SnarkShark

I'd say both probably could be discussed. Roy even guest hosted an episode of the British version.

For the Specials and One Offs area. TITLE*: A Carpool Karaoke Christmas CATEGORY*: Music/Interview - Specials and One Off NETWORK: Apple TV RELEASE DATE: December 16, 2024 SYNOPSIS: James Corden passes the keys to Zane Lowe, a fellow interviewer and trusted voice amongst today’s top artists, as he jumps into the driver's seat in this festive installment of “Carpool Karaoke: The Series,” featuring Lady Gaga, Dua Lipa and Chappell Roan singing along to Christmas classics, including “Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas” and Wham’s “Last Christmas,” along with their own signature songs, such as Lady Gaga’s chart-topping “Die With A Smile,” Dua Lipa’s “New Rules” and Chappell Roan’s breakout hit “Good Luck, Babe!” As a holiday treat, Lady Gaga puts her own special twist on the Christmas classic, “Santa Claus Is Comin' to Town,” now streaming on Apple Music and all major music platforms. Fans can get into the holiday spirit with their favorite artists Lady Gaga, Dua Lipa and Chappell Roan, beginning December 16 and rolling out globally on December 20. “A Carpool Karaoke Christmas” is a seasonal celebration of the multi-Emmy Award-winning “Carpool Karaoke: The Series,” which won an Emmy for five consecutive seasons along with multiple Producers Guild Awards and a Writers Guild Award. The series is produced for Apple by CBS Studios and Fulwell 73 Productions with executive producers James Corden, Ben Winston and Eric Pankowski. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: HEADER:

To a large degree anyone who works at a firm like that gets vetted with a full background check. Which might explain the lack of security internally... but makes it even more ridiculous that a fictional person, "Madelyn Matlock" got hired in the first place. Usually there would be printers either right inside the lawyer's office, or at their assistant's desk, although not necessarily any real security when those people are away from their desks. But there'd also be a big difference between how legal documents are produced and how a mere email is printed. The legal docs would be saved in a document management system, and official copies used for filings would be printed centrally by a documents department. An email would just be routed to any old printer in or outside someone's office.

This could play out only a few ways. Jod himself could only majorly profit by selling the planet's location (a significant reward for the kids being returned is a pipe dream, especially after seeing how regimented that society is). We could have a moral crisis where he decides if he's going to do that. There could also be a plot with them accidentally leading pirates to the planet. Finally... the planet leadership could turn out to be overt heavies, trying to bury the whole thing once they return. At minimum wiping out Jod (and the kids may feel compelled to save him by that point). At maximum, wiping out anyone with detailed knowledge of outside (so the kids too, and possibly the parents).

If not human, she's a close human analogue, but besides her cybernetic enhancements, she's also got that white hair that suggests she could be something else, given that white hair is pretty rare (albeit not impossible) in actual young humans. That said, the previous character we know with cybernetic enhancements, Lobot, is clearly identified as human in Star Wars lore.

There's definitely a sense that returning home (likely the season ender) will cause even bigger problems. I guess we'd been led to assume (by the early looks at the show) that Suburbia Planet is something it's not. It's not an ordinary planet. It's a secret, and the kids leaving is only going to be a problem made even worse by them leading people back. Thumbs up for this subverting expectations so quickly.

Reviewing back my own last post I may have changed my mind about how someone else doing the narration might have been the fix. Maybe nobody needed to. I remembered how Ted Lasso wrapped things up with a look forward montage (admittedly less time and more straightforward) and avoided it seeming too sweet. The scenes told the story, not some narration. Show, don't tell.

They've got to Michael Scott Wendy's character. She can only be annoying if she's also lovable. Either that or they'd have to go to the other extreme and make her the antagonist.

My controversial hot take is that the emotional stuff at the end was too heavy handed. I didn't hate or even dislike the majority of the individual parts of it, but it felt too sicky -sweet to me. I get that the legacy of Superman is positivity. I get (and was one of the many people who viscously criticized) the Grimdark versions of Superman, both on film and even the occasional turns in that direction in the comics. I get (and agree with) the overall tone of this show and most of the writing and decisions along the way. I get (and agree with) that there had to be a decisive happy ending. I don't even dislike a lot of the plot and character decisions for the very end. But the actual execution felt heavy handed. Again, this isn't hate. It didn't "ruin" anything for me. I just have some feeling that some tweaking of what they did could have made it even better. My gut says that an outside view of what we saw would have felt less sappy. It did need a narration, but I think it shouldn't have been Clark. If they changed the plot up and had Clark die first. Lois would have been a natural for it. But they also could have used one of the sons, or even Lana. I'm on the fence on if changing the narration would have meant erasing the after death sequence. They could have still transitioned from the narration of someone else to just seeing that stuff. Although even there I think meeting Lois was all that was really necessary. The wave goodbye to all people living and dead sequence might be as close as I come to actually disliking any piece of it strongly. That could have been structured with the people living being in the house at the time of his death, and the deceased (but honestly... really just Lois) being there after death. If they needed to give the younger actors screen time at the very end, the only touch needed was seeing his two adult sons transition to looking like the younger ones as he started to die. Again, this is mild criticism. Takes it from being superior to just better than average. And I'm sure many (most) will angrily disagree with me.

Yes. But the show will have a challenge keeping that from being boring.

I like that the writers were willing to risk Fern being mean. Obviously it's a setup for character growth, but it's inherently a risk in a kids show to have a non-villian character be a jerk straight off. And on the flip side, Win clearly has an arc too. This type of show is bound to validate his thirst for adventure rather than drive it out of him, but there's still clearly an arc about him being unmotivated/irresponsible. Sure that structured society where one test for young kids seems to determine their whole lives is being criticized by the show, nevertheless they're also making the point that he didn't study (and was the major cause of those kids getting launched into space). Zero doubt, even if we hadn't heard him speak. The moment we saw the closed helmet it telegraphed it had to be him. To me it just felt like them pushing even harder on the idea that girls mature faster than boys. They made it literal here so nobody would even question Fern being bossy. That shouldn't be necessary, yet I think they did it anyway.

People who write those blurbs often seem to have never actually been screened the show first. Ludwig is just the character's pen name for when the puzzles are published. The character doesn't use it otherwise. Yes, the show is named that, but probably because "John" wouldn't make a very good show name.

I haven't listened since the Election. What's he got left to talk about?

Hmm. Why else would the Times grant him a fake Judge title? Clearly being an existing fake Judge is a prerequisite!

There IS slightly more to it than just being a Convience store. A 7-11 on the same street wouldn't be a Bodega. Most areas with a large Latino community are likely to have bodegas. You call them that, because they're run by Latinos... and because they themselves call it that. LA definitely has, and calls them that. NY definitely has, and calls them that. To my recollection, Miami has them, but I don't know if it's completely uniform among Cubans to use that label (whereas Puerto Ricans and Dominicans and Mexicans definitely do). Not sure about Texas. That would be another area where it's likely but I've never been there personally to check.