Callaphera

I thought that was Jack White. Has this really been on for an hour and a half? It feels like four hours with these ballads.

You need it to get through this snoozer of an award show. FFS, I'm still getting the History of the Eagles from the couch. Make it stop!

According to the soon to be Mr. Callaphera, this Eagles bit sucks because someone original isn't playing guitar, this is too slow of a version and he's still bitching since the song started. I think he needs more wine too.

Ed Whoever wins an award, Taylor Swift is acting like her baby just graduated with honours. I think she was more excited than him.

Second Dave Grohl sighting. Drink again!

What's with all the red Solo cups?

I think she stole the other chick's pants, 'cause she seems to be missing them.

Another sleeper. Thank God for wine.

I think it is. And I think I have the same reaction every year, too. It's my yearly "Back in my day, sonny"/"Hey, you kids, off my lawn!" moment. Or the wine always makes me forget until the next year. Toss up, really.

... seriously? Seriously?! Just call it the Grammy Concert with bonus awards. What happened to an award show handing out awards? I know, crazy concept but...

Drink! Dave Grohl sighting! I think it should be two shots since it wasn't a traditional rock/hard rock song.

I want to like Megan Trainor. I just can't. I don't know why.

Oh, the camera guy is getting fired. Lionel Ritchie is wearing an ear piece and holding a microphone. Ruined the surprise.

"Just in case you forgot that the Grammy Awards are on CBS, here's more CBS stars! And more! Did we mention that you're watching CBS?"

There have been a lack of reaction shots of the audience during performances so far. I'm waiting for the traditional "cut to Dave Grohl when a rock band plays" shot. I'll be disappointed if I don't get one this year. It's practically a Grammy tradition!

Thanks for brushing your hair and your beard, Mr. Country Dude. Is that the second award in forty minutes? This really is going to run into my wedding tomorrow.

Canada, what happened? Do we not have any amazing talent to export anymore or are we just keeping the good stuff to ourselves? (says someone who skips the Juno's every year because those are even worse.) More exciting than the Grammys: the meat-a-palooza pizza that just came to my door. Zzzzz some more.

How much shellac went into that hair-do? Damn!

I did, too! I'm surprised that it was just one dude with gravity defying hair. My music tastes are still stuck in the 90's grunge era and cheesy 80's pop.

The guy's hair bouncing in the front is more exciting than this song. ETA: the singer guy, not some rando in the crowd. It's making me so zzzz that I forgot to specify. The only good thing about Ariana being over so fast on stage is that we won't get our reaction shot of Frankie Grande in the audience, still holding onto his little sister's coattails.

Ugh. Five seconds of Ariana warbling is five seconds too much.

We chose the 16th on purpose because flowers would have been cheaper (and will be for anniversaries!) and it'll be easier to get a table at a restaurant, since it's two days after Valentine's. Plus he can buy me cheesy heart shaped stuff for 50% off. Budgeting for the future!

Aaand we've started this year much like last years show. I'm falling asleep already. Carrie Underwood is so bland that it's hard to make fun of her.

Ah, this may be a big mistake. So I'm getting married tomorrow afternoon. And rather than running around and worrying about last minute details, I've ordered a pizza, I've cracked open a bottle of red wine, and I'm sitting here ready to snark on the Grammys. But that's not important. What's important is that we're all here to celebrate the 25th anniversary of "Uptown Funk", which seems to have been out for just as long as "Happy" last year (165 years strong!).

From my understanding, the prosecutors couldn't prove that he wore those specific shoes, although it was his shoe size, and there were none in the house. I have to assume that they at least looked in his closet. But what really blows my mind is the gloves. As I'm reading through Vincent Bugliosi's book, he makes mention that he personally sent prosecution a still shot that he had seen of OJ doing commentary at an NFL game wearing the gloves that Nicole had bought him, the same ones that were found at the murder scene, and they never introduced anything like that into evidence. He assumed that he wasn't the only one that had sent them a picture of OJ wearing the gloves, since apparently he had been seen wearing them at different football games but absolutely no mention of that at the trial. It's circumstantial but there weren't many pairs of those gloves made or sold in that specific size and Nicole had purchased two pairs (though size and colour weren't specified on the receipt, but he was seen wearing a black pair and the dark brown pair that would have matched the murder scene gloves) in 1990 as a gift for OJ. You'd think that they would bring that up. So missing the pictures of the shoes? Seems a little more plausible to me. No one handed them a picture of OJ wearing the shoes. Also when you consider that, again according to the Bugliosi book, there were something like twenty five prosecutors assigned to the case, half of which were working on it part time, the other half full time. With that many cooks in the kitchen, there must have been an awful lot of communication breakdowns.