All Episodes Talk: All Rise

[Florinaldo]

24 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Two tow truck drivers.  (...)     I think the whole thing is a scam. 

Not filing a workplace injury claim in exchange for a car certainly is suspect; if the extent of his injuries is really as he said, he would probably have been entitled to much more compensation than just the value of a used or repossesed car. Or maybe he is just as unintelligent as he looked on the stand.

[AngelaHunter]

Mr. Ramos? Are you really saying if a person doesn't have a canopy outside they can expect their doors to leak? Wow. I live in a very harsh climate and have doors like that leading to my deck - French doors - which are 28 years old. I have no canopy and never have my doors leaked. He's a fast-talking scammer and nothing more. Door knob causes leaks too? Are you kidding, you little twerp? Doors you order usually have no holes in them and they have to be drilled. Yes, plaintiff gets back all the money he paid to the slick Mr. Ramos, who conveniently doesn't happen to have the reciept for the door he says he purchased. Why would someone in business keep any records like that?

Those two dumbass, duh "Me and her were" sisters, fighting over a 20 year old Ford Escort and a 15 year old Chevy Impala after Mom dies and leaves this vast estate of junkheap cars? I could feel my brain congealing yet more during this nonsense. I'm really glad we didn't have to hear from plaintiff's Bozo son.

[Byrd is the Word]

This is probably the first time in history that two tow truck operators from my home town of Chicago were in a courtroom and neither went to jail.

[Byrd is the Word]

2 hours ago, Florinaldo said:

Not filing a workplace injury claim in exchange for a car certainly is suspect

Absolutely, positively no way that a towing company from 49th and Halsted carries worker’s compensation insurance. You’d sooner find a one legged ballerina that a responsible, reputable operator in this city.

Edited February 28, 2019 by Byrd is the Word

[iwasish]

3 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

So on today's first episode, wife, and mother of three kids by a fool who apparently uses his head only to hold his hair up, claims the defendant, ex of hubby, vandalized her car.    The husband wasn't home during the night when this happened, and he was at his cousin's house, with the ex.  Apparently, the ex isn't really an ex, but a current side piece.    We later find out the hubby was home, and in the basement with the girlfriend.   Poor Byrd looks a bit confused.    Plaintiff husband previously assaulted the defendant, and spent three years in prison for the assault, but she still was boinking him after that, and after he married the other woman.      Supposedly (according to defendant) hubby was texting defendant to come over to cousin Dominique's house, and his wife was with him at the time, when they all ran into each other at the mall the day before.     

Defendant and plaintiff wife had a fight including a pistol whipping, at the defendant's house, in the basement.     There is an existing No Contact order between Plaintiff hubby, and defendant too.     There is a voicemail confessing to the car vandalism, supposedly by the defendant, but even Byrd can't figure it out.     Nothing for anyone, because they're all nuts.   

What is with the mumblers? I barely understood one word the guy said. His lips hardly moved when he talked. The ladies too. They talk so fast and leave syllables off words... it’s all so much gibberish.  I did catch that one of the things in the counter claim the defendant  filed was that  the plaintiff stole her “teeth”

I just want to know what she did with them. 

[AuntiePam]

Sorry, but I can't get the vacation/dead traveling friend case out of my head.  The case needed an auditor -- someone to sit down with mom's bank and credit card statements and determine how much of plaintiff's $4K was spent on the vacation, how much was refunded, and how much was left sitting in mom's bank account.

For all we know, $2K might have covered air fare and hotels, and the balance was for tours, shopping, incidentals, massages and facials, etc. at the destination. 

It's possible that a lot of that $4K was "left over", and lined defendant's family's pockets, leaving plaintiff with zip nada.

I can't believe JJ didn't award her anything. 

[Florinaldo]

1 hour ago, Byrd is the Word said:

Absolutely, positively no way that a towing company from 49th and Halsted carries worker’s compensation insurance. You’d sooner find a one legged ballerina that a responsible, reputable operator in this city.

Aren't there government-run programs in some states to compensate people in case of workplace injuries?

[Byrd is the Word]

8 hours ago, Florinaldo said:

Aren't there government-run programs in some states to compensate people in case of workplace injuries?

Perhaps, but I’ve never heard of such a program and I have no experience with  such matters as either an employer or and employee. 

[Byrd is the Word]

9 hours ago, AuntiePam said:

Sorry, but I can't get the vacation/dead traveling friend case out of my head.  The case needed an auditor -- someone to sit down with mom's bank and credit card statements and determine how much of plaintiff's $4K was spent on the vacation, how much was refunded, and how much was left sitting in mom's bank account.

For all we know, $2K might have covered air fare and hotels, and the balance was for tours, shopping, incidentals, massages and facials, etc. at the destination. 

It's possible that a lot of that $4K was "left over", and lined defendant's family's pockets, leaving plaintiff with zip nada.

I can't believe JJ didn't award her anything. 

Didn’t she award the plaintiff roughly half of what she was seeking? And what this case really needed was for a family member from each side to sit down with the credit card statement and figure out the debits and credits. You and I could have done that in a half hour at most. Further complicating this, I think, is that there was probably money going back and forth between these women regularly and that the well intended plaintiff daughter was lied to about much of it. The defendant made an issue of the word “etc.” on the check and took a lot of grief for that. Perhaps it was his awkward way of introducing the fact that the financial relationship between the two old women was messy.

[AuntiePam]

11 hours ago, Florinaldo said:

Aren't there government-run programs in some states to compensate people in case of workplace injuries?

Sure -- Workman's Compensation.  I thought every state had such programs, but maybe not.  There are rules. I broke a hip in a fall at work.  I had to be treated by an approved physician, in an approved facility.  The program paid 100% of the doctor and hospital bills.  I was compensated for lost earnings -- almost as much as what I would have been paid, and with no deductions.  When I was fully healed, I was paid a final amount, for my "permanent partial disability", or maybe it was "temporary total disability" -- I forget.  My stepdad was hurt on the job and mom was paid for his disability even after stepdad had died. 

But yeah, workers comp is an excellent program.  The downside is that employers want to keep their costs down, so sometimes they'll cut you off before you're healed, or even dispute your claim. 

[Byrd is the Word]

1 hour ago, AuntiePam said:

Sure -- Workman's Compensation.  I thought every state had such programs, but maybe not.  There are rules. I broke a hip in a fall at work.  I had to be treated by an approved physician, in an approved facility.  The program paid 100% of the doctor and hospital bills.  I was compensated for lost earnings -- almost as much as what I would have been paid, and with no deductions.  When I was fully healed, I was paid a final amount, for my "permanent partial disability", or maybe it was "temporary total disability" -- I forget.  My stepdad was hurt on the job and mom was paid for his disability even after stepdad had died. 

But yeah, workers comp is an excellent program.  The downside is that employers want to keep their costs down, so sometimes they'll cut you off before you're healed, or even dispute your claim. 

To be clear, worker's compensation insurance isn't a state program per se.  It's private insurance, mandated and regulated by the state that virtually every employer is required by law to carry.  Like and other insurance your rates vary depending on the insurer's risk.  Coverage for an office of clerical workers is less expensive than that for a factory or a business operating a fleet of gravel trucks. The trouble is, and I'm sure the tow truck case is an example, some shady employers operating outside the law simply don't carry the coverage, just like certain motorists don't carry automobile insurance.  Clearly one of the things going on here was "Freddie" didn't want Jaba the Tow Truck Pirate to deliberately or accidentally blow the whistle on his failure to provide proper coverage and tried to buy him off with some janky car they towed.  By the way, stay turned for a future episode of JJ after jumbo tries unsuccessfully to register that car.

Also, generally speaking the driving force behind cutting you off comes from the insurer and not the employer.  In my (fortunately) limited experience with worker's comp claims, the insurer worked with injured employee regarding treatment, when to return to work, etc.  Once the claim is filed the employer has very little say in the matter.

Edited February 28, 2019 by Byrd is the Word

[funky-rat]

7 minutes ago, Byrd is the Word said:

Also, generally speaking the driving force behind cutting you off comes from the insurer and not the employer.  In my (fortunately) limited experience with worker's comp claims, the insurer put the pressure on the injured employee.  Once the claim is filed the employer has very little say in the matter.

Yep.  My Uncle had his arm badly damaged on the job.  He was forced to go to the WC surgeon, who performed a risky and unnecessary procedure to save money, and permanently damaged his shoulder as well.  He was on workman's comp until disability kicked in (a good year or two) and until that happened, investigators photographed him doing things that supposedly meant he wasn't really hurt (they were wrong, but still).

[khyber]

14 hours ago, AuntiePam said:

Sorry, but I can't get the vacation/dead traveling friend case out of my head.  The case needed an auditor -- someone to sit down with mom's bank and credit card statements and determine how much of plaintiff's $4K was spent on the vacation, how much was refunded, and how much was left sitting in mom's bank account.

My career was in finance & you are exactly right. I kept waiting for JJ to ask them to produce exactly that info. It was never clear who got the refunds.

[TheLastKidPicked]

17 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

16 hours ago, Florinaldo said:

Not filing a workplace injury claim in exchange for a car certainly is suspect

Two tow truck drivers.    One driver supposedly hit the other one, and severely injured his arm, and didn't even slow down.    They both work off the books too.   This is the famous M&J Trucking case.   I wonder if anyone at the state licensing bureau, or the IRS, caught this case?    There is no worker's comp paid by the company either, at least to the injured man.     The plaintiff claims a car was supposed to be given to him as a settlement.   Defendant knows he hit the plaintiff, and really doesn't care at all.     I think the whole thing is a scam.    Nothing for either of them.

All of you talking about this are correct.  I know a little about it because I see it at my job once in a while.

People come in and undercut our price.  They pay their workers under the table, in cash, so nobody can track it.  No taxes, no social security, no worker's compensation insurance.  Just like the tow company in the Judge Judy case.

And I always tell the younger guys,  "This sounds great until something goes wrong, and then you're hanging out there with no help".

Of course, the idea of receiving cash, with no taxes or social security taken out seems appealing to them. . . 

Until somebody gets hurt.  And the worker's compensation department is very clear:  There was no coverage in place, and by law, we cannot help you.

Which is exactly why they ended up on Judge Judy instead of collecting worker's compensation.

[Florinaldo]

I think I made the mistake of assuming that things in the US work roughly like here in Canada, that Big Socialist Country in the North.

Here, the workplace injury itself is handled by provincial agencies and they reimburse the employer (or the employee in some cases) for the immediate consequences; for example if someone had to use some of their accrued leave because of the accident, the agency reimburses the employer so the days used can be credited back to the employee. Specific provisions vary from province to province and not all claims are granted of course.

Disability benefits, short term or long term, are handled under the particular insurance plan, either through the employer or purchased by individual employees if there is no company plan, until the employee returns to work. Permanent disabilities fall under other government programs, similarly as in the US I believe.

If the company has no coverage, I think you could sue them in case of an injury with long-term consequences, but I am less familiar with these situations.

In the tow case, we know that the injured driver could have tried to sue the company, but he preferred the quick and easy solution of getting a free car.

Edited February 28, 2019 by Florinaldo

[Byrd is the Word]

33 minutes ago, Florinaldo said:

I think I made the mistake of assuming that things in the US work roughly like here in Canada, that Big Socialist Country in the North.

I think generally government takes a less active role in business here. That has its pros and cons. 

Edited February 28, 2019 by Byrd is the Word

[CrazyInAlabama]

I bet the tow company calls the drivers 'independent contractors' which means they pay them, but everything else, including taxes is the responsibility of the drivers.      Worker's comp. doesn't cover independent contractors, and as written in the previous post, it works fine until it doesn't.    

In the travel refunds case, the only things the defendant's mother's estate owed were the refunds made to the mother's credit cards, because that is what was used to make the travel arrangements, including airfare.    If there wasn't a refund, then it wasn't owed to the plaintiff.     I think the plaintiff should only get the airline refund, and the other one, but anything that was non-refundable wasn't right for the plaintiff to get back.      That was certainly an expensive vacation. 

Edited February 28, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[AuntiePam]

1 hour ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

In the travel refunds case, the only things the defendant's mother's estate owed were the refunds made to the mother's credit cards, because that is what was used to make the travel arrangements, including airfare.    If there wasn't a refund, then it wasn't owed to the plaintiff.     I think the plaintiff should only get the airline refund, and the other one, but anything that was non-refundable wasn't right for the plaintiff to get back.      That was certainly an expensive vacation. 

That's assuming the entire $4K was spent on the vacation expenses, but we don't know that.  It's too bad that JJ thinks that she's more important than the outcome of the cases.  God forbid she "waste" time eliciting information, when she could be repeating her favorite Judy-isms.  "It's either a Yes or a No!"  "Um is not an answer!"  "Where did you think you were coming today, to the beach!"  "They don't keep me around because I'm gorgeous!"  Etc. etc.

[Byrd is the Word]

Mr. Spineless Bridezilla needs to tell his super high strung wife that there are way more upsetting things in life than a flaky, poorly prepared DJ and without better coping skills for her and the balls to keep your new, equally high strung MIL in check you’ll both be miserable forever.  

Mr. Deadbeat Dad sits there like the wheezily little piece of shit he is while JJ rips the $390 away from his children and gives it back to Mrs. Deadbeat Dad. PS, Mrs Deadbeat...next time let the kids keep your lousy $390 and make your low life husband pay you back.

All in all, a terrible day for manhood. 

Edited March 1, 2019 by Byrd is the Word

[CrazyInAlabama]

The DJ ruined my day case-15 seconds of silence, the humanity!     The woman got a lot more music and services than many would have done for the money, especially since the wedding venue was apparently halfway to nowhere.    I see Bridezilla and Momzilla are definitely two of a kind, and Momzilla better stop coaching the bride or Momzilla is going to get the Byrd boot.    Bridezilla married the right guy, he kept his mouth shut.    Bridezilla has the emotional maturity of a two year old in mid-tantrum.    Plaintiff gets the tip $280 back.  

Wife of deadbeat dad gets her paycheck garnished, for his two kids with ex-girlfriend.      Defendant says she doesn't actually get told where the money comes from.     The child support was grabbed by child support authorities instead of her traffic ticket getting paid (don't you have to be seriously delinquent to get garnished for a traffic ticket?) for $390.   (Why do I suspect deadbeat dad doesn't work, at least on the books, so he won't have to pay his child support?)

Man buys stolen dirt bike.   I remember this one, the owner tracks down his stolen dirt bike, has all of the right paperwork, and sues for damages to the dirt bike by the man.    The girlfriend of man claims the bike was a great deal from some fictitious guy.    I hope the local police checked every VIN number on the property.    Girlfriend of man (not teen unless he's the oldest teen I've seen lately) claims she bought the bike for $400 from some man, in April.     However, the police checked the VIN number in March.    What a couple of liars.  Defendant didn't get a title, and has three other motor bikesor ATVs, they bought at a garage sale, the others were 1500 or 1700, this dirt bike was $400.    Defendant Jessica is such a bad liar.   She called the local pawn shop to check the VIN numbers, and the police came to check the bike.   They went to mediation, and defendant man thinks Jessica 'accidentally' bought the plaintiff's dirt bike, and claims the VIN number didn't match.    The defendant is a scammer, and girlfriend is too.    Plaintiff gets $1,000.

Edited March 1, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[Brattinella]

I TOTALLY agree with the verdict JJ gave to the check-garnishing crudbum.  SHE owes nothing to the ex-gf for HIS children.  And, in the hallway, she STILL doesn't get it! 

[Byrd is the Word]

7 minutes ago, Brattinella said:

And, in the hallway, she STILL doesn't get it! 

Still, it's hard for me to find fault with a woman raising two kids on her own and dealing with a deadbeat father who owes her thousands. The real losers in this case are those kids.

Edited March 1, 2019 by Byrd is the Word

[ItsHelloPattiagain]

8 hours ago, Byrd is the Word said:

To be clear, worker's compensation insurance isn't a state program per se.  It's private insurance, mandated and regulated by the state that virtually every employer is required by law to carry.  Like and other insurance your rates vary depending on the insurer's risk.  Coverage for an office of clerical workers is less expensive than that for a factory or a business operating a fleet of gravel trucks.

Years ago I did temp work for a very large orthopedic clinic - the employee I was subbing for was walking on the sidewalk outside the office and fell and scraped up her hand. She apparently was a type 1 diabetic (young woman) and her hand didn't want to heal, so she ended up with gangrene and then large skin grafts and other odd assorted maladies on the entire palm of her good hand. She couldn't write or type or even use the hand at all. So much for those clerical workers. 

[Byrd is the Word]

5 minutes ago, ItsHelloPattiagain said:

So much for those clerical workers. 

We employ an office of clerical workers and sales people.  Several years ago a 60 something year old woman we employ (and I am personally fond of) was in Minneapolis on business for a trade show when she fall and shattered her ankle.  Since it was after show hours there was some back and forth with the insurance company as to whether or not it was a "work place injury".  Ultimately is was decided that it was and that led to a very, very expensive claim.  The story has a happy ending in that she healed well, her bills were paid, her wages were mostly compensated and she returned to work after a 3 month recuperation.  Our rates increased a bit but in the end the system worked for all parties.

[AngelaHunter]

45 minutes ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

The defendant is a scammer, and girlfriend is too. 

When JJ asked Sole, "You're not an idiot, are you?" I assumed she was kidding. Short-assed, pony-tailed, dull-eyed Sole and his dumbbell girlfriend, Jessica (it truly is awesome how water always finds its own level), are idiots of the first degree. People, how many times do I have to say that if you are stupid, don't try scamming or lying. It never works out.  Congrats, Jessica, for looking like a lying fool in front of your daughter. And close your goddam mouth. You'll catch flies that way. 

[Byrd is the Word]

7 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:

And close your goddam mouth. You'll catch flies that way. 

The one and only time she opened it and a lie didn’t escape. 

[Florinaldo]

1 hour ago, ItsHelloPattiagain said:

She couldn't write or type or even use the hand at all. So much for those clerical workers. 

If an accident happens on the employer's property it is usually recognnized as a workplace injury, even it it is just falling in the parking lot or on the entrance sidewalk. if it happens on the city's sidewalk leading to the entrance, then it probably will not be recognized as such. It is also a workplace accident if it happens in transit towards a work event like a meeting off-site, a trade show or a business trip. Your daily ride to work and back does not qualify.

So even if office workers are less likely than heavy machine operators to get injured at work, they are not immune to it. Think of repetitive strain injuries and other types of professional injury that occur in an office environment.

Edited March 1, 2019 by Florinaldo

[CrazyInAlabama]

Many years ago, I started my first post-college job.   In orientation the (it was for a huge, national library) occupational health person said report all injuries, because you never know when something will have complications.    They actually said report all paper cuts (I would have been writing reports for that constantly).    Their example was an employee who got a paper cut, it got infected, and turned to gangrene.       You just never know I guess, and who knows what complications someone has.

I bet the local authorities are very familiar with the man, and his fool of a girlfriend who got caught with the stolen dirt bike.    I wonder if the police checked the other vehicles on the property for proper ownership papers?

[Brattinella]

Emmett Kelly Duck-lips is on JJ today!

[Byrd is the Word]

11 minutes ago, Brattinella said:

Emmett Kelly Duck-lips is on JJ today!

She makes me think of a poor man's Angelina Jolie or as others have suggested, Octomom.

[SandyToes]

Oh, my.  Ms. Martinez - yes, you are as dumb as you look.  Every person on the planet knows exactly why you showed up on this show with your boobs hanging out.  As for Mr. Diaz (?)  I am speechless.  Just when I think I've seen the worst contest-igant on this show, he appears.  @AngelaHunter , break out the good stuff.  Yowza.

[AngelaHunter]

24 minutes ago, SandyToes said:

@AngelaHunter , break out the good stuff. 

I haven't seen the buxom Ms. Martinez yet, but I did go to the booze store today, so we're well-stocked for any eventuality or "contest-igants"!.

[Florinaldo]

1 hour ago, SandyToes said:

Oh, my.  Ms. Martinez - yes, you are as dumb as you look.  Every person on the planet knows exactly why you showed up on this show with your boobs hanging out.

What a dumbass to trust that defendant to help "repair" her credit; it would have been interesting to learn exactly to what extent it did work or not.

And yes, she must have thought she was auditioning for something (but we all know JJ already has the part, without even having those parts).

[CrazyInAlabama]

What a lovely family, a man who has two kids with the SSMOT (Sainted Single Mother of Three), one her kid by another relationship, and they have an ugly altercation, probably fueled by lots of booze, involving her pepper spraying him, and then he wipes the pepper spray in her face.      SSMOT can't even look at JJ, and apparently stores every vital piece of paperwork in ex-boyfriend's car, after she slashed the Tahoe's tire.      The crying voice on SSMOT is such a put on.  Note to Miss Melyssa, water makes pepper spray worse, not better.   The funniest part is Melyssa (I love the spelling) SSMOT, looks a heck of a lot like plaintiff's Mom.     

Plaintiff certainly wishes he hadn't ever met his soon to be ex.    Maybe by the time you have three kids, you both should have grown up.    SSMOT claims to have one drink, and neither JJ or I believe it.    PLaintiff gets arrested for assault by police, and charges dropped.     No medical records of man's assault of woman, by putting pepper spray on her, that she sprayed on him, and everyone's case is dismissed.  

Deadbeat boyfriend reappears after seven years, and plaintiff is now married, but she starts up contact with ex, and wants bail bond fee repaid, and the hit on her credit repaired.    Years ago, man claims he got arrested for outstanding warrant, and fool plaintiff bailed him out, and he got pulled over again.    Plaintiff paid $2015 for his bail, and he never paid a penny on that.   He claims he was pulled over for Driving While Black, not because he had tickets for driving while suspended.     Bet JJ never paid bail for Jerry, or Byrd, did she?    

After they reconnected online, she gave him $2500, because he was going to get her credit cleaned up.  Stupid move!   Man's current girlfriend finds out about the contact, and the money exchange, goes ballistic and tells plaintiff's hubby, mom, and everyone else that the plaintiff and defendant are being naughty.    Defendant says he'll tell JJ the 'true story', and I was afraid her eyes were going to pop out at that statement.       Plaintiff needs to wear a lobster bib to cover up her assets, and I don't believe that she has no feelings for ex.       

Fool of a plaintiff gets the bail back, $2015, and that's all.

SSMOT (Sainted Single Mother of Two) is suing for her parents cremains, and money from tax return from her ex, because she wanted to use the kid as a deduction (apparently, if I understood it correctly, each person has one kid each).     Another plaintiff who thinks crying voice will move the court.      The defendant ex can't go to check their storage unit for her ash collection, because he's not up to date.     Who would put their parents cremains in a storage unit?     Plaintiff just dissed JJ, and I think Byrd is not amused, and cases are thrown out.  

Edited March 2, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[AngelaHunter]

3 hours ago, Florinaldo said:

What a dumbass to trust that defendant to help "repair" her credit; it would have been interesting to learn exactly to what extent it did work or not.

She is a stereotypical brainless bimbo who thinks showing her cleavage will get her somewhere and who appears here dressed like a hooker. He - her former paramour - is a disgusting sack of shit, over 40 years old, who seems to think it's cute - something to grin about -  that he can't remember how many times or for what he's been arrested. Getting arrested is just a normal part of life for him. It's like us not remembering how many times or for what we went to the grocery store in the last few years.  It's not his fault he keeps getting stopped anyway. All the cops have it in for him because they're racist, not because he drives with no license, gets all kinds of moving violations and doesn't pay. 10K bail for traffic tickets? The only place this loser seems to be successful is in scamming the dumbo/bimbo plaintiff. Her stupidity was so appalling just listening to her was hurting my head, and she doesn't deserve a dime back. I couldn't finish this, so don't know if she got anything. 

[SandyToes]

18 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:

I couldn't finish this, so don't know if she got anything. 

Tried to warn you, sweet cheeks.....

Hint:  Lemon Vodka (Grey Goose a nice choice) with mandarin oranges.  Helps heal everything!

[AngelaHunter]

6 minutes ago, SandyToes said:

Tried to warn you, sweet cheeks.....

You need to be a little more direct, especially after my 3rd glass of wine and....er... my second Grand Marnier. Hey, it's Friday! When are these dumb broads going to learn to tell the difference between "bad boy" and "loser for life"? Ajian "AJ" definitely falls into the second category. JFC. 

[Byrd is the Word]

9 hours ago, AngelaHunter said:

She is a stereotypical brainless bimbo who thinks showing her cleavage will get her somewhere and who appears here dressed like a hooker.

Heck, I thought she looked adorable. Mars and Venus, I suppose. 😉

[Florinaldo]

10 hours ago, AngelaHunter said:

She is a stereotypical brainless bimbo who thinks showing her cleavage will get her somewhere and who appears here dressed like a hooker.

Thing is, I am sure it works for her (and others) in many life situations, so she keeps doing it.

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, Byrd is the Word said:

Heck, I thought she looked adorable.

Oh, she's cute for sure, but the revealing, inappropriate skin-tight clothes, the stupidity and the endless repetitions of "like, basically" kills it. I'm sure men find her adorable, but I don't. If she were my daughter, I'd be depressed.

[SandyToes]

And I'm sure she had the girls on display for her fabulous, wonderful, charming Mr. Ex whatever-the-heck-he-was.  They kind of deserved each other.  

Ick. 

[Byrd is the Word]

1 hour ago, AngelaHunter said:

Oh, she's cute for sure, but the revealing, inappropriate skin-tight clothes, the stupidity and the endless repetitions of "like, basically" kills it. I'm sure men find her adorable, but I don't. If she were my daughter, I'd be depressed.

All kidding aside, if she were my married daughter I would be more ashamed of her duplicitous interactions with the defendant than I would be of her wardrobe and vocabulary.  

Edited March 2, 2019 by Byrd is the Word

[Florinaldo]

1 hour ago, AngelaHunter said:

I'm sure men find her adorable

Not all men. I can personally attest that gay men are immunised against these particular props, amd I know several straight ones who would not fall for such an obvious and blatant ploy.

20 minutes ago, Byrd is the Word said:

All kidding aside, if she were my married daughter I would be more ashamed her duplicitous interactions with the defendant than I would be of her wardrobe and vocabulary. 

And of her idiocy in giving him money time and again.

[CrazyInAlabama]

I have to wonder what bimbo's hubby thought when he viewed her skanky attire, and discovered that she not only bailed her loser ex out, but reconnected online, and then gave him $2500 more?     I bet the outcome of that was spectacular, and will be on Maury  any day now.     

Edited March 2, 2019 by CrazyInAlabama

[AngelaHunter]

1 hour ago, Byrd is the Word said:

if she were my married daughter I would be more ashamed of her duplicitous interactions with the defendant than I would be of her wardrobe and vocabulary.  

Her wardrobe, her dumbness, her vocabulary, her judgment, her choices, etc. It's the whole package of "NO". 

1 hour ago, Florinaldo said:

Not all men. I can personally attest that gay men are immunised against these particular props

I was referring to straight men, of course, but yeah I'm sure there are many who wouldn't want this lamebrain, but still might think she's cute.  As a friend of mine said once, about a certain celebrity: "I'd like to f---k him, but I wouldn't want to have dinner with him."

[Byrd is the Word]

22 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:

f---k

 I’m filling in the 3 blanks and can’t figure. “Flock”? “Flick”? “Frack””Frock”? Help. 🤪

[AngelaHunter]

31 minutes ago, Byrd is the Word said:

“Flock”? “Flick”? “Frack””Frock”? Help.

"Fork." 😊 Hey, I'm trying to be delicate. Not an easy task for me.

Edited March 2, 2019 by AngelaHunter

[SandyToes]

21 hours ago, AngelaHunter said:

Hey, I'm trying to be delicate. Not an easy task for me

Next time the mods update this site, they need to add one more button:  a million likes.  Heart emoji just ain't enough sometimes.

Love my AH!  We seriously need to plan a road trip.  But we couldn't tell anyone, 'cause God knows who'd be on the lookout for us!  Hee!

[Byrd is the Word]

17 minutes ago, SandyToes said:

Next time the mods update this site, they need to add one more button:  a million likes.  Heart emoji just ain't enough sometimes.

Love my AH!  We seriously need to plan a road trip.  But we couldn't tell anyone, 'cause God knows who'd be on the lookout for us!  Hee!

[AngelaHunter]

2 hours ago, SandyToes said:

Next time the mods update this site, they need to add one more button:  a million likes. 

Gee. That's the nicest thing anyone has said to me in... well, quite a while.🤗

Byrd is the Word: 🤣  My kind of road trip, minus the rocketing over a cliff.

On 3/2/2019 at 1:13 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

I have to wonder what bimbo's hubby thought when he viewed her skanky attire, and discovered that she not only bailed her loser ex out, but reconnected online, and then gave him $2500 more?

I notice he didn't show up here to cheerlead his little wifey-poo. Too bad. I'd like to have seen him. I'm picturing her dressing for her appearance here: "How do I look in this outfit, honeybuns?"

Hubby: "You basically look sooooo hot, cupcake. Just don't, like, give any more money to AJ on your way in, or, like, screw him on your way out, 'k?"