Mrs peel

The real problem for Lisa and Ken with a Maine Coon is that they don’t like to be held. My possibly part Maine Coon (he came from a shelter as a kitten so who knows his complete parentage) is definitely a loner. He likes to be around me when he wants, but is never up for being held. Definitely not lap cats. Stop, stop with the extensions!!! No one believes your hair is that long.

I immediately thought of David Foster too. Erika and Rinna lost me with the traditional Japanese meal. If you don't want to eat real sushi (California rolls? really???), then don't do the meal. And don't act like you had no idea there would be a musical performance. Now I eat like an 8 year old, so I wouldn't have eaten much on their plates, but then again I wouldn't have talked smack about the meal either. Dorit is a mean drunk. Sober she was mean at the photo shoot too; it's not up to the "model" to decide whether the photos look good. And dorit, they were trying not to remind you they would be photoshopped.

Who doesn't have the new security system checked out, including for remote access? And if she had $1MM in jewelry, at least some of that needed to be at the bank and/or they needed a real safe in the house.

I wonder about this too. I don't practice in NY, but a bit of googling found NY, like many states, change of custody if there is a material/ substantial change of circumstances: New York courts recognize those situations that qualify as either a material or substantial change that have a profound effect upon the original agreement, such as health or medical conditions, remarriage, job loss, criminal behavior, negligent or dangerous behavior or a change in residence. All this needs to be about the CHILD, not the parents. Since Jason did a plea deal that dismissed the charges, no criminal behavior. I'm not sure his behavior that led to a dismissal would be considered "dangerous" to the child, but NY lawyers would know better. And I think NY is strongly in favor of joint custody, so this is an uphill battle. If B thinks she can move out of state easily, she has an uphill battle. Apparently NY is particularly strict about moving out of state, and that she "wants" to move, possibly for her career (when she has a very successful career in NY), when she will be putting a continent between the child and her father, doesn't look like a winner. Even if she obtained sole custody, she'd still need a court to rule she could move out of state.

Obamacare does require insurance to cover rehab. I don’t know how well, my company plan pays only 50%, in network. Lord knows how many/few places are in network. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was too expensive for her, and maybe she would be better served by AA.

LOL, I guess you can have a “step and repeat” anywhere! Nice large cubicle behind it though! she looks terrible there, way too much plastic surgery.

I’m not interested in either one. As others have said, Erica Jayne is painful to watch and embarrassing. Erica Gerardo is just the classless second wife of a PI lawyer. She sees money and possessions as indications of class.

I doubt the agreement allows Jason to bar travel out of the country, but of course she can’t change the times he has Brynn in order to take a longer vacation somewhere. And a guardian ad liter technically represents the “best interests” of the child, not “what the child wants.” In m experience a Judge won’t take into serious account what the child wants (though I once had a case where the mother coaching an 8 year old backfired, the judge totally saw through the kid repeating everything the mother wanted). as others said above, this does look like an attempt to either bankrupt Jason or push him into an over-reaction so he harms the plea deal. Or both. And that’s despicable, because their daughter deserves stability and the love and attention of both parents.

Looks like an ornamental pond to me. But the plants do look stupid.

She is probably charged with a misdemeanor. I suspect no bail needed is typical for those. I see an apology and community service in her future. Maybe some substance abuse counseling since the Judge seems to have mentioned it at the arraignment (wonder if the judge is a RH fan???).

Wonder if she's a CO$ member? It's an aggressive response from him, and presumably he has the medical records to back it up.

I think the reference to being in a labor camp (which CO$ denies exist) is the clue to the satire.

Please God no.

This is stupid, but I am not sure she darkened her skin. First, lousy job if that's what she did. But I think it's a tan, made odd by the matte lighter lipstick. And if you look at her chest, she has some red as if she was in the sun. But still stupid.

Adding my prayers and sympathy for the loss of your pet.

LOL. I hate posting with Apple auto-correct!

Arbitration is usually binding; mediation is not.

FYI - all of that stuff can be part of a punishment for a crime. Particularly restitution and community service (the latter often in lieu of prison/jail).

The employees of a business next door to her townhouse aren't really her "neighbors," at least IMO. It's just more evidence that she did a group email. chances are she keeps her car (she has a car?) at the garage, and emails whoever parked it for her when she wants it brought out, valet-style. Would explain her having their email addresses.

Grab for attention. Certainly she doesn't send her own emails, unless she's finally run out of "assistants." Plus she was allegedly sending the new invitations out the day of the party?? But I do like that Page 6 describes the group invite as having gone out to "staff at her parking garage." Sonja owns a parking garage? Why would she even have email addresses for staff of the (presumably next door) garage???

Not said by the ADA. Not sure if the Daily Mail updated the page since you saw it, but now there are 2 (virtually identical) paragraphs: 'It is clear from the trajectory of this case that her claims were not substantiated or credited and that their motive was questioned,' the attorney said. Hoppy's lawyer said that the ruling was a clear sign that Frankel's claims 'were not substantiated or credited and that their motive was questioned'. It looks like a badly worded attempt to quote Jason's lawyer. And it just doesn't sound like a DA's office to say this publically. As to the Manhattan DA's office being very professional, there are several recent questions about people with power having pull over DA Vance. I doubt B has the kind of clout needed for this, but.....

3 years? Jeez, time flies!

I don't specifically know NY law, but where I practiced the law discouraged multiple change of custody petitions, to the point that a petition for change couldn't be made in the first 2 years after a custody order unless there was serious harm claimed to the child. I doubt this argument between the parents would be enough. And so many states (including NY I believe) now use joint custody as the standard that sole custody is likely difficult to get at all (if the other parent fights it). the saddest thing is that, by not being able to be civil to each other, they are hurting their daughter.

If the 99% turned her down number is real, then she did a pretty lousy job of choosing who to ask for money/supplies. Not sure why, with her money and connections, she couldn't/didn't target companies with which she had connections. They would help her out. The number makes it look like she did an email blast to everyone for whom she had an email address - not the best way to get large donations. It may also be people turned her down because they provided assistance in other ways (to the Red Cross, etc.). That may be turning her down, but those companies/people are still helping. So the stat may be deceptive in a couple of ways.

I missed that, thanks!