apinknightmare

Nope, just mentioned that she's always salty about it - which she is, and she was in those tweets. Never mentioned anything about her being upset.

It clearly annoys her and has for a while. I don't get the point of replying at all at this point.

I never said anything she wrote was problematic - I wouldn't have commented on this particular set of tweets at all if it wasn't something she's done repeatedly where Tommy is concerned. It's just confusing considering she's accompanied him to cons where he's there....because of his role as Tommy. She's okay with that, but claps back at people mentioning it on Twitter. It's weird.

Her original tweet was about Arrow - people were just responding to what she put out there. So weird.

I don’t get why Patti’s always so salty about people asking Colin about Arrow. That’s....a good thing? Fans of Chicago Med will probably be asking “what if’s” about him long after he leaves that one too. It’s what they do. Chill a bit - it’s the same thing as people saying they loved her in whatever shows she’s been in after they’ve closed, which I guarantee she has no problem with.

If anyone has a gif of Barry getting thrown in jail, please send it my way - TYIA!

I bet she's evil or broken up with early on in at least 17 of them.

Anything for Barry!

That one has a door, it's just on the hall side for whatever weird-ass reason. Why yes, I've paid a weird amount of attention to Oliver's cellblock!

LOL, his room has doors.

That's Sarah Schechter - and that is a very unfortunate pic of her.

With the way this show works I wouldn’t be surprised if he mentioned betraying Oliver so Curtis can assure him he did the right thing/what he had to do. Hopefully TPTB won’t do the obvious thing (but I won’t count on it).

If he didn't think he'd done something wrong, he wouldn't be talking to Curtis about how he couldn't shake the way things went down with Oliver. People with clear consciences generally don't dwell on things like that.

The disconnect for me is that the emphasis is on "betray" instead of "had" - which is why it doesn't seem to me like he's making excuses for what he did. Hopefully it comes off better in show.

Fair enough. I think it could go either way - it just seems to me if he really believed he had to betray Oliver he would be able to "shake how everything went down" with him. But who knows with this show.

The inflection in his voice and the preceding line doesn't make it seem (to me) like he means that he was forced to do it - it seems to me like he's recounting something he now regrets, like when someone steps on the scale, sees a number they don't like and says, "I just *had* to go and eat that piece of cake, didn't I?" (that someone may be me)

I will laugh forever if she and Oliver fight and someone's life gets endangered over someone in the Baddie Brigade.

I haven't even seen any of these episodes yet and I'm already tired. Arguing for at least 4 straight episodes? Ugh.

“All for Nothing” — (9:00-10:00 p.m. ET) (Content Rating TBD) (HDTV) OLIVER AND DINAH FACE OFF — Oliver (Stephen Amell) continues his battle with Cayden James (guest star Michael Emerson). Dinah (Juliana Harkavy) and Oliver have a major disagreement that endangers the life of one of their own. Mairzee Almas directed the episode written by Beth Schwartz & Oscar Balderrama (#612). Original airdate 2/1/2018. https://www.spoilertv.com/2018/01/arrow-episode-612-all-for-nothing-press.html

That's not Oliver's apartment, is it? I didn't think that was Oliver either, considering she's wearing a wig - I figured that was some rando she was offing because that's her style.

I'm glad that Rene seems to be doing some soul-searching regarding ratting Oliver out, which is...well, I guess that's more than I thought would happen, so that's something.

Where in that article does it say what she was told when she was asked to do reshoots? The only thing Ridley Scott actually said in the interview was that he and Michelle were doing it for "free," but that Christopher Plummer and the crew were getting paid. He didn't mention anything about Mark Wahlberg. Is it in a different piece somewhere? I think this is an extenuating circumstance, because there are outside forces at play. If they had to do reshoots for pretty much any reason other than because they were replacing a sexual abuser, I think there is a legit issue. But Michelle very well could've not wanted to profit off of that kind of situation, which I - personally - do think matters in the discussion.

Same. If it came out that she'd only been able to get a percentage of what he was able to negotiate, or if everyone got paid but her, I'd definitely have a problem with it. This seems like everyone else handling a difficult situation with grace, and Mark Wahlberg going in for a payday because he could and he's an asshat.

This doesn't seem like an equal pay issue to me, since Michelle flat-out told the director that he could have her time, her days off, whatever they needed. I think she basically accepted per diem for her time (which I'm pretty sure is required under SAG, but I could be wrong) without negotiating anything above and beyond because she didn't want to.

It was in the original article published by USA Today: