LennieBriscoe

Sure, David looked good in blue; who doesn’t?! I was hoping for different colors maybe in the red/purple/burgundy family.

Yes, I see your point about my post. I don't know what the heck I meant now! I think it was a "Get off my lawn!" moment! I know I watched "Oppenheimer" and knew Cillian would win the Oscar! Just goes to show how much opinions can differ on the same thing. I LOATHED Seth Rogen's puerile vulgarity and thought he and Melissa McCarthy's dress were the evening's low-lights!

I didn't say those other movies had no Intermission. I can't think of any "much more common nowadays" "3 hr+ films" without. Do you have an example?

"The Brutalist" has an Intermission. People used to have no problem in sitting through a long movie: "Cleopatra"; "Lawrence of Arabia"; "Dr. Zhivago"; "Gandhi." All over 3 hours.

Likewise, plus "A Complete Unknown." "The Brutalist" is playing 1 1/2 hours from me!

HAPPY NEW YEAR! https://www.chattr.com.au/mafs-2025/ JANUARY 27!

Needed more Melissa McCarthy! Otherwise, an excellent show! P.S. Gallows Humor. Not just for breakfast anymore.

Juan has dead eyes with Karla.

The same with Madison regarding Allen's looks! And if I might digress: That was the issue with several husbands about their wives on the latest MAFS: UK. These applicants might all talk a good game about "personality" or "character" or "loves their mother," but honesty is proverbially the best policy, and the "experts" need to get real.

Many things and situations were different for women last century. Not able to independently own a bank account, a credit card, and so on. But David is not a woman. Nor is he right out of college. And it's 2024. I think he sees his MAFS marriage as a second income, the faster to "buy a house whenever he wants."

Yes, 'tis true that MAFS is not how relationships usually develop in real life. Nobody is in the dark about this. Thus, the applicants obviously want one or more eventualities: lasting love after the ceremony; an improved financial situation; fame; a career in the Reality TV Universe; just an over-all betterment of their life. The faint-hearted, the logical, and the lucky need not apply.

Like the Spanish Inquisition, nobody expects to get a Mom's-basement-dweller, never mind an unkempt one who smirks that his bed is "the couch." Wink, wink, nudge, nudge. His living situation is why he is single. Michelle's request to have a husband on her literal level (above-ground, haha) is reasonable, normal, and fair. If the judges thought she was disingenuous and actually avaricious, they didn't have to make themselves look stupid by assigning her David as a "gotcha." (Calling that "trolling" is acknowledging he was a very bad option.) I'd have noped right outta the show. Let me know when he's "saved" enough.

Camille wants Urban 🌆; Tom is Suburban 🏡. Clubbing 🎶 vs. Grilling 🍔. Swag 🕶 vs. Stability 👔. Homie 🤴 vs. Homebody 👨‍🍼. I think she might want her vision of "exciting." They too often forget what led them to this show.....

Juan is STILL saying he's so busy he forgets about Karla! WTH, JUAN?! Does he not even see the cameras?! Some people don't look good in togas.

No thread for new episode?