catsitter

Fields was actually glimpsed through the window at the end of season 1 when Irv was outside their house.

His name has been mentioned - Drummond. He is played by an Icelandic American actor called Ólafur Darri Ólafsson who I have seen in a couple of other series - "Trapped" (set in Iceland) and "The Tourist" (set in Australia).

Except that she thinks you should tilt your head back if you have a nosebleed, instead of forwards. A common mistake on tv though.

I thought Burt said he had been following Irv.

I just rewatched season 1 episode 5 and when the MDR team visited O & D, they found out that the O & D people had a myth that MDR people had abdominal pouches with larvae in, the larvae supposedly jump out and attack people who get too close, and eventually the larvae eat and replace their parent. So I guess the goat people have heard this story too.

We're just up to this episode in the UK, so I realise that this issue might be addressed in an episode I haven't seen yet, but for some reason I thought Palmer was going to be the main beneficiary of Ducky's will, and they haven't mentioned anything about that yet, or about who did inherit if not Palmer.

Just got to the end of this. Surely Natasha needs therapy urgently? And she was saving Shanelle's life by hitting JT over the head, so I don't think she would have been prosecuted if they had told the truth earlier on. Also, when Spenser and Naima find out about the baby (and they will, since their grandmother knows now), I should think they would be very upset with their parents for not letting them see him during his short life. It seemed at the end of this episode that they were wrapping up every single plot thread, many of which I doubt that anybody would have been worried about if they hadn't bothered, but then they put in that bit at the end to lead into a possible third season. I think they would have done better to start season 3 with a brand new case, set, say, a year on from this season, because the child actors grow up so fast and they will have grown even more by then.

I thought at first, when Stephen pulled the photo out of the fire, that it was going to be one of those silly last-minute twists, and that he would see something which proved Catherine was lying, such as a bottle of booze and two glasses. At least that didn't happen. But if Nancy was so obsessed with Jonathan's photos, surely she spotted Nicholas in that photo too? It looked as though Stephen was taking a knife with him to the hospital, but then his murder weapon was just going to be a syringe again?

"Let him cook" is a thing the young people say(I know thanks to my kids!), nothing to do with concentration camps. https://www.dictionary.com/e/slang/let-him-cook/

In the "flashbacks" to what happened in Italy, Nicholas is definitely 4, but in the present day, Catherine says he was 5. Nancy getting it wrong, or Catherine can't remember how old her son was when he nearly died? I hope that the last two episodes will clear up the question of whether people had mobile (cell) phones 20 years previously since they don't seem to have them in the "flashbacks", yet the present day seems to be about now?

Stephen thinks teenagers use Facebook!

So did Nancy write a book about her son having sex? Eww!

They do have long queues in scorching heat in India, but they do at least provide water.

I don't understand why Masa never told Susie that he worked in robotics instead of refrigeration, but appeared in a promotional video about his robotics work?

My TV listings magazine had a completely different episode synopsis. Maybe for next week's episode? I won't say what it was though.