Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

College Football


Minneapple
  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Carey said:

Whew!  I expected better from Indiana.  Well back to being a (has-been) hoops team that has a football program.

On a related note, Notre Dame opens as a 1.5 point favorite over Georgia

I didn't watch it, but hubby said the IU QB threw 2ints in the first 5 min.  That told me all I needed to know.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
34 minutes ago, Carey said:

Man, imagine how bad Bama would've been waxed had they been playing today in Happy Valley! /s

That's all we're gonna hear until next August.  But Bama did it to themselves by losing so badly against OK.

If Jennings hadn't thrown three Int's in the first qtr and fumbled (even tho he was down, he still fumbled) maybe SMU would've been able to fight.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
8 minutes ago, roamyn said:

That's all we're gonna hear until next August.  But Bama did it to themselves by losing so badly against OK.

As a Bama fan, I'm fine with how things ended up. I'm not playing the 'what if' game.  The team was inconsistent, and the chips fell where they did.  Hopefully they'll have a good Bowl game in Tampa. 

I would've been okay with Miami or Florida making it into the playoffs though.  I watched about 3 quarters of the game last night but got bored with it.  Same with the Penn St. vs. SMU game today.  Total bust on those 2 for me.   This Clemson vs. Texas game is much more interesting.  

My main disappointment in college football at the moment is the number of players on bowl-eligible teams who abandoned ship and transferred out.  As Saban said, there's not much loyalty anymore.  That's what he saw when recruiting players.  It was only about the money.  Not about the school.  College football will be in the crapper in the near future if these issues aren't dealt with.

Here's hoping the other Bowl games are better than some of them we've seen so far.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment

All the home teams won comfortably, so the detractors of the expanded playoffs will say "I told you so." I'm OK with it, it's the first round. There's a lot of blowouts in the 1st round of the B-ball tournament. 

Link to comment
8 hours ago, AimingforYoko said:

All the home teams won comfortably, so the detractors of the expanded playoffs will say "I told you so." I'm OK with it, it's the first round. There's a lot of blowouts in the 1st round of the B-ball tournament. 

In the NFL playoffs most home teams win. Higher seeds are higher seeds for a reason.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
(edited)
 

I didn't watch it, but hubby said the IU QB threw 2ints in the first 5 min.  That told me all I needed to know.

No he didn't. He threw one into and the ND qb threw an int.  Husband needs to pay attention. 

 

Considering how all first round games went not as horrible as all the pundits implied on Saturday morning. 

 

As a Bama fan, I'm fine with how things ended up. I'm not playing the 'what if' game.  The team was inconsistent, and the chips fell where they did.  Hopefully they'll have a good Bowl game in Tampa. 

I would've been okay with Miami or Florida making it into the playoffs though.  I watched about 3 quarters of the game last night but got bored with it.  Same with the Penn St. vs. SMU game today.  Total bust on those 2 for me.   This Clemson vs. Texas game is much more interesting.  

My main disappointment in college football at the moment is the number of players on bowl-eligible teams who abandoned ship and transferred out.  As Saban said, there's not much loyalty anymore.  That's what he saw when recruiting players.  It was only about the money.  Not about the school.  College football will be in the crapper in the near future if these issues aren't dealt with.

Here's hoping the other Bowl games are better than some of them we've seen so far.  

Its only been about money for the schools for years. That's why we have mega conferences down to the power 4.  The schools havent had the players best interest for a long time. No reason the players should act any different. 

Edited by DrSpaceman73
  • Like 1
Link to comment
 

In the NFL playoffs most home teams win. Higher seeds are higher seeds for a reason.

True, but usually it's a 60 minute game.  Of course, the NFL competition is much better so those are more likely to come down to the wire.  The first round games were over by halftime if not well before the final quarter.

Part of the situation was that warm weather teams were playing in cold weather places in wintertime.  So that's not good.  Indiana has cool weather so they lost because they suck.  Same goes for Clemson; they were playing in hot Texas, who might win it all.

As mentioned elsewhere, I'm in the category of "games suck but it's Year One".  Forget the fact that it's the first round & on one's home field.  This is the first year they're doing this 12-team format.  I'll wait at least a year or two to give better judgement.  Personally, I'm more upset that there's no re-seeding & how less elite teams get a winning path that should be for the most elite.

Either way, people are going to feel angry, but it's not a big deal.  The pretenders are out (Tennessee is out but not a pretender) and now we'll get 8 teams going for the title.

Things were not pleasant, but the teams that made it can't say they weren't given the nod to play for the title.  Maybe next year well get people that'll lose by less than 5 scores because they're actually close to the level of the eventual winner.

So, moving on.  It's a double digit margin in terms of favorites for Penn State & Texas, while Ohio State is favored over Oregon by the same margin Notre Dame is against Georgia (1.5)

Link to comment
45 minutes ago, DrSpaceman73 said:

No he didn't. He threw one into and the ND qb threw an int.  Husband needs to pay attention.

I may have misheard him.

 

35 minutes ago, Carey said:

Part of the situation was that warm weather teams were playing in cold weather places in wintertime.  So that's not good.  Indiana has cool weather so they lost because they suck.

What's TN excuse?  They play at Rocky Top, which is on the top of a mountain and it snows there on occassion.

Link to comment
30 minutes ago, bluegirl147 said:

So the question is are the eight teams remaining the best teams?

Out of the 12 playoff teams?  No.  However, it's close.  I'd say yes if you swap Tennessee & Arizona State.  Not sure what to make of Boise State, but I think they're definitely better than Indiana, SMU, and Clemson.  Boise State, like Ohio State, nearly escaped Eugene in a positive way.  Speaking of the Buckeyes:

3 minutes ago, roamyn said:

What's TN excuse?  They play at Rocky Top, which is on the top of a mountain and it snows there on occassion.

Their excuse is that they played their first playoff game against one of, if not the best teams in the country.  A team that's seasoned & has playoff experience.  Plus, a team that I think will definitely make the CBF Playoff for the rest of time.  Probably had more to do with their competition & less the weather than before, and I'd pick them to beat teams like SMU and Indiana anywhere

Link to comment
1 hour ago, DrSpaceman73 said:

The schools havent had the players best interest for a long time. No reason the players should act any different. 

Respectfully, Saban was all about player development.  He instilled discipline too.  I've seen more undisciplined Bama players this season than I did the whole time Saban was coach.  Of course he wanted to win, but his main focus was on the individual players and making them all-around better people. 

I worked for a guy who got to go to some of the practices and then attend the meetings in which Saban spoke.  It was interesting to get the inside scoop on Saban & the team at that time.  

If they don't get NIL & the transfer portal under control, I really do believe that it'll turn fans away, then where will they be?  

48 minutes ago, roamyn said:

What's TN excuse? 

I truly expected better of them. Looks like they got outplayed to me. No excuses. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Chit Chat said:

Respectfully, Saban was all about player development.  He instilled discipline too.  I've seen more undisciplined Bama players this season than I did the whole time Saban was coach.  Of course he wanted to win, but his main focus was on the individual players and making them all-around better people. 

I worked for a guy who got to go to some of the practices and then attend the meetings in which Saban spoke.  It was interesting to get the inside scoop on Saban & the team at that time.  

If they don't get NIL & the transfer portal under control, I really do believe that it'll turn fans away, then where will they be?  

I truly expected better of them. Looks like they got outplayed to me. No excuses. 

Saban was making over 10 million a year

Alabama football was bringing in $130 million a year. 

Making that much and complaining about NIL hypocritical. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I have to agree with @Chit Chatthat yes, Saban & AL made tons of money off college football, but he did instill discipline and he does care about the players.  He may have the same last name (pronunciation) as me, but I've never been a Saban fan.

However, he does care about the quality of the product and the young men who play it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Another thing that doesn't get mentioned enough: Sure coaches leave, to where the issue of them bolting was accepted but not a student athlete.

There is a difference.  A coach isn't going to be in 3 (plus) different institutions in as many years.

I'll be dead before there's a concrete review on the current era of NIL & the transfer portal, but I think it'll definitely be an interesting read when it comes to a "Where Are They Now" story on these athletes.  Spending 11 years in school, transferring to 14 programs due the one's inability to handle a half ounce of adversity.  What was the endgame?  What good came out from doing so to where the future was bright?

Definitely something worth paying attention to, and hopefully something that gets addressed to where it's not so much a tough documentary down the road

  • Like 1
Link to comment
25 minutes ago, DrSpaceman73 said:

Making that much and complaining about NIL hypocritical. 

He's actually for NIL, but it needs some tweaking.  Other coaches agree with him. 

I don't think it's hypocritical of him to speak out about the issues with it either.  Yeah, Saban made a lot of money, but he gave back to the community through service and charity.  He always set a great example in that regard to his players. 

He said that recruiting guys now comes down to the player and/or family asking how much they're going to make, not how the coaches & university can help the player.  If Saban was being hypocritical, he wouldn't have bothered to start Nick's Kids, or to partner with Habitat for Humanity and ask the players to help when they've built and dedicated homes to folks, and other endeavors.  He could've banked his money, done his job, went home and called it a day.  He leads by example and the players were better for it, just ask his former players who are now in the NFL.  They speak highly of him.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...