or did Twit realize it's difficult to keep a cat indoors if it likes being outdoors & dump him back in the park where she found him?

  • Love 1
18 minutes ago, ClareWalks said:

December 12 is a Wednesday. What an odd day for her to go out with someone "in the US." Although to be honest, on Wednesday nights I teach a group personal training class where we do 45 minutes of circuit training, and I would fuckin' LOVE to put Whit through the paces and see what happens.

I think it might have something to do with her return to the U.S. Maybe Twit's gonna deplane wherever the lucky winner is & wag her ass at her/him.

  • Love 4
4 hours ago, Dot said:

That's probably not an option for her. The U.S. & many other countries have rules about transporting animals, including a 6-mo quarantine. It depends on the country, I think, but I would guess the Philippines require the more stringent rules.

Twit is still talking about it in her profile story, however.

 

I don't know all the details, but an American friend who had been working in Australia, and married an Aussie, just returned with her husband and their three dogs to stay permanently in the US.  Apparently the big issue with bringing a dog into the US is not the government regulations. She said for that, they only needed vet certificates that all the dogs had been vaccinated against rabies no more than three months before they traveled. There was no quarantine required (except if they were going to Hawaii.)  The big problem (and expense) is that the major airlines have seriously tightened up the restrictions on transporting pets internationally, and nearly all of them require you use a pet-shipping service.  I was floored when she told me it cost nearly ten thousand dollars to bring the dogs with them.

Besides, didn't Whitney say she wanted a dog that was big enough for her to lie on, full body contact? I have a vague recollection of her making that comment in some SM video or livestream(?).  That dog looks like she'd smother it if she tried to do that.

Edited by Ketzel
  • Love 5
51 minutes ago, Ketzel said:

Besides, didn't Whitney say she wanted a dog that was big enough for her to lie on, full body contact? I have a vague recollection of her making that comment in some SM video or livestream(?).  That dog looks like she'd smother it if she tried to do that.

She did indeed. This awful bitch. If she just wants to squash something, there are perverted men who will PAY her to sit on them. It's probably the only job she is qualified to do, anyway.

  • Love 10
2 hours ago, ClareWalks said:
2 hours ago, Ketzel said:

Besides, didn't Whitney say she wanted a dog that was big enough for her to lie on, full body contact? I have a vague recollection of her making that comment in some SM video or livestream(?).  That dog looks like she'd smother it if she tried to do that.

She did indeed. This awful bitch. If she just wants to squash something, there are perverted men who will PAY her to sit on them. It's probably the only job she is qualified to do, anyway.

Ugh...I agree, what a disgusting horrible bitch. There is NO breed of dog that could withstand a morbidly obese human LAYING on them, and no dog should HAVE to have that done to them, either. Any pet adoption facility she visits should have that video clip sent to them, so they know what she's going to do with the poor thing. God she's vile. 

You're too fucking FAT to be laying on a dog, Whitney! And get your damn head examined, normal people don't want to lay on their dog.

She's too damn fat to have been riding that horse, that was horrifying too, but who the hell says they want to lay on a dog? She is so messed up, she absolutely PRIDES herself on coming up with the most inappropriate, crazy f'ing thing to say that she can think of. I just hate people like that. They come up with some crazy "confession" of some weird thing they like to do, and almost act like they want to whisper it to you, because, you know, they're kind of "ashamed" but they just have to tell you. No you're not, you're not ashamed, you don't even WANT to do it probably, you're just coming up with the strangest thing you can think of at the moment to get some attention because you're a huge attention whore.

She'd eat buffalo shit on a cracker if it got her 30 extra seconds of air time.

  • Love 9
3 hours ago, Ketzel said:

Besides, didn't Whitney say she wanted a dog that was big enough for her to lie on, full body contact? I have a vague recollection of her making that comment in some SM video or livestream(?).  That dog looks like she'd smother it if she tried to do that.

That is so unbelievably vile. Who thinks such things and even more appalling who admits to thinking such things. This woman continues to prove she needs serious psychological help. 

  • Love 3
3 minutes ago, Dot said:

Boy, if I were shilling an exercise video, this is the LAST photo I would choose to advertise it.

Good ol' Ryan must have dollar signs revolving around his head at the thought of a possible 6000 attendees to his $97/mo videos. All that pandering to Fatso was worth it, eh, Ryan?

Yea she’s been hard at work on this.... all those pictures by the pool and at the dog cafe prove it. 

I think it’s hilarious that she thinks all of those people who said yes really mean it. 

  • Love 5

I'm sure she thinks this pic makes her arms look "muscular". Well it doesn't. They just look fat.

Kinda marshmallow-ish...reminds me of the time my brother came home from college, and said "Come here, look! I learned how to make s'mores in the microwave!" and then proceeded to blow up a marshmallow in our parent's new microwave.

All done after the folks had gone to bed and we thought we could get away with it...we had some explaining to do the next day.

Anyway, big, white, puffy, growing exponentially bigger by the second...yeah. Marshmallow-ey. That should be a word, I need that word for her.

Edited by Sasha888
  • Love 6
7 minutes ago, Sasha888 said:

Yeah, 5,978 said yes....5,970 didn't mean it.

The other 8 think it will be free, and will drop out when they find out she intends to make money off the deal.

I'm thinking now that the Dec 12 date with her "biggest fan" may have something to do with unveiling this latest shill. And, remember, she's also got another con going, her soon to be announced "active wear."

@Sasha888, I thought her arms looked awful, too. But I was really appalled by the gut hanging out over her waistband. How can she possibly think this is an attractive pose?

  • Love 4
11 minutes ago, Dot said:

I'm thinking now that the Dec 12 date with her "biggest fan" may have something to do with unveiling this latest shill. And, remember, she's also got another con going, her soon to be announced "active wear."

@Sasha888, I thought her arms looked awful, too. But I was really appalled by the gut hanging out over her waistband. How can she possibly think this is an attractive pose?

Yes, it's all just awful. The seams on those pants have to be just screaming.

She is such a joke as a "fat athlete", and such a horrific dresser, I just can't think of anybody who is less qualified to have an active wear line. She's barely active and barely wears anything! People can buy spandex pants and poorly fitting bras anywhere. If her line includes anything with sleeves, I'm going to be saying what the hell does she know about sleeves? She never wears them!

I am nowhere near her size and you'll never catch me without sleeves. I inherited some kind of weird gene that causes any little bit of weight I gain to go right in my upper arms (chest too, so you know, bonus there, but the other stuff...well, the Lord giveth and Lord taketh away...I got screwed on the upper arms thing). And I can lose weight, but those arms aren't going back to the way they used to be, hell no, they're just not as full of fat as they were, so SLEEVES! Sleeves, woman, learn about them! It's amazing how I can minimize the size of my upper arms with the right shirts! So I don't get why anyone would NOT want to do that, why do you want to look worse than you could?

And the gut, for the love of all that is holy, put a shirt over that stomach! BLECH! Again, another thing on me that no one needs to see, and I'm nowhere near that huge. It would take SO LITTLE EFFORT for her to look a lot better, just by not letting it all hang out there.

As long as I'm on a big long rant here, let's go after the leggings too. LEGGINGS ARE NOT PANTS. I wear leggings. I like them. Sometimes I might even wear them out of the house. BUT...I wear them with a tunic that's hanging WAY down, the shirts I wear with leggings are damn near dresses. Again, no one wants to see my fat ass in leggings. There's a public part of the legging, and a private part. Not with her, NOPE! It's ALL public! 

"Leggings are not pants" is a hot button issue in fashion and there are "private/public" maps drawn on leggings as a visual aid...yes they are funny but they are also true! Nobody wants to see that shit, I don't care if you're a size zero, I don't need to see your camel toe or your leggings creeping up your behind!

It's SO freaking laughable that she thinks she, the worst dresser of all time, should have a clothing line.

What's next, is she going to give etiquette lessons?

  • Love 14
41 minutes ago, Sasha888 said:

 If her line includes anything with sleeves, I'm going to be saying what the hell does she know about sleeves? She never wears them!

I am nowhere near her size and you'll never catch me without sleeves.

Amen. I'm less than half her size, and I'm *always* working on my "guns," but there's a limit to what you can do when you're 70 years old and have lost significant weight. So the only place you'll see me in public without sleeves is in the pool. 

Hell, I even sleep in sleeves.

  • Love 6
3 hours ago, Dot said:

This is apparently what Twit wore to perform at the festival. I believe it was @Irate Panda who pointed out that porn actresses wear more appropriate clothing than Twit does.

She also wore spandex shorts. There is a photo in her profile 

Edited to add- she is not taking the dog home. Thank God. 

Edited by 3girlsforus
  • Love 5
1 hour ago, SevenCostanza said:

I see we're doing the ass wiggle with some arm raises.   Quite a work out .  The little girl next to her is itching to actually do something more, but Twit's too busy making dirty jokes.  "Touch yourself,  tee hee."

Wow. That is just appalling. Several of those young girls look really uncomfortable. That is just completely inappropriate for a family gathering. Also the photo I saw on her profile has her just wearing those shorts but not the mesh leggings. I really hope those were two different shows on the same day instead of the more terrifying idea that she took the mesh part off in front of people I some kind of creepy striptease. Luckily I don’t think she’s capable of taking leggings off without help. 

  • Love 3
39 minutes ago, Ketzel said:

She's teasing an "important announcement" on Monday in an instagram picture with Tal and the TLC sign.  Many comments in response about the two of them marrying/having/adopting a baby.

I'm sure it's just the premiere date for the new season...no way would any reasonable agency give those loons a baby! Right? ...RIGHT? <panics>

  • Love 6
48 minutes ago, ClareWalks said:

I'm sure it's just the premiere date for the new season...no way would any reasonable agency give those loons a baby! Right? ...RIGHT? <panics>

That'd be my guess, too, esp. since Tal already gave it away in the caption with the TLC sign. Another possibility is an announcement about her active wear clothing line. If we've learned nothing about Twit, it's her teases are never very "important."

ETA: Tal's IG photo with him, Twit & a TLC sign is the one with the caption about MBFFL returning in Jan. The same photo on Twit's IG page has the tease instead.

It's interesting the BGDC/NoBS Queen only includes slim dancers in her festival performance.

Edited by Dot
ETA
  • Love 5
33 minutes ago, ClareWalks said:

I'm sure it's just the premiere date for the new season...no way would any reasonable agency give those loons a baby! Right? ...RIGHT? <panics>

I'm sure. 1/2 of the comments say that it must be something besides the premier of the new season because she has already told them that will be coming. But they are giving her too much credit. It's definitely just the premiere date. 

  • Love 4
5 hours ago, 3girlsforus said:

Wow. That is just appalling. Several of those young girls look really uncomfortable. That is just completely inappropriate for a family gathering. Also the photo I saw on her profile has her just wearing those shorts but not the mesh leggings. I really hope those were two different shows on the same day instead of the more terrifying idea that she took the mesh part off in front of people I some kind of creepy striptease. Luckily I don’t think she’s capable of taking leggings off without help. 

That made me furious. Completely inappropriate comments from Twit when there's a LITTLE GIRL who appears to be about 9 on stage with her. Way to sexualize a child, you jagoff. 

  • Love 5
1 hour ago, Colleenna said:

That made me furious. Completely inappropriate comments from Twit when there's a LITTLE GIRL who appears to be about 9 on stage with her. Way to sexualize a child, you jagoff. 

It made me so angry as well. I think people need to start complaining to TLC about her inappropriate behavior. This was a TLC family event. Sure they probably don’t care but maybe if enough complaints come in they will. Her show can’t be that valuable to them. 

ETA: the video has been taken down. Interesting 

Edited by 3girlsforus
  • Love 3
1 hour ago, Colleenna said:

That made me furious. Completely inappropriate comments from Twit when there's a LITTLE GIRL who appears to be about 9 on stage with her. Way to sexualize a child, you jagoff. 

Not just the comment. It merely emphasized an inappropriate "dance" move for a family-oriented festival. I would hope this is the last time TLC invites Twit to perform at one of its events.

  • Love 5

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...