Trini June 28, 2016 Share June 28, 2016 From the NBC upfronts earlier this year: 'Powerless Cast Reveals DC Characters in Pilot': Link to comment
MarkHB June 28, 2016 Share June 28, 2016 IGN has an extensive look at all 21 shows Warner Bros. TV is bringing to San Diego Comic-Con, and it has this to say about Powerless: Quote 2:30–3:00 p.m. Powerless Pilot Screening and Q&A — It’s a Super Hero’s world. We just live in it. Join cast members Vanessa Hudgens (High School Musical), Danny Pudi (Community), Alan Tudyk (Suburgatory) along with executive producer Ben Queen (A to Z) and executive producer/director Michael Patrick Jann (Reno 911) for a screening of the pilot episode and Q&A covering the first comedy series set in the DC universe. Powerless is the story of Emily (Hudgens), a young insurance adjuster specializing in regular-people coverage against damage caused when Super Heroes and Super Villains treat the city like their own personal battleground. Taking care of insurance needs one by one, Emily and her team of co-workers might not have any superpowers but they are out to make a difference in people’s lives and prove that you don’t need to have powers to be powerful! From Warner Bros. Television and based on characters from DC, Powerless premieres midseason on NBC. Become a fan of Powerless on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/NBCPowerless, and follow the show on Twitter at @NBCPowerless. 1 Link to comment
MarkHB July 21, 2016 Share July 21, 2016 There's a new poster for the show, including Ron Funches.... and drawn by Neil Adams! 2 Link to comment
MarkHB July 21, 2016 Share July 21, 2016 First pilot review I've seen, from Gizmodo. They give it a resounding "meh". The pilot was screened last night at Comic-Con so I'd anticipate seeing some coverage today; there's a full panel later in the week. Link to comment
Trini August 17, 2016 Share August 17, 2016 (edited) ‘Powerless’ Creator Ben Queen Departs NBC’s Midseason DC Comedy Series : Quote There has been a change at the helm of the new DC Comics-themed NBC comedy series Powerless. The show’s creator/executive producer and showrunner Ben Queen is exiting. Start of production on the midseason series, which had been slated to begin in two weeks, is being postponed as a search is underway for a new showrunner. The delay will not impact the launch of Powerless as NBC has yet to set its midseason scheduling plans. Queen’s departure was a mutual decision among the writer-producer, NBC and Powerless producer Warner Bros. TV stemming from creative differences. http://deadline.com/2016/08/powerless-creator-ben-queen-exits-nbc-midseason-dc-comedy-series-1201804342/ Edited August 17, 2016 by Trini Link to comment
Kromm August 17, 2016 Share August 17, 2016 7 minutes ago, Trini said: ‘Powerless’ Creator Ben Queen Departs NBC’s Midseason DC Comedy Series Uh oh. 1 Link to comment
Trini August 17, 2016 Share August 17, 2016 (edited) Sorry! Fixed my post above. Edited August 17, 2016 by Trini 1 Link to comment
MarkHB September 9, 2016 Share September 9, 2016 Powerless gets its own shot at DC All Access.... Link to comment
MarkHB November 20, 2016 Share November 20, 2016 Preview story on Powerless in the latest issue of SFX. Not sure how valuable it is seeing as it's quoting Ben Queen. Link to comment
Trini December 9, 2016 Share December 9, 2016 Premiere date February 2. New info in NBC's mid-season press release: Quote ... "Powerless," based on characters from DC Comics, begins Thursday, Feb. 2 at 8:30 p.m. following "Superstore," one of the most critically applauded comedies on all of television and a solid rating performer that has helped NBC establish a promising comedy beachhead this fall on Thursday nights. ... "POWERLESS" - Thursday, Feb. 2 at 8:30 p.m. In a world where humanity must cope with the collateral damage of Super Heroes and Super-Villains, Emily Locke (Vanessa Hudgens) begins her first day as Director of Research & Development for Wayne Security, a subsidiary of Wayne Enterprises that specializes in products that make defenseless bystanders feel a little safer. Full of confidence and big ideas, Emily quickly learns that her expectations far exceed those of her new boss (Alan Tudyk) and officemates, so it will be up to her to lead the team toward their full potential and the realization that you don't need superpowers to be a hero. Danny Pudi, Christina Kirk and Ron Funches also star. Justin Halpern, Patrick Schumacker, Len Goldstein, Marc Buckland and Dean Lorey are executive producers of "Powerless." The series is produced by Warner Bros. Television and is based on the characters from DC. We knew this was set in (one corner of) the DC universe, but now there's a direct tie to Batman/Wayne Enterprises. 1 Link to comment
Kromm December 9, 2016 Share December 9, 2016 (edited) Wait a second. Other than the same actors being involved, and it still being an office comedy, this sounds like a totally different show. It seemed key that they were an insurance company before, and I think this seriously loses some teeth if they aren't. Edited December 9, 2016 by Kromm Link to comment
The Crazed Spruce December 9, 2016 Share December 9, 2016 Probably trying to distance itself from the Damage Control series that Marvel's supposedly got in the pipeline. (Sure, that's about a firm that rebuilds after superhero fights rather than insurance, but it's in the same wheelhouse.) Link to comment
Trini December 13, 2016 Share December 13, 2016 It's so weird that every other show that doesn't have Batman in it can't even mention him, but this is the show that they decide to connect to Wayne Enterprises. I imagine that the Pilot screened earlier this year is mostly irrelevant now. 1 Link to comment
MarkHB December 13, 2016 Share December 13, 2016 On 12/9/2016 at 5:57 PM, The Crazed Spruce said: Probably trying to distance itself from the Damage Control series that Marvel's supposedly got in the pipeline. (Sure, that's about a firm that rebuilds after superhero fights rather than insurance, but it's in the same wheelhouse.) Either that, or the showrunner they fired thought that the insurance angle had far more laughs than it turned out to have once they started writing. Link to comment
MarkHB January 10, 2017 Share January 10, 2017 I saw my first commercial for this, during Celebrity Apprentice tonight: Link to comment
MarkHB January 14, 2017 Share January 14, 2017 New promo... and Alan Tudyk's character has a new name... Link to comment
Kromm January 14, 2017 Share January 14, 2017 Why name the company Wayne and then NOT have Bruce Wayne running it? Not that I expected to see him on the show, but I don't recall Bruce having an idiot relative running stuff in his stead. Link to comment
MarkHB January 14, 2017 Share January 14, 2017 Wayne Enterprises is huge; this is just one tiny little corner of it (and apparently they are not blessed with Lucius Fox running their R&D). Plus, usually Bruce is supposed to be a dilettante playboy who, nonetheless, owns the place, so having him run the company wouldn't quite work if that's the characterization of him they're going for. This way they can leverage the Batman connection in the marketing but leave it at that (and keep Alan Tudyk as the asshole boss character). 1 Link to comment
Kromm January 14, 2017 Share January 14, 2017 6 hours ago, MarkHB said: Wayne Enterprises is huge; this is just one tiny little corner of it (and apparently they are not blessed with Lucius Fox running their R&D). Plus, usually Bruce is supposed to be a dilettante playboy who, nonetheless, owns the place, so having him run the company wouldn't quite work if that's the characterization of him they're going for. This way they can leverage the Batman connection in the marketing but leave it at that (and keep Alan Tudyk as the asshole boss character). I wasn't suggesting Wayne Enterprises isn't big, or that Bruce should actually be running all of it. Just that it's kind of pathetic seeming to invent some previous unknown asshole cousin, rather than just making Tudyk a generic asshole boss. 1 Link to comment
Trini January 19, 2017 Share January 19, 2017 Write-ups and quotes from the TCA panel : Deadline, Quote “Usually very, very protective of their characters, and for good reason,” Halpern acknowledged. “A lot of people have invested a lot in these characters. We ask for as much as we can get.”Among the challenges is the quantity of red tape created by the “[Greg] Berlanti-verse” on “another network” (the CW). He predicted optimistically that the show would be afforded more freedom over time but acknowledged, “The lesson I’ve learned it to ask for everything – or, just go with it and get a laugh at the table read and then they’re stuck.” TV Line, Quote Powerless is set in its own universe, Earth-P, and doesn’t treat the DC films “as things that’ve happened within this world,” Halpern noted. Explained Schumacker: “Batman v Superman and Man of Steel are the cinematic universe. The Berlanti-verse is its own thing. And Earth-P is its own thing. And they all exist within the multiverse of DC,” but separately. However, that won’t stop the show from having a laugh at the expense of its super serious cinematic counterparts. “We have a joke in the pilot where we poke fun at the Batman v Superman film,” Halpern shared. “It’s always going up to [the DC Comics brass] and being like, ‘Hey, can we s—t on this?’ and usually they have a good sense of humor about it.” EW, Quote The original concept of the series found Hudgens’ character working as a spunky young insurance adjuster specializing in regular-people coverage against damage caused by the crime-fighting superheroes. But the series changed gears about 15 weeks in, as Schumacker says that angle was not generating the workplace storylines they wanted to be telling. After brainstorming with DC, “We landed on security products,” he said, “because we still wanted to do the idea that they’re working on stuff that will make you or me a little bit safer” while there are demigods running around, causing destruction. IGN Quote When they use those DC elements and characters, Halpern said, “We try not to ever play it for a joke in and of itself,” saying they decide, “If we do it, why are we doing it and how does it affect our characters in a mundane sort of way?” While Bruce Wayne, Batman and the Joker all get some heavy name drops in the Powerless pilot, the producers promised the series itself will pull from across DC Comics. Bruce Wayne is really only important to Van, as a character, “as sort of a dangling carrot” for the career ascension he wants to achieve. 1 Link to comment
MarkHB January 19, 2017 Share January 19, 2017 We've had a couple of ads, but here's the real Official Trailer with some jokes we haven't seen yet: 1 Link to comment
MarkHB January 31, 2017 Share January 31, 2017 Another new promo... with a special guest narrator... And here's a longer Sneak Peek 1 Link to comment
The Crazed Spruce February 1, 2017 Share February 1, 2017 And, in case you wanted to know about Van Wayne's one and only appearance in the comics.... 2 Link to comment
Trini February 7, 2017 Share February 7, 2017 'The 10 Biggest Changes Powerless Made From Its Original Pilot' Link to comment
SVNBob February 7, 2017 Share February 7, 2017 Interview with showrunner Patrick Schumaker and writer Sabrina Jalees. Caution: article contains some plot spoilers for future episodes, in particular for the episode written by Jalees. 1 Link to comment
Trini February 10, 2017 Share February 10, 2017 Interview with EP Patrick Schumacker: Quote At TCA, you also talked about the fact that there’s a lot of red tape involved, if you want to depict characters that already exist in the film franchises or in the Berlanti-verse shows on The CW. When do you decide that it’s worth going through all of that red tape to fight for something you really want on the show, and when do you decide to work around it and get creative about representing whatever you want to do, in a different way? SCHUMACKER: I think we should amend the red tape of it all. I think some of the comments at TCA came off like there is a combative relationship with DC that is absolutely not true. There are politics involved because we don’t want to step on the toes of other shows and their domain, but DC is one phone call away, every time we pitch them an idea. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn’t, creatively, for them. They are rightfully protective of their characters and the light in which we are showing their characters. We might have an instinct, as comedy writers, to make fun of Superman in a way that is not something that DC wants to express, as far as how they want to portray Superman. By all means, we want to work with them to show their characters in the best light possible. That’s the best way I can put it. They’re always open. I had a conversation with Dan Evans from DC about getting a member of the Legion of Superheroes in our show. It’s about finding what works for our show, creatively, but also if they have something in the works with another show that deals with someone from the Legion and how far along they are in developing that. It’s about wanting to respect the world of the other shows and allow them to exist on their own. If Supergirl is ahead in the game of bringing in a member of the Legion of Superheroes, then we don’t want to step on their toes. It’s that kind of thing. We just want to be respectful and keep the communication open with them. But we have been given a lot of latitude by them to incorporate things. We can reference whoever we want. The Justice League exists in our world. You’re not going to see Ben Affleck walking through our office, but that’s not to say that, in success, we can’t have Jason Momoa show up, playing the Sparkletts guy. You can do those meta things. We just don’t want to say that this exists in the Arrow-verse or the Snyder-verse, or whatever you want to call it. Link to comment
MarkHB March 24, 2017 Share March 24, 2017 They apparently announced the pre-emption of the 3/23 episode last week. I'm not sure if there was a problem in production, if they REALLY want to push "Trial & Error," or if something's giving them cold feet about that particular ep, but the 3/30 episode is apparently the one that was always scheduled for that date, not the one from this week. Link to comment
paulvdb March 24, 2017 Share March 24, 2017 (edited) The announcement you linked was for the pre-emption of last week's episode. The pre-emption for this week's episode was announced on Wednesday. Looking at the schedule it seems that they have been moving episodes around a lot. Not just the pre-emptions but also changes in the episode order. Edited March 24, 2017 by paulvdb 1 Link to comment
The Crazed Spruce March 24, 2017 Share March 24, 2017 That doesn't exactly bode well for the network's faith in the show.... 1 Link to comment
The Crazed Spruce April 4, 2017 Share April 4, 2017 The Cancel Bear's setting a place at the table.... Link to comment
MarkHB April 5, 2017 Share April 5, 2017 Yeah, TV Grim Reaper (the original Cancel Bear) has odds of renewal about on a par with a "Struck by Lightning" revival. Link to comment
The Crazed Spruce April 5, 2017 Share April 5, 2017 Preempting the show at the last minute two weeks in a row to air a rerun of a show that aired just two days beforehand prrrrrrrobably wasn't a good sign.... 3 Link to comment
paulvdb April 6, 2017 Share April 6, 2017 It certainly wasn't a show of confidence in the show. And pre-empting it also didn't help the show keep viewers. Ratings dropped significantly when we finally got a new episode again. And it's not like the ratings were that great to begin with. 1 Link to comment
MarkHB April 6, 2017 Share April 6, 2017 I think that when they retooled, and as part of that cut back on the number of gags that relied on high comics knowledge ( whether Wonder Woman destroying something was an act of God, since she's a demi-god, etc.), they pretty much lost their niche. I still think it's funny, but it's too mundane to attract hardcore nerds and it's not distinctive enough to draw the GA. Link to comment
legaleagle53 April 10, 2017 Share April 10, 2017 We don't get to see Emily's new office as part of the tour? :( 1 Link to comment
Roaster April 25, 2017 Share April 25, 2017 And that's it for Powerless. NBC's schedule no longer includes it. http://www.spoilertv.com/2017/04/powerless-pulled-from-schedule-by-nbc.html?m=1 I hope they let us see the remaining episodes they made. 2 Link to comment
The Crazed Spruce April 25, 2017 Share April 25, 2017 *sigh* Wish I could say I didn't see this coming.... Too bad. I kinda liked the show. The characters were good, most of the jokes were amusing, and all in all, it was fairly entertaining. And I loved all the snarky comic book references. 6 Link to comment
Trini April 25, 2017 Share April 25, 2017 Danggit! I really wanted to see "No Consequence Day". 2 Link to comment
The Crazed Spruce April 25, 2017 Share April 25, 2017 2 hours ago, Trini said: Danggit! I really wanted to see "No Consequence Day". I was looking forward to it, too. Hey, maybe they'll burn off the leftover episodes this summer.... 3 Link to comment
Trini April 25, 2017 Share April 25, 2017 (edited) It's only 3 more episodes, right? Can't they just burn them off on a Saturday night? Edited April 26, 2017 by Trini 3 Link to comment
vibeology April 26, 2017 Share April 26, 2017 This sounds really negative but if the writer's strike happens, I bet the last few episodes will air. NBC is only going to have so much in the can and if they need to pad out a schedule, I can see them airing this. At the same time, if a writer's strike happens it certainly a guarantee that those last three episodes will be it for the show (and probably several other bubble shows that might have survived otherwise.) 1 Link to comment
Delphi April 26, 2017 Share April 26, 2017 Ugh that's a bummer, I knew it wasn't getting renewed but I had hope that they'd air the episodes already ordered. 2 Link to comment
thuganomics85 April 27, 2017 Share April 27, 2017 Just heard the news. Can't say I'm surprised, but still a little bummed. It wasn't a perfect show, but I felt like the past few episodes were pretty solid, and the show was starting to find itself. It felt like they were tightening a few things and a lot of the stuff I wasn't a fan of (mainly the way everyone was piling on Emily), was being toned down. Alas, it was too late. It feel like comedies really have it hard. If they don't hit the ground running, they are doomed. And being set in a comic book universe makes it even harder, I suspect. Hopefully, the cast will find other gigs soon (especially Alan Tudyk.) And after "Emergency Punch-Up", I really hope Vanessa Hudgens branches out and actually tries for more villainous roles, because she could actually be pretty good at that. 4 Link to comment
Recommended Posts