jjj July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 (edited) 1. Not wearable 2. Not owned by any Gilmore, girls or older generations. 3. Not owned by anyone in the opening credits. 4. Seen in only one episode. 5. Not edible. 6. Not seen in the Hollow. 7. Seen in the Yale years. (seemed like we owed them a visit!) 8. Seen prior to the yacht joyride. 9. Not seen at Yale (nor on Yale-related properties like apartments or New Haven restaurants). So, not in the vicinity of Yale. 10. Could fit inside Bert. 11. Seen in the state of Connecticut. 12. Not seen at the Dragonfly 13. Seen at Richard & Emily's home. 14. Not a gift. 15. It has a function, but also has style. 16. Has nothing to do with Jason or the Jason year. 17. Richard and Rory are both near the object and part of the conversation about this object, but neither handles it. 18. It does involve Logan. You could say he INFLAMED the situation. (Trying to help here!) Edited July 13, 2014 by jjj Link to comment
Aloeonatable July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 (edited) Was it the object Logan put in the Gilmore's house in trade for the object he stole? Edited July 13, 2014 by Aloeonatable Link to comment
jjj July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 1. Not wearable 2. Not owned by any Gilmore, girls or older generations. 3. Not owned by anyone in the opening credits. 4. Seen in only one episode. 5. Not edible. 6. Not seen in the Hollow. 7. Seen in the Yale years. (seemed like we owed them a visit!) 8. Seen prior to the yacht joyride. 9. Not seen at Yale (nor on Yale-related properties like apartments or New Haven restaurants). So, not in the vicinity of Yale. 10. Could fit inside Bert. 11. Seen in the state of Connecticut. 12. Not seen at the Dragonfly 13. Seen at Richard & Emily's home. 14. Not a gift. 15. It has a function, but also has style. 16. Has nothing to do with Jason or the Jason year. 17. Richard and Rory are both near the object and part of the conversation about this object, but neither handles it. 18. It does involve Logan. You could say he INFLAMED the situation. (Trying to help here!) 19. Yes, it was the object Logan placed in the house in exchange for the one he, um, re-appropriated. Link to comment
txhorns79 July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 It's a lighter! Am I right? Do I get start a new question? Link to comment
txhorns79 July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 All right, I'm thinking of a controversial political figure. (I've never played, but judging from the rules and how others have started, this appears to be enough info to start. If you need more to start, just let me know.) Link to comment
jjj July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 Thanks for moving things along! I'm without power and Internet, and it took a while to find the dialup modem! Have fun! Just to get things started before I depart: (1) Was this political figure seen in person or on a television screen within a GG episode? And (2) "is his face too small for his head"? (I think that's the right quote, can't look it up!) Link to comment
txhorns79 July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 1. No. This political figure was not seen in person or on a television screen within an episode. 2. His face is not too small for his head, i.e. this is not George W. Bush. Link to comment
txhorns79 July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 1. No. This political figure was not seen in person or on a television screen within an episode. 2. His face is not too small for his head, i.e. this is not George W. Bush. 3. Yes. Lorelai does mention this person. Link to comment
jjj July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 (edited) Was this person Russian? Was this person Italian? (If one of these is "yes", I will let someone else complete the job, as my connectivity is iffy, so I should not be the "host"!) (Boy, she really did make some dramatic analogies!) Edited July 13, 2014 by jjj Link to comment
txhorns79 July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 1. No. This political figure was not seen in person or on a television screen within an episode. 2. His face is not too small for his head, i.e. this is not George W. Bush. 3. Yes. Lorelai does mention this person. 4. No. This person is not Italian. Sorry Mussolini! 5. No. This person is not Russian. Sorry Stalin! Lenin! Trotsky! Link to comment
txhorns79 July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 1. No. This political figure was not seen in person or on a television screen within an episode. 2. His face is not too small for his head, i.e. this is not George W. Bush. 3. Yes. Lorelai does mention this person. 4. No. This person is not Italian. Sorry Mussolini! 5. No. This person is not Russian. Sorry Stalin! Lenin! Trotsky! 6. Yes. This person is male. Link to comment
txhorns79 July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 1. No. This political figure was not seen in person or on a television screen within an episode. 2. His face is not too small for his head, i.e. this is not George W. Bush. 3. Yes. Lorelai does mention this person. 4. No. This person is not Italian. Sorry Mussolini! 5. No. This person is not Russian. Sorry Stalin! Lenin! Trotsky! 6. Yes. This person is male. 7. No. This person is not Ari Fleischer. Link to comment
mstaken July 13, 2014 Author Share July 13, 2014 Is this person mentioned at a Friday Night Dinner? Link to comment
txhorns79 July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 (edited) 1. No. This political figure was not seen in person or on a television screen within an episode. 2. His face is not too small for his head, i.e. this is not George W. Bush. 3. Yes. Lorelai does mention this person. 4. No. This person is not Italian. Sorry Mussolini! 5. No. This person is not Russian. Sorry Stalin! Lenin! Trotsky! 6. Yes. This person is male. 7. No. This person is not Ari Fleischer. 8. Yes. This person is mentioned during a Friday night dinner scene (I don't believe it was during the actual dinner.) Edited July 13, 2014 by txhorns79 Link to comment
mstaken July 13, 2014 Author Share July 13, 2014 Is this person an American politician? Link to comment
txhorns79 July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 1. No. This political figure was not seen in person or on a television screen within an episode. 2. His face is not too small for his head, i.e. this is not George W. Bush. 3. Yes. Lorelai does mention this person. 4. No. This person is not Italian. Sorry Mussolini! 5. No. This person is not Russian. Sorry Stalin! Lenin! Trotsky! 6. Yes. This person is male. 7. No. This person is not Ari Fleischer. 8. Yes. This person is mentioned during a Friday night dinner scene (I don't believe it was during the actual dinner.) 9. No. This person is not an American politician. Link to comment
mstaken July 13, 2014 Author Share July 13, 2014 Gah---this is impossible. I'll leave this to someone more politically savvy than I am, but a parting question: Was this mentioned during the Plaid Years? Link to comment
txhorns79 July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 1. No. This political figure was not seen in person or on a television screen within an episode. 2. His face is not too small for his head, i.e. this is not George W. Bush. 3. Yes. Lorelai does mention this person. 4. No. This person is not Italian. Sorry Mussolini! 5. No. This person is not Russian. Sorry Stalin! Lenin! Trotsky! 6. Yes. This person is male. 7. No. This person is not Ari Fleischer. 8. Yes. This person is mentioned during a Friday night dinner scene (I don't believe it was during the actual dinner.) 9. No. This person is not an American politician. 10. If the "plaid years" mean the seasons when Rory attended Chilton, then no, this person was mentioned during the Yale years. If any kind of hint is allowed, let me know and I'll give you one. Link to comment
lulu1960 July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 When Lorelai mentions this person does Emily or Richard comment back? Is this person from Asia? Oh Oh! Pol Pot (Is that how it is pronounced?) Link to comment
mstaken July 13, 2014 Author Share July 13, 2014 Ooooh, very impressive guess, lulu! I bet that's it! Link to comment
jjj July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 Yale FNDs! Not Wile E. Coyote! (the anvil conversation) Not a real question. Just too hot to focus. Link to comment
txhorns79 July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 (edited) Lulu, you are too much! And you are exactly right. Great job! For a reference, Lorelai refers to Emily as Pol Pot in the magazine interview she gives concerning the Dragonfly. In Blame Booze and Melville, Emily gets a chance to read the article and confronts Lorelai. Mind you, I'm trying to imagine why the readership of a travel magazine is going to be all that interested in an article reviewing an inn where a good portion of the article is apparently dedicated to the the inn owner trashing her mother. Even as gossip, it would only seem good if you knew Lorelai and Emily. Edited July 13, 2014 by txhorns79 Link to comment
jjj July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 That is very impressive topic and solution! I thought I had all the scripts memorized, and I did not recall that! Link to comment
lulu1960 July 13, 2014 Share July 13, 2014 I even impressed myself on that one. It just popped into my head. Okay, lets go with an object. Link to comment
lulu1960 July 14, 2014 Share July 14, 2014 This object is not at/in the Crapshack. This object is not at/in the Gilmore mansion Link to comment
lulu1960 July 14, 2014 Share July 14, 2014 This object is not at/in the Crapshack.This object is not at/in the Gilmore mansion This object is not at/in Yale This object does not belong to ANY Gilmore girl. Link to comment
Taryn74 July 14, 2014 Share July 14, 2014 Mind you, I'm trying to imagine why the readership of a travel magazine is going to be all that interested in an article reviewing an inn where a good portion of the article is apparently dedicated to the the inn owner trashing her mother. Even as gossip, it would only seem good if you knew Lorelai and Emily. Preach it. New one - is it seen in someone's home? Link to comment
lulu1960 July 14, 2014 Share July 14, 2014 Oject is not at the Crapshack, Gilmore mansion or Yale. It doesn't belong to ANY Gilmore girl It is at someone's house. Link to comment
lulu1960 July 14, 2014 Share July 14, 2014 Object is not at the Crapshack, Gilmore mansion or Yale.It doesn't belong to ANY Gilmore girlIt is at someone's house. This object is in Stars Hollow Link to comment
lulu1960 July 14, 2014 Share July 14, 2014 Object is not at the Crapshack, Gilmore mansion or Yale.It doesn't belong to ANY Gilmore girlIt is at someone's house.This object is in Stars Hollow The object is at Sookie's house Link to comment
nolieblue July 14, 2014 Share July 14, 2014 Is it the bear that Sookie bought to "butch up" the place? Link to comment
lulu1960 July 14, 2014 Share July 14, 2014 It is not the bear. But I did almost use that. Link to comment
lulu1960 July 14, 2014 Share July 14, 2014 The object at Sookie's house is not edible. Link to comment
lulu1960 July 14, 2014 Share July 14, 2014 Object is not at the Crapshack, Gilmore mansion or Yale.It doesn't belong to ANY Gilmore girlIt is at someone's house.This object is in Stars HollowThe object is at Sookie's house It is not edible It is not wearable Not the bear Not the cleaver Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.