UsernameFatigue

I know! You posted it while I was typing my post, so saw it was soon as I posted mine. Too funny!! Regarding LVPs Vegas bar tanking, the reviews are pretty funny. Obviously many posting are fans, because they post about the sub par food, sub par and expensive drinks, long waits when the bar is half empty, rude staff, but still give her a 4 out of 5. It appears that either LVP is having a hard time getting staff so the bar is often half empty (even though it has limited hours), or she is trying to give the illusion of being busy by trying to create a line to look like it is busy inside, when in fact it isn't. Many commented on being in a line waiting for quite awhile while they could see that there were many empty tables. One reviewer posted that she had food/drink dumped on her twice by the same waiter. I can't remember all the details off hand but do remember than she said though her clothes were stained, (and I think glass was broken) no one came over to make sure she was OK, offer to dry clean her clothes (which one would think would be the first thing a manager would do), etc. Nothing. It appears that LVP should be spending more time training staff and less time on social media obsessing about RHoBH.

When Camille was crying in Rinna's arms, I couldn't help think that she resembles Janice the Muppet. At the time that the lie detector story came out, several posters (myself included) posted info on this guy. LVP pretty much said he worked for the police department (LOLOL) when in fact he is not accredited at all and actually lost his PI license years ago. He is a charlatan, which was pretty obvious by the way he conducted the test. I don't follow any of the women on social media, so did not know about the Goodbye Kyle challenge. Hilaroius!! I especially loved Harry Hamelin's. Too funny. OMG, I was just typing out a post that I thought Camille resembles Janice the Muppet when you posted this, KFB. Hilarious!!

That petition is hilarious. I think someone should start a GoFundMe page to get this woman a life - lol.

Ya, the comment that taking the lie detector in front of the camera crew was scary was hilarious. This from the person who was a full time acting student from the age of nine. Maybe that is why LVP was a failed actress. Lol. They showed a scene that reminded me of one of the many reasons I am not an LVP fan. In the scene where she was horsing around and aiming the dryer at Kyle while the dog was being groomed, the dog was obviously upset as it did not know that Kyle was screeching in "fun". Did LVP notice or care that the dog was obviously stressed? Nope. Either didn't notice, or didn't care. F**k off, LVP. LVP is acting just like Carole Radziwill did when she (supposedly) left RHoNY of her own accord. For someone who keeps saying she doesn't care, LVP is acting just the opposite. I am sooo looking foward to an LVP free RHoBH next year, just as I did the Carole free RHoNY this year. Can't wait.

Oh, Lu definitely knows it. She said specifically in the previous reunion show that she had to blow at 3 pm, so she had two mimosas at 10 am because she thought there would be enough time in between for the alcohol not to show up when she blew at 3 pm. She also said that was at lunch, and I thought 10 am was rather early to have lunch (sounds more like brunch) so she must have really wanted those mimosas. Also she would have had to have finished them by 10 am to give her the 5 hours until she was to blow at 3 pm. Also, didn't Lu say that she blows 3 times a day? So if she was normally blowing at 3 pm, why would she blow again just 4 hours later? She told Andy that she had to blow at 7 pm. Wouldn't the times be spaced apart? Say 7 am, (for those who like to drink into the early morning hours), 3 pm and 11 pm? Just wondering. Lu's statement that she was dealt a really tough hand was hysterically funny. She breaks into someone else's room to have sex, kicks and cop and threatens to kill him. She blames her behaviour on being upset because she was in Palm Beach (apparently against her will?) where a year before she had married Tom. I am surprised that she didn't claim to have PTSD - Post Tom Stress Disorder. And of course, she married Tom against everyone's advice, not to mention in the face of his ongoing infidelities. But yep, Lu was dealt a tough hand. Lu's biggest problem with being dealt a tough hand is that Lu is also the dealer.

I believe Teddi over LVP and the Johns. I do think LVP tried to use Teddi to get back at Dorit. We have seen LVP use people before, it is hardly new. As others have said, it is her MO. And the Johns are her employees. Sessa is one of the thirstiest and slimiest people I have seen on this show, and that includes Erika's Mikey. LVP has certainly been shown to be a liar before. Again hardly new. So you can draw your conclusions just as I can draw mine. As far as Carole R goes, she admitted to using Tinsley for a story line. Even introduced a friend to Tins, who ended up falling for her. Apparently Carole would do anything to keep her apple, but it backfired on her. Once Carole had no use for Tinsley she coldly said that they were never friends. Talk about doing something that she knew was not true - that was on Carole.

There are various ways of rescuing animals. For example, taking in a stray cat and keeping it (not that this is what you are referring to, but as an example) is very different than adopting from a rescue organization. Our rescue, as well as all the ones we work with, has an extensive questionnaire to be filled out by the prospective owner. It includes ages of any children, as well as current pets, their ages, and even former pets. Many real animal lovers (which it sounds like you are) already have pets when their children join the family, so the kids are brought up from day one with pets. Adding another is not as problematic as adding say, a little dog, into a family that has a 4 and 2 year old that have never had pets before. In many cases (and it appears to be the case here as I think it was Jagger that wanted a dog?) the parents really have no interest in animals, but are getting one to make a kid happy. They have no idea of the time, patience, and responsibility it entails. Which is my beef with LVP. This wasn't even a family in off of the streets wanting to adopt - this was a couple she has known for ages. She knows they had (and I think still did at that time) multiple nannies for their children, and only seemed to spend time with them for the 'fun' stuff. They are vain, superficial, irresponsible and totally unsuited to bring a little dog into their lives. The bottom line is a rescue organization's first (and really only) responsibility is to make the best match for the animals in their care, to ensure that it is not further traumatized by being adopted into a home and then returned or rehomed. It still can happen with all the safe guards in place, but IMO LVP failed two of her dogs with regards to putting their welfare above all else. Once was bad enough, twice was unforgivable.

But LVP said she was just fine with what Dorit did. In front of VP Dogs, to a TMZ cameraman, Lisa said "She did not give it to a shelter. I'm going to set the record straight with that, that's not true at all. She gave it to somebody who really wanted the dog, who assured her it was going to a loving home and that's what Dorit thought. She would not drop it off at a shelter. Dorit did nothing wrong - it didn't happen the way its been reported and I won't have that said about my friend". What LVP should have said, if she was really protecting Lucy (and the integrity of VP Dogs) was that Dorit was in error and should have returned the dog to VP Dogs. But she didn't. She threw Lucy under the bus by saying publicly that what Dorit did was OK, sullied the reputation of her organization, and then used the Johns, and tried to use Teddi to get back at Dorit.

LVP should have known more than anyone that Dorit and PK were not suitable owners for a small puppy. They could not even take care of their own children when they were small without multiple nannies. LVP adopted out not one but two dogs to them. I am with an animal rescue charity and we are very strict as to who we adopt our rescued animals to. Dorit and PK would never be considered, with two still small children.

LVP lies as much as Dorit does. But LVP supposedly was just fine with Dorit, and did not pursue anything. She said specifically on air that she didn't want to talk about it. Because SHE dropped the ball. Then she used whoever she could to get back at Dorit rather than confront her herself. I have no idea why she did not have Lucy's back, but she definitely did not.

I didn't read anywhere that it was a "new" VP of Operations. And if you sign for someone else, you must write p.p. beside the name so it is known that it is not actually that person who has signed. It doesn't seem like she was told this, or why would she be reprimanded? And if it was all hunky dory, how can Sessa now use the cheque incident as a reason for letting her go? He never said anything in the letter about her medical leave, which was hardly a leave in any case since she was only gone a few days and he is the one who told her to take the time off. All in all Sessa appears to be in over his head as ED, which doesn't surprise me. From what I have seen of him he is shady AF. Edited to add - I don't know what California laws are like, but where I live there is a Human Rights Tribunal that you can access if you have been fired without procedures being followed, especially where medical concerns are involved. If that were to happen where I live it would most likely cost the organization a nice chunk of change.

According to legal documents, she as Operations Manager was told to sign John Sessa's name to all cheques. She was then reprimanded by the VP of Operations for doing so. So apparently the VP of Operations didn't think it was all fine and dandy. The matter was resolved she thought and she did not continue to sign cheques. A week later she left work an hour early due to anxiety, and ended up hospitalized on a 5150 hold. Sessa told her to take a few days off with pay to relax. When she went back to work, Sessa told her that the the cheque situation and the 5150 hold were "a perfect storm" and not the best time for her to be acting as manager. The next day she was sent a termination notice which specifically stated the cheque incident. The woman thinks she was fired due to her "perceived mental disability" from the 5150 hold and the cheque situation was used as an excuse. She is suing for discrimination and wrongful termination.

Well, that was interesting. I am glad that it was brought up that LVP did not bother to ask Dorit who she gave Lucy to, or ask for a phone number and address to follow up on where Lucy was. As I have said all along, LVP was the original puppy dumper. The reason she did not fire John Blizzard (or have Sessa do it since he is the ED of VP Dogs) is because Blizzard was doing exactly what LVP asked him to do, including the scene where he fell on the sword for LVP and said he put words in her mouth. As if. Lol. It appears though that VP Dogs should be looked at a little more closely, given the now latest time Lisa or an organization that bears her name has been sued. An employee being told to forge cheques, and then being fired for doing what they were told? Shady, shady, shady. Maybe things are more lax in the states, but as someone who is on the board of directors of an animal charity, we have strict laws and regulations that must be followed to the letter. Forgery would definitely be a no-no. But then, none of us on the board would have to be told that. It is kind of common sense - unless you are either an idiot or underhanded, or both.

According to LVPs wiki page, she was full time drama student by the age of 9. She didn't have a role in anything until the age of 13, which was an uncredited role. From then, over the next 6 years including the age of 19 she appeared in a total of 8 episodes of various shows. So barely one a year. And was in a movie where she is listed about half way down in the cast credits, so hardly a big role. I would imagine the page is accurate, as a narcissist like LVP would make sure every appearance was listed. So if LVP bought an apartment at age 19 with such a sparse amount of acting credits since being a full time drama student 10 years previously, it was likely with her parents help. It does explain though why she had such a hate on for Eileen Davidson, and to a lesser extent Rinna since they are actually successful in their chosen field.

The most interesting thing about this whole episode for me was when Andy assumed that Luann had the two mimosas after a cabaret show, and Lu was quick to correct him that the show had nothing to do with her temptation to drink but rather she drank them at 10 am. She said it was at lunch (maybe she meant brunch) but regardless she felt that having two mimosas at 10 am was not a problem. Mostly because she thought she would not be found out. As others have said it makes me wonder how many other times she drank gave herself enough time not to be caught? (Assuming that you can drink a certain amount and not have it show up if you have, say, a 7 hour window in between?). Ramona really looked rough. For someone who is trying to promote an "ageless" skincare line, she really needs someone who can give her that dewy look. She may be the oldest of the group, but on the reunion looked much much older.

Interesting. So I guess introducing her friend Scott to Tinsley was also producer driven? Appears Carole was willing to use anyone and everyone to keep her apple. So either Carole is lying, and finding a way to blame someone else for why she acted so abhorrently to Tinsley or Carole really is that shallow and had no problem using someone for a storyline. Now why she gaslit Bethenny makes perfect sense. Too bad it backfired. Sorry, not sorry. Carole has to continue to exploit her dead husband, his dead cousin and dead cousin's wife because she has nothing else. I watched the special on the JFK Jr wedding tapes and was surprised that Carole had not wormed her way onto that show. In fact she wasn't even see in the footage of the tapes, though Anthony was. That must have burned.

What I didn't understand was, where was Charlie's mother through both his first trial and his second? He had his friends there supporting him, but where was she? I don't understand why she wasn't charged with anything. It seems obvious to me that Charlie did what he did (assuming he is even the one who shot his father) because his mother called him at school and asked him to come home. It seems to me that he was protecting her, and that she was using him.

I agree with everything you have said, Though what LVP has brought with her is her narcissistic personality disorder. The traits of a person with such a disorder are: grandiose sense of self importance, lives in a fantasy world that supports their delusions of grandeur, needs constant praise and admiration, sense of entitlement, exploits others without guilt or shame, frequently demeans, intimidates, bullies or belittles others. IMO LVP has all of those traits, in spades. Which is why I do not enjoy her on the show and am glad she will no longer be on.

I never said that Erika's note was unique. I pointed out that it was a handwritten note. Another poster then said that the note was basic. Yet another poster said that wasn't basic and that she was impressed that Erika took the time to send a handwritten note as no one does that these days. I agreed and said that not only was the note not basic, it was very sweet. My opinion. I am also one of the posters who said that I still have the cards sent by friends when each of my parents died, but don't remember all the people who called. I didn't once say that I didn't appreciate those calls, or the food and flowers dropped off, etc. I said at least twice that I appreciated any gesture made, in whatever form that person was comfortable with making it. Simple. As a poster above pointed out, and I agree with, Erika and LVP were work friends. Nothing more. Erika's gesture was totally appropriate IMO.

Having lost both of my parents and having received numerous cards, when people took the time to hand write condolences similar to what Erika wrote I was very touched. But then again, I am not a narcissist and was actually appreciative when others reached out, in whatever manner was comfortable for them.

Not only was Erika's note not basic, it was actually very sweet. (And to recap, it said "Dear Lisa - Tom and I were saddened to hear of your brother Mark's passing, Please know that our thoughts and prayers are with you and your family at this difficult time. Sincerest Condolences, Erika). It was actually more personal that buying a card and simply signing her name to it. LVP said she was upset that Erika didn't call. Not everyone is comfortable with calling (and I believe Erika said she was not, which would hardly be a surprise). When each of my parents died, I received phone calls and many cards. The cards I still have, whereas I could not tell you now who called. When my dad died there is one close friend who lives in another province that I did not hear from which surprised me a bit but I still knew that he loved my dad, and me. It wasn't until years later that I found out that he did call, I wasn't home, he left a message with my niece which she forgot to give me. In any case I was grateful for every condolence, no matter the form it took (or how long it took to receive it for that matter).

I actually thought that Erika looked very pretty and natural at Kyle's luncheon, and agree that she looked very similar to the pic.

I actually have enjoyed all of the cast this year, sans LVP. They remind me somewhat of the NY crew, who have their spats but generally get along and support each other. I hope Camille is not back next year, even as a 'friend of'. She was very tame at the first of the season, then the crazy came out. It is not entertaining to watch someone berate, apologize, berate, apologize, etc. Pick an lane, lady. It is too bad that she hadn't learned something about acting in the time she was with Kelsey. She is coming off like a really bad actor who is desperate for a part.

There are many times that LVP has been rude, or hurtful. Her berating of Ericka because she sent a handwritten note when LVP's brother died? Tacky and classless. My biggest beef though (and why I am soooo glad she will not be on next year) is that IMO LVP is the original puppy dumper. She gave not one, but two puppies to people who she should have known more than anyone were not going to care for those dogs properly. These are two people who had to have multiple nannies for their small children. I have worked in an animal rescue for years, are we are fanatical about who we adopt our rescued animals to. And just because someone might be a friend does not mean they will be allowed to adopt. The animals' welfare comes first, always! I have no idea if LVP did this for publicity, or was hoping for a spin off featuring VP Dogs? In any case she did NOT put the welfare of those dogs first, and for that I will always consider her the original puppy dumper. Shame on her.

I actually loved this scene because I thought it was quite believable. While Renata is a brilliant business woman, we have seen her come unhinged several times when confronted with real life situations. I know a few business women who are extremely successful in business, but a mess where their own lives are concerned. And I watch enough true crime shows to know that this is often the case, where successful women make mind boggling stupid decisions in their personal lives. The fact that Renata is a self made woman, but her husband was able to bankrupt her is one. And really, why would Renata think that a magazine would feature her as a self made successful woman when it is known that she is going through bankruptcy, even if it was caused by her husband? Because she is Renata. I love Laura Dern in this role, and love MS as Mary Louise. Just because ML may look like a frumpy 60 something nothing, doesn't mean she isn't smarter and more cunning than any of these women. Age, looks and even education have nothing to do with how smart and cunning someone is.