Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

NFL Thread


Recommended Posts

So now there's serious talk that the Vikings may end up with Rodgers. I'm sure he'd rather go there over the Giants or Steelers, but if the Vikings sign him they are even bigger idiots than the Giants and Steelers. The latter two teams do not have their franchise QB already on the roster and they are not in contention for a Super Bowl next season (with or without Rodgers), so while it would still be dumb to bring him on, at least it wouldn't interfere with their franchise QB's development or muck up team chemistry during a potential Super Bowl run.

(edited)
3 hours ago, Carey said:

Couldn't agree more.  If there's a need for someone in the even that McCarthy isn't the guy, I get it.  But then you franchise Darnold if that's the case, period

I heard they offered Darnold just a tad less than Seattle.  Considering JJ McCarthy may come back & start this season (tho I think he's not a good NFL caliber QB, the Viking did pick him in the first round), and less money offered, it's not surprising Ssm went to Seattle.  So yeah, all this Rogers BS could've been avoided if they'd have franchised the latter.

Edited by roamyn
21 hours ago, roamyn said:

And just like Dallas they have little to no Defense.

And unlike Dallas they have a great offensive core that will put them in contention.

And unlike Dallas they have a great defensive player that is closer to a return to complete the so-called trifecta.  Not zero or 100% but it's more than what Dallas has had defensively & will have going forward

After thinking about the above for several seconds, coupled with how the Steelers have made it known that they're moving on from Russell Wilson, I'm in the just sign Russ back already.

Forget Aaron Rodgers and move on.  Yes, A-Rod is better but technically speaking, Russ is younger, and while he can't move, neither can Rodgers today.  He still has a deep ball so there's that.

One of the reasons why they lost every one of their games down the stretch is because the teams that were on their schedule hardly ever lose.  The winning percentage of Baltimore, Kansas City, & Philadelphia was outstanding.

It is a possibility that the league backloads the Steelers schedule again, and this time, in addition to still starting Week One on the road, they'll finish the last two weeks on the road.  Games against the Lions Tigers and Bears are going to be brutal, but at least they don't have the Eagles or KC this year.  Although they host Buffalo & Minnesota, both of those spell loss today.

In the event that things are even out for Pittsburgh, they can probably manage better.  Still 9 or 10 wins as the ceiling and either missing the playoffs or losing yet another wildcard game they trail by 21 plus.  The fact is, just sign Russ.  Who cares if you "parted ways" with him.  Other than Minnesota or New York, not much of a market, and people often reconcile anyway

  • Like 1

The NFL is considering tweaks to the new kick-off format.

Interesting info from the linked article: The league made the changes last season because the season before that had the lowest rate of kickoff returns in league history, including zero in the Super Bowl. The new kickoff resulted in the second lowest return rate, but did result in more longer returns since 2016 and the most TDs since 2021. So things are going in the right direction with the new format, it just needs a bit of fine-tuning.

There really wasn't much left in free agent QBs. The Giants will draft a QB this year and are just picking up a couple of the remaining bodies to be bridge QBs/fill out the QB room. Winston is getting backup money to be a Giant for two seasons while Wilson only has $10.5 million guaranteed to play one season, potentially doubled in incentives if he turns out to have a really surprising amount left in the tank, which is unlikely. The plan seems clear: Draft a QB, let him sit and learn from Wilson for a season while competing with Winston to be the first backup, and then the following season he takes over as primary QB while Winston is first backup and Wilson has either retired or signed with yet another team.

The Titans will probably take Cam Ward, so I'm wondering if the Giants' seeming plan to take a QB who they will have mostly sit the first year means they're going to take Jaxson Dart.  I can't imagine drafting Shedeur Sanders with the idea of sitting him for a year, because his father would create too much drama in the media.

Playoff bound with Mayfield still under center...on a regular basis?  Eh..I don't think so.  Maybe semi-regularly; Baker has been very good since his exit.  However, he's playing with several hall of fame players, which does aid him.  It would aid anybody, if they're capable of playing the position at a high level.

Sanders might work, he might not.  I don't think I'd bet on Pickett being a better answer than Sanders.  It does help that the coaching will be good enough, but it does not help that Haslam will find a way to wreck things when it's unnecessary to do so.

The good news is that Cleveland has realized the importance of offense in the NFL & made moves to get it right.  While not the best or correct decisions, at least there's legitimate focus on that side of the ball

Something that occurred to me to look into. Tom Brady went to the Super Bowl 10 times, facing nine different QBs. Looking at those opposing QB's by career passer rating, we get this:

  1. Mahomes 102.1 (Scored 9 pts vs. Brady's team in Super Bowl)
  2. Russell Wilson 99.8 (24)
  3. Goff 95.7(!) (3)
  4. Warner 93.7 (17)
  5. Matt Ryan 93.6 (28)
  6. Foles 86.2 (41)
  7. McNabb 85.6 (21)
  8. Eli Manning 84.1 (14, 21)
  9. Delhomme 81.3 (29)

It's interesting that the two QBs who beat Brady's teams were two of the objectively worst QBs that he played against, and that the higher rated QBs and offenses were ones that the Pats and Bucs most completely shut down.

Aside from the Bucs/Chiefs blowout and the 13-3 Pats/Rams game, every other game was a one score affair. Most of them could easily have gone the other way if not for some truly iconic mind-boggling plays (Helmet catch, Butler INT, Edelman deflection catch, Mario Manningham sideline catch/Welker drop). Truthfully only the McNabb Pats/Eagles game seemed relatively weighted in the Pats' favor throughout.

Brady won the Super Bowl in which he passed for the fewest yards (145 vs. the 2002 Rams) and scored the fewest points (13-3, Rams), and lost the game where he passed for the most yards (505 vs. the Foles Eagles)

Eh, I think that second Rams game could've gone the other way too.  Well, if valid luck came for Los Angeles.  While the outcome ended with a 2-score margin, that was pretty close throughout most of the game.  No one had decent offensive success throughout the game.

Nevertheless, great stuff.  Rather coincidental but one QB doesn't really beat the other; they only outduel one another.  One thing that's more baffling (or tremendous) is he losses in the AFC Title game opposite the same guy aren't even his worst performances in the conference game, despite being on the road unlike the one home loss.

SB 53 is IMHO a decent 2nd in terms of the Big Game (behind 25).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...