Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

S48.E06: "Doing the Damn Thing" LIVE CHAT THREAD


Recommended Posts

Just now, LadyChatts said:

So basically the meat shields are going to run the game and get out anyone that's good at puzzles, a strategist, or making moves (basically playing the game).  Hoping this is foreshadowing to this alliance having a quick downfall and David being the first to go.

Me, too.  Boring challenge beasts boringly dominating the game is just . . . boring.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
1 minute ago, Rodney said:

So Joe, Eva, David, Kyle, Kamilla, and Shauhin want to play a non-backstabbing game?  They want an alliance of strong people.

I like that Kyle said he's openly lied so far and that people don't know about his alliance with Kamilla.

I wonder what that group thinks is going to happen if it actually got down to those 6 and then they had to start voting each other out.  What are they going to do, rock/paper/scissor for who goes home so they don't have to lie and backstab?

  • Like 2
  • LOL 2

Charity has a good point.  Get Eva out to weaken Joe.

Oh, Charity.  This may not be you in the real world, but it's so me.  That's why I'd be an ace at this game.  I would lie, I would cheat, I would steal, and if I have to . . . I would even kill if it got me what I wanted.

Charity made a boo-boo.  Asking Star to ask Eva for her idol back was a mistake.  She'd better win immunity.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
1 minute ago, iMonrey said:

We haven't heard a peep out of Charity all season long. Suddenly we're seeing a lot of her. HMMMM. I wonder what that means.

I don’t think the million dollars will ever go to charity.

Or Charity.

I’m bored and I want to be clever. 🤷‍♂️

Edited by Lantern7
  • LOL 8
1 minute ago, Rodney said:

Charity has a good point.  Get Eva out to weaken Joe.

Having a good point means nothing if no one you’re talking to likes your point. Star is playing with her heart. Doesn’t look good for my viewing satisfaction if the winner is going to be based on who they like rather than good strategy.

1 minute ago, dizzyd said:

Having a good point means nothing if no one you’re talking to likes your point. Star is playing with her heart. Doesn’t look good for my viewing satisfaction if the winner is going to be based on who they like rather than good strategy.

I know.  That's disappointing if that happens.

3 minutes ago, truthaboutluv said:

That's always the danger of playing a bold game. Charity's not wrong in her rationale for going after Eva but not surprised it's gotten her name being thrown around. 

I think these people are all fools for not getting Eva or Joe out right away.  But Charity definitely took the wrong approach.  And it doesn't seem like she has any idea her standing in the game.

Is it really too much to ask to have a good old-fashioned merge?  Everyone gets a buff (because haven't they technically earned it?  How is this making them earn it anymore?), everyone competes, one person wins immunity and a reward.  I'm glad they dropped the team-immunity portion but why do they still have to compete in teams?

  • Like 4

It seems counter-intuitive to keep making these people crawl through mud because the TV audience can't tell who they are. Why do they keep doing this? Do they think it's funny? Are 13-years olds designing challenges?

Oh, I forgot. Nobody has "designed" a challenge on this show in years. They just keep recycling the same parts over and over again and "crawl under net thru mud" is on the bingo card.

  • Like 3
  • Applause 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...