Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Big Little Questions from Non-Book Readers & Answers from Book Readers


Recommended Posts

(edited)

We have similar threads like this for Game of Thrones and Outlander, so I thought it might be useful for this show too. Sometimes non-book readers have questions about the books but don't want to be spoiled, so here is the place to ask!

Book readers, please use the quote function to quote the question you are answering and then put your answer under the spoiler tag. This allows non-book readers to find out the answers to their questions without being spoiled about everything else asked in the thread.

For example:

  Quote

Is the book set in Monterey like the show is?

Expand  

 

  Reveal spoiler
Edited by ElectricBoogaloo
  • Love 1
  On 3/2/2017 at 3:01 PM, Winston9-DT3 said:

This isn't very important but I'm curious if Nathan's landscaper job is low-skilled, like he mows lawns for a living, or more like a landscape architect or owner of a landscape company in the book.  It seems odd to me that they'd portray the former as living in a decent house in Monterey and not in that crappy motel-looking place Jane lives or driving in from a more inland CA town.  

Expand  

@Winston9-DT3, I was going to skim  through my book this weekend so I could answer your question but I can't find it. I think I gave it away after I read it, but I'm going to dig around some more and see if maybe it's hiding somewhere else in the house!

  On 3/2/2017 at 3:01 PM, Winston9-DT3 said:

This isn't very important but I'm curious if Nathan's landscaper job is low-skilled, like he mows lawns for a living, or more like a landscape architect or owner of a landscape company in the book.  It seems odd to me that they'd portray the former as living in a decent house in Monterey and not in something like that tiny bungalow Jane lives in or driving in from a more inland CA town.  

Expand  
  Reveal spoiler
Edited by MeloraH
  • Love 2

Actually 

  Reveal spoiler

You could be correct about Nathan, but

  Reveal spoiler
Edited by kassandra8286
  • Love 1
  On 3/21/2017 at 4:45 PM, kassandra8286 said:

Actually 

  Reveal spoiler

You could be correct about Nathan, but

  Reveal spoiler
Expand  

Oooh, yeah! I totally forgot. Oops. I think he is handy though, right? I think that was a thing... I don't know why I thought that...Maybe I'm conflating books...

  On 3/21/2017 at 4:45 PM, kassandra8286 said:

You could be correct about Nathan, but

  Reveal spoiler
Expand  
  Reveal spoiler
  • Love 1

Was there anything in the book about Ed having some kind of inappropriate goings-on with Maddie's older daughter?  I had thought when she moved out there might have been a plot point along those lines, but nothing came of it.  But, watching the finale again, I noticed for the first time that when Ed moved to comfort her at the funeral she looked really uncomfortable and moved away from him.  Was there anything about that in the book?

  On 4/5/2017 at 4:28 AM, pbutler111 said:

Was there anything in the book about Ed having some kind of inappropriate goings-on with Maddie's older daughter?

Expand  
  Reveal spoiler
  • Love 1
  On 4/5/2017 at 4:37 AM, chocolatine said:
  Reveal spoiler
Expand  

Though you'd hope it wouldn't be outwardly manifested, it would be kind of weird if he loved someone else's kid as unconditionally as his own.  But I wonder what we were meant to take from that brief little interaction during the funeral?  It seemed so suggestive of something under the surface.

  • Love 2
  On 4/5/2017 at 4:46 AM, pbutler111 said:

But I wonder what we were meant to take from that brief little interaction during the funeral?  It seemed so suggestive of something under the surface.

Expand  

I did notice the brief funeral interaction, and I was wondering whether that was to set up something for the second season, if there's going to be one.

  • Love 1
  On 4/5/2017 at 5:01 AM, chocolatine said:

I did notice the brief funeral interaction, and I was wondering whether that was to set up something for the second season, if there's going to be one.

Expand  

I actually took the funeral interaction and Ed's couple of odd looks at Abigail as the kind of typical male leering even "good" guys often do. I didn't think they were sleeping together or that Ed was truly interested in her, but that on some level, women are objects to be ogled to many (most?) men. The barista is the one man on the show who doesn't do any of that and who always sides with and supports the women. He seems to get and appreciate them in a way none of the other men do. It's why he's so empowering for Jane and why, I suspect, Madeline jumps to the conclusion that he's gay.

  • Love 3
  On 4/5/2017 at 1:48 PM, Winston9-DT3 said:

Same last name?  I missed that.  I thought it was another business owner named Tom somewhere on the same street.  One of Jane's clients, maybe.  I want to say a plumber or machinist or something.  He had a more 'manly' job that contributed to the confusion, I thought.  

Expand  

I think it was the same last name. He was a plumber or something like that.

I can't see Vallee dropping seeds for a season two, since he felt (like I do) that this story was self-contained and has been told and there should be no season two.  I do wonder if the earlier hints about Ed might've been for added suspense but I didn't see any hint of inappropriateness at the funeral, and that wouldn't really be the time for suspense without future seasons in mind.   But to me Ed was basically Ben in Parks & Rec.  

I actually don't think that there was any implication by the creators, writers, or actors to imply any inappropriateness between Ed and Abigail.  I think that Ed's looks were more an "actor's choice" by Adam Scott to maybe portray his befuddlement/cluelessness/helplessness with Abigail.  I think we the audience picked up on it and interpreted it as something nefarious due to the nature of the show, but I don't think there was really anything meant by it.

I think it was just Adam trying to portray the "helpless stepdad" in his interactions with Abigail and they came off the wrong way.  I think the character of Ed in the show is supposed to be particularly socially awkward.  Hence his scene with Bonnie, where he comments on her sweating, not meant to be creepy but came off that way.

  • Love 7
(edited)
  On 4/5/2017 at 3:52 PM, JBC344 said:

I think we the audience picked up on it and interpreted it as something nefarious due to the nature of the show, but I don't think there was really anything meant by it.

Expand  

This is what I saw too. I didn't think there was anything sexual in his looks and was surprised when I read other people's interpretation. It did make me wonder if maybe I'd just missed it, that maybe I was desperately trying to cling to the one good guy in that town. But all I really saw was a guy who is socially awkward and uncomfortable in his life/marriage. I think he didn't know how to deal with Abigail. He might even have worried about it looking inappropriate if he got involved in her life too much. It is a slippery slope for a step-dad with a teenage daughter. How close is too close? What will others think.

I do think the nature of the show made us expect the worst in most of these guys. I'd say most of them did not disappoint. But I think Ed was one of the good guys. He just didn't know how to handle a teenage step-daughter. I know guys who have beautiful teenage daughters and it is hilarious watching them ogle other girls their daughters age then have it pointed out to them that other guys are doing the same with their daughters. In a culture that glorifies teenager girls as sexy, it's just gonna be awkward. He was also probably insanely sexually frustrated, hence the Bonnie comment. Poor guy just needed to get some but I never got the impression he actually would, from anyone other than his wife.

Edited by Mabinogia
  • Love 4
(edited)

I think there was intentional misdirection re: Ed & Abby because the placement of scenes is very well thought out.   A Greek chorus woman was talking about how all the guys were ogling Bonnie's dancing and how she "saw erections."    Quick cut to Ed eyeing Abby on the deck.

Edited by Razzberry
(edited)
  On 4/5/2017 at 4:47 PM, Atlanta said:

You made a statement that most men view women as to be ogled. Ed is just awkward. Not a perve.

Expand  

Actually I said "many" and questioned "most." I stand by that, and agree that Ed isn't a perve. He is a typical man, though. That's how it came across to me in the show anyway. I haven't read the book. The show was all about perception, male/female relationships, female friendships, etc. Ed being a typical ogling guy fits, though I've definitely gotten the impression that this didn't appear in the book, along with Madeline's affair.

Edited by madam magpie

I don't think typical men eye teen stepdaughers appreciatively.  Not anything more complex than Max complimenting Celeste, anyway.  And if they've been the dad in residence for at least 7 years, when the kid was Chloe's age or younger, I think it's even less likely unless the guy's a perv.

I don't think Ed was pervy at all in the book, not even with any appreciative remarks to or about Bonnie.  That addition was kind of icky.  

In the book, Ed is portrayed as being more authoritative than Maddie. He is very quick to stand up for Maddie when Abigail mouths off in the book. In one section, Maddie wonders if 

  Reveal spoiler

Missing from the show is that Ed & Maddie have two biological children-  Fred and Chloe. Ed got to name Fred and Abigail named Chloe. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...