Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

S02.E08: The Book of Quinn


  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

 Color me shocked that Solo has been there all this time and had no idea about the other survivors in the Silo. 

Again I have trouble watching this due to the darkness. I turned my brightness all the way up, then things look unnatural. I get it. It’s dark down there. How do they even farm? Are there grow lights in stock to have lasted 150 years?

I’ll been interested next week to see how Juliette talks her way out of being killed by the other women in the second Silo. 

  • Like 2
11 hours ago, Mindthinkr said:

Color me shocked that Solo has been there all this time and had no idea about the other survivors in the Silo. 

Speaking of being shocked, I’m shocked that all the commenters from last week’s episode that were commenting on Juliet not getting the bends, haven’t come back to say, “gosh I guess we should’ve waited to see the next episode before we started complaining? “

  • Like 4
(edited)
7 hours ago, HerkyJerky said:

Speaking of being shocked, I’m shocked that all the commenters from last week’s episode that were commenting on Juliet not getting the bends, haven’t come back to say, “gosh I guess we should’ve waited to see the next episode before we started complaining? “

And she got the bends and how this advanced the story? It did not. We just wasted more episode time with Juliette being underwater. 
At this point it is like a video game where Jules has to pass various levels.
Level one, build a bridge. Level two, find survivor. Level three dive. Level four heal infection. Etc etc etc.

Edited by Zaffy
  • Like 5

I binged all eight episodes yesterday with Apple's free weekend pass. Don't know if I'll pay to watch the last two. This whole season has been very repetitive. It feels like the rebel storyline just goes in circles and so does Juliette. I'm very bored with all the political bullshit. 

On 1/3/2025 at 11:04 AM, Mindthinkr said:

 Color me shocked that Solo has been there all this time and had no idea about the other survivors in the Silo. 

I think he did know. He's such an odd duck it's hard to tell though.

  • Like 4
(edited)
On 1/3/2025 at 10:22 PM, HerkyJerky said:

Speaking of being shocked, I’m shocked that all the commenters from last week’s episode that were commenting on Juliet not getting the bends, haven’t come back to say, “gosh I guess we should’ve waited to see the next episode before we started complaining? “

Came here to post something similar. #BeatenToThePunch

On 1/4/2025 at 5:25 AM, Zaffy said:

And she got the bends and how this advanced the story? It did not. We just wasted more episode time with Juliette being underwater. 
At this point it is like a video game where Jules has to pass various levels.
Level one, build a bridge. Level two, find survivor. Level three dive. Level four heal infection. Etc etc etc.

So... showing the consequences of the thing about which you complained that there were no consequences has no story advancement?

Then, why were you complaining that she didn't get the bends in the previous episode?

If you didn't think that addressing that issue was worth addressing it... then why were you mad when you thought that they didn't address it?

Let's cut to the core of this whole debate: This show is also a story about survival under dire circumstances.

As a result... they are going to show them trying to survive under dire circumstances. That's part of its DNA.

Edited by Charlemagne
  • Applause 6
On 1/6/2025 at 7:52 PM, Charlemagne said:

So... showing the consequences of the thing about which you complained that there were no consequences has no story advancement?

Then, why were you complaining that she didn't get the bends in the previous episode?

If you didn't think that addressing that issue was worth addressing it... then why were you mad when you thought that they didn't address it?

First of all I was not mad.
I complained because it is a bad way of storytelling and bad writing.
According to the diving experts she could had probably die even getting to the bottom. But in any case, this was just filler time. Surviving is a part of the story , but it is narrated so badly and in an unrealistic way.  She gets "beaten", one way or another, again and again and she seems like she is just fine. 
So, she basically survives because of the plot armor.. not her skills..

4 hours ago, Zaffy said:

First of all I was not mad.
I complained because it is a bad way of storytelling and bad writing.
According to the diving experts she could had probably die even getting to the bottom. But in any case, this was just filler time. Surviving is a part of the story , but it is narrated so badly and in an unrealistic way.  She gets "beaten", one way or another, again and again and she seems like she is just fine. 
So, she basically survives because of the plot armor.. not her skills..

This never seemed to be a problem for the likes of John McClane, James Bond, Ethan Hunt, Indiana Jones, and a host of other male protagonists who get knocked around.

But it seems to be a problem here, I guess.

  • Like 2
15 hours ago, Charlemagne said:

This never seemed to be a problem for the likes of John McClane, James Bond, Ethan Hunt, Indiana Jones, and a host of other male protagonists who get knocked around.

But it seems to be a problem here, I guess.

I fail to remember any of the heroes you mentioned above, falling from multiple floors and survive. Plus none of the movies above take themselves as seriously as the Silo tries to.
 

On 1/11/2025 at 4:05 AM, Zaffy said:

I fail to remember any of the heroes you mentioned above, falling from multiple floors and survive. Plus none of the movies above take themselves as seriously as the Silo tries to.
 

Perhaps try watching all those movies - as well as others - again.

And maybe pay extra attention.

Like to the physics-defying raft scene at the beginning of Temple of Doom.

So many movies and shows are filled with unbelievable acts of survival that to single this out as some sort of outlier seems odd. 

Also, try to extrapolate instead of trying to focus on a 1:1 comparison.

Like when the hero gets shot - sometimes multiple times - and can still participate in a full-on fight scene afterward.

The point - which you seem to be deliberately trying to handwave - is that film has a long history of male protagonists taking unbelievable amounts of punishment and then still being able to function.

I get it. You don't want to give female protagonists the same leeway. Okie dokie.

  • Like 2
(edited)

I actually am surprised that there are more people in the second Silo, I would assume that Solo had no idea but he's so in his own world he might know and just hasn't mentioned it or really understood. Its more surprising that they're apparently the cast of a YA teenage dystopian novel by the looks of them. 

I was hoping that Juliette would be back at her Silo soon to really get things moving, but I do like the rather unique narrative where we know so many things that the characters don't know, most pertinently that leaving the Silo is a very bad idea, unless we get another plot twist about what killed the rest of Silo 2.  

Juliette being off in her own side quest does let a lot of supporting characters get more development, which I enjoy, but I was really hoping that we would have learned more at this point.

Edited by tennisgurl
  • Like 2
On 1/13/2025 at 7:08 PM, Charlemagne said:

Perhaps try watching all those movies - as well as others - again.

And maybe pay extra attention.

Like to the physics-defying raft scene at the beginning of Temple of Doom.

So many movies and shows are filled with unbelievable acts of survival that to single this out as some sort of outlier seems odd. 

Also, try to extrapolate instead of trying to focus on a 1:1 comparison.

Like when the hero gets shot - sometimes multiple times - and can still participate in a full-on fight scene afterward.

The point - which you seem to be deliberately trying to handwave - is that film has a long history of male protagonists taking unbelievable amounts of punishment and then still being able to function.

I get it. You don't want to give female protagonists the same leeway. Okie dokie.

oh Geez... really? you play the misogynist card?
Apart from me being a woman, what kind of argument is this??
I complain about how much unrealistic a show has become and you answer with some kind of a distorted feministic theory?
Is this some kind of a  joke? That's it!  you are trolling!
Such an idiot I was trying to answer you seriously! I will make a note to myself not to ever bother answer you again. My bad!

3 hours ago, Zaffy said:

oh Geez... really? you play the misogynist card?
Apart from me being a woman, what kind of argument is this??
I complain about how much unrealistic a show has become and you answer with some kind of a distorted feministic theory?
Is this some kind of a  joke? That's it!  you are trolling!
Such an idiot I was trying to answer you seriously! I will make a note to myself not to ever bother answer you again. My bad!

You're the dealer in this game. I simply played the card that you placed on the table of your own volition.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...