SuperNormal: Public Appearances, Tweets, Media And Other Social Media Of The SPN Cast

[Wayward Son]

8 hours ago, catrox14 said:

 

Sounds like Creation made sure Misha/Jensen panel was fully them for 30 minutes. That's good

 

GOOD for them! Id love to know if Creation were pissed they had to reschedule an entire evening because of Jared goofing around and not just going like he was meant to. 

[Wynne88]

Jared and Misha only had 24 minutes of uninterrupted time.  The first few minutes of their panel included Rob and the other band members, then Jensen came back on stage several minutes early, so if any panel got shortchanged, it was that one.

Although I could understand frustration if Jensen and Misha's time had been seriously impacted, I personally found Jared's antics amusing as heck.  I don't know why he doesn't think he's any good at comedy.

Edited November 21, 2017 by Wynne88
Clarity

[Bessie]

4 hours ago, Wayward Son said:

GOOD for them! Id love to know if Creation were pissed they had to reschedule an entire evening because of Jared goofing around and not just going like he was meant to. 

Well, if they are, they'd be wise to keep it to themselves considering J2 is a cash cow for them. Besides, the actors crash each other's panels fairly often, so I don't know why Creation would single out Padalecki. Plus, my guess is it's all planned beforehand. 

I suppose Creation could try to implement a rule about "no panel crashing by Jared Padalecki".  That'd go over well. 

[Wayward Son]

15 minutes ago, Bessie said:

Well, if they are, they'd be wise to keep it to themselves considering J2 is a cash cow for them. Besides, the actors crash each other's panels fairly often, so I don't know why Creation would single out Padalecki. Plus, my guess is it's all planned beforehand. 

I suppose Creation could try to implement a rule about "no panel crashing by Jared Padalecki".  That'd go over well. 

See IMO there’s a big difference between other actors occasionally crashing a J2 panel, or J2 crashing a solo Misha panel and something like this. There’s something like a 100 of those a year so the occasional crash is no big deal. On the other hand, fans who want a Jensen and Misha panel get a handful a year a best. I think JIBcon is the only big con to feature a Jensen and Misha panel and this was the very first one at a Creation Convention. So yeah it wasn’t appropriate for him to crash this one in my opinion and I’m glad Creation allowed the panel to continue to make up for the time lost. 

[DittyDotDot]

3 minutes ago, Bessie said:

Well, if they are, they'd be wise to keep it to themselves considering J2 is a cash cow for them. Besides, the actors crash each other's panels fairly often, so I don't know why Creation would single out Padalecki. Plus, my guess is it's all planned beforehand. 

I suppose Creation could try to implement a rule about "no panel crashing by Jared Padalecki".  That'd go over well. 

I don't know, this wasn't a simple panel crashing. Jared just wouldn't leave the stage after his panel with Misha was over and was interrupting both Misha and Jensen while they were trying to answer questions for something like 10-15 minutes. Hijinks are expected during a changing of the guard, so to speak, and actors will crash a panel for a minute or so, but in this case, I think it went on far too long and became rather obnoxious.

I think a better course of action would've been to get someone backstage to quietly get Jared's attention and have him leave the stage, but I'm sure no one back there figured it would go on as long as it did. So, it was smart of Creation to extend the panel so people who had shown up to hear Jensen and Misha got that.

Personally, I think it would be wise for someone to have a bit of a talk with Jared simply because I think he's gotten too comfortable with the cons and seems to forget himself quite a bit lately, but I highly doubt anyone from Creation is going to do it.

[Bobcatkitten]

The last two cons Jared has stopped himself from saying further things specifically because of the recent incident so I think he's there. Just being silly. To me he takes it a bit too far though. 

[Wayward Son]

27 minutes ago, DittyDotDot said:

don't know, this wasn't a simple panel crashing. Jared just wouldn't leave the stage after his panel with Misha was over and was interrupting both Misha and Jensen while they were trying to answer questions for something like 10-15 minutes. Hijinks are expected during a changing of the guard, so to speak, and actors will crash a panel for a minute or so, but in this case, I think it went on far too long and became rather obnoxious.

And the fact it went on for 10-15 minutes was especially bad for this particular panel because it was only a 30 minute panel in the first place. So that was a 1/3 - 1/2 of their scheduled time. 

Edited November 21, 2017 by Wayward Son

[DittyDotDot]

4 minutes ago, scribe95 said:

The last two cons Jared has stopped himself from saying further things specifically because of the recent incident so I think he's there. Just being silly. To me he takes it a bit too far though. 

I'm not talking about just saying inappropriate things but more he seems to forget that people have paid a lot of money to come and ask their questions--whether or not they've been asked and answered time and time again. Personally, his behavior lately has felt rather disrespectful and I think he maybe needs a bit of a wake up call to remind him that he's not just hanging out with a bunch of his buds here.

[Bobcatkitten]

Yeah I said I agreed that he was taking the random silliness a bit too far. 

[Bessie]

I wish Padalecki would leave the con circuit altogether. 

[Pondlass1]

Jensen's a brilliant actor.  I can never tell if he's annoyed or not.  I actually think Misha was a bit.  Jensen is a good and true friend to Jared.  I'd not be so tolerant and kind myself. 

 And if I was one of TPTB on the Supernatural set I'd take him aside and have a few words with him.  Time is money.  The crew have families to get home to.  Funny is only funny for a while.

[catrox14]

 

Someone put all the panels in one video. 

[DittyDotDot]

21 minutes ago, Bessie said:

I wish Padalecki would leave the con circuit altogether. 

Oh, I don't know, there are plenty of people who enjoy seeing Jared and I think he adds something to the experience, I just think he's gotten bored with them. It's just like when they're filming, the hijinks and such happen when Jared doesn't have much to do and gets bored on set, so he starts messing with other people to entertain himself.

TBH, I think it would behoove Creation to mix up their panels more like they did here. They could still have their Jared and Jensen Gold Panel, but pair each of them with someone different in the afternoon--not just Misha--at each con. Like do a Jared and Osric panel, a Jensen and Rob panel, pair up the two Johns for one panel a year, put Jared and Kim in a panel together and Jensen and Brianna in one at another con, and so on and so forth. It would make each con a little different and special instead of them all being the same.

Just like when writing an episode of TV, the best way to break out of a stale format is to pair up two unlikely characters and see what happens. 

[Bessie]

If they just got rid of Padalecki, they could have Ackles doing panels with various other actors. I think people would really enjoy that so it wouldn't lose Creation any money. They ought to try it for a couple of cons and see how it goes. 

ETA: They could try the same thing on the show since he's problematic onset, as well.  Reduce his screen time and pair Ackles up with a variety of other actors. And then see how the ratings do. Who knows? They might go up. 

Edited November 21, 2017 by Bessie

[catrox14]

It seems to me that mixing up the panels would put new life into the cons. And they could position it as when there is a J2 main panel it's a big deal now.  Also, if Jared is so bored with doing cons that he behaves questionably at times then maybe he should cut back and do a few less.

[Bobcatkitten]

Mixing up the panels is a good idea but Jared is #1 on the call sheet. He needs to be there. The show is about the brothers and while his antics go over the edge every once in a while I think he still brings a lot to them. When he focuses (maybe ADHD?) he really answers questions well. 

[catrox14]

FWIW, Rob left the stage at about 2:30 and Jensen came out at about 27:00.  And the transition to  Jensen Misha was delayed by a bit of Jared goofing and the cast presenting a birthday cake to the Creation person. After the birthday thing Jared probably should have left but he stuck around and did the piano bit for several more minutes. I think it is reasonable they extended it. Even with the extension Jared, Rob, Dick and the band came out for the final goobdye.

[Pondlass1]

The J2 panels have become stale with repetitive questions, etc.  I agree with the notion that Jared  gets bored and (like a 3 year old) he acts out to entertain himself.

I wouldn't mind a Jensen solo panel - although I have a feeling Jensen prefers being with someone on stage.  The Jensen/Misha duo can be hilarious, but they're not very PC when they get together and the US is quite conservative when compared to Europe.

Still, the Supernatural conventions continue to be a smash hit for Creation Ent.  And from the comments I saw on twitter Jared's behaviour is always viewed as goofy and cute.  So it will continue as is I guess?

[catrox14]

8 minutes ago, scribe95 said:

Mixing up the panels is a good idea but Jared is #1 on the call sheet. He needs to be there. The show is about the brothers and while his antics go over the edge every once in a while I think he still brings a lot to them. When he focuses (maybe ADHD?) he really answers questions well. 

They have two or three J2 less cons coming up next year. And 3 times Jared had to leave the Rome con early and they made it work. I'm not advocating for Jared to not be there, I'm saying if it's HIM being bored, maybe he could cut back is all.  There is a difference between comedy that every cast member is expecting to participate in and Jared seeming to go off on tangents that seem off book even for these improvisational actors. JMHO.

2 minutes ago, Pondlass1 said:

The Jensen/Misha duo can be hilarious, but they're not very PC when they get together and the US is quite conservative when compared to Europe.

The dirtiest panel at Rome was Mishalecki. They spent most of it riffing on "influencing" all over each other which spun off to other innuendo. The second dirtiest, innuendo filled is J2M. IMO Jensen/Misha is pretty tame on the innuendo front. They spend time teasing each other and telling stories about set life and filming and actually trying to answer fan questions. They made up a song together in Rome. So for me, the Jensen/Misha panel is probably the tamest on the innuendo front in comparison to Mishalecki.

[Bessie]

5 minutes ago, Pondlass1 said:

I wouldn’t mind a Jensen solo panel - although I have a feeling Jensen prefers being with someone on stage.

They should do an Ackles solo panel in the morning and then rotate different actors for the afternoon panel with Ackles. I’d love to see an Ackles panel with Samantha Smith and hear their take on the Dean/Mary relationship. 

[Wayward Son]

1 hour ago, Pondlass1 said:

 And if I was one of TPTB on the Supernatural set I'd take him aside and have a few words with him.  Time is money.  The crew have families to get home to.  Funny is only funny for a while.

By all accounts Jared, Jensen and Misha are all equally as bad as each other when it comes to on set shenanigans during filming. If there was to be a talk it would need to be to the lot of them and not just Jared IMO. Plus, I don’t think the crew really mind the joking around. I think that related atmosphere is said to be a part of why they all get along so well and work together. 

[catrox14]

I did like that the Hawaii con got a new Jensen/Misha story with Misha ordering the three least ordered items on a menu that turned out to be sweetbreads, brains and something else(HORK)  I love that they all really do love each other and annoy each other at the same time.

1 minute ago, Wayward Son said:

By all accounts Jared, Jensen and Misha are all equally as bad as each other when it comes to on set shenanigans during filming. If there was to be a talk it would need to be to the lot of them and not just Jared IMO. Plus, I don’t think the crew really mind the joking around. I think that related atmosphere is said to be a part of why they all get along so well and work together. 

J2M were kicked off the set by Nina when they were filming Tombstone because they were tormenting poor Alex LOL. 

[Pondlass1]

2 minutes ago, Wayward Son said:

By all accounts Jared, Jensen and Misha are all equally as bad as each other when it comes to on set shenanigans

I dunno?  I think Misha had had enough that particular day and Jared doesn't know when to stop.  I do appreciate that they are all such good friends and probably will be for life.

I'm not so tolerant unfortunately.  But I admire people who are.  

[Wayward Son]

2 minutes ago, Pondlass1 said:

I dunno?  I think Misha had had enough that particular day and Jared doesn't know when to stop.  I do appreciate that they are all such good friends and probably will be for life.

I'm not so tolerant unfortunately.  But I admire people who are.  

I don’t really mind on set stuff for the simple reason we don’t see it (beyond the usually awesome gag reels) and it doesn’t really affect fans in anyway.

 

IMO Cons are different for the simple fact fans pay a ridiculous amount of money to be there and therefore they should be given what they paid for. 

 

8 minutes ago, catrox14 said:

J2M were kicked off the set by Nina when they were filming Tombstone because they were tormenting poor Alex LOL. 

 Oh geese! The three of them must have been really bad for it to reach that point, that or Nina has far less patience for messing around than most directors haha

[Pondlass1]

I have to admit the Supernatural gag reels are the funniest and the best.  Gag reels from most other shows are usually just line fumbles and curse beeps (the ones I've watched anyway).

[catrox14]

Misha is TOO CUTE with this little girl.

[Bessie]

6 minutes ago, Wayward Son said:

The three of them must have been really bad for it to reach that point, that or Nina has far less patience for messing around than most directors haha

Or maybe it was Padalecki causing the problem, getting the other two riled up, and if she had just kicked him out, everything would've stayed professional. 

Edited November 21, 2017 by Bessie

[Diane]

9 minutes ago, Bessie said:

Or maybe it was Padalecki causing the problem, getting the other two riled up, and if she had just kicked him out, everything would've stayed professional. 

And how could you possibly know this, they are all clowns, which they ALL have admitted. 

[catrox14]

4 minutes ago, Bessie said:

Or maybe it was Padalecki causing the problem, getting the other two riled up, and if she had just kicked him out, everything would've stayed professional. 

 I mean Jared himself admits to being the biggest prankster/mess abouter so I mean if Nina thought Jared was the problem child alone she would have bounced only him. In s9, J2 were kicked off the set for tormenting Misha.LOL Jared isn't being persecuted here. 

They have all told the current story that for the first time in Misha's tenure he could bother Alex like J2 have bothered him.  And he was surprised at how much he enjoyed it and felt a little guilty about it later.  Nina went to them and said they were all wrapped for the day and all three were like, 'Wait, what? We haven't finished" and she was like NOPE  you're all done.

[gonzosgirrl]

20 minutes ago, Bessie said:

Or maybe it was Padalecki causing the problem, getting the other two riled up, and if she had just kicked him out, everything would've stayed professional. 

I'm sensing a little hyperbole for effect here ;)

They are all three guilty in the initiation of Alex - and he's new enough to it that he couldn't keep it together like Misha can after years of practice, lol. Too funny, in this latest iteration of the let's-torture-Misha saga, Jensen told how even the camera operator got involved, just said screw it and dropped his pants (all the while keeping the camera rolling). Misha's reaction: You too?!?!!!???? 

ETA: Jensen did say that he's mostly guilty-by-proximity at this point, to which Misha rolled his eyes so hard it was audible, so I'm guessing.... no? LOLOL!

Edited November 21, 2017 by gonzosgirrl

[SueB]

40 minutes ago, Bessie said:

If they just got rid of Padalecki, they could have Ackles doing panels with various other actors. I think people would really enjoy that so it wouldn't lose Creation any money. They ought to try it for a couple of cons and see how it goes. 

ETA: They could try the same thing on the show since he's problematic onset, as well.  Reduce his screen time and pair Ackles up with a variety of other actors. And then see how the ratings do. Who knows? They might go up. 

First, for the show -- there's no Ackles if there's no Padalecki.  Just like there is no Padalecki if there is no Ackles.  They are a team and have been since S1.  And they BOTH goof around on set.  The crew have the ability to rein them in.  And at the end of the day, if they goof around too much, they have to film longer hours.  The boys loathe that.  So, they manage their time and have fun while doing it. Neither are 'problematic' from a production perspective.  If they were the crew would not stay with them as long as they have.  People LOVE coming to their set.  If you listened to Kim's comments in the Brianna/Kim panel she said the boys don't get nearly enough credit for the hard work they do to make the show right.  So, if anything, you are hearing a distorted view of production  

For the cons: got rid of Padalecki? What fandom have you been watching? There are just as many starry-eye Jared fans as Jensen fans.  What I can tell you is that the boys have made 'individual attention' an art form.  This is most evident in photographs and autographs.  They have handlers that try to keep things moving (and theirs music playing during the shoots to keep things 'light') but they look into your eyes, they give you an extra squeeze on the shoulder, they direct unique words directly AT you.  Same with the autos - they will pause and look at the person in the eye and interact.  Both do this.  

As for Creation - yes, I've had a little BTS access to the workings of a con.  Not as a worker but as someone who was able to see the workings.  And when they get behind, it IS an issue. But they NEVER shorten fan time for main panels. And anything involving J2M and JDM is a main panel.  Little things that do get effected - elaborate photo set-ups (like lying on the ground), their personal breaks, and sometimes they'll take a fan with a lot of tickets (J2, J2M, J2M2) and get their 'shoot' done at once during a J2M2 session - with individual participants changing in and out depending on what's on the ticket. But boys usually plan their return trip to give them a couple hours of margin at the end of the con to finish signing autos.

 

11 minutes ago, Bessie said:

Or maybe it was Padalecki causing the problem, getting the other two riled up, and if she had just kicked him out, everything would've stayed professional. 

Wow, you REALLY think Jared is the root of all shenanigans.  I think Jared does goof around a lot but he's just as often 'the second guy'.  Like the first guy starts it (Jensen) and doesn't get caught, but the second guy (Jared) gets caught.

Ultimately, if this was a real issue that Jensen felt needed to be addressed, it would be Jensen -- and Jensen alone -- would tell Jared to settle down.  That he doesn't, means Jensen doesn't consider it a problem.  

Finally - IF we are fortunate enough to get the panels recorded, you can always fast forward through the stuff that annoys you.  But suggesting Jensen dump Jared for events is literally like telling Dean to dump Sam.  It's not going to happen.  

Note: I DO agree that mixing up panels is a nice treat and if they could get two days out of the boys for conventions, that would be viable.  As it is, the photo ops and autographs are more important than panel time (for both fans and Creation) for most conventions.  They really can't squeeze in to much more time. I'm not sure HOW they did Hawaii -- maybe they limited photo op options?  They needed something 'extra' to get people to just do the general admittance (as it was a fly-in con for most) so more panels would make sense.  

[Bessie]

7 minutes ago, gonzosgirrl said:

26 minutes ago, Bessie said:

 

I'm sensing a little hyperbole for effect here ;)

Not really. I believe things would calm down a lot if padalecki left the cons and the show. And I wish he would. Plus, both would probably be much more professional that way. Whether or not you (general you) think that’s beneficial is a personal opinion. 

[DittyDotDot]

50 minutes ago, Bessie said:

They should do an Ackles solo panel in the morning and then rotate different actors for the afternoon panel with Ackles. I’d love to see an Ackles panel with Samantha Smith and hear their take on the Dean/Mary relationship. 

I also would love a Jensen, Jared, JDM and Matt panel for the same-ish reason. But, they don't need to omit Jared altogether. He's part of the experience, I just think they need to change up the dynamic a bit to make it more interesting for fans and the "talent" alike.

Edited November 21, 2017 by DittyDotDot

[catrox14]

8 minutes ago, gonzosgirrl said:

ETA: Jensen did say that he's mostly guilty-by-proximity at this point, to which Misha rolled his eyes so hard it was audible, so I'm guessing.... no? LOLOL!

Jensen and Misha said at JIBcon one year that they were filming in a warehouse and Jared started throwing rocks at the glass. They joined him and when they all got yelled at they pointed to Jared and said, "He's number one on the call sheet. We're just following his lead". LOLOL So clearly they all fuck around equally.

I think also J2 have told the story that they pranked each other when they first started the show and realized it was gonna get ugly so they joined forces.

[SueB]

5 minutes ago, Bessie said:

Not really. I believe things would calm down a lot if padalecki left the cons and the show. And I wish he would. Plus, both would probably be much more professional that way. Whether or not you (general you) think that’s beneficial is a personal opinion. 

I believe the cons and the show would end. I'm stunned that you think it's viable without one of the two leads.

[catrox14]

5 minutes ago, Bessie said:

Not really. I believe things would calm down a lot if padalecki left the cons and the show. And I wish he would. Plus, both would probably be much more professional that way. Whether or not you (general you) think that’s beneficial is a personal opinion. 

Are you advocating on Jared's behalf for him to leave the show, not that you actually see him as the problem?

[Wynne88]

Quote

I believe the cons and the show would end. I'm stunned that you think it's viable without one of the two leads.

Absolutely agree with this.  And I doubt that either one of the J's would be willing to even consider continuing with the show if the other were to leave.

And for all the angst about Jared clowning around on stage during the start of Jensen and Misha's panel, from the laughter it sounded like the people in attendance were enjoying it.  I'd be interested in hearing from some who were actually there.  So often it seems that what we see on the con video's fails to tell the complete story.

[Bessie]

1 minute ago, SueB said:

I believe the cons and the show would end. I'm stunned that you think it's viable without one of the two leads.

Aren't they already having cons without J2? I'm not sure that cons without Padalecki would be much different. And showcasing Ackles might draw from a whole new audience. So, yes, I do think cons are viable without Padalecki. 

The show is a different matter. But, I think if they just reduced his screen time without getting rid of Sam entirely, they could maintain current ratings. The biggest problem with that is I doubt Ackles would want more hours so they'd have to switch it up with other characters and/or create some interesting new ones. 

[Res]

15 minutes ago, SueB said:

Ultimately, if this was a real issue that Jensen felt needed to be addressed, it would be Jensen -- and Jensen alone -- would tell Jared to settle down.  That he doesn't, means Jensen doesn't consider it a problem.  

Note: I DO agree that mixing up panels is a nice treat and if they could get two days out of the boys for conventions, that would be viable.  As it is, the photo ops and autographs are more important than panel time (for both fans and Creation) for most conventions.  They really can't squeeze in to much more time. I'm not sure HOW they did Hawaii -- maybe they limited photo op options?  They needed something 'extra' to get people to just do the general admittance (as it was a fly-in con for most) so more panels would make sense.  

I completely agree with both of these but would add that if Jensen did address it, we would never hear about it because that is something that would be just between them as it should be.

[gonzosgirrl]

24 minutes ago, Bessie said:

Not really. I believe things would calm down a lot if padalecki left the cons and the show. And I wish he would. Plus, both would probably be much more professional that way. Whether or not you (general you) think that’s beneficial is a personal opinion. 

Uhhuh.

[catrox14]

3 minutes ago, Res said:

Ultimately, if this was a real issue that Jensen felt needed to be addressed, it would be Jensen -- and Jensen alone -- would tell Jared to settle down.  That he doesn't, means Jensen doesn't consider it a problem.

I'm kind of puzzled by this. 

Neither Jared nor Jensen are the boss of the other one. They are best friends so they can ask or even tell the other to do or not do something but if said action or behavior doesn't change that doesn't mean the other is complicit or implicitly approving of that behavior.

[gonzosgirrl]

9 minutes ago, Res said:

I completely agree with both of these but would add that if Jensen did address it, we would never hear about it because that is something that would be just between them as it should be.

Jensen did address it - he said (paraphrased) both Jared and Misha bring their quirks along with everything else, and he loves them for it. What we think of things is our right and privilege, but none of us should project our thoughts and feelings onto Jensen. He gets enough shade from the various fan/ship factions as it is.

[Diane]

7 minutes ago, catrox14 said:

I'm kind of puzzled by this. 

Neither Jared nor Jensen are the boss of the other one. They are best friends so they can ask or even tell the other to do or not do something but if said action or behavior doesn't change that doesn't mean the other is complicit or implicitly approving of that behavior.

What I believe is being said, that if either of them had a problem with the other one, that they would take care of it in private. They would not air their dirty laundry. 

Edited November 21, 2017 by Diane

[Res]

12 minutes ago, Wynne88 said:

Absolutely agree with this.  And I doubt that either one of the J's would be willing to even consider continuing with the show if the other were to leave.

And for all the angst about Jared clowning around on stage during the start of Jensen and Misha's panel, from the laughter it sounded like the people in attendance were enjoying it.  I'd be interested in hearing from some who were actually there.  So often it seems that what we see on the con video's fails to tell the complete story.

I know I wasn't there for this con but I have been at other cons and can tell you first hand that while I am amused initially, I do start thinking about the money I spent and how I didn't pay for them to cut up with each other so much that I probably will have even less of a chance to ask my question because of it. Then I'm very annoyed because I did pay money for them to more or less be there for us, not each other, and NOT to barge in on other panels for more than a couple of minutes. IMO that's unprofessional, thoughtless and very rude. It's hard enough to scrape the money together as a single mom on an educator's salary because education isn't worth anything in the US's mind so educators don't get paid much and I have to work another part time job so when I say it ticks me off if it goes on too long, I mean I get TICKED. It's hard enough to get the main panelists to settle down sometimes. This doesn't help anything and I don't find it "goofy or cute".

[catrox14]

19 minutes ago, Wynne88 said:

And for all the angst about Jared clowning around on stage during the start of Jensen and Misha's panel, from the laughter it sounded like the people in attendance were enjoying it.  I'd be interested in hearing from some who were actually there.  So often it seems that what we see on the con video's fails to tell the complete story.

I think some think it is funny. And sometimes people laugh out of feeling awkward. I don't think fans will actually start booing Jared. I also suspect if they hadn't extended the panel time then con goers might be a little less amenable to the antics.

[DittyDotDot]

12 minutes ago, Wynne88 said:

And for all the angst about Jared clowning around on stage during the start of Jensen and Misha's panel, from the laughter it sounded like the people in attendance were enjoying it.  I'd be interested in hearing from some who were actually there.  So often it seems that what we see on the con video's fails to tell the complete story.

I know someone who was there and I'll just say she she said is was cute at first, but went on too long and felt there was a portion of the crowd who kept it going so long by encouraging him to continue.

[Res]

8 minutes ago, catrox14 said:

I'm kind of puzzled by this. 

Neither Jared nor Jensen are the boss of the other one. They are best friends so they can ask or even tell the other to do or not do something but if said action or behavior doesn't change that doesn't mean the other is complicit or implicitly approving of that behavior.

That's what I meant to say. I think Jensen would talk to him as a best friend and just say something like, "rein it in a little, dude". I think he did it in a tweet once but not that either is the boss. Just a little friendly type, "dude, chill a little" type thing. 

[catrox14]

6 minutes ago, Diane said:

What I believe is being said that if either of them had a probelem with the other one, that they would take care of it in private. They would not air their dirty laundry. 

I agree they wouldn't air their dirty laundry. I took it to mean IF Jensen had a problem then the behavior would have changed because he would have told Jared to stop. Maybe I read that all wrong.

[Res]

10 minutes ago, Diane said:

What I believe is being said that if either of them had a probelem with the other one, that they would take care of it in private. They would not air their dirty laundry. 

Exactly. I have problems with words sometimes. Haven't had coffee yet and am in a lot of pain right now so things aren't working right. Thank you for understand my unclear intent. ;-)

Edited November 21, 2017 by Res

[catrox14]

3 minutes ago, Res said:

That's what I meant to say. I think Jensen would talk to him as a best friend and just say something like, "rein it in a little, dude". I think he did it in a tweet once but not that either is the boss. Just a little friendly type, "dude, chill a little" type thing. 

Sorry, I thought I was replying to @SueB comment. Yeah, I see what happened. I thought I was in Sue's post quoting her but it was yours. SORRY.

Edited November 21, 2017 by catrox14