Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Luckylyn

Member
  • Posts

    2.2k
  • Joined

Reputation

7.7k Excellent

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCxc9nna22ZEvHeOBCT80zyw

Recent Profile Visitors

3.0k profile views
  1. The movie is weird regarding his financial situation. The make a point of showing that he’s in serious trouble with only $17 in his bank account, no one buying his art, and his just spending a huge amount of money for an upcoming art show that get’s canceled. Yet the character is oddly unconcerned. What if one of his sources of stress is being unable to quit the society because it’s the only thing allowing him to pay his rent. This would acknowledge a real life issue of people taking demeaning jobs out of necessity and how emotionally damaging it can be. The tension between being a creative person but also trying to monetize it is a subplot that they just leave dangling. @HarveyThe movie acknowledges the difficulty of his situation at the end and does nothing with it. The movie had potential.. There are ideas but little development.
  2. I think the concept had potential but the script needed more development. It was very repetitive and sometimes felt like a sketch being stretched too long. There were some great moments and some good knocks against certain movies that used the Magical Negro trope. It was weird that the lead character was very thinly developed. He has no family, no friends, and barely any history. He’s treated like a mechanism for the plot to make points. There’s no inclusion of any black community outside of the Society. How interesting would it have been to see him hiding his new job from friends and family and dealing with that stress. One of the reasons that the script is repetitive is that it makes little room for character depth and makes the world of the movie so small. The movie made some good points but was very superficial. I liked certain scenes but the overall film needed further development.
  3. Family Vlogs are extremely popular and large amounts of money can be made. There’s so much opportunity for abuse. There is no regulation and the child doesn’t get a say if they want to participate or not. Regarding vlogger Ruby Franke. More information has come out. One of the children escaped from the house and went to a neighbor for help. The child was visibly malnourished and there was evidence the child was being held against their will. The police were called and Ruby and her therapist/business partner were both arrested. Ruby’s daughter and sister have come forward to express relief about her arrest. I hope this is end of Ruby’s Connexions group where they provided disturbing parenting advice. It’s good the kids are getting medical treatment and out of danger.
  4. It’s so rude to the performers to be disruptive during the show. It’s also unfair for the audience who are paying to see professionals having to endure amateurs creating distractions so people don’t get to fully enjoy the performance. For some paying for a ticket means getting to enjoy the live show free of audience disruptions which is my preference. But for others paying for a ticket means they can sing along uninvited. I know some shows started having singalong days where audience participation is encouraged. This would provide options for people who want to be vocal during the show and also provide days where the audience has to be quiet so people can make choices about what show experience they want.
  5. Family vlogger Ruby Franke arrested on suspicion of aggravated child abuse A video from a couple of years ago to give you a background. Ruby got more extreme views after joining/leading a group called Connexions. Last I heard Ruby’s husband Kevin moved out I think last year and the oldest boy Charld choose to move with him. The oldest daughter Shari spoke out about why she’s not in contact with her mother anymore a few months ago. I know she communicates with her mother’s family who Ruby no longer has a relationship with. Ruby has pretty much cut contact with anyone who doesn’t follow the Connexions philosophy.
  6. This is unfortunately part of a problematic pattern at shows. Bodyguard the Musical cancelled due to disruptions from the audience Audience Behavior is getting out of control
  7. Barbenheimer is more than a Meme
  8. Luckylyn

    Barbie (2023)

    Barbenheimer is more than a Meme
  9. YouTuber Colleen Ballinger's podcast and several live shows are canceled on "cancel culture," accountability, and being in the writers' room with Miranda Sings Her Netflix show “Hater’s back off” is still available under the pg rating.
  10. Yes, Five or six years ago Colleen would play Trisha’s Only Fans videos with friends and share nude pictures of her in text messages to mock her. They knew each other but weren’t close friends then. It’s really cruel how she befriended this person knowing she’d been making fun of her. Then, she tries to blame the 14 year old for it. But one of Colleen’s ex fans came forward with proof of his text exchanges regarding the porn and mockery establishing Colleen was the one sending the photos around and instigating the situation. Trisha is an easy target because people don’t like her due to her history of being an internet troll starting controversy. That still doesn’t justify making her body the target of jokes and especially of including minors in it. Criticism of Trisha’s behavior is fine but her looks aren’t why she has a problematic reputation. I’m not a Trisha fan, but she didn’t deserve this. In the last couple of years Trisha and Colleen became friends and they started doing the podcast together which stopped suddenly when people started speaking out about Colleen’s behavior with minors. Also Trisha has mellowed a bit and isn’t constantly saying offensive things online all the time like she used to. I do think Colleen could be in serious legal trouble if the evidence she shared the porn with a minor is still accessible. I really want to see a law enforcement response to this.
  11. There’s been more evidence released regarding Colleen. She has been friendly with Trisha Paytas and they recently started a podcast together that abruptly stopped posting when the current controversy started. Trisha is a very controversial online personality. She has said and done some incredibly offensive things. So the concern when they started working together was that Trishas would damage Colleen’s reputation and it was kinda implied that Trisha should be grateful that Colleen was willing to be friends and work with her. In addition to her Youtube channel, Trisha is also a sex worker on OnlyFans. Evidence has come out that Colleen was sharing Trisha’s pornographic videos and pictures with her fans so they could make fun of Trisha’s looks. The one who posted the evidence was around 20 years old when he received the pictures and messages and attended watch parties Colleen would have to make fun of Trisha. One of her fans who was 14 at the time says he was also sent the pornographic material which takes things to a criminal area. An adult can’t show pornography to a minor. I wanted to ask if anyone was knowledgeable about the legal issues. The 14 year old is 20 now and so is there a statute of limitation on this which would mean Colleen can’t be prosecuted? Also she’s in the US and he’s in Ireland. Which country has jurisdiction? Trisha has now responded to the situation and the man who was 14 at the time of these events has responded.
  12. Colleen/Miranda Sings had a Netflix show, a bestselling children’s book, and multiple live shows. There’s been this perception that she’s a kid friendly performer which allowed her to get away with a lot of inappropriate behavior because people assumed she was safe. Parents do have to pay closer attention to the content their kids are watching. Her Netflix show was labeled pg but includes multiple examples of sexual innuendo. This is a review of her Netflix show that points out the examples of how the show was inappropriate for kids despite the pg rating. Hater’s back Off I don’t think she was trying to have sex with children. I think she got off on sneaking sexual content to children underneath their parents noses. For example she had a page in her book of a tutorial of how to draw a hot dog that a parent probably wouldn’t see a problem with but she tells her underage fans that it’s secretly supposed to be a vagina. I think she enjoyed being hero worshipped by these kids and having scandalous secrets with them. She also liked to tell them about people who wronged her which would lead these adults and kids in her special online chat to go on the war path towards those she considered enemies. She doesn’t have to directly bully anyone because her favored fans would do it for her giving her deniability. She tells herself it’s okay because she’s doesn’t have sex with them, but she’s still exposing kids to sexual content. I do think she’s deriving some sort of thrill from it. I don’t know if it’s sexual or some sort of power trip. I still don’t know what to make of the content of her live shows that was done blatantly in front of the audience. Why did the parents of the 9 year old asked get snacks by putting his hands in her pants allow this? Why didn’t any of the adults at the live show accept this?
  13. How Colleen Ballinger (Miranda Sings) Destroyed Her Career She posted a response that people assumed would be an apology but instead was one of the most baffling tone deaf videos I have ever seen. Why is she singing about an accusation that she groomed minors?! Basically she claims it’s not true, then it is true but not a big deal (discussing in detail her sex life [what toys she uses, sex positions…etc}, asking them sexual questions, sending her bra and panties to a 13 year old, having an underage girl lie down on stage while she spread her legs in front of the crowd [which she minimizes by calling it just a fart joke], calling underage boys on to the stage and asking them to reach into her pants to get snacks she placed in front of her crotch, she claims her conversations were 5 years ago when she only stopped participating in the group chat with minors a couple of weeks ago, its the parents of the kids fault, it was just a mistake, and it’s not true once again. Anyway I am sharing the video through one of the kids impacted instead of directly through her youtube channel. He’s 20 now but was 13 years old when he and Colleen starting communicating and she was 30 years old. I think the craziest thing about it is there’s so much evidence of inappropriate behavior to the point that she was including it in her live act on stage. Why did parents and the general public see this and not get concerned? Why when accusations came out 3 years ago was the response to harass the boy who came forward rather than investigate her behavior? She’s making millions while he got death threats because her fans don’t want to hear that she did anything wrong.
  14. Break down of some of John Wick 4 fight scenes I just love how these films handle action sequences.
×
×
  • Create New...