Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

MLB Thread


smittykins

Recommended Posts

(edited)
7 hours ago, ProudMary said:

He may not technically be late, but the other pitchers were all in camp already, so not a good look. Considering how poorly he pitched the second half of last season, he shouldn't be mouthing off about when he gets to pitch. 

I personally don’t care about Stroman one way or the other but it’s not like he waited til the last possible day. He came in two days later. That’s a drop in the bucket.

 

Edited by DMK
9 hours ago, Lantern7 said:

I knew that the Mets have never had an MVP, but I wasn't aware the only other teams like that came from the 1998 expansion. That's a little depressing.

That is depressing.  Not a shocker though.  At least the team has only been around for over six decades, thanks to the Dodgers coast-to-coast move.  Still a little surprising (if you don't think about it) that when you combine both in terms of the MVP count, it still isn't tops in the league or all of baseball, given how long the Dodgers existed

55 minutes ago, Carey said:

That is depressing.  Not a shocker though.  At least the team has only been around for over six decades, thanks to the Dodgers coast-to-coast move.  Still a little surprising (if you don't think about it) that when you combine both in terms of the MVP count, it still isn't tops in the league or all of baseball, given how long the Dodgers existed

I'm sure Dodgers fans would be happy to say it's anti-west coast bias from east coast writers who go to bed right around the time their home games start.

  • Like 1
4 hours ago, baldryanr said:

Want to start?  Pitch better.

^^^This.

First off, one of the anticipated starters usually gets injured to some degree and they'll probably need another starter before the season starts, so keep your mouth shut until everything plays out. Don't start this crap on your first day.

But, if Stroman wants only to start, then show them from day one that you're deserving of a spot in the rotation. 

 

  • Like 2

Trout says he's moving to right field. 

Devers says he *won't* be moving to DH.

 

RE: Devers, I have immense respect for guys who do interviews in English when it's their second language. I know they're trying to connect to fans. But in situations like this, where the topic is clearly emotionally-charged, I really think the interpreter and/or the team PR person has an obligation to jump in and try to get them to switch to their native language. (Also see Jorge Lopez and the glove toss interview last season.)

  • Like 1

I don't disagree that he should move off 3B (early reporting that Bregman would play 2B made no sense to me) but I do think that interview gives a false impression. 

Here's a tweet series with a deeper translation, if anyone is interested. 

Either way, between this and Cora's comment about Chaim Bloom, sounds like a mess in Boston. 

I'm watching the NY v. TB spring training game live. Michael Kay, Jack Curry and Meredith Marakovits have been discussing the facial hair rule change. In addition to showing a clip (see below) from Hal Steinbrenner's presser regarding the change, they added a few other comments they picked up from the clubhouse. 

Hal specifically spoke with Aaron Judge, Gerrit Cole and Giancarlo Stanton about the long-held (48 years!) policy. He also had conversations with CC Sabathia, Willie Randolph and Ron Guidry. Hal was also concerned that the policy as it stood could impact the decisions of players of interest to the Yankees who might not want to shave their existing beards to come to the Bronx.

While Hal mentions that there will be parameters, the only thing that Meredith mentioned was that hair length must still be above the collar.

Personally, I like a neatly trimmed beard. I think that management should be very clear on the parameters because there's always going to be someone who pushes the limits and I don't want to be looking at 2004 Johnny Damon!

Back to the actual baseball side of things, we just had the first ball/strike challenge, which was lost by the Rays. Each team gets two per game. If the calll goes in the challenging team's favor, they retain that challenge. 

I'm SO glad to be talking baseball again!

 

  • Like 1
43 minutes ago, ProudMary said:

Hal was also concerned that the policy as it stood could impact the decisions of players of interest to the Yankees who might not want to shave their existing beards to come to the Bronx.

I guarantee you that’s what prompted the revamp of the facial hair policy. Look at the top players hitting free agency next year: Kyle Tucker, Vlad Jr. off the top of my head. Both bearded, both can cherry pick wherever they want to go, and the Yankees are trying not to potentially lose players over something so penny-ante.

  • Applause 2
4 minutes ago, ProudMary said:

I agree completely. I think they signed Goldschmidt because he accepted a one year deal. I'd bet that Rizzo (and others) were looking for 2-3 years and the Yankees wanted to go after Vladdy in the '25-'26 offseason.

Heh, I’m pretty sure Rizzo would’ve taken a 1yr deal, based on the fact that he’s still unsigned. Yankees passed on him because he’s cooked. But yeah, I agree that Goldy’s 1yr deal is to keep their Vladdy options open.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...