All Episodes Talk: All Rise

[CrazyInAlabama]

3 November

4 p.m. episodes-

Truth Has Its Day in Court! -  Plaintiff Vaquel Lofton is suing defendant/her ex-boyfriend's boss Kathryn Brown and plaintiff alleges the defendant sent a letter about the non-payment for judgment in small claims court suit plaintiff lost.     Plaintiff is suing for harassment, defamation of character, and character assassination.  Plaintiff wants $5,000. 

Plaintiff was sued for repair of windows on defendant's property of the travel trailer that defendant owns, and ex-boyfriend was living in as part of his salary.    Plaintiff broke the travel trailer windows.  After months of non-payment the defendant sent letters to a bunch of people plaintiff knew, outlining her shady behavior.    When the deputies tried to serve the plaintiff at work, the first two servers were told she didn't work at Kaiser-Permanente, the third deputy was successful.    

Oh no!  The plaintiff is some kind of nurse?   Poor patients, I hope they don't make her mad.  Plaintiff is a Sainted Single Mother of Four (SSMOF).    The amount from the small claims was $80, but it's the principal isn't it?    The plaintiff only paid the $80 after the letters were sent out, and her employer talked to her about her bad judgment.  

$0 for plaintiff.

Hijacked Rental Car, Stolen Cash-Plaintiff Shundrica McCollins suing defendant Kamisha Lee for rental car fees and wages owed for ticket sales.   Plaintiff rented a car for defendant, defendant did not turn the car in on time, and rental company called and told the plaintiff the car wasn't back.   

Defendant has a huge titty tat of a butterfly, on both hooters.    Defendant says she didn't return the car because she wasn't a listed driver, so plaintiff had to return it.   $352.80 is still owed on the rental car, because defendant kept it for four days.    However, plaintiff says the defendant was a listed driver.   

Plaintiff also was foolish enough to collect ticket sales at the defendant's event because defendant said she would pay her for her time, and for working the ticket sales.   Defendant is so shady.      Defendant's witness (her boyfriend) claims plaintiff stole from the ticket sales, and he's shady too.   Another defendant with titty tats.   

Plaintiff gets $582.80 ($200 for unpaid wages, and $382.80 for the rental car)

 

Lovers or Roommates? - Plaintiff Todd Stout suing defendant (former live-in girlfriend) Joyce Caudle for belongings left when he moved out of the joint rental house.    Plaintiff claims they were romantic, but defendant says they were only roommates.    Defendant claims plaintiff stripped the house to the bare walls when he left.   Plaintiff paid everything, and defendant paid very little.  

Plaintiff gets his stuff back if he picks it up in the next five days.     Defendant claims he assaulted her, JJ isn't believing it. (JJ looks at the text messages on the defendant's phone, and declines to scroll through them, because they're nasty).    

Defendant is counter claiming for stolen property, loans, and an assault.  Defendant didn't call police until a few days after the 'assault' and no medical report. 

Plaintiff gets his two Directv boxes, and the rest of his property back if he picks it up in the next four days. 

Dangerous Biker Boy-Plaintiff /car owner Amber Martinez-Gonzales suing defendant/parent Tami Maiden of a 7-year-old boy (Dante) for car deductible and replacement of her brand new rims after child ran into her parked car with a bicycle. 

Plaintiff's witness, Andre Scott, who didn't know either parent in this case, he testifies he saw the child hit the parked car with bicycle.  (this was in Las Vegas, NV) 

$1500 for plaintiff, for deductible, and rims. 

5 p.m. episodes-

Drunk Driving Freeway Brawl?!-Plaintiff Aaron Gayle suing defendant/ex-boyfriend Nathaniel Briscoe for an assault.         Two men went out clubbing, were drunk, and started fighting.    While driving home they got into a fight in the middle of the freeway, early in the morning. 

Plaintiff claims the defendant reached back and smacked him in the head (he was sitting in the back seat).   The plaintiff hit the driver in the head a couple of times, while he was still driving.

Plaintiff demanded to be let out, and defendant let him out on the freeway, and they started fighting even more.     Another car stopped, and told the defendant to let the plaintiff go, and they all got in the car and left the plaintiff behind.    Plaintiff walked 30 minutes to the nearest exit, and someone at a building saw his injuries and called the police.    (This was on some freeway in California, in the Central Valley).   JJ says continuing the assault after the car was stopped, and plaintiff left the car, wasn't mutual combat, but assault by defendant.   

The plaintiff has a restraining order that was granted against the defendant.     

$2500 to plaintiff.  

 

Don't Double Talk Me!-Plaintiff Jessica Dixon is suing defendant/ former friend Montai Thompson for unauthorized credit card charges, and missing furniture.  Plaintiff never signed the lease on their joint apartment.     

Defendant used the plaintiff's credit card (co-applicants on credit card to help credit history for defendant), defendant never paid the credit card bill, and plaintiff cancelled the card (yes, it's confusing).       

Defendant was trying to get a car flipping business off the ground.   Defendant had a custody battle at the time, and he used the credit card for money for the attorney.  

 Defendant owes $4,000, and plaintiff gets it.    

 

Kid Bullies and Vandals?! -Plaintiff Tiekeisha Johnson is suing defendant Nakiah McDonald for her kids bullying her 4-year-old, and vandalizing her car.      

Who lets a 4-year-old run around unsupervised in the front yard, and no one was outside with him?  Plaintiff claims her 12 year old daughter was watching the little boy from inside the living room.   Plaintiff claims that her son comes in tells her the kids pushed him and called him the "r" word.   

The woman climbs out of the shower, claims she saw one neighbor kid hitting her car with a broom, and the other kicking the Defendant’s car.     I guess she showers in the driveway? 

 The two alleged vandals are five and seven, and were supposed to be watched by the defendant's sister.   Car pictures show bumper damage, and some dents, and I suspect someone ran into something before this.   The seven-year-old claims the four-year-old is a bully, tries to fight them, and calls them names. 

The defendant's child is well rehearsed, and is blaming the defendant's 4- year-old for the car damage.    I bet all three kids run loose, unsupervised constantly, and someday the parents will be on TV crying about their missing kid, or when one gets run over.     Plaintiff is called a liar by JJ, and that turns on the tear ducts, so  plaintiff will have to fix her own car.     

No money for anyone.  

 

Get Outta My Lane! -Plaintiff Sharonda Adams suing defendant David Wright over car damages, for an accident plaintiff blames on the defendant. What a shock, both claim it's the other one's fault.   Shocker, they both have insurance. 

Plaintiff claims she was in the left turn lane, went across the intersection with the green arrow, and the defendant's pickup truck nailed her from a lane that was going straight, not left.     They didn't get a police report, and his insurance company says it isn't their responsibility.     Defendant claims he was in the straight through lane, but plaintiff turned left from his right, straight through lane. 

Critical moment, is gas station video, showing the plaintiff in the left turn lane, and the defendant in a lane next to her, so plaintiff was in the right, and defendant still thinks it was a lie.   

Plaintiff gets $2,000 to cover her deductible, and I hope she submits the video to the defendant's insurance company to show whose fault it was.

[One Tough Cookie]

@ceazyinalabama

I red your pots, but i am so far behind I generally have difficulty  connectingtmhe.  But I love our recaps!

[CrazyInAlabama]

I surprised that my two hours of JJ continue, and there are now episodes that haven't aired several years airing again).    

6 November

4 p.m. episodes-  

Sisters, Funerals and Guns! –-Plaintiff/Andrea Vasquez suing defendant/sister and ex-landlord Anita Vasquez had her arrested unjustly for theft, and  is suing for false arrest, property return.    Plaintiff and kids were moving out of abusive relationship, and moved in with sister.  

Defendant allowed plaintiff and two kids to move in with her and her two kids.  After defendant didn't go to a family funeral, plaintiff moved out, and soon police came to arrest plaintiff for stolen property defendant claims was stolen while she was on a trip to Bali.    Defendant says a lot of sentimental and expensive possessions were stolen from her room, and the room was ransacked.    Plaintiff claims their father heard defendant tell her son to shoot plaintiff in the head with a BB gun.    Litigants' father is testifying for plaintiff, against his other daughter, but he didn't tell the police about anything mentioned in court.   Father's house, and defendant's house neighboring properties.   

Police report about the burglary is submitted.  Defendant says she put a 10' privacy fence around her property to stop plaintiff's harassment and trespassing.    Defendant cut off the cell phone, truck access, and funding to plaintiff to pay her probation fees.   Police report says plaintiff was found hiding in the closet in defendant's bedroom by police. 

Defendant says the pants plaintiff is wearing in court are actually stolen from defendant.    Plaintiff is unable to prove sister made false allegations.  Plaintiff claims the stolen property defendant alleges was actually plaintiff's property. 

I believe what the defendant says about everything.   

Plaintiff's case is dismissed 

Ex-Lovers Laptop Fight! -Plaintiff Jason Parker suing defendant/ex Scott Smyers for unpaid rent and utility bills, and the return or value of a laptop.    After the two broke up, defendant needed a laptop to help with his job search.   Plaintiff claims defendant would repay him from unemployment, and his later job. 

As usual, defendant says laptop was a gift.  Plaintiff showed up with an I.O.U., but producers say plaintiff had a signed I.O.U. for the rent, but he lied.

Plaintiff case dismissed. 

Friends with Partial Benefits -Plaintiff/former tenant Alyssa Norwood suing defendant/former landlord John Denton for assaulting her, and slamming her 55" TV to the ground. 

Landlord says tenant was on drugs.   Landlord says they were only partial benefits involved, and they were just friends.  Plaintiff only paid one month's rent, $750.   Plaintiff was only in the house for about five weeks, but claims she paid $750 for July's rent, but landlord says she only paid $600 for July, and $150 for the partial month she stayed in June.    Current tenants pays $750. 

There are two other tenants who pay $1500 a month total, and defendant's rent is $2800 a month.   Defendant says he evicted plaintiff for drug use, after he found a glass drug pipe.  

Plaintiff claims when she went to pick up her stuff, that defendant assaulted her in front of his daughter.    She claims defendant smashed her TV. 

Defendant is counter suing for unpaid rent, and a loan to buy a car. 

JJ goes to use her Phone of Justice to call Rent-a-Center, about plaintiff's claims for payments for her bed and TV. Rent-A-Center claim first TV was returned, and another TV was on payments.  However, the first TV was returned, and not the one she still has.   Rent-A-Center took the first TV back, and swapped for another TV, and the rental agreement is invalid. 

JJ dismisses plaintiff's case, for lack of proof.  Defendant case dismissed. .  

 Chill Dog Wreaks Havoc! -Plaintiff Katie Swaboda suing defendant/dog owner  Coyle for damages from defendant’s emotional support (not service dog) dog,  wrecking more than $2,000 of plaintiff's belongings. Plaintiff was taking care of defendant's service dog, so assumed responsiblity for the dog's actions at her home. 

Plaintiff case dismissed

 

5 p.m. episodes-       

Pepper Spraying Parent Catastrophe! --Plaintiff Richard Gookin and mother Vivian Bergquist are suing defendant/ ex-girlfriend SSMOT (Sainted Single Mother of Three, only two are  plaintiff's) Melyssa Ackerman for bail cost for plaintiff ($4800)posted by mom, and slashed tires.  The litigants have a 8- and 6-year-old together.    The two litigants had an argument over her cheating.     Defendant was drinking, they argued again.   The argument escalated.    (JJ's darker hair looks too dark for her). (I bet defendant had a whole lot more than one drink).   Then defendant slashed the plaintiff's tires.   

The poor kids woke up during the argument.    Then plaintiff went to take kids to his sister's house, because he says defendant was drunk.      Next morning, he got into his other vehicle, to take the kids to his sister's house for babysitting.    Then, defendant climbed into the Yukon with plaintiff and the three kids, pepper sprayed him, and he wiped the spray into her face. 

Two older kids got out of the car, but the youngest daughter got hit with the pepper spray too.   The litigants have finally broken up, and she has full custody of both kids.   (I'm assuming the court only lets him visit the children  that are his biological children).   

Defendant claims she was cleaning the kid's birth certificate and other documents out of the car.   Defendant claims man attacked her in the Yukon, and she pulled out the pepper spray, and hit the man with it, and that's when the plaintiff wiped the pepper spray off of his face, and on hers.  Defendant claims plaintiff pushed her, and she hit the daughter with the pepper spray when she fell.   Defendant claims plaintiff was kidnapping her kids.

I think the defendant is a total fake, drama queen. JJ is totally unimpressed by defendant's phony tale of woe.  

Plaintiff left for his mother's house, came back with his mother to get clothes, and the police arrested plaintiff, but charges were dropped.   No medical records of assault, but it was all her fault for spraying the pepper spray. 

Plaintiff was arrested, and it cost his mother $4800 for bail.  Everything dismissed.   I feel sorry for the kids, not the parents. 

 

Wild Tequila Bar Catfight! -Plaintiff Ceyerah Curtis suing defendant Kailey Aiello for medical bills and damages after defendant assaulted her after a bar hopping night (five bars/clubs the same night, drinking tequila at all of the bars).    They can't agree on if they went to the club together or not.    They got to the club/bar at 10 p.m., and the fight was after 1 a.m. at closing time.      The two went out for a cigarette, talking to two new men.   

The two drunken women started arguing, plaintiff claims defendant smacked her first, and they were rolling around on the ground.    Plaintiff has photos of her injuries, a swollen lip, scraped knee, and two broken nails.    No medical report of plaintiff's injuries.     

In my view both litigants are fools, and deserve nothing.    Defendant is counter claiming for tuition bills, and injuries, all dismissed, and dental bills.   Dental bill has nothing to do with this case, so it's dismissed.   Plaintiff had her lips done, and claims the fight ruined her lip fillers, that's also dismissed. 

Nothing for either litigant.  Why didn't they show the video?   I love a good fight video.

Older Woman Takes Advantage of Young Partner?!-Plaintiff Arna Kimiai suing defendant/former business partner Mary Stallworth for damages from dissolving their salon business.    Defendant suing for stolen, and damaged property.   Plaintiff (who has huge, woolly bear caterpillar eyelashes) didn't bring the contract, and never signed it, so no contract is in force.      I absolutely hate the abrupt way plaintiff is treating Officer Byrd, she's a rude idiot. 

Property is mostly salon furniture, and plaintiff wants wall paint expenses, etc.  Very dense plaintiff.     Defendant will give back three chairs.  However, no receipts for two sofas, or hair dryer.   Plaintiff wants new chairs, not used chairs, and she can forget that.    Plaintiff wants her bonnet dryer, attached to sofa back, she paid for, $900, and she gets that back.   

Sofa bonnet dryer was to replace dryers, styling station, microwave and fridge the plaintiff got rid of when she moved into the salon.   

Plaintiff gets the three chairs she doesn't want back, microwave, refrigerator, and $900 back.     However, plaintiff got rid of three styling stations in the salon, microwave, and refrigerator, in salon, that defendant owned.    Also, $900 sofa / dryer was to replace two dryers plaintiff trashed when she moved into the salon.    Defendant went from a three station salon, to a one station salon after plaintiff trashed equipment that was already in the salon. 

Plaintiff gets nothing, just her property back.  The $900 to plaintiff is cancelled out by the value of what plaintiff trashed that belonged to defendant. 

Edited November 7, 2023 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

7 November

4 p.m. episodes-

1,000 Beer Bottles Clean-Up?! -Aunt/plaintiff Melissa Schrader J made the huge mistake of renting a house month-to-month without a lease to defendant/her nephew Jacob Romberger (her sister's kid) for unpaid rent and damages, $5,000.     Plaintiff wants money for cleaning, trash removal, damages.    Aunt/plaintiff was living in Las Vegas, and came back to Harrisburg, PA to care for her terminally ill mother-in-law, and gave nephew/tenant notice to quit.   Nephew said he was looking for another place.   Aunt/plaintiff told nephew to move out, said he was moving, and then sublets said they weren't moving after nephew moved.   

Aunt saw the house with beer bottles, trash, and dirty dishes everywhere. So, aunt did notice to quit, and then had him evicted.           Plaintiff's husband supervised the house, when he got out of prison, and then went back to prison.    Nephew says he had permission to sublet from uncle.   

JJ doesn't believe what plaintiff claims district court told her to do, which is have the police evict them, because they had no lease, but were paid up, month-to-month tenants.   

Bills for cleaning up trash, and estimates are submitted by the nephew.     Nephew didn't pay August rent, but didn't get the place cleaned up.    Nephew claims she changed the locks after he moved out, Aunt says she didn't.    The sister/mother of nephew is defendant's witness.     I bet Thanksgiving is fun with this family.  

Nephew claims he had to move out on 1 August, claims that Aunt freaked out when he was going to move his last load of stuff, Aunt went nuts, and damaged his car.   

Aunt claims she was holding a dining chair outside, and moving the trash out, and claims nephew was piling trash outside, and said he was leaving all of the trash.     Aunt claims nephew attacked her, and threw her to the ground,    Aunt also claims the house took days to clean out, and was revolting.  

Plaintiff gets $500, defendant gets $250 for car damage by plaintiff.    So, again JJ shows landlords should stuff it for damages, and trashing your house. 

 

 

Extravagant Beach Wedding Fail! -Plaintiff Melissa Dang suing defendant/former fiance Rich Thornton for backing out of their wedding. Plaintiff wants money for the ring, her dress, venue costs, all kinds of non-refundable vendor costs, and she's out of her mind.         He sent her a text to cancel it.   Plaintiff takes desperate to a new level, moved defendant in to her place after two weeks, were engaged and planning a wedding after six weeks.   Defendant (twice divorced) wanted a courthouse wedding, but plaintiff (once divorced) wanted a fancy beach wedding.   Budget for wedding was $17,000 or more. 

Defendant has a bankruptcy, and lots of bills, and plaintiff says in her sworn statement that she knew he was broke.        As JJ points out, the man paid very little of the living expenses, but plaintiff thinks he's going to pay for the wedding of the century?   Plaintiff claims she didn't know defendant was living with another woman when they met. 

Case dismissed. 

Brother-Sister Skirmish-Plaintiff / condo owner Megan Duhrkop suing defendant /brother Kevin McDonald for 'artwork' his children did on her walls when sister let defendant, and two teenage children move in to the condo.    He  paid rent for a while, then stopped and wanted his mother to pay the rent, but mother says it never happened, and she's plaintiff's / daughter's witness.     

Defendant didn't pay eight or nine month’s rent, and claims Mother was going to pay his rent, and claims sister was going to cut his rent in half.   

Defendant also had a cat, not allowed by the HOA, so plaintiff will get fined for that too.   Damages to condo include holes in walls, ruined doors, and his teens ruined the walls with 'artwork'.   The pictures don't show a little crayon or marker, but a lot of marker ink on every wall.   

The entire condo is filled with trash, damage, and will take thousands to fix, and $5,000 won't even begin to fix it.   Defendant loses, and I only hope he's been evicted too.      Plaintiff says the artwork looks exactly like the brother's graffiti, so it may not be the teens.  

$5,000 to plaintiff.  $2500 for unpaid rent, One of the few times JJ took the landlord's side in a case. 

5 p.m. episodes-

Wedding Dress Distress-(the case where the plaintiff designer/seamstress did the wedding dress, and is wearing what looks like a bunch of black garbage bags made into a dress, including a huge bow for court)- Plaintiff /bride Danielle Burke suing defendant /dress designer and seamstress Sonya Timmon-Scott for refund on dress, cost of new dress, and emotional distress.

Plaintiff actually was on a local TV news program in a modified dress to claim it's very ugly, but  it was after plaintiff changed it from the original.    The defendant has a picture of the dress when it was finished, and the plaintiff removed the nice touches.  It looked awful when plaintiff claimed on TV the dress was nothing like she ordered.     

Plaintiff paid less for the dress when she picked it up because it was not totally finished.   $490 was owed, and she paid $300.     Designer says the plaintiff and mother caused a big scene at pick up.      This is a completed contract at the reduced price, because plaintiff took the dress.

Apparently, it's one of the wedding dress, and reception dress events,  requiring  two dresses situation.     Defendant says the dress was ripped apart, posted on social media slamming the designer, and went on the local TV news show with a consumer ripoff reporter.   

The designer picture is lovely, and the plaintiff's picture after she took the dress apart was hideous.    By the way, cramming too much person into a satin dress is a bad idea, and too tight satin shows every lump and bump.  Too tight satin is a great way to have a massive wardrobe malfunction too.   The seamstress plaintiff hired to 'fix' the dress took the beady piece off of the dress, and put it on the wedding dress, but it's still fraud, 

Plaintiff gets nothing, and defendant gets $2500.

Pregnant and Panicked!-Plaintiff Andrea Gonzales suing defendant/family friend Casey Craven for unpaid loans.     When defendant's hours were cut back, she couldn't pay her insurance, $280.    Defendant claims the plaintiff wanted her policy number, to pay her insurance.     

Defendant backed into a neighbor's vehicle, and then left the scene.    She also claims that when she had the accident she panicked, and left, parked the car at Brake Master's, and plaintiff paid that bill too.   The accident cost plaintiff $500, then loaned her another $200, equaling $980.      

$780 for the plaintiff, no proof of the extra $200.     I wonder if the neighbor saw this, and figured out who whacked their car and left?   I hope so. 

 

I Need You To Love My Lamb!-Plaintiff Paulette Cyr suing defendants Megan and Kelly Heidner for return of her lamb, now a full-grown sheep.  This is the story of the plaintiff who adopted a lamb off of craigslist, was raising a lamb in her house, and finally the husband told her it had to go.   

Lambs do poop in the house, I wonder if she considered diapers?   Plaintiff says she was going to eventually put the three to four-month old lamb outside, but that never happened.    (As patty1h says, note the giant photo of the lamb on the easel). Plaintiff had a house-raised lamb, and is suing defendants/new lamb owners for return of animal to raise in her dining room.  

Plaintiff gave it to some people who treat animals like animals, not like house pets. The defendants' farm looks great, and the herd look like they're in great shape.    Plaintiff wants defendants to give the lamb (now a grown sheep), back because they let the lamb/sheep live outside with the flock of sheep and goats, live in a barn.

Defendants offered to buy the lamb for $150, but plaintiff didn't want the money.    Plaintiff changed her mind, a few days later, and wants the lamb, now a grown sheep back.        

Plaintiff says she has changed her house around so the sheep will be happy living inside with her again, and apparently arranged for a companion.  Plaintiff proposed that the defendants should keep the lamb, while the plaintiff found a companion for the sheep, and prepared her house.   Four days later plaintiff wanted the lamb back after she prepared her home for the lamb's return.   Plaintiff wanted a playmate for the sheep, and then wanted the lamb back in her home, not in her barn.   Plaintiff claims defendant Megan at first agreed to return the lamb, but then decided to visit plaintiff's home and see if it was suitable for the lamb, and Megan said it wasn't suitable, so kept the lamb. 

Defendant shows a video of their hobby farm.   20 acres with 7 sheep and 9 goats. The lambs and goats look great. and their farm looks lovely.     Plaintiff claims her husband pushed her to get rid of lamb, and she wasn't in her right mind when she gave the lamb away (mean personal note-I bet that woman has never been in her right mind, and I bet the lamb was never outside before the farm).

As JJ says, you can't give something away as a gift, and then take it back. 

Plaintiff gets nothing, including the lamb, and case is dismissed.        

Playing the Ride Share Game-Plaintiff /Ride Share rental owner William Anderson suing defendant /Uber driver Christiano De Marco for car rental fees, insurance refunds, and car damage, They had no contracts, but JJ says their car payment constitutes a contract.   Defendant needed the car because his previous cars were repossessed.     The plot thickens when the defendant had an accident with the rental car, 

Car costs $57 a day, plus $2.    Car accident happened, and there is a police report too.    Defendant is filing for bankruptcy too.     

JJ is right, collision on car should cover the damages, and plaintiff needs to file a claim.     Plaintiff claims defendant owes $413 rent for a few days he didn't pay for.  (JJ doesn't believe the defendant's tale of how the accident happened, she also would like to hoof him in the nuts too.   I may not be psychic, but JJ telegraphs her feelings very well).   

Plaintiff paid the insurance, and there was a $20 refund, and defendant got the refund, and didn't pay that to the plaintiff either.   

$407 for the plaintiff.

[CrazyInAlabama]

8 November

4 p.m. episodes-

Meth Mechanic Slander! -Plaintiff /car owner Amber Thorne suing defendant/mechanic Gary Skiles for return of parts from her car.   Mecchanic was paid $1,500 for purchase of parts for plaintiff's Mercedes (she's a process server and has multiple vehicles.  He admits he didn't do the work. 

However, plaintiff posted online that defendant was on meth, and she denies going to his child's school.    Plaintiff has Mercedes towed to defendant's house, it was later towed to plaintiff's house, and was never put back together.   

Plaintiff paid defendant the $1500 to get parts for the Mercedes.    Defendant is a one-man operation, and was backed up with other jobs so he couldn't do the Mercedes repair that same day.    Then, plaintiff claims defendant wrote her a nasty text.  And defendant put the repair off for a couple of weeks, because of issues with clients that were in front of plaintiff's car in line. 

JJ wants to know how long to put the parts in the Mercedes, and defendant says about 8 hours, so a day's work.    JJ says defendant shouldn't have taken on the job working for plaintiff.  

Plaintiff is suing for return of the $1500.   Defendant is counter suing for defamation and harassment.  Plaintiff posted on craigslist "beware of Meth mechanic" about defendant, posted his name and wife's name online, his home address.   Plaintiff denies she caused issues at defendant child's school.   However, plaintiff says she called in a complaint to CPS about defendant.   

Defendant and wife were also put on various sex sites by plaintiff, and he says they were getting nasty phone calls at all hours of the night. 

Plaintiff case dismissed.   Defendant gets $5,000 for plaintiff's acts. 

 

 

Safe Deer...Injured Car! -Plaintiff Douglas Sansbury suing defendant/former employee David McLean for damaging a company car avoiding a deer.  Plaintiff has a handyman service, and defendant was an employee, and defendant drove company car. 

Plaintiff did not have insurance on the company car.   Defendant is counter claiming for the last week of work, $420.   

Defendant says he was on lunch, and on the way back to work, a deer jumped in front of him, and he swerved, and hit a mailbox.   He notified the homeowner that he hit the mailbox, and defendant paid $84 for the mailbox.  

After plaintiff heard about the accident, he told defendant to return to the scene and call police to make a report.  Police arrested defendant at the site of the accident.    Plaintiff claims defendant told police the accident happened on Saturday, and defendant was arrested for making a false police report. 

JJ tells plaintiff that he needed to have insurance coverage for employee cars, and he should have claimed it on his insurance. 

Plaintiff case dismissed, $420 to defendant for his unpaid wages. 

 

Wedding Planner Rip-Off?! -Plaintiff /bride Lauren and Daniel Herrera suing defendant/wedding planner Pam Barrie for the return of her fee, stolen property. and for ruining plaintiff’s wedding.

Bridal couple married in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico and had a reception for 100 in Temeculah, CA for people who couldn't go to Mexico for the ceremony.   They had two bar servers, no bartender,  decorations,

Bride claims defendant stole the flowers, Also, only one bar server showed, not the promised two servers.  Defendant was late setting up, and did show up late, but defendant says venue wouldn't allow the early time.   There was a three hour set up, and only one hour allowed for break down and clean up.   Defendant charged $57 an hour, and $100 for the one bar server.   Couple paid defendant $500, including the bar server's $100.   Bride says she couldn't do family photos at 4:00 pm because decorations weren't done.   Also bride is claiming for $275 for the photographer, and pain and suffering.   

JJ says three people setting up, decorating, serving food and booze, and clean up for $500 was a bargain.     Bridal couple paid over $5,000 for the wedding in Mexico.   Bride claims some of her family had to pitch in. 

Bride claims defendant stole the $75 of flowers she purchased.   Defendant says she wasn't reimbursed the $75 for the flowers. Bride says the $500 to defendant included the $75 for the flowers, so defendant was paid $425 for the server, and another helper, and all those hours of work. 

So, this takes defendant's fee down to $47 an hour.   

Groom and bride complain defendant left early, and didn't clean everything up.  JJ reads the note defendant left when she left.  Bride whines defendant was paid to clean up, load, and unload after the reception, and didn't. 

There is no contract, just a note from plaintiff.   

Plaintiff case dismissed.

Fatal Dog Walk?! -Plaintiff/dog owner William Goree suing defendant/dog walker (father) Jim Singh and (son and dog walker) Preet Singh over the death of a 12-year-old poodle.  Plaintiff says dog was injured while defendant son was walking the dog, so he feels defendant father should be financially responsible for the dog's death.  Plaintiff hired 12-year-old to walk the dog, claims the dog was injured during a dog walk, and dog later died during surgery.   Plaintiff wants the father to pay the vet bills.   

Plaintiff did sometimes pay the defendant son, but usually paid in treats, popsicles, and other items.    Plaintiff says the defendant son was negligent. Who hires a 12-year-old to be a dog walker?    Plaintiff would have to pay a whole lot more for a professional dog walker. 

Plaintiff says young man pulled dog out from under furniture by the leash, and that caused the dog's injuries.   Plaintiff claims he showed the young man how to walk the dog, and only walk the dog in the courtyard.    

Plaintiff showed bad judgment in 'hiring' the young man. 

Son says he had dog on leash, sitting on the porch, and plaintiff called him and said, "Walk Sasha (the poodle) in a new place", but still in the courtyard.  Plaintiff says in hall-terview that defendant son yanked on the leash, dislocated the dog's shoulder, and dog died in surgery.    Defendant son says dog always had a bad

Plaintiff case dismissed.  I suspect plaintiff never let this go. 

5 p.m. episodes-

Pet Sitter Kills Dog?! --Plaintiff  Susan Budwiser suing defendant/pet sitter Kerry Harnden  for the death of her dog, when dog was in the care of the pet sitter.  Plaintiff had four small dogs, one Shih Tzu, and Shih Tzu mix, plus two other small dogs.   The Shih Tzu mix is the dog that died.  

Plaintiff was on a European cruise, and sitter was supposed to be living at plaintiff's house, and caring for the dogs.  

 Dog sitter was recommended by the woman's vet, and I hope she told the vet what an idiot she is, and what happened.   Defendant is a so-called animal activist, who seems to be impaired in court.  Defendant was supposed to stay at a woman's house, take care of her four dogs, and took the dogs back to her home instead.    Plaintiff agree to pay $750, with $400 down, and was going to give defendant $1,000 total. 

The 'animal activist' part confuses me, or is the pet sitter, really one of those animal activists that thinks all pets should be allowed to run free in the wild, to get hit by cars and starve?     One dog dug out from under the fence, and got hit by a car.     

The pet sitter won't shut the hell up, and keeps talking over Judge Judy.     Defendant claims harassment, stalking by plaintiff sitting in front of her place of employment, and made reports to CPS about some kids, not hers (no, I don't understand this either).     I guess the idiot pet sitter is a nanny or something.    

Defendant also sent text messages to plaintiff saying she's glad the dog died, and her other dogs should die too.  Defendant claims plaintiff saw pictures of plaintiff's dog at defendant's house.   However, dog was unsupervised long enough to dig out of the yard, and get run over.   (Guess who still advertises her pet sitting business)

Defendant claims plaintiff's sister and daughter sent death threats to her.   Defendant claims both litigants were great friends after plaintiff came home. 

JJ says she will hear the plaintiff's complaints of harassment by defendant, because defendant is harassing JJ.   JJ also says defendant is high in court.

Officer Byrd clearly wanted to beat the defendant into a bloody pulp, and if it wasn't a ratings sweeps month I'm sure the defendant, Cruella Deville, would have been booted out long before the end of the case.     

Plaintiff gets $1,500.

 

You're an Idiot for Helping Someone in Need! --Idiot plaintiff Natalie Gutierrez leased a Honda for the defendant Vanessa Medina, and is suing for at least one unpaid ticket, excess mileage, and other payments.   Car was leased from Honda.

Defendant has a long history of getting cars repossessed, and that makes the plaintiff stupid.     Defendant claims she was giving rides to plaintiff, etc. , and defendant didn't have enough money for lease.    Plaintiff had car registered, in her name, and defendant is named on the insurance.     Plaintiff also had full insurance on the vehicle, which was her only smart move. 

 Plaintiff is whining because the defendant owes for at least one unpaid parking ticket (Plaintiff’s getting that), excess mileage.      Plaintiff's not getting that, since she can't prove who did the mileage, and wants the defendant to pay what she agreed to.     The defendant has a weird little top bun.     (Yes, plaintiff was an idiot for leasing the car for defendant, and for whatever that eye makeup she's wearing is supposed to be.    That eye makeup is hideous). 

Defendant had a limit of 12,000 miles a year, but put 22,000 miles on the car instead.  I don't even want to know how much the extra 10,000 miles will cost.  JJ says only plaintiff had the contract for the mileage, not defendant, so plaintiff gets nothing. 

Defendant still doesn't think that a person who doesn't pay their bills is a bad risk, and plaintiff had a DUI after this all happened too.  Lots of bad judgment in this case by both litigants. 

The plaintiff only gets $84 for the traffic ticket, and nothing else. 

 

Woman Left Dying on Bathroom Floor?! -Plaintiff Chrstiana Smith is suing defendant/ex-boyfriend Robert Wilson for a truck, medical bills, filing a false police report, return of property, and apartment rent.   Plaintiff is another idiot, and thinks that defendant was going to take care of her financially forever, for rent, health insurance, and other financial items,  in return for moving with him to Las Vegas.  (They both moved from Oklahoma to Vegas, and both are back in Oklahoma, hopefully a long distance apart).     Plaintiff left defendant's and her own property behind when she moved out of the joint apartment in Las Vegas. 

Defendant still has a jointly owned truck, and took motorcycle helmets.   Defendant sold the motorcycle in April, when they still lived together.    One month rent, for an apartment she was alone in for a month.    Plaintiff left his property behind in the apartment, and she got evicted after she didn't pay rent for month (I suspect an extended stay or something like that).     Defendant tried to get a restraining order against plaintiff, but judge said no.       

Defendant is trying to get the truck solely in his name by refinancing.  He claims he'll see his bank to refinance when he goes back home.     He wants his name off the apartment lease, and JJ almost wets her pants laughing for obvious reasons.       

Plaintiff sent a dick pic to his relatives, claiming he sends these to many women, and he claims she stalks him, but brings no proof.   I guess they got an apartment lease. Most of the extended stay places allow monthly leases too, so I bet that's what the lease was for.  

Plaintiff claims he left her dying on the bathroom floor, except she seems to be breathing just fine.    I really wanted to know about the 'dying on the bathroom floor' but it wasn't discussed.  Plaintiff seems like a bunny boiler to me, and I hope her new fiance watched this. 

Plaintiff gets $500 for the false restraining order.  I don't see the restraining order as false after hearing the plaintiff's allegations.  However, court denied the protective order against plaintiff. 

5K Credit Card Free Ride- Plaintiff Michelle Garceau suing defendants /ex-boyfriend Brian Buckley and current girlfriend Lisa Marrero for credit card charges. Plaintiff stayed for two days with defendants, with her son, and the male defendant is the father of her kid. 

Plaintiff claims defendant woman borrowed her credit card.   Defendants claim the plaintiff and her son stayed with them, for a couple of days when plaintiff was sick.  .       Defendant woman gets $3k a month disability, and worker's comp.     

Plaintiff loaned her credit card to defendant woman, and defendants claim the credit card use was in lieu of rent.    Defendant woman claims the Plaintiff was having panic attacks after assault from her boyfriend, and claims she stayed two months with her.   

JJ wants texts from plaintiff that address the credit card use in lieu of rent, and the defendant man has nothing.   

 Plaintiff gets $5,000.     

[CrazyInAlabama]

9 November

4 p.m. episodes-

Online Scammer?!-Plaintiff Dan Haahr bought truck from defendant Marlon Kolandsuing for a refund.   Defendant’s account was a phony ebay account, from defendant who is a day trader in bit coins.    Plaintiff claims the same defendant has a bunch of phony sales ads, pretending to be a transferred military officer (he isn't).   

(This is the case where JJ talks about Kelly Filkins, aka Ebay of Pigs, selling pictures of cell phones, instead of the actual phone).      

Plaintiff called ebay, but it wasn't the real ebay that transferred the money to the defendant.   What a shock, defendant claims he was scammed also, and isn't a crook.     Defendant claims the scammer actually ripped him off, but also scammed a bunch of people too.   A man in the middle attack is what the defendant says he was a victim of.     

The defendant only had the Bank of America account for a month, so he was in on it. 

Plaintiff gets his money back.    

Music Blaring Recklessness?!-Plaintiff Cristina Tirano  suing fellow motorist/defendant Marcus Johnson Jr for backing into her car in a parking lot.  Defendant claims plaintiff hit him.    Both litigants had insurance, but plaintiff only had liability, so she filed on the defendant's insurance.   

Plaintiff and defendant were both parked, plaintiff backed up, and defendant backed up, and plaintiff claimed he hit her.   Defendant says he backed up, and plaintiff hit him.     Plaintiff was foolish enough not to make a police report, because defendant said if she called the police, then he was leaving.   

Plaintiff's hood is obviously smashed in, defendant (who tries to advance on the sacred bench, and Byrd backs his butt up) had no insurance, and plaintiff gets $2307.  

 

Baby Daddy Drama!-  Plaintiff Shacoya Anderson suing her former landlady/defendant Latonya Wilson for false restraining order, disposal of her property, and other garbage.    Defendant was renting the room for $200 a month.    Plaintiff had a few kids, all living in the room with her.   

Defendant claims the plaintiff was fighting with her baby daddy, and twice the police were called.   Defendant admits the plaintiff paid her rent that month, but defendant didn't return it.   

Defendant told the plaintiff to leave, and got a restraining order against baby daddy.    Defendant didn't get a restraining order from the judge against the plaintiff.   Defendant trashed the plaintiff's property after she never picked it up.   

Plaintiff gets $5k.  

 

My Neighbor Tackled Me! -Plaintiff William Shaw suing defendant Curtis Segura  for an assault, medical bills, and assessment fees.   Defendant has a black Lab, son brought his dog, and plaintiff claims the dogs were roaming the neighborhood.   Defendant says the dogs went on plaintiff's property, and defendant says plaintiff used simulated police sirens, bullhorns, and plaintiff threatened to kill the dogs the next time the dogs were on his property. 

Defendant says son's dog didn't wander.   Defendant took steps to keep his Lab in, and that stopped the dog wandering.   Plaintiff admits the dog issue is resolved 

Plaintiff claims he saw the No Trespassing signs on his property, but they weren't his signs.    Plaintiff went to photograph the signs, and claims neighbor verbally assaulted him, and was raving about building a fence, and claims defendant threw a piece of wood at him, and then tackled plaintiff. 

Medical report and photos of injuries show injuries.  Plaintiff had a sprained knee from the attack. 

Defendant claims he was putting up a corral for his ducks, he did put the signs up, but admits one of the No Trespassing signs was on plaintiff's property.   Defendant claims he heard someone swearing, claims he thought someone was injured, went to check, and plaintiff confronted him.   

Defendant claims plaintiff was a bad neighbor, and did throw a stick.  Defendant sounds like a hot head.  Defendant says "that's it", when plaintiff tripped, defendant ridiculed him, all on plaintiff's property. 

 I believe exactly what the plaintiff says about the defendant, and the attack.  

Defendant is for filing a false order of protection, and attorney fees.   Plaintiff was not granted the order of protection.  

Defendant claim dismissed, because it's bull pucky. 

$2500 to plaintiff.

 Spiteful Car Ownership! -Plaintiff/ex-girlfriend Stefanie Redding suing defendant /ex-boyfriend  Zachary Satrk for car damages from an accident and impound fees.  Defendant bought the car with his own funds during the relationship, and took the car with him when he left.   Car was insured and titled in plaintiff's name because she would get better insurance rates. 

JJ says plaintiff should have signed title to defendant when he left.  Plaintiff claims it was a year after defendant left that he asked for the title.   Plaintiff claims defendant offered to give her the car, but he didn't.   Plaintiff claims she lost the title, and had to apply for a new one.  Apparently, plaintiff wasn't worried about having the car titled, and insured  in defendant's name.  Defendant says he immediately asked her for the title, and on several other occasions, but plaintiff never gave him the title.   

When defendant totaled the car, the insurance company was coming after the registered/titled owner who is plaintiff, for impound fees, and damages for the other car.   Plaintiff says defendant cancelled the insurance, but defendant says plaintiff stopped paying for the insurance. 

Since defendant didn't have the title, it's plaintiff's fault she was financially responsible, and she cancelled the insurance. 

Plaintiff case dismissed, so the $4,000 debt is her problem. Defendant claims he will help her with the debt, I wonder if he did? 

 

5 p.m. episodes-

You Made It Awkward! - Plaintiff Jummal Wren suing defendant/former roommate Jacquelyn Ying for breach of lease, damages, and late fees.   Plaintiff, plaintiff witness Jarrell (also defendant's ex), and defendant moved into the same apartment.   Plaintiff witness, and defendant were in a dating relationship, then broke up.    Defendant moved out four months before lease ended.    

Defendant says even after the break up, plaintiff and plaintiff's witness were still friendly, and witness would let himself into the apartment with his key, even after witness moved out.   Defendant had a new boyfriend, and eventually told plaintiff she didn't want plaintiff witness in the apartment.  Defendant claims ex was harassing her, texting her, and apparently, looking at her funny.   Defendant's mommy is her witness, and thinks her daughter is so right, and mommy is so wrong.   

Defendant wanted to change the locks to keep the ex out.    To get plaintiff off the lease, defendant would have to find a co-signer (probably mommy).   Defendant didn't show up for her ex parte restraining order.    Defendant's mommy just has to stick her nose in the situation.     Defendant is trying to stick plaintiff with her portion of four month’s rent.  

Plaintiff receives the defendant's half of the rent for four months, $1600.    Defendant's stupid counter claim for emotional distress is dismissed, because it's stupid. 

I am Not My Adult Son's Keeper -Plaintiff Angel  Davis suing defendants/her son Carephes Welsh, and his ex-wife Vanessa for a loan to son to pay off credit card debt.  Loan was made after the divorce was filed, to pay off the credit card bills of the couple.   

Ex-daughter-in-law isn't a party to the loan.    Plaintiff says money for attorney to son was a gift , $2800.    Then son asked mother for a loan, $689 for his house payment, then a couple of weeks later, she loaned him $4800 for credit cards.   

Plaintiff saw the JJ show, and called the show directly to file the case.    She never filed locally in small claims.   My guess, plaintiff filed just to get money from the show, and she never filed locally, because son would have to actually pay a judgment.   

Plaintiff sent back to file in local small claims court, which will never happen.  Bet if plaintiff files, it will be against ex daughter-in-law, and case will be dismissed again.  

 

p. 493, 17 May 2021

Open Relationship Shocker! ; Chicken Slaughter!

[CrazyInAlabama]

10 November

4 p.m. episodes-

Don't Show Up Drunk!-Plaintiff Brandy Darby (SSMOT-Sainted Single Mother of Two) asked defendant (father of her two kids) Darlington Roach to come over and babysit the kids while she started her new job.  Plaintiff is suing for a broken window, and defendant keying her car.    Plaintiff says defendant was drunk, when asked to leave broke a window at her apartment, and keyed her car.    Plaintiff saw man break the window, and claims he called her and said she was going to pay for this.   Defendant also showed up at Sainted Single Mother of Two (SSMOT) baby sitting job at 1:30 a.m.     

Defendant sees no issue about showing up drunk, and really late.   Father of the Year material isn't he?   

 There are estimates for the window repair, and pictures of the car, plaintiff gets $3,000. 

Mutual Combat Cruise?!-Plaintiff Douglas Culmer suing defendant Timothy Jones over a disastrous cruise and accusations of assault.    Litigants went on a cruise together, shared a cabin, and everything went very well.    They decided to go on another cruise, and both are suing each other because the cruise wasn't fun for them, and it was because of the behavior of each blames on the other.   

Then, they had a physical fight.     Why couldn't I get the video of this case?   It sounds like a wild fight.   

Plaintiff gets $500, because defendant assaulted him, and plaintiff brought photos. 

 

Vengeful Ninja Brick Thrower?! -Plaintiff /ex-girlfriend Veronica Jones suing defendant/ex-boyfriend Sherrad Bennard for having her arrested for vandalizing his car.  Defendant says plaintiff threw a brick through the windshield.    Defendant agreed not to prosecute her if he was reimbursed for the windshield. 

Defendant claims the police report, and prosecution were mixed in with another case against him, and those files were lost.  

Plaintiff claims she didn't trash his car, or smash the windshield.   Defendant has been plaintiff's 'friend' for two years, and he recognizes her car.   He says she called him many times in the days before the windshield incident.   He didn't see plaintiff toss the brick, but he heard a loud noise, and saw someone dressed all in black running away from his car.  He says he saw her driving away from his house. 

Right after the incident, plaintiff stopped calling him.   He made the police report, and two days later plaintiff was arrested.   Case was ultimately dismissed, but that doesn't mean plaintiff was innocent. 

JJ says just because defendant only showed in court once and the charges were dropped, doesn't mean plaintiff didn't do the crime she was charged with.   Defendant says two incidents happened, and no police reports were available.   JJ mentions that you don't show up in court in shorts.  

First time brick didn't go all of the way through his windshield.  The second night he's not sure who did it, because he didn't see anyone running or driving away.   However, the first night is when defendant saw plaintiff running and then driving away. 

The recordings plaintiff submits to the court are bizarre, and prove nothing. 

Plaintiff case dismissed.   

 

 Lies, Lawyers and Landlords -Plaintiffs/former tenants Cory Capone and girlfriend Kelsey Swanson suing defendant/former landlord (he was another tenant, renting the house) Michael Hernton for unlawful eviction after landlord broke the lease, htey're suing for return of property, and rent after an illegal eviction.

Plaintiffs rented the Main bedroom from defendant.  Defendant and his ex-wife rented two bedrooms, were the leasors of the house.  When ex moved out, they moved another tenant in to take her place.   Defendant claims he told plaintiffs that it wasn't legal for him to sublease to them, so they had certain conditions on renting from him. .   House was rented by defendant and ex-wife, and it had four bedrooms.  

Defendant's counter claim dismissed because he was illegally subletting the bedrooms. Defendant doesn't come to court with clean hands.  

Plaintiff man talks about the altercation he had with defendant, claiming defendant barged into their room when they were half-naked.    Defendant says there were a lot of drugs being used by plaintiffs.  I believe what the defendant said, after the reaction of the plaintiffs to the drug allegations. 

They paid rent of $600 the last month, then moved in with his parents' house. Defendant said he reminded plaintiffs about a real estate agent coming to view the house, and reminding them to clean up, but claims he knocked and waited to talk to them, didn't just barge in. 

Police report is submitted, which is only what plaintiffs'

Plaintiffs receive $300 back from their month's rent. 

In the hall-terview plaintiff man says defenda t wouldn't have seen the drugs if he wouldn't have barged into their room.  

5 p.m. episodes-     

Woman Whacks Husband's Ex in Head with a Gun?! – Plaintiff wife Dorthea Lockhart is suing defendant/ex Dalquesha Taylor for vandalizing her vehicle.   Plaintiff husband went to prison for 3 years for assaulting the defendant, and married his co-plaintiff wife while he was in jail, and the three kids with plaintiff wife range from 11 years to 5 months.  Plaintiff husband lives sometimes with his wife, and sometimes at his cousin's house.   

Plaintiff is an idiot ex-con who claims he was innocently out until midnight (and we all know what he was doing, and probably with another desperate woman).  Supposedly man texted defendant at mall, to come to his cousin's house, not where he's shacking up with the wife.   Defendant goes to the cousin's house, wife/girlfriend plaintiff whacks stupid desperate defendant in head with a gun.

Defendant made phony police report saying plaintiff ex-con wasn't present, so it didn't violate his non-contact order with desperate, stupid defendant.     

Plaintiff wife says she has a recording of confession from defendant that she vandalized the car.      Poor Officer Byrd has to go listen to the garbage audio recording on the phone, and couldn't figure out anything on it.     Plaintiff says something about vandalizing the defendant's car, but not until two days after defendant claims it happened. 

 Plaintiff wife apparently walked in on plaintiff husband, and defendant boinking in the basement, and that's when the assault happens.      I wonder what happened to the plaintiff's teeth?  Or is that a souvenir of love muffin's assault?   Defendant claims when plaintiff wife showed up in the cousin's basement, when she was boinking defendant, plaintiff stole her phone, social security card, false teeth, and broke her purse.  

Plaintiff wife claims defendant vandalized her car.   Plaintiff wife's witness is her own husband.  Defendant claims she was madly in love with plaintiff husband. 

Apparently, defendant took her fake teeth out, and claims plaintiff wife took the teeth too.   

No money to either party, because they're stupid, and desperate, and all three will probably go home to continue this freaky relationships. 

My Arm Was Almost Torn Off-  Plaintiff / tow truck driver Michael Solis suing defendant/tow truck driver Camerino Hernandez for injuries during their mutual race to a tow call, so medical bills, pain and suffering.    Two tow truck drivers work for the same company in Chicago. 

They get paid cash for each tow, which apparently makes things very competitive.     Plaintiff claims defendant parked too close to his truck that plaintiff's arm was caught, and almost torn off.    Truck company doesn't get worker's comp., and claims the company said they will take care of the plaintiff, and didn't want him to get a lawyer, for obvious, sleazy reasons.     

The two drivers were racing to get to the accident, because first one there gets the tow, and the money.   The plaintiff looks so confused and hurt when JJ says there's a scam going on, and she'll figure it out (he's not a good actor either).      I think part of the reason they came on the show was to advertise the business, and I'm surprised the litigants, and their witnesses aren't wearing M & J Trucking t-shirts.    When defendant pulled out to go to the tow, the T-shaped boom hit p.'s arm.   

JJ tells them both to take it up with M & J Trucking, no one gets money from Officer Byrd today.

 

p. 482, 29 December 2020

Teenager's Night in Prison! ; Completely Hideous Bridal Gown?!"

[CrazyInAlabama]

13 November

4 p.m. episodes-      r

Drugs, Arrests and Gas Poisoning?! – Plaintiff /ex  Jordan Allen and their  former landlord  Gretchen Mickler are suing defendant/former tenant with Allen Gary Brodman for a loan, rent property damage, and harassment.  Defendant says he should get the security deposit back, because he paid the entire deposit, and any damages were done by Allen's current boyfriend.   

Defendant borrowed money for a car payment from landlord Mickler, and claims he paid loan back by working for landlord for several days, worked for her son, and owes plaintiff Mickler nothing.   

Defendant says Allen's drug use caused issues in the rental house, so he finally had to move out.  Mickler wants money for damages defendant did, but can't prove who did the damages, whether Allen, her past boyfriend, her current boyfriend. 

Plaintiff Mickler gets $250 for the loan. 

Allen submits photos of the house damages.  JJ says Mickler should sue both Allen and Brodman for the damages because they were the only tenants on the lease.

Defendant says he moved out after Allen was spiraling, out of control, and had her druggie boyfriends in the house.   Mickler gave Brodman an eviction notice, but he already notified her he was moving out and wanted to break the lease.  Defendant says he didn't do the damage, and Allen claims defendant did it.  

(This is the classic case where plaintiff Allen claims the windows are "carbon monoxide" windows to prevent gas from hurting you, but those windows don't exist. That statement by Allen shows me who the cuckoo bird is in this case. Then Mickler doubles down supporting Allen's bizarre statement). 

Plaintiff Allen is suing for defendant's half of the rent for three months when he moved out of the house.    Defendant says plaintiff was arrested right before he moved out, one was for DUI, and after a theft charge, and a drug charge.  Allen says she wanted a plea, instead has a jury trial for the drug charges pending.  

JJ dismisses Mickler's award, and case because she keeps interrupting. 

JJ dismisses two month's rent to Allen, and discusses the rent for the month defendant moved out.    I wouldn't give a penny to either plaintiff, they are blaming defendant for moving out after repeated arrests of Allen, and blaming him for damages that they have no way of proving any damages were defendant's. 

$250 to plaintiff Mickler, nothing to Allen.  Defendant case dismissed. 

 

Bat Girl Goes Bonkers?! --Plaintiff William Madden suing defendant Crystal Steiglman for assaulting him with a baseball bat, while he was sleeping.     The defendant was offended by some rumors she blamed plaintiff for spreading, and she whacked him.     

When plaintiff is asked why he didn't have her arrested, he says because he didn't want to take a mother away from her children (this is when JJ asks "She has children!!!).   

Defendant hit plaintiff in the head with a baseball bat she brought with her.   She claims it was self defense. 

Plaintiff gets $5,000 for medical bills.

Separation and the Single Mother- Plaintiff Tony McIntosh suing Sainted Single Mother defendant Jane Andaya over whether money to pay her rent was a gift or a loan.  $1500 dollars is in dispute. 

Defendant claims plaintiff sent her an expensive purse, and then put the $1500 in her bank account.  This story by defendant is in her sworn statement to the court.  Defendant says the sworn statement is the truth, so she's been lying to JJ in court. 

Defendant claims she was in a divorce, ran into problems paying bills, and claims plaintiff gave her a gift of the money, to pay her rent.   Then, JJ finds out that defendant's entire story is a lie. 

 $1500 to the plaintiff. 

5 p.m. episodes-

 

Guess Which Breed of Dog Annihilates Another! -Plaintiff/dog owner Lisa Hicks suing defendant/Pit Bull owner Arin Wilson for vet bills, and for threats. Teen niece of plaintiff, Nadia, and a friend go to walk her dog (German Shepherd).  They are across the street when neighbor's two pit crosses came out of the yard, and attacked the dog.      The pits are kept on chains at night in the back yard, and off chains during the day, and never come in the house.   

The dogs are chained, and she doesn't want to risk people kicking in her fence (I believe that the SWAT team usually kicks in the front and back doors, but maybe the gate too.   I wonder if the pits attack any dog they see, or just dogs resembling the ones that come with the SWAT team? ), at night, and letting the dogs out.    At night the dogs are chained, during the day the dogs roam the back yard.    The defendant also has a chihuahua that lives in the house all of the time. Nadia's mother testifies about seeing the aftermath of the fight, with the Pits going home, seeing the defendant's roommates putting the Pits in the back yard.  

A wonderful bystander hit the attacking dogs with a chair, and made them let go.  The girls went home, pointed out the two attacking dogs, and saw the roommates of the defendant/homeowner put the dogs back in the yard.     

Police reports were made, and to animal control.  The Pits were not quarantined. 

After the attack, the defendant homeowner kept threatening the plaintiff, the niece, and others at the plaintiff's house.    Police didn't do anything about defendant's threats.  

There is a shocking video of the homeowner screaming all kinds of threats against the plaintiffs, and the dogs, the morning after the attack.   Defendant claims her homeowner's insurance covers the Pits, I'm betting that's a lie too.  

$3,000 for the plaintiff.     

Upcoming Rap Star Bling!-  Plaintiff Cristel Sheppard   suing defendant /former girlfriend Olivia Harvey for $5k, for rent, diamond jewelry, iPhone, and iWatch.    Plaintiff paid nothing in April, May, and June, but they were living together then too.  The ex-girlfriend, or whatever, was an aspiring rap artist, so plaintiff loaned her money for an iPhone, and paid nothing back.    Then, plaintiff bought her the iWatch, and nothing was paid back by defendant, and there was one payment from defendant of $500.   

In May defendant smashed the watch and phone, and in July plaintiff bought the necklace for the defendant.  

Apparently, the defendant misbehaved in the court clerk's office before the case.    I really want the video of that misbehavior.

Plaintiff starts to yell at JJ, and defendant, and her case is thrown out.    Plaintiff says "what a waste of time", and JJ says for her too. 

 

Cat-Litter Eating Puppy?!-Plaintiff Heidi Croff suing defendants / Alisha Levine and (boyfriend) Ryan Nashfor lease breaking fee, unpaid rent. . Defendant young man and woman moved into plaintiff's apartment, and then plaintiff's cat litter was eaten by defendant's puppy.   

 Plaintiff moved out early after the fighting over the puppy, kitty, and everything else started, and JJ told her to pay the lease break fee.

Everyone gets booted, and no money.  In the hall-terview defendant woman admits the assault on plaintiff, but explains she didn't rip out plaintiff's real hair, just extensions. 

 

Shady Supervised Child Visits? -Plaintiff/child visitation monitor Therran Robinson suing defendant/ so-called dad Ian Chandler for missing visitation with his kid.    I didn't realize there were companies that supervised visitation for money.   I thought it was always through CPS/DCFS officers. 

The company employees don't have any training except the company, and no education requirement for employees, sounds shady to me.   He is a one-man company right now.    Plaintiff is suing for $768 for missed visitation.  The cost of the visit is only $115, but plaintiff is getting creative with overdue payment charges.       Defendant was told he had to have supervised, once a week visitation, for two hours. 

Defendant's supervised visitation is ordered by the court. 

The child lives with the  adoptive mother of the child's mother, Kellileeand she is the child's guardian.   Mother of the kid must be a real piece of work, and so must the maternal grandmother, and the defendant's mother looks very shaky. 

The defendant claims that because his license is suspended, he's required to have supervised visitation (bull pucky), and he shouldn't have told that to a former family court judge, because even I know that a pile of doo-doo.     Defendant brought his mommy, who looks rode hard and put away wet.

Defendant claims he cancelled the visitation for work reasons, JJ reams him out.  Defendant claims he is allowed to cancel plaintiff's services, and could have plaintiff witness, the child's guardian supervise.  Plaintiff witness keeps shaking her head no when defendant makes excuses, or lies to JJ.

Plaintiff witness and child's legal guardian says she now supervises the visits, and says supervision was ordered because of defendant's extensive drug history. 

Plaintiff receives $115.

 

Bromance Party Fail- Plaintiff David Long is suing defendant Thomas Haskinsfor his portion of trip to Hawaii.    Plaintiff had the trip for nine planned with a co-host, both were celebrating their 40th birthdays.   

 Plaintiff paid $1490 for tickets and hotel, for the group trip, and defendant didn't pay his part.   Defendant has a bunch of lame excuses, but he's just another deadbeat. Defendant is another whiny man-baby who thinks everyone will finance him for the pleasure of his company. 

Everyone else paid for airfare, rental house, except defendant.  On a previous trip to Curacao defendant paid his portion. 

This time defendant paid $150 to plaintiff.   Plaintiff say defendant claimed that he had sent $1500, not $150, and it was a glitch in Cash App. 

Plaintiff receives $1354 for the trip costs.

[DoctorK]

3 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

This is the classic case where plaintiff Allen claims the windows are "carbon monoxide" windows

Yeah, this is a classic, almost as much as the selling of a picture of an iphone case. Installing gas heating does not create a CO (carbon monoxide) hazard unless there are leaks which would be checked before finishing the installation, although a CO monitor is not a bad idea especially if you have a fireplace. Also, keeping the windows open two inches would not be enough to take care of CO poisoning and certainly not an acceptable solution to leaks. The only slim chance that these windows have a function would be in areas where naturally occurring Radon gas seeps into basements where the solution is ventilation of the basement areas. I would love to know who supplied these $500 custom Carbon Monoxide safety windows which sound like just windows with a plastic tab that holds the windows open two inches.

This was sort of fun because the plaintiffs were such lousy people.

[CrazyInAlabama]

14 November

4 p.m. episodes-

p. 496, 5 July 2021

Horrifying Dog Death!; Bad Driver Caught on Tape!

 

Don't Be A Bum Magnet! -Plaintiff Octavia Walker suing defendant/sort of  boyfriend Tristen Bradfordfor an unpaid loan, $800.  Of course they met online, and as always defendant says it wasn't a loan, but a gift. 

Defendant Bradford says plaintiff was attracted to his facebook page, but thought it might be fake, because "he's more handsome than other people".   No, he's not.   He's also a former incarcerated person for 'financial reasons'. 

$800 to plaintiff.  JJ also tells plaintiff not to be a bum magnet. 

 

 When Doors Attack! -Plaintiff Kelsey Stoddard suing defendant Roy Smith for car damages, when a door fell on plaintiff's car.   Defendant had been renting a home, and was moving trash out for pickup, and plaintiff says an old door fell over and scratched her car. The scratch happened on the first day plaintiff owned the car. 

Defendant says scratch on car that plaintiff showed him was so minor he didn't even take a picture of it, and he doesn't understand why plaintiff wants him to pay for fixing the damage. 

$350 to plaintiff. Plaintiff actually says thank you to JJ. 

5 p.m. episodes-

House Flipping 101: What Not to Do- Plaintiff/a first time house flipper Noemie Piard claims the defendant/ contractor Daniel Ubrina-Gandarilla scammed her.   Plaintiff took a real estate how to flip course, and screwed the flip up miserably.    Plaintiff hired the man to do the kitchen cabinets, maybe opening up a wall, and putting in a support beam.     

Plaintiff says sefendant claims he ordered cabinets, but she says he never ordered anything.  Defendant says he ordered the cabinets,  and plaintiff cancelled them, and there was a restocking fee.    Plaintiff never checked any references for defendant. 

 Plaintiff gets $3000, even after advancing on the sacred desk of Judge Judy.   Plaintiff doesn't get the other $2k that she claims the man damaged in the house. 

I Threw a Ping Pong Ball , Not a Rock!-Plaintiff Brittany Ammer claims she manages an apartment house for free (she's apparently related to the owner), and is suing defendants/former tenants Caleb Johnson and Mariessa Dery for unpaid rent, stolen furniture, and furniture damage.    She claims that defendants moved in, were month to month tenants, and are still living in the duplex.  Plaintiff says she loaned an armoire, and two more pieces of furniture to the defendants.     

Defendants were going to renovate a bathroom in the building for the equivalent of $1k, and they ripped the bathroom out.     The bathroom remodel is hysterically bad, and will have to be gutted, and redone.   No permits were pulled either.  

After seeing the bad job on the bathroom, plaintiff demanded the armoire, and two lamps back.  

The glass on the armoire was cracked, defendant says plaintiff's son broke it, and there were cigarette burns (she gets $250 for armoire).      Defendant claims plaintiff hit her car, and left the scene.     Defendants moved out suddenly, and claim (on video) plaintiff whacked their car with a rock.  Plaintiff claims it was a ping pong ball or rubber ball.  Defendant claims damage to her van was not caused by the ball or rock, but when plaintiff hit van with her car.   The police case is still pending. 

Plaintiff receives $250 for the furniture damages.  Defendants receive $0.   

 

p. 482, 20 December 2020

Scary Healthcare Rip-Off ; Senior Tricked Into Nursing Home Facility?! ; Car Thieves Don't Get Far with Lemon!

[CrazyInAlabama]

15 November

4 p.m. episodes-

Ex-Lover Caught Lying! -Plaintiff Tammy Neagle suing defendant/ex Gordon Schuster for payments on a truck that's in her name, and destruction of her property.   

Plaintiff bought a truck in her name, and she claims she paid the note every months.   Truck was actually defendant's,  and when defendant left he took the truck. 

Then, defendant claims the story on the truck is wrong.  He says he sold the Jeep, when they got the truck, so he's lying about that.   Then he claims he drove away in the Jeep, but that was after the truck was bought using a trade-in for the truck.   Defendant claims he had another Jeep, purchased a year later, but he has no proof. 

Defendant claims he didn't take the truck, and left in his second Jeep, but he did.  Defendant claims he sold the Jeep months later, and then admits he's a liar. JJ reams lying defendant out.  

Plaintiff didn't pay for the truck after defendant left their live-in relationship. 

Plaintiff case about truck payments dismissed. Destruction of property is considered by JJ. 

$150 and $20 for TVs, glass door broken but it was replaced for free. 

$500 to plaintiff for property damages. 

 Get Out of Jail Rent Free! -Plaintiff/mother Sharon Clark suing defendant/plaintiff daughter's jailbird boyfriend Christopher Cunningham for unpaid rent, damages to her car, and moving expenses.

Defendant got out of prison a year ago, has no job, all bills paid by plaintiff.  Then, plaintiff goes on a tirade saying defendant stole her daughter's prescriptions, that keep daughter from relapsing.    Daughter in plaintiff's witness.    Plaintiff says defendant has had four or five jobs over the year. 

 When plaintiff took her 18 year-old granddaughter to Europe, she prepaid June and July's rent, and told defendant he was responsible for August's rent.  August's rent was never paid. 

Plaintiff's daughter now lives with the plaintiff, the granddaughter is living in Florida now.   Plaintiff says her daughter has anxiety issues.   

Defendant lives with his brother in New Port Richie, FL, and visits plaintiff's daughter every couple of weeks after she calls him, and asks him to visit.

 JJ says plaintiff had no expectation of repayment.

Defendant says car was dropped off by mother at the apartment, and it had issues, so car was for mother, and daughter.    However car was never really repaired.  Car was a loan from the plaintiff. Plaintiff claims defendant illegally rented out granddaughter's room, charging $100 to $150 a week at the apartment.    Plaintiff moved the three bedroom apartment herself, in three days.    

JJ says from her own statements, plaintiff was happy to have defendant to babysit her adult daughter while plaintiff took the granddaughter to Europe. 

Plaintiff case dismissed, she had no expectation of repayment from defendant.   

 

Front Porch From Hell-Plaintiff Karen Beck paid contractor/defendant Terrance Gorenc $8,000 (total fee was supposed to be $11,000) to redo her front porch, she's suing for $5,000.   

Plaintiff claims the porch is higher than the house, and the porch work in photos is horrendous.  There was no written contract, and plaintiff only checked online for negative information about the contractor.   The entire front porch was replaced, and doesn't look that bad to me, but the close ups show the work is sloppy.   

Defendant claims he's been a contractor for 15 years.  

JJ dismisses the plaintiff's $5,000 she wants, but leaves the case open in case fixing the porch costs more than the remaining $3,000.    

Unfit for Each Other Roommates-Plaintiff (subletting a 3 bedroom condo)  Joannie Gerbacia suing defendant / former tenant Sarah Ramos  for property damage, and unpaid rent.

Defendant moved out in August, but had a lease until October.  Defendant wanted plaintiff to use security deposit for the August rent, but that's illegal in their state.  Plaintiff objects that defendant painted the room beige, even though it was painted four years ago, before defendant moved in.   

Plaintiff $325, only for the unpaid rent.    

 

5 p.m. episodes-

Damning Vandalism and Theft Caught on Tape?!-Plaintiff Lisa Dellano is suing defendant /former tenant Michael Murphy for theft, and damage to her property.   Defendant moved in , and is shown on tape stealing from plaintiff, with the help of his friend.       

I remember this one, and the plaintiff is lucky she's not on the ID channel, as a victim.         Defendant stayed there from mid-September to the end of May.  He claims he paid in cash every month, but there are only seven months rent paid, and not one month.   

Plaintiff changed the locks, claiming police told her too, but can't tell JJ because it's hearsay.  

The video of defendant, and girlfriend shows them stealing plaintiff's property, and damaging her security cameras.    Defendant and girlfriend are both stealing a lot of stuff too.    Defendant seems to think everything on the video, is funny.   

Defendant claims plaintiff was evicted from the townhouse because of her actions against him.   

Plaintiff gets $5000.  

Don't Call My Antiques Junk-(This is the wild case where the neighbor had a lot of his junk in the old store on the first floor of the two store, and house/apartment above it owned by plaintiff's aunt.   Plaintiff  is a realtor, and manages the aunt's property.)   Plaintiff/POA for her aunt Debi Mackey is suing defendant Jeremy Burmeister for money to get his junk off of her aunt's property, and a gate put on aunt's property by defendant removed.   

 Plaintiff wants money to get the defendant's stuff off the alleyway on the plaintiff's aunt's property.  He put a gate over the end of the alleyway, and all of the junk is on the plaintiff's property.    Plaintiff wants to rehab the property, and sell, and it will then be worth about $500k (it's worth about $150k now).    

The plaintiff (niece of owner with power of attorney) had a survey done, and defendant's stuff is clearly on the aunt's property, and plaintiff wants it out now, and the gate removed.     Defendant Jeremy Burmeister, claims it's all valuable items for his art projects. 

The plaintiff has pictures of the junk, and it's not art work or valuable.    Plaintiff also claims he's adding to the pile too.    The plaintiff's witness is trying hard to not laugh herself off the chair.     The defendant only owns 3 ft. from his building, and stuff is way beyond that too, from the photos.   Plaintiff wants the stuff moved, and demolition money for the gate removal.   

The only mistake the plaintiff made is she didn't get an estimate for removal of the junk, and the gate.   Defendant has three days to remove his junk, and clear out the gate, or plaintiff will get money for dumpsters, labor, and removal fees.  I think the defendant was trying for adverse possession, but the California laws about that are very strict, and defendant can’t prove anything to qualify for adverse possession.

This is a rerun, and I'm betting that after the court case the plaintiff had to remove the junk, and get paid for it.  JJ is giving the plaintiff an order that if the junk isn't gone in three days, then she can call the sheriff, and get his junk out.      If plaintiff has to remove junk, then JJ will pay her bills for removal.      I love the response of the defendant to finding out JJ will not put up with him, and his junk.  

 

p. 482, 31 December 2020

Man's Face Caught in Blacklisted Dog's Mouth!; Bengal Cat Breeding Debacle!

[CrazyInAlabama]

16 November

4 p.m. episodes-   

Don't Pee and Post! -Plaintiff Jesse Huggins suing defendants Christopher Easley, Bailey Forsten, and Nicholas Nolan for stealing and vandalizing his Confederate flag, and vandalizing his truck.  (this happened in Arizona)

Plaintiff had a big flag pole, with a confederate flag in the truck bed on his truck.   The plaintiffs broke the flag pole, stole the flag, and were driving around with it,   Truck was $10k, with a flag pole added on the inside of the tail gate, for $200.   

Plaintiff was at a BBQ, and returning to his truck, and found the flag was gone, and a huge scratch on the tailgate.  Plaintiff bought the truck with his money from working.  Flag was ripped in half, and vandalized.     JJ points out to the defendants that not liking someone else's flag doesn't entitle you to steal it, pee on it, and other acts. 

Defendants claim they found the flag in the road, and didn't vandalize plaintiff's truck or steal the flag.  

Defendants posted their vandalism online, so plaintiff could locate them.   The defendants admit to vandalism, stealing the flag and urinating on it.   It's really fun when the 'lawyer' defendant (who is either 18 or 19), challenges JJ, says he doesn't have to answer her questions, and she tells the trio that it's a long walk home to Arizona if they don't answer her questions.     The three defendants put the flag back on the truck bed, after they urinated on it. 

Defendant Easley says in the hall-terview that he stole the flag.  

$2500 to the plaintiff.  

Peace, Love and the Broke-Down Bus! -Plaintiff Megan Graber is suing ex-boyfriend Joseph Bender for charges made to her credit card.   

Defendant took a bus trip (VW bus size bus), and he went from California, to Louisiana.    Defendant and plaintiff met up again in Louisiana, and were traveling when the bus broke down.   Litigants had to fly home for an interview, and defendant was broke, so everything was charged to plaintiff's credit card.   

Defendant says mechanic at first said that the van had mistakenly had diesel put in the tank instead of gas, but that wasn't the eventual problem, so it wasn't the plaintiff's fault.    There is also the possibility that the gas delivery service put the wrong fuel in the tank at a gas station too.   Defendant charged $992 for the mechanic, a cell phone bill, and gas charges.   

Plaintiff gets  $1366.    

World's Worst Healthcare Aid?! -(Title should be aide, not aid)  Plaintiff/aide Demitria "Demie" Davis is suing former employer/defendant Brandy Hunter after being fired after four hours working for defendant, and wants unpaid wages.   Defendant says plaintiff was the worst aide he's ever employed, and plaintiff was annoying.   He's counter suing for property damages, and emotional distress. 

Plaintiff was hired under a state program to pay her wages, for 5 hours a day, Monday, Wednesday and Friday.     Plaintiff was hired to help with cooking, bathing, and other common household tasks.  Mostly a housekeeper, not an aide.  Plaintiff only started her CNA training.   

Plaintiff actually worked for 7 days, so 35 hours total. 

Forms to claim state paperwork were filled out by defendant, but he didn't send them in. 

Defendant says she only worked two hours on one day, and two hours on another day, so only four hours total.    Defendant submits his texts to plaintiff, asking why she isn't at work.  She also wanted to use his expensive truck, and he didn't want her to drive that. 

Impact is the program that's supposed to pay plaintiff.   Defendant didn't put in for any hours for plaintiff, but claims plaintiff sent him a text saying she didn't want the money. 

JJ will pay plaintiff the four hours $52. 

 

 Hostile, Loud and Annoying?! -Plaintiff /former roommate Peter Cross suing defendants/former roommates Precious Jade Teo and landlord/roommates Abraham Kessel claiming $850 rent.  Plaintiff claims a hostile living environment (from having to attend house meetings about how annoying he is).    Teo manages the tenants, for Kessel who owns the home.   There are two other tenants besides Cross, and landlord/owner Kessel.

Defendant Teo claims plaintiff coughed constantly and like a foghorn, was very annoying to the other tenants.

I am annoyed by plaintiff already, so I think I'm picking sides in this case.   

Defendant does a dramatic rendition of plaintiff's coughing, and yawning.   The four tenants shared a big fridge, but brought enough to fill the freezer by himself.   Defendant Teo also remarks that plaintiff never used a cane or had mobility issues the way he does in court.   Defendant says Cross was noisy, rude, refused to talk to the other roommates.  Then, evening noises went from noisy at night, to all day. 

Plaintiff also demanded a landline of his own, and then wouldn't pay because he claimed the line didn't work, so defendants spent $179 to get the phone fixed. 

Cox telephone damaged the house installing the landline, so Teo and Kessel should sue Cox. 

Plaintiff moved out, and he wants prorated rent, and I would give it to him just to get rid of him.  

JJ tells defendant to return $750 of the rent back. 

 

5 p.m. episodes-     mother son        defendant

Drone Under Attack Takes Fatal Dive!-Plaintiff /mother and drone owner, Gayla Bieksha suing defendant Anthony Keller for loss of a drone after it collided with a frisbee thrown by defendant.   Plaintiff borrowed a drone ($999.99) from Mommy, and a man with a frisbee (Disc Golf) nailed the drone, and killed it.  Plaintiff son Casey borrowed the drone.

 Drone was hovering 15 ft. in the air, and the drone goes down.  Plaintiff claims the drone dipped down in front of a bunch of the frisbees, and bye-bye drone.     Defendant unfortunately said he would give the plaintiff some money.    Plaintiff is partially responsible for the drone damage, because it was flying so low.   (I think anyone over 18 that brings Mommy to court should lose on the spot). 

Defendant volunteered to pay for the drone, but mommy didn't ask her special snowflake for any money for her drone. 

$750 to the plaintiff.   

Mysterious Cat Attacks Shepherd Puppy!-Plaintiff Thomas Yowell suing defendant Nancie Walsh for her cat attacking his dog, and he wants vet bills paid, $491.

    Defendant claims it's not her cat, but if the cat attacked it's feral, and not under her control.     Plaintiff says he was walking his dog, cat attacked his dog, and when he arrived home he discovered the cat had injured the dog's eye.    

The plaintiff posted on Next Door with the description of the cat, the tags and collar, and someone answered.      A neighbor of both people posted that the cat belonged to the defendant, and is named Max, and claims the cat is a menace.  Defendant claims she's never had an issue with neighbors over the cat, but there is a neighbor complaint that says she has.   

Defendant Nancie Walsh, claims the neighbor has issues with her, not the cat.   Defendant says the neighbors also have issues with the two dogs the defendant owns, and walks.  

Defendant's witness is saying she knows all about the attack, saw it, but Max was on her front lawn, not attacking the man's dog.  Witness is a liar. 

 Hallterview with defendant is hysterical "they don't have leash laws in Austin", "there are no witnesses with anything notarized"   "Nobody can prove it was Max".   

My comments: Austin isn't a state, HOA rules address wandering animals, and Nancie Walsh makes me glad I don' live anywhere near her.  

$491 to plaintiff.    

p. 482, 29 Dec 2020

Intimately Transmitted Disease Drama!; Dog Destroys $3,000 Mattress!"

[One Tough Cookie]

@CrazyInAlabama--I tend towatch 3-4epis at a timee and I notice, without fail that when a "bargain"  contractor is used he inevitably shows up looking ether drunk or hung over.  That's Why I use Anji.  Pay a little more, but I've never had a bad experience with the professionals they send.

[CrazyInAlabama]

17 November

4 p.m. episodes-

The Tattle Tale and the Ex-Convict?!-Plaintiff Olivier Smith suing defendant/ cousin-in-law Tamika Croford for spreading rumors about her, choking her, and stealing her jewelry.    Plaintiff's husband was in jail for 22 months, and defendant became her buddy.     The two litigants had a physical fight, and plaintiff lost her necklace during the fight.    This was right after plaintiff's husband was released from 20 months in prison, and defendant told the husband that plaintiff was cheating.  

Plaintiff and husband, were discussing what defendant said, at mother-in-law's house, and defendant was there too.    Then plaintiff says defendant physically attacked her, and the necklace went missing.     Arnesha keeps making motions towards defendant.  Defendant's claim dismissed for interrupting JJ, and plaintiff's testimony.  

Plaintiff kicked the defendant in her "privacy" according to the sister-in-law who is plaintiff's witness.     No photographs of injuries, or police reports. 

Plaintiff's witness (sister-in-law) Arnesha McCoy says she saw the defendant with the stolen necklace.   Defendant tries to sweet talk Judge Judy, guess what, it doesn't work.    Unfortunately, the necklace that the husband of plaintiff purchased, has a receipt in the plaintiff's name only. (What the hell is defendant's witness wearing on her head?  It's the worst wig I've ever seen). 

Plaintiff gets $1350 for the necklace. Defendant claim dismissed. 

Flooding and Fleeing?-  Plaintiff/deadbeat and mooch Neuretha Thomas suing defendant uncle Timothy Smith for stealing and destroying her property.    Plaintiff stayed (no rent paid) in house maintained by  defendant/plaintiff’s uncle, which is grandfather's house.    Plaintiff was living in grandfather's house, and grandfather lives elsewhere.   Plaintiff pays no rent, but there was a verbal agreement to maintain, and take care of the house.  

Water was coming up through the floorboards, and so plaintiff turned the water off and left.   Then, she moved in with her mother for a week, and then needed another place to stay.    Then she called uncle/defendant up, to find another place to stay, and only then mentioned the leak, over a week after it happened.  

Grandfather (house owner) told plaintiff to leave, because the house had to be emptied for repairs.     Plaintiff claims the defendant was supposed to put her stuff in storage, instead of her getting off her lazy fanny and storing her own stuff.   Uncle says leak was inside wall, from someone yanking the outside water faucet off of the wall, breaking the pipe. 

Plaintiff also says owner/grandfather was washing his truck when the leak happened, and that caused the leak under the house.     Plaintiff worked at McDonalds, but no longer.   Plaintiff claims she lost her McDonald's job because Uncle Timothy threw her property out for junk, including her work uniforms.

Plaintiff told to stick it.  

 

Say Yes to the Shoddy Dress?!  -Plaintiff/ mom of teen  Denise McDaniel is suing defendant/ dressmaker Faith Taylor for not finishing her daughter’s prom dress on time, and for all kinds of anguish over the ruined moment of a lifetime for her daughter.   Daughter Cheyenne McNeese still wore the dress to the prom.  

The plaintiffs talked to seamstress on 6 May for a prom dress for 15 May, even though the plaintiffs knew the date of the prom eight months before this.     Why did the defendant accept the commission to do the dress?  Probably because plaintiff and daughter begged.     

JJ is right, a custom made dress commissioned on May 6 and wanted to be finished by 13 May, it was actually finished the day of the prom on 15 May.  However, as JJ points out, there are many thousands of places to buy a prom dress, so why order a custom made dress 9 days before the prom.    

Seamstress finished dress on the day of the prom, instead of a couple of days earlier.   There are pictures of daughter wearing the dress at the prom, but daughter claims lace was falling off, and one sleeve needed lace put on.   Lace was put on the second sleeve after the prom.   They paid $700 for the dress, it was worn to the prom.    Prom was held on a yacht.  

Defendant makes a ridiculous claim that she deliberately only put lace on one sleeve. 

 $200 back to plaintiff.  (My suspicion is the yacht was so the party could be outside the state water limits, so the champagne part of the party, and open boozing could happen.)    

Consignment Nightmare-Plaintiff Felicia Tillman  suing defendant/ consignment dealer Denee Adams for items she sold on the internet.   Defendant gets a 60/40 split with the sold items.      The defendant's full-time job is selling consignment items online.    Defendant claims the unsold, brand-new items were donated to charity.   

 Plaintiff had six brand-new designer items (Ferragamo, Gucci, etc.), to sell to finance her Ph.D. studies, and because she would be unemployed during school.    Defendant only sold a few items, and the rest disappeared.    For example, a Gucci wind breaker jacket bought for $600, sold for $240.  The total was $646, and defendant never paid plaintiff a penny.   There were six items consigned, only four sold.  

 $800 for plaintiff.  

 

5 p.m. episodes-

Drug Bust and Jail Time-Plaintiff/car buyer Tania Kerrin and daughter Sherry Taylor suing defendant/car seller Stephanie Chesney for car damages, rental fees, and fraud.    Plaintiffs bought the car, later Kerrin's friend was busted with massive amounts of drugs in the car, and car was ripped apart by the DEA, retrieving drugs that were hidden.  Drugs belonged to Kerrin's friend Jerome.  Car was subsequently impounded.   

Defendant sold the 2008 BMW that is wrecked to Damaged Cars dot com, and they resell the salvage titled car to idiot plaintiffs.  Plaintiff wants to be paid for damages to the car. I wonder why the damaged cars place didn't transfer the title before they sold it?   

When I trade a car in, the dealership has my title in hand, and gets legal title on the spot, so they can resell it, but Damaged Cars dot com didn't do that.    Plaintiff buys car in September 2017, never registers it, then goes to prison for 90 days, and car gets impounded in a drug bust.   

Defendant/former owner gets letter from impound lot, because they're going to charge the real owner for storage and auction shortfall.  So, they pay to get it out, husband starts working on it, and in June defendant comes for the car.      They gave it back to her, and she took it, not sure of the money involved, and plaintiff wants to be reimbursed for damage to car, and still has it. 

The defendant says that the drug bust in the car was one of the largest ever in North Carolina, with  5,000 bindles of heroin and cocaine (my spell check doesn't understand drug amounts, or I misspelled 'bindle') seized.     At least the dealer had class, and drove the drugs in a BMW.     

Plaintiff had months to register the car, but never did.  Defendant's husband says they had paid the impound fees, and car sat in their garage for months, before plaintiff picked the car up. 

 Defendant will sign car title for plaintiff, actually a reassignment of title form.   Plaintiff is still pissed she didn't get money for a car that was ripped apart by the DEA, and leaves in a huff, and I hope the car falls apart the first time she sits in it.    And I'm guessing that if she actually registers it, that the local police will be pulling her over regularly, since their drug sniffing dogs will smell the residue at a hundred paces.   

 

Roof Falls on Daughter's Head-Plaintiff /tenant Rhonica Cheatham suing defendant/former landlord Charlie Xu for damaged electronics, a hospital visit, and clothing that were ruined by roof leaks.     Section 8 tenant (don't know why the plaintiff keeps emphasizing the Section 8 part, just to paint defendant as a bad landlord is my guess).    She says the roof leaked, and before the repair she had roof leaks, and she has a picture of the damaged, expensive electronics she was keeping in a big box.     

Damaged was a white Wii, play piano, Samsung camera, Samsung tablet, and apparently many other emails full of damaged stuff.   The stuff was in a box, because they had newer versions of it too.    At the time of the court case, the plaintiff still lives in the apartment, and isn't moving until a month after the court case.   

 Love the landlord saying he didn't have to go over, since she could send him pictures and messages about the damages, and I like that.    Roof gets replaced, and landlord claims the roofers were supposed to clean up after the roof was done.   Plaintiff tries to get all of her violations, and everything else fixed too.    When JJ says the plaintiff will not be getting $5k, she starts pouting like a little kid.    Landlord/defendant says roofers paid to clean the apartment, and gave tenant plaintiff $100 for laundry. 

Plaintiff gets $300.  

 

p. 482, 30 Dec 2020

Don't Even Think About Writing Hate Mail to Judge Judy! ; Man Can't Get Ex-Wife Out Fast Enough?! ; Painful Tooth Extraction Payback!

[Jst2Wld]

Even though JJ has permanently "left the building" I will keep watching the reruns. So many I haven't seen.

 

[CrazyInAlabama]

(I have only seen a couple of episodes that I don't remember.   Apparently I watched more JJ episodes than I realized over the years). 

 

20 November

4 p.m. episodes-

Luxury Car Lemon!?-Plaintiff Angela Gebelein (Sainted Single Mother of One-SSMOO) bought a lemon Lexus, and wants repair, tow fees, and diagnostic on the 1997 ES300 Lexus from defendant/mechanic Jeffrey Plikunas.   Plaintiff spent thousands ($1700) to fix the car, and mechanics $3850 more.   Car only cost $1500, and ran for two weeks, then she spent $1700 on the repairs.   

The car was at the garage for months, awaiting money for repairs, and she finally drove it home in April.      Then, plaintiff took the car to the Lexus dealership, and had it towed for a diagnostic (towed to and back from the dealer a month later).    JJ dismisses the defendant's counter claim for repairs, storage, and harassment.   The original $1600 was for a replacement motor, plaintiff thinks because the motor was rebuilt, she wants the $1600 back.   

Plaintiff gets $1700 so Sainted SIngle Mother of One gets her mechanical work back.   

Austin Freebie!-Plaintiff Kyle Huff suing defendant Sara Sancho-Bonet for a ticket to Austin, an iPhone he bought defendant after knowing her for a month, and upgraded to the new phone, but didn't return the original phone.    Defendant claims she returned the first iPhone, and had it credited to plaintiff's account.     

Defendant took first trip to Austin, and cancelled the second flight, and she claims she told him a month before, but plaintiff says she broke up with him a week or so before.      Defendant went to Austin anyway, and went bar hopping.   

$201 for plaintiff for the second ticket.    Honestly, I don't like either litigant.   

Grandma the Car Thief?!-Plaintiff/daughter Haylei Chavez suing defendant /mother of plaintiff, and grandma of plaintiff's child Barbara Walker for down payment for a car defendant took when she moved out.

Grandma/mother defendant brings up she baby sat the plaintiff's child (her grandchild) the entire time they were in Florida.   Defendant has zero answer when JJ asks what that has to do with the down payment on a car for her.     

Daughter/plaintiff made the down payment for the car, and put the car in grandma's (defendant) name because she had better credit than daughter.       Defendant got upset when friend of plaintiff drove the car (bet it was a man friend), and claimed the car wasn't insured for that other driver.   When defendant/mother left, she took the car.   That was a week after car was purchased.    However, the grandma claims she made all of the payments on the car.     

$1500 down payment back to the plaintiff.

 

Fairytale Pit Bull Story-Plaintiff Andie Tran and father Ted Tran suing defendant/dog owner Ahmad Shahab of nine Pit Bulls,  allowing two to attacking plaintiff's dog.  Plaintiff wants vet bills paid.  Plaintiff was walking her leashed German Shepherd on the street in front of a cul de sac, when two dogs from the middle of the cul de sac attacked her dog, and latched on to its throat. 

The defendant, and another man came out when the attack started.    Defendant breeds pits, including the stud that is not even two yet, so he has nine dogs, and multiple litters.    Defendant finally pulled his male pit off the German Shepherd, by punching and hitting his dog.   

Defendant lies, and says he was walking his dog on leash, and claims the German Shepherd attacked his dog, and he wants vet and medical bills.   

Animal control visited that day, quarantined defendant's dogs for 10 days, and man was fined for something too. Defendant never tells what he was fined $132 for. (My guess is defendant's dogs weren't licensed, and maybe having too many dogs without a kennel license too).  Plaintiff has animal control report, and police reports.     Neighbors told police that both of man's dogs were off leash, and attacked the other dog. 

$3900 for vet bills for plaintiff. 

30-Year Friendship Fail -Plaintiff Kenneth Bradburn suing defendant/ex-girlfriend Kathryn Allen for loan to pay for car. Defendant claims the money was a gift from her sister.   When plaintiff asked defendant for repayment, she had already spent it on bills.   Defendant claims her sister had plenty of money from tax refunds and credits.   JJ can't believe anyone can get tax refunds without real income, head of household with her one child is enough with almost any income, I've known people who received more refunds, credits, and payments than they have income.    

Defendant needed $800 for the car, borrowed from the plaintiff, and he gave the money to his witness (defendant's sister) to give to her.    Strangely, the sister / witness lives with her own child, and the defendant sister still lives with sister too.   (Defendant needs emergency hair conditioning now, her hair looks so dry and frizzy it could break off).  (This all happened in Flint, Michigan).

Defendant says plaintiff only wanted repayment because she refused to date him. 

$710 to plaintiff, which is minus the $90 that defendant actually repaid.

 

5 p.m. episodes-     

Skateboard Boy Wonder--Plaintiff Chayo Moreno suing parents/defendants Jamar Miles and Crystal Stidhem-Miles of neighbor kid, Christian,  for garage door damages, from child hitting her garage door with his skateboard.   

The defendant child is accused of hitting and damaging a garage door, but mother of kid says plaintiff terrorizes the neighborhood (not an excuse for vandalizing someone's property).  Plaintiff hears garage door getting hit, and defendant child is standing there with his skateboard, and admitted he damaged the door.   It costs $800 to replace the door panel, and paint it.     

Little brat defendant kid swears he was at school at that time, and didn't hit the garage door.      After defendant mother got home, the little boy told his mother about the door, but didn't tell his father who had come home much earlier.   The kid's mother has all kinds of excuses that her son didn't do it, and if he did it wasn't his fault.   I totally believe the plaintiff, and think the defendant's kid gets away with anything he does.  

Defendant son claims plaintiff harasses him and other kids at the city park. 

Kids says in the hall-terview that if it's not on camera, it didn't happen.  The defendant's mother keeps saying her kid is in gifted and talented classes, so?  That doesn't make him honest, or truthful.

$800 for plaintiff, and plaintiff won't shut up, and gets the boot.   Defendant's mother still keeps yakking too.  

 

Mud-Dragging, Big Tipper?!-Salon owner/ plaintiff Douglas McNeal is suing defendant/ client Rebecca Vargas for defamation, lost wages, and non-payment.    Client/defendant at her last appointment wrote a huge tip, but reversed the charges later.   

Client/def. claims she was having her natural color removed, so I guess she's talking double process?   However, she's talking Baliage (spelling), which is just highlighting for most.   She also wanted Ombre, so with dark hair she would need the color stripped, and then the highlights, or ombre color added back.      Defendant wrote nasty internet reviews too, and JJ says tough.   The defendant is lucky her hair hasn't fallen out from all of her color techniques she wanted.    

At her last appointment the woman was charged $220, and she had $480 on her card, and she reversed it that night.   Plaintiff claims the service was $220, and tip $250, and another $10 tip, but plaintiff claims he refunded $250 that day, leaving $230.      Plaintiff has proof that defendant reversed the $230 too.  Defendant says plaintiff owes her the money for having to go to court.    

Plaintiff is owed $220, and gets it. 

 

 

Husband in Prison, Lover on the Side?! -(On a shallow note, the defendant's eyebrows are hideous).     Plaintiff James Michlitsch suing defendant/Charteena Walker for return of a Kia Optima he bought or loaned to her.

Defendant with husband in prison, dates plaintiff who gave her a Kia Optima, and he say he loaned it to her to go to work.    Defendant helps mentally ill people, and that scares the stuffing out of me.   Husband in prison for stealing and using credit cards, and they married while he was in the trial process.   Hubby has been in jail for two years, and who knows how much longer, because the defendant and her husband are liars.     

Plaintiff bought car for defendant to use for work, in September before they were in a relationship.     Plaintiff wants the car back, and swears bimbo defendant said she was dumping prison husband when he gets out.     Plaintiff bought car, then they were going to Vegas on vacation, until her stepdad died, and they went to Vegas.  On the way out of town, they stopped at the relative's house,  after seeing the relative dying or dead on the floor at the relative's house.  then they went to Vegas.    (I've watched this case before, and the dead relative on the floor actually is what defendant said happened).    The day they came back from Vegas, plaintiff drove to his construction job, came back early, and that was the last day he saw his car, and the defendant.     

The defendant and plaintiff had a tiff, over the car title not being in her name.     Plaintiff realized she was playing him for a fool, she disappeared with the car, the car she paid nothing for, and somehow had it reregistered in her name after forging his name on the title.    When he went to her apartment the temporary plates, were now permanent plates on the car, and title and registration were in her name.  Defendant is not only a thief, but a liar, and I see being married to her prison husband has been a learning experience for her.   Apparently, plaintiff was shocked to find out the prisoner husband is back.     (Defendant's eyebrows are hideous, microblading fail). 

Defendant shows when she registered the car in her name, by forging the paperwork.  

JJ issued an order to get car back from defendant bimbo, (bet the car disappeared the second she left court, and called hubby), she's back with ex-con hubby, and defendant Charteena Walker has to give the car back.  JJ gets tough with defendant, and orders to sign the title back to plaintiff.   (Why do I suspect plaintiff never saw the car after this case?)

 

Stealing From Little Old Lady?! -Plaintiff/Little Old Lady (LOL for this case works) Marlene Noteware suing defendant Keith Boydstun for stealing from her.   The roommate couldn't make the rent, and so LOL plaintiff loaned him $780 for rent.   The defendant should be horse whipped, and I believe Byrd would like to do that, and I know I would like to do this also.           

Plaintiff had to go back to work to pay her bills (she's a school bus driver).   

The defendant is the dumbest person on the either episode today, and I hope someone permanently, and forcefully persuades him to stop bothering little old ladies for their last penny.   

$780 was the loan amount from Little Old Lady plaintiff, and she's getting that back. 

Edited November 20, 2023 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

21 November

4 p.m. episodes-

Truck Takes out House! -Plaintiff Marty Bolin suing defendants/tenants James and Linda Landon for unpaid rent and late fees.  Plaintiff had first month's rent, $1200, and security deposit $1200.  Accident happened in February, moved out in June.   But, plaintiff's insurance company didn't pay until April.   In mid-April plaintiff wanted to start work, but defendants didn't clean out the family room, garage, and driveway for the workers.  But plaintiffs still lived in the house, until they moved out without notice to landlord.   

 Defendant woman hit the house, she claims by accident, hitting the gas instead of the brake.   Almost the entire wall of the house collapsed after she hit the house. 

Plaintiff/landlord says defendant woman sounded very drunk when she told him about crashing the truck into the house. 

The entire door and width of her truck cames down.   Plaintiff claims defendant was drunk when she hit the house, and when he talked to her on the cell phone right after the accident.    

Plaintiff left multiple notices with defendants to start construction, but says defendants squatted in the house after May.   Plaintiff says the defendants paid rent February until May.    JJ doesn't believe the plaintiff couldn't get the defendants to cooperate.   JJ is also picking on the landlord, as usual. 

Defendant woman complains she couldn't lock the house, and that allowed burglars in.   In May the plaintiff issued a notice to quit.   In June, tenants didn't pay rent, but that took them months to move out, and weren't entirely out until August. 

Plaintiff isn't getting rent. JJ says plaintiff should have fixed the house in spite of defendants having junk everywhere, and blocking the driveway. 

JJ dismisses plaintiff's back rent claim, and defendants nothing, saying they cleared $2400 for two months rent they didn't pay. 

Jealous Roommate Rage?! -Plaintiff Joisha Anderson suing defendant Amanda Ramirez for unpaid rent and bills.  Plaintiff and boyfriend shared one bedroom, defendant had the other bedroom.   The litigants split the rent 50/50.   Plaintiff says defendant's boyfriend stayed over constantly too. 

After an argument the defendant moved out, and plaintiff wants the rent for the next two months.   Defendant needs $700 for September, and plaintiff wants October's rent too.  

Anything left in the apartment belonging to defendant will be trashed.   $1326 to plaintiff, and defendant will be signed off the lease. 

Pro Squatters vs. Slumlords?-Plaintiffs / landlords Mark Mahmalji and Alan Mahmalji  accuse defendant/former tenants Ishmael Carmonaof squatting and owing for rent, then the tenants sue for water damage (don't they always have some ridiculous counter claim?).    Plaintiffs bought an old house for a bargain basement price as a foreclosure, and did virtually nothing to fix it.   As JJ said, why didn't the defendants move if it was so awful?     Tenants only paid two months rent, out of three months, and were short on the third month.    Landlord says they didn't pay the third month, or fourth.    

Rent is $725, paid only twice.   Plaintiffs want two more months rent over the cost of the security deposit.  

There was water damage, tenants claim the basement leaks, but landlord says the tenant used a washing machine that leaked and flooded the basement.    The home owner says there was an apparently non-working washer in the basement, and claims the tenant installed washer, and dryer, and the washer discharge line was laying on the floor and flooded.     

Tenant claims water came in through the walls in the house, and he has video of that.    Landlord says the basement did have a damp wall, and sealed walls again.   

Why did the tenants leave tons of junk in the basement?    And the tenants want money for the ruined stored junk in the basement.   There are piles of clothes, and stuff in the basement.   

 I agree with JJ, the tenants hooked a washer up that they bought, and that ran the basement at least an inch deep in water.   

Landlord/plaintiff took out renter's insurance with State Farm, and the tenants were supposed to pay that monthly, and never paid that either.    Tenant claims he didn't file with insurance for damages, but there is a letter from State Farm stating that the tenant needs to call them about the claim.   

Former tenant claims State Farm said the house was unsafe to live in.    Defendant woman says bathroom was a death trap of mold, and she is a total pain, and won't shut up.    Defendants were taken to housing court, after eviction notice, and moved out.    Defendant woman claims the landlord showed a fake rent in housing court.   

Defendant woman claims the renter's insurance claim is still in process.    Their counter-claim is for $5,000, isn't it always?  

Defendant told to stuff it. So, the award is $0.   Plaintiff will gets renter's insurance payments, no back rent, late fees $0 , and they keep the $725 security deposit.

I think the description in the episode title is exactly right, another couple of pro squatters.  I hope the insurance company denied the defendants'  claim, since they didn't pay the premiums, and the tenants obviously flooded the basement. . 

 

5 p.m. episodes-

p. 482, 31 Dec 2020

Endangered Child Rescue! ; Child Surrogacy Meets Plastic Surgery!

 

Stealing Workers and Money?! – Plaintiff Sharon Groleau r suing contractor/defendant Williams Joyner for stealing her money.  

A contractor is accused of taking thousands of dollars from a woman and leaving her with nowhere to live, while she denies hiring his own men out from under him. 

Plaintiff claims that defendant left her without completing the work, and left trash everywhere.   Then, plaintiff hired defendant's stepson, and other workers directly, cutting defendant's company out. 

Contract says work would be done before the date plaintiff hired the workers. 

Plaintiff paid defendant $5800, he spent $1800 for supplies, and took out a wall, and other items.    Defendant says everything he bought was left at plaintiff's job site, and he paid plaintiff $400 for the windows.   

Plaintiff also hired Anthony Jenkins to do the work, but he claims he's disabled with a bad back, and can't get a real job.   Plaintiff claims Anthony didn't do the work, he just directed the neighbors who worked on the house.  

Plaintiff gave defendant $3500 in cash, plus $2300 in gift cards to use at the hardware store.  

This is a mobile home, and it didn't have regular walls, but exterior siding, insulation, and then interior walls.  

$2,500 to plaintiff for uncompleted work that she has receipts for getting done. 

 

[CrazyInAlabama]

No JJ episodes 23 and 24 November for Football.

22 November

4 p.m. episodes-

Horse Abuse?! –-Plaintiff Anne Shapiro suing defendant/ boarding barn owner Christina "Tina" Chute for return of boarding fees for her two horses. Plaintiff claims defendant abused and starved her horses.

 The plaintiff, and the rest of her riding club boarded their horses at Tina's boarding barn for years.   The horses all moved to the club members' trainer's farm, when he bought a farm.     

Plaintiff wants board fees for two horses back, and when plaintiff went to the barn to scream (my opinion) the  defendant had the sheriff's office boot her off of the property.    There is no vet testimony.    There was a boarding contract in place, but not signed.     The sheriff removal happened on 1 August.     The horses had been at the boarding barn since 2014, so I suspect the reasons are phony.    

So, the horses were at this barn since April 2014,  and coincidentally, plaintiff suddenly claims the horses were neglected, and had to be moved when the trainer opened his own barn.   And coincidentally, the horses from the riding club all moved to the new barn at the same time. 

Nothing for the plaintiff.

 

Terrier Mauled by a Bear?! -Plaintiff / Boston Terrier dog owner Bruce Ross suing defendants/ vicious dog owners Mary and Lee Nesler for vet bills.  Plaintiff’s dog was in its own fenced back yard when despicable defendants’ dogs attacked the Boston Terrier. Defendants claim plaintiff told them a bear attacked his dog. 

The defendants claim a bear attacked the dog, not his animals (Boxer/Mastiff mix and Cane Corso/Rottweiler).      The dogs attacked the little terrier in the plaintiff's own fenced back yard.        When the plaintiff went out back after the attack, he was inside his house at the time of the attack, he saw evidence of damages to plants leading directly to defendants' back yard.  The defendants  (woman claims she wasn't home, but plaintiff saw her outside the house) claim their dogs are harmless, and a bear must have attacked the terrier.   Plaintiff claims he heard defendant man calling his dogs to come home.   Defendant says he saw nothing, because he has a bad eye.   Fence was only 4 feet, and after this defendant put up a six foot fence with barbed wire top.    

Boston Terrier is growling and staring at the cameraman.   

There have also been complaints to animal control about the defendant’s dogs.     The previous attack happened when the dogs escaped the defendant's yard, and attacked a man and his adorable little dog (Pekingese size dog).    There was a fine of $633 assessed, but defendant didn't fix the fence then.   The owner was also attacked.     

Defendants didn't improve the fence until after the second attack.    The defendants are such liars.    I'm so glad the little dog owner moved, because the defendants will never do anything about those dogs, and apparently animal control doesn't have the laws in place to euthanize the defendants' dogs.     

Plaintiff gets $5,000 max for the court. Bills were almost $6,000. 

 

The Case of the Stolen Bulldogs? -Plaintiff Jennifer Bild suing defendants Donna and Raymond Mithun for return of two Bulldogs, or $4100 for the dogs.   Plaintiff accuses the defendants of stealing her dogs, but she gave the dogs to the defendants.  She claims the defendants stole her dogs.  Plaintiff had two English Bulldogs, and wanted a friend to watch the dogs while plaintiff and husband Richard worked out of state.    

Defendant witness Lisa, was plaintiff's tenant, and she testifies that plaintiffs wanted her to dog sit, but witness wouldn't dog sit, and claims plaintiffs were abusive to the dogs, and wanted them gone.    Then, witness posted on Facebook for a home for the dogs, and defendant Donna agreed to take the dogs.   

Plaintiff says defendant witness found defendants to take the dogs, and plaintiff claims defendant would watch the dogs for free, and plaintiff claims defendant she could get the dogs back anytime.   Defendant husband says plaintiff said it was permanent.   Defendant didn't hear from plaintiff Jennifer for over a month.    Text message from plaintiff says if defendants fall in love with dogs then defendants can keep the dogs.  

Three months later plaintiff claims she wanted the dogs back.   However, Defendants rehomed one of the two dogs three weeks after plaintiff dropped the dogs off.  Plaintiff got that dog back, so that's dismissed. 

Plaintiff claims defendant husband threatened to kill her. 

I don't see why defendants shouldn't consider both dogs theirs, and rehome one.  Plaintiff texts say she's not keeping dogs, and to consider dogs defendants' to keep.  JJ doesn't believe defendant husband's claim that plaintiff said she was surrendering the dogs, and says he's lying when he says plaintiff told him rehoming the one dog was fine.

Defendants should have made plaintiff to sign a transfer of ownership statement. 

JJ is giving either an order to get her dog back with police help, or get $1500 for the dog. Plaintiff wants the dog back.  

 

5 p.m. episodes-

 

Alabama Crackheads Beware-Plaintiff CWO Steven McCulland Sr suing defendant/deadbeat parent Anthony Beverly  for a dog bite while plaintiff was doing his job, serving warrants.     

When Chief Warrant Officer Steven McCulland Sr (he actually is the senior child support enforcement officer for Mobile, AL), was serving subpoena on an Alabama man, and a dog chained up bit CWO McCulland Sr.  on the leg.    The defendant claims that there were signs, but I didn't see any, and he has eight English Bulldogs (they are not English Bulldogs, unless they're crossed with something bigger, and meaner. I suspect they're American Bullie crosses) that he not only has chained up in the front and back yard, but sells too.     

Plaintiff gets zero, because he was an uninvited person on the man's property.  The dog owner only had rabies shots for the dog the day after the bite.  The defendant is slimy, and treats his animals poorly, and isn't allowed to chain them out like this all of the time, so he's the worst kind of backyard breeder, and a bad owner, who also apparently doesn't get rabies shots on time either.  Slimy defendant says his nine children have no issues with the dogs. 

CWO McCulland says the dog didn't have rabies shots until the day after the bite.    Sorry JJ, but process servers are supposed to serve the person, not just run away like a chicken.   The city ordinance also says dogs have to be penned, not on a chain ($150 fine).  

Reports are submitted by plaintiff that show defendant's dogs bit two people before this attack. 

(This is why some delivery people have been shown booting packages into yards, to avoid being bitten).  

The defendant's dogs bit two other people in April, and he is guilty of failure to have the dogs penned in a fence with four walls, instead of chained out.    

(CWO McCullen Sr. is a legal officer for Mobile, Alabama  and serving warrants is his job, and he wasn't trespassing when he went on defendant's property.  Plaintiff had the right to be there. JJ says nothing about the dogs not having rabies shots either.)

( I love how the plaintiff's tie, and shirt collar match). 

Plaintiff receives nothing from Judge Judy, but in my opinion he deserves something for being injured doing his job.  He was doing government business serving warrants to deadbeat parents, that’s not trespassing, it’s his government job.

 

Rib Bones Sicken Puppy-Plaintiff Kayla Aguilar Bianca Giacomini accused the defendant Bianca Giacomini of feeding rib bones to her Husky puppy, requiring surgery to remove the bones, and plaintiff wants medical bills paid.   

Defendant took dog out of kennel (they were at a mutual friend's house), and let him eat rib bones.    However, the plaintiff's idiot witness, Shawn Harrison,  says he saw the defendant take the dog in the back yard, and Husky grabbed the rib bone from the brother's dog and chewed on it. 

 The plaintiff's witness is the idiot who gave the brother's dog the rib bone.       (the long shot of the plaintiff table with only the Husky's rear end visible is hysterical). 

$0 to plaintiff.  Plaintiff should have sued her witness, not the defendant. 

p. 482, 1 January 2021

Dual Driving Disaster ; Aggressive Accounting

[CrazyInAlabama]

27 November

4 p.m. episodes-    

10-Year-Old Car Thief -Plaintiff Cristen Funderburk suing defendants/parents Lillian Williams (mother) and John Williams (father) of 10-year-old car thief (Amarion Hood) for car damages. Jeannette Wootin is kid's aunt, and Amarion was staying with her, and her husband for the night.   

Plaintiff heard a crash about 3 a.m. , went outside, and saw her car had been totaled by 10-year Amarion Hood.    

10-year-old is claimed to have stolen the car keys in the middle of the night, and caused a four vehicle collision.      Parents don't think they did anything wrong, aunt and uncle don't think they did anything wrong, and kid has no remorse or shame. (This is a case that makes me want to know what happened with the kid since the case aired).

Kid was staying with aunt and uncle, stole the keys, claims he was driving for 90 minutes before he crashed the aunt and uncle's truck into plaintiff's car.  Little Amarion also claimed some man in a red shirt stole the truck, and ran away leaving him to take the blame.   

Car was a 2005 Honda Accord, but three  cars were crashed, including the truck owned by aunt and uncle. 

$5,000 to plaintiff.

Motorcycle Enthusiasts Clash! -Plaintiff /motorcycle buyer Misty Morrow suing defendant/motorcycle seller Tammy Wells over a motorcycle sale, and is suing defendant for repoing the bike.    The two litigants met in a ladies bathroom at a restaurant.   Defendant repo'd the bike, after plaintiff didn't pay the first payment.  

Defendant says plaintiff was driving the bike to work, 42 miles away, but instead defendant saw the bike close to her house.   Defendant says her witness was claimed to be using the bike, and plaintiff was lying about riding it, and paying for the bike.  So, defendant repo'd the bike. 

The litigants had a contract calling for specific communications between litigants, but contract didn't say no one else could ride the bike.  However, defendant says the insurance didn't cover the witness driving the bike.   Defendant submits texts from plaintiff saying to take the bike back because of defendant's control issues. 

The plaintiff claims she should get a settlement for the bike, but she had use of the bike for two months, without making payments.  

Plaintiff said she gave defendant three options, 1. She gets the bike back and resumes payments. 2. they should cancel the deal, and defendant should  pay her $750, or 3. Go to court.  

Plaintiff gave the motorcycle to defendant's witness, so I wouldn't have given her a penny. 

Plaintiff gets $500, half of her deposit.  Plaintiff signs title over to defendant. Defendant keeps the bike. 

p. 516, 27 Sept 2023

$14,000 Out the Window! ; Show Me the Bail Money!

5 p.m. episodes-   

Kicked Back Home to Saudi Arabia?!-Plaintiff Aziz Alosaemi suing defendant / former roommate Kendal Overbay for selling his car, and disposing of plaintiff’s property when plaintiff had to go home to Saudi Arabia.   Defendant, the roommate of plaintiff for five years, is accused of selling the car belonging to the plaintiff, when plaintiff had to go home to Saudi Arabia.     Defendant sent property to dump right before plaintiff came back.   Car was sold by neighbor, and defendant claims he didn't do it.      

Witness of plaintiff talks about the car, and plaintiff gave defendant permission to sell the car, but defendant kept the money, $2,000.    Defendant claims buyer drove the car to the mechanic on flat tires.   Defendant claims he took the money for the car for room rent for plaintiff, and says plaintiff still owes $400.   However, car value is dismissed, because plaintiff gave the keys, and title to someone named Brent to sell for him.  

Plaintiff's witness. Tanya Savas needs to shut the heck up.   Nobody gets anything.

 

Wake Up! You're a Squatter!-Plaintiff Leslie Wilson suing defendant/former roommate and tenant Lisa Porter for an  illegal eviction, fraud, and return of security deposit.   Plaintiff claims she paid rent to defendant, but the money was never paid by defendant to landlord. Plaintiff was renting a room for $1100, the house changed owners, and they legally informed that they were to move on July 30, to be out by 30 August.   

Plaintiff is suing the former tenant, who collected rent for the first owner.      Plaintiff stopped paying, and is still in the house, and is litigating her move out with the house owner.     

Plaintiff's picture is on the dictionary entry under "Squatter".      Another professional tenant, who knows that owners and landlords will be extorted to get them out without eviction, that the tenant will be tied up in housing court forever.      

Plaintiff/squatter is trying to sue former manager/tenant for security deposit, when she hasn't paid rent for over six months at the time of the filming. 

Guess who is going to get zippo?    Yes, squatter / plaintiff is extorting current owner to let her live there rent free until 31 December.   (Yes, some places are so tenant friendly, that it's cheaper to forget unpaid rent, and allow tenants to keep squatting in your property, and even pay them to leave.)     

p. 493, 18 May 2021

I Was in Rehab for Everything!

[CrazyInAlabama]

28 November

4 p.m. episodes-     

Muzzle Mishap Leads to Attack?! Plaintiff/Yorkie owner  Penny Compton  suing defendant/dog walker Randy Newman and Melanie Russell dog owner  for vet bills. Dog walker was walking friend's dog, fails to muzzle the dog, and is sued for another dog's injuries.  Cute little Yorkie was viciously attacked when on a leash and being walked.   

The defendant man was walking his pit cross, and the woman defendant's Shepherd/Husky mix.       Defendant was walking both dogs, and defendant Russell's dog broke loose (the Shepherd/Husky mix), and attacked the Yorkie.   (At the time of the dog attack, dog walker and defendant owner were shacking up). 

JJ cringes when she sees the pictures of the injured Yorkie.   This is the case where owner says "it looked like his internal organs were coming out". 

Defendant dog walker, and defendant dog owner came to the vet's office, and said they would pay for the bills.      Defendant says her dog doesn't wear a muzzle, but a gentle leader device.   

Defendant dog owner claims dog walker had the dog on a leash, but not the gentle leader, even during the attack.  Would a gentle leader device stop the dog from attacking?  Or was dog supposed to be wearing a muzzle? 

Defendant owner wasn't at the attack, but claims plaintiff's dogs approached her dog, and were the aggressors.   Defendant Newman says he was bitten by a rattlesnake and can't use his left hand, so he couldn't put the gentle leader on the attacking dog.    Defendant Newman's story of the attack is ludicrous, and obviously a total lie.   

Defendants are counter suing for emotional distress. I should get money for emotional distress, for hearing another POS dog owner and the dog walker lie about a tiny dog deserving to be chewed up. 

JJ says dog walker is liable, not dog owner.    $2760 to the plaintiff.    

 

Fixit Ticket Blues!-Plaintiff Gevonna Johnson suing defendant/car owner Adrina Lindsey for non-payment of fixit ticket and fees. Plaintiff's license is suspended for non-payment of a ticket, and fees.    Plaintiff wants the defendant to pay her for the Fixit ticket.   Plaintiff found out a couple of years after the ticket was issued that her license was suspended, so she couldn't register a car, get a license from the other jurisdiction, or anything else vehicle related until she paid the ticket, and fees.  So, plaintiff paid the ticket, and fees, and wants money. 

Plaintiff was driving defendant's car when she got the burned out taillight ticket, got the light fixed, and didn't show the police the car was fixed, and since the ticket wasn't cancelled, the plaintiff's license was suspended.     

The plaintiff claims former friend /defendant wouldn't let her take the car to the police station to show it was fixed.  JJ calls her a liar.  Plaintiff was driving the car on Monday, got the light fixed on Tuesday, but didn't go to the police station.   

Plaintiff gets nothing, and deserves the same.  

 

p. 516, 29 Sept 2023

Mormon Good Will Hunting ; Family No More!

5 p.m. episodes-   

Most Ridiculous Error in Judgment Award Goes to...-Plaintiff/mother Debra Pugh suing defendant/ son’s former roommate Ethan Reynolds for rent, security deposit, unpaid loans.    Plaintiff Mom co-signed for idiot son for apartment because the son, and his friend, and two other people couldn't get an apartment on their own.   Plaintiff's son is Daniel Pugh. 

Defendant was evicted in April for non-payment, but claims he was paying rent.    He was also arrested with a suspended license while driving drunk son of plaintiff home.    License was suspended for unpaid ticket for not having insurance a while before.     

Plaintiff says it was nice having son gone, and son Daniel looks startled to hear that.        Tenants were son, defendant, and two much older friends, one on Social Security, and that friend's son was low income.    Defendant claims the other renters were paying him, and claim he was shorting them on rent.     

Plaintiff was stupid to do that, and she will get nothing for the rent.   Plaintiff bailed out defendant, and is owed $240 for bail, security deposit was lost ($1950)-$487.50 is the defendant's part.    Defendant also borrowed $700 from plaintiff, and then found out it wasn't for rent, but a vacation.   

$4250 for plaintiff.   Defendant is still a jerk, and plaintiff is a fool. 

 

Hooter's Manager Not So Manageable-Plaintiff James Slukasuing defendant/ former roommate & Hooter’s manager Robert Canfield for a loan, rent, internet service, and stolen property.     Plaintiff has a 3 bedroom, rents 1 bedroom out, and claims the Hooters manager defendant was a deadbeat.    Defendant moved out 1 August, and didn't pay July's rent.   

Defendant moved out suddenly, without notice, and claims he didn't get text messages plaintiff sent him.     Defendant also borrowed various amounts of money he repaid, then stopped repaying later so since he paid some, they were loans.    Plaintiff claims the defendant took some property when he moved out.  

This plaintiff certainly has everything organized well.    I think he's just a lonely man, who rents rooms for companionship, and this time it didn't work out at all.   The deadbeat guy with big holes in his ears is calling the plaintiff weird?    

Plaintiff gets $850 back for rent and loans, gets a total of $975.    

 

p. 492, 12 May 2021

Marital Debt Drama! ; Teenager Hit at School ;  Child’s Bike/Car Collision Caught on Tape!

[CrazyInAlabama]

29 November

4 p.m. episodes-   

Retaliation Fireworks?!- Plaintiff Judith Anderson suing defendant/neighbor Michael Sanders for fireworks damages to her roof.    Plaintiff claims the next door neighbor defendant was shooting fireworks off near her house, and they were landing on her roof also. 

The plaintiff claims the troubles started when the defendant and his friend were going to bury a dog that defendant's friend slammed into the ground.  When plaintiff called animal control, and said the dog wasn't dead yet.     

Defendant was shooting fireworks right to her house, they were landing on the roof, and when the fireworks were watered down, the roof leaked, causing water damage.    Defendant claims he was much further away from her house.  (Does Michael look a bit out of it in court?) 

My personal suspicion is the defendant is full of it, and is harassing the plaintiff.    The roof pictures do look like burns to me.  Plaintiff's witness is her daughter, who was at the house during the fireworks incident. 

It's time for a new roof anyway, plaintiff gets $250.  (I think plaintiff should have received more, defendant could have set the house on fire, and was being a jerk. I think it was retaliation for calling about the poor dog.). 

Transgender Ex-convict Wardrobe Malfunction?! -Plaintiff Yavaughnie Wilkins is suing  defendant/her soon to be ex-sister-in- law Mere Turner, and plaintiff wants the value of the clothes, or return of the clothes.  Plaintiff bought $500 worth of clothes for the defendant's boyfriend/husband who was just released from prison. Plaintiff claims defendant was supposed to keep them until Father's Day, and pay for them.   (No, I don’t see why the date defendant was supposed to keep clothes is relevant).  Brother is transgender, so that's what the case title comes from.  

Supposedly, the defendant's husband got arrested for domestic violence, defendant got a restraining order, and he violated the restraining order, and got arrested again.  Brother didn't want the clothes, but the plaintiff wants them back.  Defendant claims she gave the plaintiff's clothing to her husband.  (I hope I got the facts of this case right, it was hideously confusing). Mehuni Wilkins is defendant and brother's son, and is in court watching this despicable circus.   Defendant claims the ex is in prison for life, but no confirmation of that.  

Plaintiff is getting nothing.   

 

Don't Start at the Beginning!-Plaintiff/ex-girlfriend Delanie Cooper claims defendant/ex-boyfriend John Nelson owes her $1600 for an unpaid loan for his car payment.

Exes sue each other, over unproven loan from plaintiff (ex-girlfriend) to defendant (ex-boyfriend).   Text messages are inconclusive.   There is only proof of one bank withdrawal for $800.   JJ doesn't want to hear the story from defendant 'from the beginning', and I don't either.  

Plaintiff receives $800.

 

p. 516, 28 Sept 2023

Why Own a Pit Bull? ; Mother’s Day Car Bashing!

5 p.m. episodes-

p. 492, 5 May 2021

Video of Assault While Holding a Baby!

p. 493, 20 May 2021

Puppy Death Drama ; Lightning Strike Strife!

[CrazyInAlabama]

30 November

4 p.m. episodes-     

Judge Judy Busts a Liar!  -Plaintiff /driver with right of way Carolina Nacariosuing defendant/making left turn Vanessa Lopez for car damages, and medical bills.  As always, defendant wasn't insured.  

Plaintiff going straight had right of way, and was insured.  Defendant was turning left, and caused the accident.  

If defendant had insurance, it would have paid for damages to plaintiff's car.  Defendant claims she had insurance, but since both were with the same company, plaintiff's adjustor said defendant wasn't insured.  So JJ calls the insurance agent on her Phone of Justice to find out defendant is lying to her. Defendant's policy expired for lack of payment, four months before the accident.   

Defendant was a delivery driver, and claims the company she delivers for (Lakewood, CO) knew she was uninsured.  Defendant's witness, her uncle claims she told him car insurance was up to date.  

Plaintiff receives $3546, for payments, and medical bills.  In hall-terview defendant still claims plaintiff was speeding, texting while driving, and caused everything, totally ignoring that she never paid her insurance, and was at fault.  

Horse Repo -Plaintiff/horse owner Jessica Strakose and her mother Doreen Strakose suing defendants Amber Bun (Age 20) and London Chandler (Age 19) for stealing and selling her horse.   Plaintiff wants her payments returned, $1400. 

Defendants claims plaintiff didn't make the payments, and are counter suing for boarding costs.   

However, there was no schedule of payments.  Plaintiff Jessica claims she was only asked one time for money. Then says there was another text, three months after plaintiff made the down payment.   

Plaintiff teen was buying a horse on payments from defendants, made a down payment, and claims defendants repo'd the horse and sold horse to someone else. 

Plaintiff wasn't paying after the down payment, for several months.  However, defendants claim plaintiff was sending the horse for expensive training.  Plaintiff Jessica stopped dealing with Amber, and only texted with London. 

Plaintiff is suing Chandler (boarding barn manager) for letting Bun on the property where plaintiff had the horse boarded, and letting her repoing the horse.   

The issue to JJ is    JJ doesn't believe the defendant resold the horse for $100, and London claims horse was resold. 

$1400 or return of horse to plaintiff.   Plaintiff will get the horse back, because defendant Bunn still has the horse.   Horse will be returned after plaintiff pays defendant London $100. 

 

p. 516, 26 Sept 2023

Judge Judy 101 ; Lovers Too Soon?!

5 p.m. episodes-

p. 493, 19 May 2021

Frightened Mother’s Telling Texts?!

p. 493, 21 May 2021

Bed Rest Made Me Do It! ; Worst Teen Driver Award!

[CrazyInAlabama]

1 December

4 p.m. episodes-      

Death Divides a Family! –Plaintiff/mother Judy Smith and son Tommy Jones are suing defendants/ Pastor Griffin and son's aunt Penny Jones-Spenser, for return of a TV that plaintiff’s late father, Tommy Jones, Sr.,  supposedly gave to defendant.  Plaintiffs claim defendant was stealing from the hospitalized father, Tommy Jones Sr.  Plaintiff son claims his dying father told him what he was leaving him, and didn't mention the preacher.

Preacher claims he was close to late father, and he gave him the TV.   TV was a 50 inch (preacher has this) and a 32-inch TV (son has this one, taken from apartment a month before father died).  Son donated furniture after father died, but kept a turntable/stereo, speakers, DVDs, and other items he retrieved before father died.    Son claims father gave him keys to the apartment to copy so son could access the apartment.   Father was in a nursing facility and the hospital. 

50-inch TV was gone from apartment before father died.  Preacher says father gave him the TV before he died, and when preacher separated from his wife and moved into an apartment the father gave him the TV so he could watch the NBA playoffs.   Preacher was pastor to Tommy Jones Sr, for six years, and says they were close friends. 

JJ says late father didn't give the TV to defendant pastor, according to what she has heard.    Preacher did call police, but there was no evidence of a break in, so police didn't take a report.    

Planitiff mother says when son saw TV was gone, she told him to take anything he wanted from father's apartment, so son took smaller TV, DVDs, turntable, etc. Mother claims preacher stole a list of items, but has no proof except for the TV. 

Aunt says it was a gift according to what her brother told her.    TV was a loan originally, and father told his sister/defendant that preacher should keep the TV as a gift.

 JJ says if father gave something away before dying it belongs to the people he gave items too, and son is only an heir to items father owned when he died. 

Plaintiff case dismissed. 

Baby Daddy Drama -Plaintiff/mother Chalise Modest suing defendant/son’s father Keith Burton for payment of medical bills for their 20-year-old son Najee.   Son lives with grandmother/father's mother, and works at Macy's.   Plaintiff mother says her full-time employed son should have bills paid by defendant father.   

If you were covered on a parent's plan, as of 2010, you keep coverage until age 26.   After son moved in with grandmother, plaintiff mother continued to receive child support payments from defendant.   JJ wants to know how much money plaintiff mother sent to the grandmother when son was living full time with her, but he was already 19 then.     Defendant was under a child support order, and plaintiff mother collected child support amounting to $4,000, not one penny supported the son. 

Modest claims she was accumulating the money, and was going to give it to the son.  However, she was having big issues with son, and that's why he moved to grandmother's place.  

JJ tells plaintiff mother to use the child support to pay the medical bills, and the support money should have been sent to the grandmother.

p. 516, 25 Sept 2023

Mocked After Being Attacked?! ; Girl Friend Causes Heart Failure?!

5 p.m. episodes -     

Son Spits in Father’s Face! -Plaintiff/son Deonta Slayton suing defendant/father Louis Elston for property left behind in apartment father was renting to plaintiff in a building owned by father.   The most hateable jerk on this show in years, the son in this case. 

Plaintiff/son was staying in apartment financed by father, when ungrateful son got fired (he says quit, because his hours were cut), and his father told him to leave.  The rent was $200 a month.  Plaintiff was complaining to the father about everything, and told him he quit his job.   Dad/defendant told son to get another job, or even several part time jobs.     ( I love the dad's bow tie, and suspenders, but hate his beard). 

Plaintiff apparently has Tourette's.    Son claims father picked him up, and threw him outside, but is someone who has kidney failure and just got out of the hospital capable of tossing the son out?   A fight resulted, the son spit in father's face while the police were escorting the defendant out, and off to jail.    The defendant/father just got out of the hospital when everything happened father's face.     

The plaintiff claims a 50 inch TV he owned stayed behind, iPhone, speakers, 3 controllers for games (black, gold and silver), and other stuff.   However, the roommate, who is not in court, was still in the apartment.   Plaintiff's witness is his aunt, Ms.  Slayton, who claims father told her he would get items back to son after he paid what he owed the defendant.  

Roommate of plaintiff still lives in the apartment.     Counterclaim by defendant/father is damage to door from son trying to break in, and son, of course, says he doesn't know how the door broke.   Door costs $319, plus labor, defendant gets $400. 

Son / plaintiff was charged with assault for spitting in father's face when police were taking him out.  

Plaintiff’s case dismissed, defendant gets $419 for the door, and emotional distress.

 

Ex-Fiances Cut Their Losses!  -Plaintiff Kayla Jaquay-Davis suing defendant/ex-fiance Shane Barbushfor half the cost of a ring, car payments, insurance, and damages.    They moved into an apartment together after high school, and lived there a little over a year.    Defendant works as a bus aide for special needs students on the family bus business, and was fired.    Defendant stopped paying for car because he got fired.   Both cars, and insurance were in plaintiff's name.   Plaintiff is told to sell the ring.   

Defendant admits he drove the cars, and then stopped paying bills when he quit the family business, and says he wasn't fired.       Then, he moved back in with Mommy, and I bet she was thrilled.   Defendant claims the plaintiff forced him to buy the second car, and sell his truck he owned before that.        Defendant says the plaintiff paid almost all of the bills, so he thinks he should have to pay more.   

 Plaintiff gets $1190 for car, insurance, extra money for breaking lease, and apartment damages.

 

Dog Uses Bathroom in Shared Hallway?!- Plaintiff /former tenant Barbara Goodrum is suing defendant/ landlord Verdel Hogues for her former apartment where a Mastiff relieved himself in the hallway at her back stairs for a year.  Plaintiff is suing for damaged and stolen property, threats, and harassment. 

 Defendant's brother now owns the property, and is the loser that owns the dog.      Defendant thinks it's fine for animals to do their business indoors, because he scattered kitty litter down.   Defendant brother, Tomothy Hogues,  that owned the building before deeded it to Verdel Hogues, owned building for 19 years, and was sick of dealing with the property.  

Plaintiff submits photos of the dog's potty area.   

Former owner brother says plaintiff was being evicted, and he let her move into the apartment as a favor to his mother.   

Plaintiff was evicted from a previous apartment.  Plaintiff claims defendant stole her property, but defendants claim tenant and son took all of her stuff out.     Plaintiff claims a 32 inch TV, tv stand, boxes of wine, eyeglasses, elephant statues, and other items were on the stairs for her to pickup.   Utilities were to be cut off too.  

Defendants want damages to apartment.   Hardwood floor in part of plaintiff's apartment have some black paint, tar, or stain on it, and will have to be sanded and restained.  The floor looks like either multiple coats of paint or something even harder to remove.   My guess is that there was existing finish, and I bet plaintiff or some friend poured stain on top without sanding, and it dried like that.  

This was a subsidized apartment, and there is no way it was approved looking like the move out pictures. $600 was total rent for plaintiff.  Subsidized often have very strict rules for approval, and there is no way that the apartment looked like the move out pictures when the subsidy was approved. 

The defendant brother Verdel Hogues is the current owner, and is a jerk, but plaintiff trashed the apartment.   

$2500 to defendants for repair, and cleaning, but because of the dog, plaintiff gets $2500, resulting in  nothing to anyone. 

Edited December 1, 2023 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

4 December

4 p.m. episodes-    

Hong Kong Freak -Out?!-(Classic episode)-Plaintiff Nina Ofek suing defendant/former roommate Limor Zane (daughter) and Judy Zane (mother) landlord for return of rent and security deposit.  

Plaintiff rents room from daughter of enabling mommy (mommy actually owns the condo) and is suing for hostile living conditions.    The plaintiff notices there were a lot of cameras inside the unit, but thought they were lights, and found one aimed at her bedroom.   

Defendant daughter claimed to be moving to Hong Kong forever.  Daughter threw everything she wasn't taking on the bed and floor.   Daughter was in Hong Kong when the room was rented to plaintiff.   

Then the tenant saw a live feed of all four indoor cameras, two pointed at tenant’s bedroom, and tenant's bathroom door.   Condo owner/mommy said her daughter had big issues.   Plaintiff claims mother said daughter had problems in Hong Kong over drugs, but mother denies that. 

On return from Hong Kong, defendant daughter was totally paranoid, and claims she had a medical issue (sigmoidoscopy), and came back to condo from Hong Kong after two days.     Why would a sigmoidoscopy require an ambulance ride?  (This happened in Studio City, CA)

Daughter also claimed the mafia was after, and people were following her.     The mother/condo owner is as whacked out as her daughter.   

Defendant has to give back the security deposit, but gets to keep the rent for the month, so $1,000 for the plaintiff.  Defendants' counter claim for the remainder of the year's rent is dismissed. 

 

Pit Bull Arm Chomp!- Woman viciously attacked while shielding her young niece form a pit bull (so much for the statements that pits aren't people aggressive, just dog aggressive garbage. I’m guessing it's not a regular pit, but  Pit crossed with something human aggressive, and probably a lot bigger than a Pit.)-(I remember this one, and it's horrible for the plaintiff, and her little niece). 

Plaintiff Shannon Brown is suing defendant/Pit Bull owner Karrie Kascsak for the attack on her by the defendant's pit bull, and wants medical bills, plus pain and suffering.   Dog is always kept in a cage in the house.     

Defendant claims the plaintiff attacked the dog.    Defendant was walking her pit (she lives with three little kids 10, 4, and 2 years old), and dog is a rescue dog and hyper.     

Plaintiff and her 5-year-old niece were standing outside, the dog lunged, broke the leash, came after them, and latched onto the plaintiff when she shielded her niece from the dog's attack.  Defendant claims the little girl ran toward the dog, and caused him to break the leash, and plaintiff punched the dog, and the dog bit in self-defense.   Defendant keeps claiming the plaintiff lied about the attack, and created her own injuries.   

The photo of the plaintiff's arm looks horrific, with 13 stitches, and bruising.  The scar is about 5-6" long, and if the plaintiff would have been a shorter woman, then the dog would have ripped her arm muscles to shreds instead of outer arm tissue.      Plaintiff had to hit the dog a bunch of times, to get him to release her arm.     (This happened in Ohio)

My question is why anyone would keep a dog they had to cage up constantly, except for brief walks?   

Animal control never could catch up to the dog, it lives at the defendant fool's father's farm.   $3k for plaintiff, and she should have sued for $5k.

 

p. 516, 5 October 2023

Therapy Dog Defender! ; Family Fraud?! ; Believe It or Not?

 

5 p.m. episodes-   

Ex-Lovers Lifetime Protective Orders! -Plaintiff Darin Courter suing defendant / ex Angela Wiljelmi for plane tickets, medical bills, and an engagement ring.   Plaintiff and defendant went to Costa Rica, had a big fight, flew back to the U.S.       Plaintiff wants his engagement ring back.

After coming back to the U.S., the local U.S. judge granted lifetime protective orders to both litigants.     .   JJ says she's not interested in medical bills, plane tickets, etc.      Litigants decided to get engaged, but not marry for three years until her $3800 spousal support expired.     Defendant claims the ring wasn't for engagement, but an apology to her.    

I see who is the most reasonable person, and it's not the defendant.    Defendant claims plaintiff broke her rib, and she was off work for 8 weeks, and had $20k in medical bills.    I feel so sorry for the judge in the protective order case, because I'm sure that hearing was more than 15 minutes minus commercials unlike JJ's court.     

Defendant sold ring back to Costco for $5972.02, which is full purchase price.  and that's what the plaintiff gets, $5,972 over the court maximum.   

 

Vandalizing Fit of Jealous Rage?-Plaintiff Vernelle Payton suing defendant /former friend Jayleshia Smith, for vandalized his home, and damaged his property.     

Defendant says they were more than friends, but not really dating.    Defendant came to the plaintiff's house without a date, and plaintiff said he was sick.  So, defendant dropped by his house, but plaintiff didn't answer the door, and defendant says she went to the grocery store, to buy him medicine, and food.  Defendant went to grocery store, and ran into the man, and he looked healthy.   

Defendant was ticked, and drops the claim she was bringing him chicken soup.    Plaintiff's car was vandalized that night, and post-its were on the air conditioner, said she would pay for it.  This is the case where the post-its said she was, 'shermed out' or however you spell it, and Byrd says that's high on synthetic marijuana.     

Car damage estimate is $2539.26 (defendant scratched the living daylights out of the car).    Plaintiff's witness saw the woman, who he recognized, around the plaintiff's car that night. 

Plaintiff gets $2539.26

 

p. 492, 13 May 2021

Gorgeous Engagement Ring Setback! ; Conspiracy Theory Flight Plan

[CrazyInAlabama]

5 December

4 p.m. episodes-

Property Tax Ripoff?-Plaintiff Jency  Claiborne suing defendant/former tenant Percy Wilson for back rent, unpaid utilitiestax money back. Defendant suing for property kept by plaintiff.   Plaintiff moved in with defendant (didn't pay rent, as usual), and gave defendant cash to take to pay her property taxes.   

Defendant was downsized, and supporting himself with handyman jobs, and moved in with plaintiff without a rent agreement.     Plaintiff gave man $440 to pay the property taxes in cash.  Defendant  went to wrong office, and other office was closed, he got a money order and mailed it to the County, and he doesn't have receipt for money order.   

Detroit sent her a statement with late fees, and said the taxes were never paid.    When the man left plaintiff's house, he moved in with the niece.   

Plaintiff gets  $440 tax money back, and two months back rent, a total of $840.   

Defendant gets his property back, and needs to pick them up.  Defendant claims he left a 24" TV, and 8" tablet, (liar), and clothes. 

Pain Med Payback?!-Plaintiff Simonique Gutierrez and (mother) Maria Perez suing defendant/ex boyfriend Timothy Harveyfor unpaid loans. Plaintiff woman moved boyfriend, and his kid into her mother's house, mother made him loans.  Defendant claims he gave the plaintiff's mother his pain meds in trade.   Loan to defendant was because car was repossessed, and plaintiff gave defendant check for $560.     

Plaintiff daughter claims that defendant violated protective order, but there is no proof of abuse, or police reports.  So how did plaintiff get a protective order?  Plaintiff daughter never saw doctor, no police reports, and she got a protective order.   

Defendant claims he loaned plaintiff daughter money to visit daughter in New York, but it was a gift.   Defendant claims he lost custodial visits with his son, because plaintiff daughter told his kid's mother lies about him.  Plaintiff claims she saw defendant choke his son, and that's what she told the defendant's son's mother. 

Plaintiff Perez gets $560 for loan.

 

Mother's Klepto Keeper?!-Plaintiff Rebekah Kitchen suing deceased mother's ex-neighbor/defendant Christi Snowden for a loan, suing for  $2900 out of original amount of $3500.   Defendant claims that the checks were payments for work done around the mother's home.   

Defendant says that they were given the money up front, and then worked it off.    Defendant claims she gave $2000 in cash to plaintiff, and $1500 in a check, shown in a ledger signed by the plaintiff.   

Plaintiff gets $2840, and I believe everything she said, and nothing the defendant said. 

 

p. 516, 2 October 2023

Troubled Teens’ Crash Pad! ; Pit Bull Breakout! (defendant's last name in Rhodes, I typed it another way in the original recap). 

 

5 p.m. episodes-

Locked and Loaded Neighborhood Patrol?!   -Plaintiff Edith Sieg-Reed suing defendant/former neighbor (I hope former neighbor) Richard Gorman Jr.  for harassing her relatives when they were lurking in a gated neighborhood, cost to move a shed, and harassment.  

Plaintiff thinks the rules of the HOA about sheds don't pertain to her.     Defendant was part of neighborhood patrol, and had run in with niece of plaintiff, and JJ says he was in the wrong.   Bet the people who had burglaries about that time don't think so.   

Plaintiff gets shed that doesn't follow appearance rules, and set back rules, gets taken to court by HOA, moves shed in January to follow rules, and redo roof, and so case was dismissed by court, but it was without prejudice, and from court decision, plaintiff lost.     There were other sheds not in compliance, but my guess is they were much older and were grandfathered in.  

I think plaintiff should move, not the defendant she's harassing, and I'm sure she is harassing him and the other neighbors.       There is a similar problem where I live, with minimal HOA rules, compared to the subdivision in question.   We have two people who were given and signed the rules, and think they don't have to follow them, and they have been advised they aren't special, and have to follow rules.     Some do move to subdivisions that have rules, and think they can do what they want to.     

Defendant lost in court too.    Defendant is trying to sell, and plaintiffs constantly parks right on the edge of his driveway, and I think it is harassment, and ruining his chances to get a decent offer.   I'm not buying a place that has a neighbor like the plaintiff irritating people, and I bet his buyers won't either.   

My guess is JJ will totally blow off the defendant's counterclaim. but I've seen enough of the same behavior from others to think she's definitely trying to get him.   

 JJ living in her lofty mansions doesn't realize when you live in some communities, you don't have a huge police force, but have county Sheriff's offices. They're probably severely understaffed and may have to cover huge areas.    Neighborhood patrols are volunteers, like neighborhood watch members are, and in many places have citizens who have concealed carry permits.   So, some places the communities do have volunteers who watch out for their neighbors, and with the rash of burglaries in the community, I can see why the defendant was suspicious of the lurking car. 

Plaintiff claims she's going to move, but I'm not betting on that.  

Nobody gets anything, but good luck for defendant getting a decent price on his house with that woman's cars parking in front of his house constantly.       

 

Falsely Imprisoned Bad Driver- Plaintiff Matthew Angeleri suing defendant/bad driver Stacy Grifall for car damages.  Defendant claims she didn't hit plaintiff's parked car, but there's a video.   Defendant clearly hit plaintiff's car. Another defendant from Planet Nutcase.    Defendant doesn't know the date, claims plaintiff falsely imprisoned her by not letting her leave before the police got there.   

Defendant didn't have insurance that night, because it "overlapsed".     What a shock, Googling Stacey Grifall in California produces a lengthy arrest record with other offenses including reckless driving, driving suspended, and my guess it's not the first time.       

Defendant got ticket for no insurance, and no license was on her either, and she got a fine when she went to court.   The video is really interesting, and she totally hit his car.   Her car is stuffed full of junk, and I doubt she could even see out the windows, and she backed up in a traffic lane too.   I bet $4,200 in damage qualifies as a felony, so plaintiff should have tasered her for that amount.      

Plaintiff gets $4,200 for the damage.     

What Does Judge Judy Hate?! (JJ hates phone cases, and so do I)-Plaintiff Ashlie Gack suing defendant Cheyenne Herronfor unpaid loan, the value of a phone, and seven months of cell phone bills.    Defendant failed to repay loan from plaintiff. and defendant says plaintiff just went and paid the car insurance bill on her own.     Another defendant who doesn't remember what they wrote in their sworn statement for court.    Defendant also owes for seven months of cell phone bills.     

Plaintiff gets $ 260, because she let the phone service keep going without payment for seven months.  

[CrazyInAlabama]

6 December

4 p.m. episodes-   

10-Year-Old Skater Vandal?! -Plaintiff Linda Blansit suing neighbor/defendant Ashley Conway for her children damaging her garage door. Plaintiff claims neighbor's 10-year-old son damaged her garage door with his skateboard. The noise continued, the woman say the little boy, and his sister were at the end of the driveway with their skateboards.   Plaintiff saw him when she came out of the house after hearing something hitting her garage door.   

When the woman came out, the kids ran away, towards their house.    Little boy admitted he did it, and they talked to the kid's mother about the damage.    Both garage doors (they're side-by-side doors) had damage, and plaintiff claims the defendant said she knew someone who will fix the door.     There are photos of both garage doors, showing the door damages.  

When JJ questions the little boy, C'Andre, he claims some other kids did the damages.  When interviewed, the little boy lies about who hit the garage door. C'Andre is certainly well rehearsed.  

 $248.97 to the plaintiff.  

Judge Judy's Exclusive Pez DIspenser Story!-Plaintiff Phyllis Orek suing defendant/silver plate contractor Mike Fewell for not delivering her silver plated Pez dispensers on time for a charity auction, and she claims the workmanship was faulty.   There are no actual contract, just an order form filled out by the plaintiff.  This is the case of a person who wanted collectible Pez dispensers silver plated for a charity auction, and plaintiff wasn't satisfied with the work.   Plaintiff wanted different colors and gold plating, but defendant says he only did silver plating.    Plaintiff shows a previous vendor's work that are the quality of work she wanted.   

JJ’s story is that when  eBay was started, it was so the founder's wife could buy and sell Pez dispensers online.   Plaintiff almost croaks when she tells JJ she can't even give them away, and JJ gives one to Officer Byrd.   

I think all of the Pez dispensers look butt ugly, no matter who did the silver-plating.   $3500 was the total cost.  Defendant claims none of them were broken.    The price is really cheap for the quantity of work done.  There were no specifications to the appearance of the finished product, and nothing saying what features the finished dispensers would look like.  A contract saying shiny finish would have solved this.  

Plaintiff already was paid $200 for the broken dispensers, and JJ gives her nothing else.   $0 to plaintiff.

 

Ditched and Drunk? -Plaintiff Mallissa Mayweather  suing defendant Jamal Saunders for stranding her at a gas station, stealing her purse, and breaking her phone. 

Plainitff boasts that on their first date at defendant's house they boinked.  Defendant denies the boinking happened.  This was their second date, or whatever it was. 

Defendant is counter claiming for plaintiff vandalizing his car. He says plaintiff was very drunk, he was taking her home, and did nothing with her purse or phone, and says she was so drunk that she probably lost her purse and phone. 

After drunk plaintiff met defendant at his friend's house, he says only plaintiff was drinking.    The litigants met on Facebook, and this was their second date.  The fight with drunk plaintiff was when he was driving her home to Amityville, where she lives. Except plaintiff wouldn't tell him where she lives, and so he got lost driving her home. 

So, plaintiff wanted to stop at a gas station, to smoke at 3:00 a.m..   Then, plaintiff claims defendant drove off with her phone and purse in the car, stranding her.  Then, plaintiff claims defendant dropped her phone out of the car, and that defendant drove off with his cousin, and purse in the car.    Cousin claims he handed the phone to plaintiff, and they didn't drop the phone.

Police report says plaintiff said her purse was in the car, but there was no confirmation from police, and purse wasn't in defendant's car according to police. 

Plaintiff case dismissed. 

Tax Woes Kill a Friendship -Plaintiffs Bernard and Colleen Augustine suing defendants /former friends and current deadbeats Mike and Heather Anderson for two loans and gas money.  Defendants needed money to pay their taxes, 

Total payments given to plaintiffs amounted to $1038.    This was the loan for taxes.    Sccond loan was to pay off a TV $1100 to get rid of the bills from a rent-to-own place, to pay off the TV loan.   Heather says the second loan, was actually a gift.  

Gas bills dismissed by JJ.  

Plaintiffs get $1100.   

5 p.m. episodes-

p. 492, 7 May 2021

Yes, I Attacked Him! ; Yes, I Choked Her!

p. 493, 24 May 2021

$8,000 Designer Sneaker Fight! ; Sister Mustang Feud

[CrazyInAlabama]

7 December

4 p.m. episodes-

When Bed Bugs Bite! -Plaintiff/former landlord  Roberta Thompson suing defendants/ deadbeat tenants Brooke Hill and boyfriend Taje Jones  for unpaid rent, security deposit.    Deadbeat tenant claims she didn't pay because there were bed bugs, and all kinds of other issues. 

Red Cross paid her security deposit. (I didn't know they did that).     One month defendant didn't pay because of bed bugs, next month claimed there was no hot water.  Defendants only paid partial rent for two other months.  

There were other tenants also, not sure if it was a sublease situation or not.   Pest control contract plaintiff pays for includes bed bug treatments according to the contract, and in the lease with tenants.   Defendant claims the bed bugs were left from the last tenant.  

Landlady had pest control in to look for bed bugs.   Defendant man claims he slipped and broke the oven door glass, and other damages were done by evil elves I guess.    Landlady has before move in, and after move out pictures, at last someone who is a professional homeowner.   

Defendant Hill gives JJ the evil eye when JJ says they didn't pay their rent.  JJ won't give landlord money from the stove, even though landlord found a used stove for $250.    A used stove for $250 is cheaper than replacing the stove door glass.    Another tenant is plaintiff's witness and she says Taje punched the walls and that's where the holes came from.  

Plaintiff is awarded $2,000 for rent and damages.  Defendant's ridiculous counter claim dismissed. 

 

Dying Son, Deadbeat Dad?- Plaintiff Debbie Anello suing defendant/deadbeat dad Frank Anello for a loan for a trip to visit dying son.   However, son survived, and is plaintiff’s witness. Defendant being sued for airline ticket to see dying son, that he hadn't seen in over 20 years (dying son is in the plaintiff witness chair), and ex let him stay at her place.     

Plaintiff said he would pay what he could when he could. 

Son looks healthier than dad does.  Defendant actually adopted son of ex-wife when son was 8, and they separated when the son was 14,.  Father looks in worse shape than the son ever did.     

Plaintiff will get plane ticket $441, minus $50 from defendant, =$361 to plaintiff.  

 

p. 516, 4 October 2023

The Black Eye Whodunit?!

5 p.m. episodes-

p. 495, 10 June 2021

Overcrowding Chaos! ; Bleeding Head Intro?! ; Teen Vandal in Hot Seat?!

p. 494, 26 May 2021

Alabama Section 8 Payback!

Edited December 7, 2023 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

8 December

4 p.m. episodes-

Drinks, Baseball and a Bailout? -(They both work at a ball park, that's where baseball comes in) Plaintiff Danita "Nikki" Jones suing ex-boyfriend/ defendant Clinton Lott for a loan for a car of $1800, he says it's a gift, but paid her $300 back.     

Defendant blames plaintiff for the DUI, because he says when he got drunk, she locked him out, and he had no choice except to drive, and that's when he was arrested for DUI. 

Defendant dumped plaintiff right after the car purchase, and right after he was nailed for a D.U.I., and she bailed him out, and car was impounded.   

$1500 for plaintiff

Sibling Squatter-Plaintiffs/ parents of five Travis and Lynelle Remillard say defendant/brother of plaintiff wife Cody Harris for unpaid rent, damages to their rented property.      Plaintiffs were renting a place in Colorado, brother moved in, then plaintiffs moved to Wyoming leaving brother in the house.  Mother, brother, and other relatives moved into plaintiff's place, but weren't paying the rent.     After plaintiffs returned home, they found out brother,  mother, and another relative skipped out on rent, didn't pay the utilities,  and hoarded trash in their home.   

The plaintiffs moved to Wyoming for work, that didn't pan out, and moved back.   Then plaintiffs found the rent hadn't been paid, and $2800 in utilities were unpaid.   The mother quit her job, and moved out when the plaintiffs returned.   Defendant brother claims he paid everything, but stopped paying rent.     

 Colorado has squatters rights, at least when this case occurred, and brother exercised them.   Since Cody the deadbeat brother finally moved out, the couple only rent the garage (I bet they're living in the house themselves), to another brother.      Cody was renting the garage for his car, and never paid.   Cody also trashed the yard, the neighbor's yard, and the house, and they had to pay for cleaning. 

Plaintiffs get $800 unpaid rent.   I would have given plaintiffs the trash hauling fees. 

(The hall-terview is hysterical, deadbeat renter Cody talks about how he owes nothing). 

 

p. 499, 30 August 2021

Wedding Planner Nightmare!

5 p.m. episodes-

Trucking Venture Disaster?! -(Litigants are cousins) Plaintiff Ricky Murran suing defendant Aaron McIntyre for costs from a trucking business they co-owned, including delivery fees, repairs, and fuel costs.  Defendant financed this, and was the dispatcher, and plaintiff was to drive and do deliveries.  Defendant purchased the truck, and paid the expenses for the truck.   Plaintiff was the driver. 

With the initial trip they were supposed to clear $6400, and split it evenly.   Company was not paid $2800 of the delivery fees, because of damages, late deliveries, etc.   Two out of the three deliveries were screwed up.  The truck broke down too. 

Photos of damaged merchandise were sent by the two customers who then didn't pay for the defective merchandise.   

JJ points out that plaintiff wasn't an employee who was paid wages, but was a partner who only was entitled to split the profits. 

$1315 to plaintiff for gas costs.   

 

Waffle Whammy-Plaintiff bride Gloria Darrington suing defendant/ caterer Michael McKee for an engagement party that went badly.    Caterer was almost two hours late arriving, without set up or anything ready to go.  The omelet, and waffle bar were delayed.      Two friends had to go out and get food at a local drive in. 

 (I love the plaintiff’s outfit and hair, so court appropriate, and lovely too) 

$450 for plaintiff.   (I gather from the defendant’s rant in the hall that the plaintiff was on TV before?  So, what does that have to do with him being two hours late?)

 

p. 493, 14 May 2021

Drive to Church Gone Bad! ; Whiplash? I Doubt That!

[CrazyInAlabama]

11 December

4 p.m. episodes-

Pregnant Cow Cover-Up!?- Plaintiff/ cow buyer Myra Hazlett suing defendant/cow seller Ricardo Rodriguez for a refund, and boarding costs.  

Plaintiff claims her  first cow has tree growing in its nasal cavity, fortunately, no pictures.    Plaintiff purchased second cow from defendant, cow was supposed to be pregnant.    Plaintiff wanted to return cow, because it either wasn't pregnant, or lost the pregnancy (not uncommon in cows).     

The cow was a replacement for another cow that got pneumonia from a tree growing in her nasal cavity, or a polyp, and the old cow needed IV drugs, and would lose the calf, or have to have antibiotic pills.    The first cow was going to be kept in agony until December, and then they would pull the calf, and then treat the cow.  Since plaintiff bought the second cow for milk about the time they would pull the first cow's calf, I'm guessing the first cow wasn't going to survive.    I freaking hate the plaintiff.

After cow #1 was sick, plaintiff bought cow #2, supposed to be pregnant.    Plus, cow #2 was supposed to be seven months pregnant, but vet saw the cow in October (one or two months after due date).   Plaintiff agreed cow looked seven months pregnant.   Plaintiff called defendant five days after purchase, and wanted a refund.   So, since plaintiff thought cow was pregnant, and wanted a pregnant cow, then why did she want a refund 4 days after the purchase?  It makes zero sense.    Vet didn't see the cow until two months later. 

 In August the cow bred with a bull, meaning she's not pregnant.   Plaintiff is telling JJ all kinds of information she doesn't want to hear, from her many years of being a vet tech.        Plaintiff also needed a substitute milk source for the first cow's calf, because cow apparently wouldn't survive after they pulled the calf.  

Sorry, a vet visit would have been appropriate to detect pregnancy before woman bought the cow.    Apparently, the world's oldest vet tech didn't know a pregnant cow either.  Just because you worked as a vet tech, it doesn't mean you're a vet, or qualified to pregnancy check a cow. 

Plaintiff gets refund $1200, and she still wants food and board for cow for four months, and didn't get it.    (This decision was wrong, you can't guarantee a pregnant animal will carry to term, even if cow really was pregnant when purchased.  Plus, plaintiff wanted a refund days after buying the cow, so this simply isn't adding up.) (Someone needs to tell me if the cow with a tree in it's respiratory system is even possible.  I'm hoping for the cow's sake that the answer is no). 

The Disappearing Tax Refund!-Plaintiff Kareen Julien suing defendant/ex-girlfriend Eileen Cortez for a tax refund that was deposited in her bank account, instead of his.  But plaintiff's father did the taxes, and he's the one who set the tax check to go in girlfriend's account.   Ex-girlfriend is accused of spending a man's tax refund.  Defendant ex-girlfriend admits she had the deposit in her account.   

Plaintiff's tax refund went into defendant's bank account by his father who does the family tax refunds.      The direct deposit went to the right accounts a few years in a row, when they lived together the first year, the next refund (after the plaintiff and defendant split up), father did the tax return and accidentally put the refund in the defendant's account.     Defendant has lame excuses, but she kept a refund that wasn't hers.    

Plaintiff get $960.

p. 515, 29 June 2023

Salvaged Car Fail! , Failed Friendship! ; Sister Drives Into Tree?

5 p.m. episodes-    

Adultery and Assault?!-Plaintiff Josie Gonzalez suing defendant/ex Keith Schnieder for value of furniture she bought for their shared apartment, hotel costs, and dog sitting expenses. Plaintiff claims they wanted to move in together, defendant says he wasn't moving in with the plaintiff.   

They were dating in Palm Springs, and defendant needed an apartment in Long Beach when he was offered a job there.    Plaintiff and defendant bought furniture together for the new apartment.     Plaintiff claims a $600 TV bought on plaintiff's card, $899 sofa, and she kept buying items for his place.   Plaintiff never stayed at his apartment, and later she found out he was cheating.   

Plaintiff was renting her own house out, and was claiming to move in with defendant in a joint apartment, and that's what she bought the furniture and TV for.  

Plaintiff says defendant gave her two payments, totaling  $800, and JJ is throwing out the plaintiff's dog sitting bills for watching the defendant's dog, and hotels costs for him to stay at Airbnbs.     

JJ says pay plaintiff $865, and he keeps the furniture.     

 

Border Collie Puppy Sent Packing!-Plaintiff/puppy seller  Joni Long suing defendant / puppy buyer Jessica Tolson and her father Jason Tolson for unpaid money for dog, and travel money to pick the puppy up after defendant decided dog didn’t ‘fit in’ with their family.    Defendant daughter bought the puppy, and her father is just as delusional as she is. She wants a full refund for the puppy. 

18 year old defendant, her father, and sister moved into a new house, and advertised for a Border Collie.   Defendants wanted a  full refund after the puppy 'doesn't fit in', after a couple of days.   I remember this one, great way to be hated by every dog lover in JJ's audience. 

I think it worked out better for the dog. I'm hoping the puppy ended up with a good home.  

Defendant wanted to make payments for puppy, $150 down, $150 next Thursday, and $200 the next Thursday.    Defendant paid the $150, paid nothing else, and wanted to return the puppy before the next Thursday. 

Defendant owes $350.    Defendant Twit, says puppy wasn't friendly, didn't fit in with the family, and puppy needed to go back.    Defendant's father is just as ridiculous as his daughter.    

Plaintiff gets $350, but doesn't get the gas money for the round trip to pick the puppy up.   (I'm very glad that plaintiff picked the puppy up from defendants, I can only imagine who they would have resold the puppy too, or dumped at the pound).  

p. 499, 19 August 2021

Poorly Performing Parents?! ; Teacup Yorkie Fail! ; Truck Driver Ripped Off?!

[CrazyInAlabama]

12 December

4 p.m. episodes-

God Weighs in on Truck Dispute-Plaintiff Capri Williams (homeowner Mayes was visiting) and Johnnie Mayes (truck owner)(plaintiffs are cousins) wants illegal tow money back, value of truck that wasn't picked up,  and is suing defendant/tow owner, Benjamin White, and property manager/HOA manager Lisa Lindsay who say the truck was illegally parked.     

Lindsay says the HOA had to pay to get truck back, and she's counter suing for the tow and impound money.   Tony, is defendant's witness, and testifying for the HOA manager Lindsay.  Truck is owned by Tony Robinson, who is ex-brother-in-law of Mayes and Williams).   

Lisa Lindsay found out from tow truck owner, that Robinson was the owner of the Tahoe. Robinson says Mayes would pay $2500 for the truck, but Mayes paid $1950, and not the other $650, so the title was never given to Williams.    Mr. Mayes had truck towed before because of his expired license, 

Defendant property manager claims it's not even plaintiff's property, and it's not registered to plaintiff, but his ex-brother-in-law Tonyand his wife.      Defendant's witnesses (the truck owner) says plaintiff never paid off the truck, so they never gave him the title.    The property manager says the truck wasn't properly parked, and didn't belong to the resident/plaintiff.     HOA property manager paid the tow fee, and that was a mistake.   

Everything dismissed. Williams and Mayes don't own the truck, so dismissed.   CC&Rs say owner of unit is responsible for guests and their actions, so truck towing should have been on Williams as owner living in the HOA.   JJ dismisses counter claim.   

 

Ex-lovers Leftovers-Plaintiff /ex-girlfriend Debra Fetner suing defendant/ ex-boyfriend J.D. Johnson for property she left behind at his house when she started couch surfing.       Plaintiff never paid rent after she moved out either.   

They were shacking up for seven years. Eight months after move out, plaintiff wanted her stuff back.   

Plaintiff claims defendant has $5,000 of her property.  

Plaintiff can pick up TV within five days, and defendant wants back rent.  Since defendant knew where plaintiff was, and didn't serve her in rehab, then he gets nothing.  

 

BBQ Balancing Act! -Plaintiff Jocelyn Martin suing defendant Donald Evans for BBQ grill (both are restaurant owners).   Defendant bought BBQ from plaintiff for $2800, and took possession.     Plaintiff received $1500, and defendant still owes $1300.   

$1300 to plaintiff.

 

p. 515, 27 June 2023.

Emergency Surgery Fallout ; Cockroaches and Drug Trafficking?!

 

5 p.m. episodes-

Fresh Mouth Dismissed from the Courtroom?-Plaintiff Raven Miyamoto is suing defendant/former roommate Dache Williams  for a loan, moving costs, and a destroyed phone.   Defendant is also suing for a destroyed phone.   

Defendant owes $920 for the first month's rent, plus utilities $20 to $50 a month.   Plaintiff moved out, but defendant is still living in the apartment.    Loan to defendant was for rent and bills.

The two litigants argued and then plaintiff says "Bull s%&^", and both litigants are dismissed.   

Toddler Day Care Injury-Plaintiff Michael Terry Sr suing defendant/day care provider Shaurna Walters for injuring his 3-year-old, not medical bills, just pain and suffering.    Defendant sat for the little boy for 18 months.      Little boy had his finger smashed in the door.

Defendant takes care of 8 kids, with two part time assistants only, and one assistant is another day care mom.   There is no business insurance, just homeowners insurance.     Defendant says there were no medical bills because Dad and child are covered by Medicaid.     

Little boy’s finger was smashed, and has no feeling, then plaintiff says finger was ripped off (no it wasn't, just has nerve damage in the tip of the finger.  It can take months for feeling to come back, so it may be too soon to sue). 

 Sadly, eight kids with one day care provider is legal where this case happened.     Plaintiff consulted an attorney about pain and suffering, and the provider has no insurance, and the attorney said no case.     Plaintiff is 48 years old, and in school.     

Plaintiff has no medical bills, and case is dismissed.  

Pit Bull Chews Up House!-Plaintiff/landlady Rajena Chavez suing defendants/former tenants Ralstina Norfot and Vurdell Watson for house damages, many attributed to the Pit Bull defendants owned, for $4900.    

Plaintiff rented a home to the defendants for five years, with husband, and wife, and two kids.    When defendants moved out, landlady says they had damages amounting to $4900.     $800 security deposit was paid, and plaintiff kept that.        Defendant husband disassembled the toilet to unclog it, there were three bathrooms, and he never put it back together.   

Defendant also want money for 'improvements' and broken items that they fixed instead of landlady.   Landlady has an estimate, but it's a total amount, not itemized.    The outside door frame, siding, and door are thoroughly chewed.     At least the landlady has pictures of the damage, $1805, minus security, so $1,000. 

This is the 'heart warming' case where the pit bull became inconvenient, so defendants dumped him at the animal shelter.    

Plaintiff/landlady receives $2805, minus $1,000 security deposit, so $1,850.

 

p. 496, 23 Jan  2021

The Ultimate Neighbor Fence Dispute! ; I Want a $25k Video for Free!

[CrazyInAlabama]

13 December

4 p.m. episodes-

Teen Vandalizes Grandma's Car?! -Plaintiff/sort-of-grandma Maria Reyes and witness Lorraine Session are  suing defendant/sort-of-grandson Andrew Rosler and his mother Fatima Rosler for car damages from him vandalizing the car.   Defendant teen is accused of vandalizing his sort-of Grandma's (plaintiff) car, witnessed by a neighbor. 

Teen used to help grandma, then it changed when the witness, Lorraine Sessions,  moved in across the hall, and things changed.  Andrew says after Ms. Session moved in, that the relationship with Maria Reyes deteriorated with his family.   

Teen wanted grandma to buy computer, and he would teach her how to use it, but the teen never did.    The plaintiff Session found out that the teen had purchased insurance for his phone, on her computer, for $199.     

Teen claims grandma purchased phone for him, and the charges were included on her account.    There was a restraining order request against teen, but it didn't go through.     

Plaintiff grandma saw teen scratching all over  her car with a rock, and plaintiff's witness Session claims her car was also damaged.     The two women were worried about the teen's brother retaliating (he also lives with teen's mother in the building).   Neither plaintiff did a police report, because they were afraid of retaliation from defendant and his brother. 

Plaintiffs get $1200.    

Father Son Drug Drama!-  Plaintiff/son Tyler Sadler suing defendant/father Joshua Sadler for his medication money that father stole.  Son received the insurance checks (insurance is in father's name), totaling $680 to reimburse son for the medication from the insurance company.  So father cashed the checks and kept the money for himself.   

Defendant is claiming the money was his because son didn't pay rent.   Father of the Year also wants to be reimbursed for the airplane ticket for son to come home from rehab.  Rent is dismissed, because father never tried to evict son for nonpayment. 

Plaintiff is doing better, and working, and I hope this continued for him.        

Plaintiff gets $680, minus the plane ticket price, $140, so $540 to plaintiff.

p. 514, 17 May 2023

Breathalyzer Scam? ; Car Keying Caught on Tape!

5 p.m. episodes-

Repo Assault and Neglect-Plaintiff/ step daughter (SSMOO-Sainted Single Mother of One)  Epiphany Austin suing defendant/stepfather Willie Sanders for repo on her car, that she purchased from him,  and punitive damages.     Plaintiff Epiphany has a history of repos.   

Stepdad made her a real deal, and she only paid one month out of three, and partial payments, and caught up in a few months later.   She wasn't stiffing the stepdad, but the bank.   Then she stopped paying again, and made a partial payment for the next month, and a month later the step dad repo'd the car.   Plaintiff says she was taking stepfather to work, and the car was only repo'd because she refused to take her mother to Publix.   She's also suing stepfather because she claims while he was repo'ing the car, he called police and said she was assaulting her mother.  

Out of $2597 in payments, she only paid $1920.      Since the car loan was in step father's name, the credit bureau hits were on his records.   SSMOO didn't put insurance on car, which is required on a car loan.   

$677 to defendant. 

Dog's Broken Nail Leads to Amputation-Plaintiff Ekaterina Castillo suing defendant/dog groomers (sorry, dog salon owners) Rachel Nading and Diana Dominguez , claiming that a groomer working for defendant broke the dog's nail, leading to an infection, and it led to amputation of toe.   

However, plaintiff didn't even take dog to vet for two weeks after 'injury', so it could have happened any time between grooming, and vet.   Vet report only says infected toe.   

Case dismissed. 

 

p. 496, 21 June 2021

Machine Operator Mom vs. Entitled Daughter? ; Generation Z Start Up Fail!

[One Tough Cookie]

@crazyinAlabama.

I'm 43 epis behind thanx to the flu, so your analysis' are really helping me weed out those I don't want to watch-primarily the dog bit issues.

[CrazyInAlabama]

14 December

4 p.m. episodes-    

Tree Root Ruckus!-Plaintiff Harriet Murphy suing defendant Horacio and Heather Ferran for driveway cracks from tree roots.  Defendant removed tree right after he was notified by plaintiff.  Tree roots were hurting the septic system on defendants' property.   

I remember this, the driveway was very old, and looks like the neighbors cracked driveways due to settling and age, just like my forehead.   The cracks aren't near the tree, but running parallel to the driveway length, nowhere near the tree.   

Plaintiff claims when she moved into her house in 2001, there were no driveway damage, but by the time the defendants moved in the driveway cracked.    However, the driveway is not cracked from the side towards the tree, but from street to house, and that's not from root damage.   

I wonder if there are drainage or water lines under the driveway?   Because the line is very straight front to back on the driveway, and the driveway is buckling, so I don't think it's the tree damaging the driveway next door.     

Defendants have pictures showing the other driveways on the street cracked from the street up the middle of the driveways too.    The plaintiff is a pain in the butt neighbor, and thinks she's getting a totally new driveway out of the neighbors.   

Plaintiff has a huge tree in her front yard that has raised her front sidewalk too.   If there are roots from a tree affecting the driveway, it's probably from her tree.  Plaintiff thinks she's RBG, and she's not. 

I feel sorry for the defendants living next to that woman, and probably not able to escape her by moving.  I bet plaintiff never stopped whining about her driveway. In the hall-terview, plaintiff says "I was just devastated" about how the case went.  My guess is the driveway cracks had nothing to do with the defendants' tree, there is no damage on the side of the driveway near the former site of the defendants' tree. 

 Nothing for the plaintiff.

 

Too Drunk to Remember!?-Plaintiff Rhoda Kabonso suing former roommate/ defendant Suzette McConnell for unpaid rent.  As usual, defendant wants property back, (she didn't move suddenly, but still left a lot of stuff), and moved out leaving her junk behind. 

Plaintiff gets $500, and defendant gets nothing (if she wanted her 'valuable junk', then she would have to pay 3 month’s rent, $1500).

p. 515, 28 June 2023

Rescued Dog Kills Cat! ; Grow Up and Pay Up!

5 p.m. episodes-

Kid Carnival Fail-Plaintiff/kiddie party rental company owner  Thomas Caringella suing defendant/kiddie party rental client Mercedes Austin for damages to rental property she had rented from him.    Defendant did a huge carnival for her kid's birthday, including a train ride, Ferris wheel, popcorn machine, cotton candy machine,  and bouncy houses.   She rented bouncy house from plaintiff, and plaintiff claims outrageous amount for bouncy house damages, and other property she rented.   Replacement tarps are $99 each, but defendant's card was charged $2650.   

Plaintiff at first said bouncy house, and other things would be in her back yard, but aisle between houses is too narrow, so it had to be in the front yard, and street.   

Rental price was for carousel jumper, popcorn machine, soda machine, and bouncy house, it was $590.   For three tarps the plaintiff wants a lot more than the $297 the receipt shows, plus he wants money for damages that he can't prove.       

Defendant gets her $2353 which was minus $297 for the tarps. 

Attempted Murder and Million Dollar Bail-Plaintiff Lamar Morgan suing his younger brother/ defendant Willie Morgan for bail and attorney fees. Charges were for attempted murder, bail was $1.2 million, down to $300k, and downgraded to $250k, with $7,000 bail cost to bondsman.   

Charges were eventually dropped, and no one was ever arrested for case.    Defendant was in jail for a week, until bail came through.     

Plaintiff wants his $4k ($3k for bail, $1k for attorney).   Plaintiff gets $4,000.

 

p. 509, 25 October 2022

Witness to Vandalism! ; Domestic Dispute Ejection?! ; Courts are for Married Folks

[CrazyInAlabama]

15 December

4 p.m. episodes-

Fight at the Dealership! -Plaintiff/ex-boyfriend Veraughn Mitchell suing defendant/ ex-girlfriend Denise Wilson for towing and car costs for a vehicle plaintiff co-signed for defendant, plus a replacement key fob. Defendant claims ex-boyfriend assaulted her after they were thrown out of a car dealership for fighting.    

 Defendant found out he was cheating after co-signing for $15,000, and after she found out there were bullet holes in the car.  Why aren't we getting video of the bullet holes?  And the story about that? 

Defendant took the car keys, moved his car, it was impounded, and towed.     Defendant's name is still on the loan.  So, she's stuck. 

It was $385 for car tow and impound fees and tow to the Bronx.    Replacement for key was $300.   Plaintiff did get his car back, but had to pay the impound and towing, and the key fob replacement.   Plaintiff broke her phone at the car dealership, when they were fighting.   Plaintiff paid her $65 for the phone.  

$685 for the plaintiff.     

WW2 Guns, Ex-Wives and a Chop Saw -Plaintiff Anthony Choquette suing defendant/former friend and roommate Ronald Herbert for belongings he left behind when he moved out of defendant's house. 

Plaintiff was broke, and lived rent free for three months, and claims the defendant stole his left behind property.   

Plaintiff's car was shipped to Tennessee, and defendant claims there was a lot of stuff loaded in the car before shipping.  There was a U-Haul the ex-wife had that she took from storage at the defendant's place for plaintiff.     Another wandering 55" TV.   A bunch of back and forth about a washing machine, work on the plaintiff's car for free, and it's all boring.    A couple of doors that plaintiff gets back, with some scuba gear.  

Plaintiff tried to file a police report, but no copy.     

Plaintiff gets nastier when JJ brings up the three months without paying.      Defendant forgave the rent to get the freeloader out.     

Plaintiff will pick up dive stuff, bifold doors, and washing machine, some other stuff, in the next five days.   

 

Hair Relaxing Fallout! -Plaintiff Ethel Scott suing defendant/hair dresser Claude Bryant over her relaxed hair falling out, suing for medical bills, and punative damages.   Plaintiff claims after defendant relaxed her hair, that her hair started falling out, and she wants her dermatologist medical bills paid and punative damages, totaling $5,000. 

Plaintiff claims her scalp had big sores, hair was falling out, and she claims that defendant did this to her.   Defendant claims there was no reaction to the relaxing, and hair dresser told plaintiff the dangers of coloring right after relaxing. 

She didn't see the dermatologist for three weeks after the relaxing.   Dermatologist says diagnosis is "alopecia" which is not anything the defendant did to plaintiff.   Defendant claims plaintiff asked him for a color treatment right after the relaxing treatment, and defendant said not to color her hair too soon or bad hair and scalp things would happen.   Dermatologist doesn't say anything about burned scalp.   Alopecia is a medical condition, not from relaxing hair, or anything else the plaintiff did. 

When plaintiff came to see defendant after the dermatologist visit, defendant says her hair was obviously freshly dyed.   Plaintiff denies she dyed her hair. 

My guess is plaintiff either dyed the hair herself, or had someone do it, and that caused the hair loss.  Plaintiff says the initial treatment was February, dermatologist in March, and defendant says her return to salon was in June.  

Plaintiff case dismissed. 

(Mayo Clinic says "Hair loss (alopecia) can affect just your scalp or your entire body, and it can be temporary or permanent. It can be the result of heredity, hormonal changes, medical conditions or a normal part of aging. Anyone can lose hair on their head.").  JJ says since defendant offered free services, she should go to the defendant for treatments.  

 

Bulldog Buddies No More! -Plaintiff Sarah Chatterton suing defendant Holly Vaughn for boarding fees.   Defendant demanded plaintiff return her dog after three years of the dog living with plaintiff.     Plaintiff gave dog to defendant for three years, and then demanded the dog back. 

Defendant got dog back after plaintiff said she couldn't keep dog any longer.  Defendant claims plaintiff called and told her she was going to get rid of the dog, unless defendant took dog back. 

Plaintiff says that she asked defendant if she was in a position to take the dog back, and defendant took the dog.  

The litigants had no formal contract, so plaintiff isn't getting anything.  Plaintiff's mother has the dog now, after defendant took the dog, and then couldn't keep the dog.    

Plaintiff case dismissed. 

5 p.m. episodes-

Homeless, Evicted, and Robbed-(I remember this one, it's wild) -Plaintiff/ aunt  Stella Williams was homeless, and her defendant/niece Patricia Nephew (niece’s last name is Nephew) made the huge mistake of letting Aunt move into her apartment, and would take over the lease.  Plaintiff is suing for return of two TVs, and other junk, breaching the lease, and other stupid stuff.   

Where does a homeless person, now living in a tent, or couch surfing put TVs?  Aunt / plaintiff moved in with niece in March,  (Only income is social security, just $735 a month), was supposed to take over lease in April, paid half rent in May $300.   

When aunt moved in it was defendant and boyfriend, and daughter, but the aunt says niece and family never moved out, so changeover never happened to aunt taking over the lease. 

Aunt went to visit her daughter,  came back, and niece said she wasn't running a ##### house (##### got bleeped by the censor, Aunt had strange hours, and bad friends. and came and went at odd hours), so I can guess what niece said.  

Aunt moved to tent in back yard of her witness, and moved into witness's house after surgery.    Aunt is suing niece for two TVs she left behind.  Where did she want to put the TVs?  On the tent side?   Niece moved out of the apartment, tried to get Aunt to get TVs, and she never picked them up.   

TVs were from a two year lease at a rent to own place.   

In June there is a text from Aunt that she'll pick up all of her stuff, except the TVs (this must have been the tent in the back yard stage).   Aunt never picked the TVs up from niece's daughter, despite repeated requests to pick them up.   

Case dismissed.   

Sentimental Family Property Feud -Plaintiff Timothy and Deborah Lombard suing defendant /neighbor Michelle Gonzales for damaged property from a pile of cement blocks, and a fence.     

This is the strange case of the family-owned desert property where the plaintiff's own it, and it's just vacant.   Plaintiffs claim neighbor dumped junk on their property, and damaged it.   

Defendant is counter suing for trash removal, and harassment. 

Defendant recently bought the property next door, and claims cement blocks were on plaintiffs property when she moved in, and she moved them voluntarily, after repeated whining by plaintiffs.   Plaintiff man is sole owner of property, with his wife.   It's 4/7ths of a acre of dirt, 30 minutes outside of Pueblo, Colorado.     

Plaintiff Timothy Lombard claims he thinks defendant put in a new patio, and dumped the concrete chunks on his property.   Overhead photo shows the track marks from when defendant moved the rocks and concrete to her property, to get the plaintiffs to shut up.   

Sadly, the pictures show the valuable family property is nothing but an empty dirt lot, and there is no damage.     

The plaintiffs also want to put up a fence, and want defendant to pay for that too.   Ridiculous plaintiffs!    The property looks like a vacant lot, and the only structure looks like a nasty old shed.     The plaintiffs are delusional, and I feel sorry for the defendant living next door to that dump.   

Case dismissed.  

p. 494, 27 May 2021

Deal with your Child in Foster Care! ; Mom’s Burial Policy ; Defective Sports Apparel Drama!

Edited December 15, 2023 by CrazyInAlabama

[One Tough Cookie]

On 12/15/2023 at 6:18 PM, CrazyInAlabama said:

 

Homeless, Evicted, and Robbed-

I saw that and said "Thank you God, for my boring life".

[CrazyInAlabama]

18 December

4 p.m. episodes-

Best Man Limo Disaster!-Plaintiff Grant Graupmann is suing defendant/limo company owner Shelly Boudreaux for damages he was charged for limo damages after a bachelor party. 

 Limo owner says the limo had interior damage, illicit drug use, cigarette burns, and can with cigarette ashes. (no smoking in the limo).      The plaintiff claims the smoker only smoked outside the limo.   

 Plaintiff wants $775 for damages back, because the limo driver isn't present, or any other witnesses.    Manager who checks in limos saw the damages, including lots of empty beer cans, knocked over beer cans, burns on the seat and headliner (ceiling), and carpet.  The wet bar replacement would cost over $4,000.  The limo company owner decided to sell the limo, instead of repair it.      

Credit card company upheld the charges of $775.   Limo charges for rental were $385, the rest of the charges were for damages, $775.  Plaintiff witness is Nick, and he claims nothing in the limo was their fault.   JJ changes her mind after Danny, the manager testifies.  Danny says he saw some powdery substance, resembling cocaine.    

I want to see the video of the plaintiffs all getting armpit hairs pulled (except Colin the smoker), for a drug test.   JJ decides that Colin is probably the coke user, and dismisses the plaintiff's case.  (This was in Fargo)

Plaintiff's case dismissed.    

Black Lab Leftovers-Plaintiff Sophia Bittner wants a $460 refund for black lab puppy, that defendant Amanda Roberts sold her.   Plaintiff didn't want the puppy after two days. (This was in Spokane, Wash)

Defendant took puppy back, and said if she sold the puppy, then she would give the plaintiff her money back.  

Defendant did not resell the puppy, she gave the puppy away after a month.   

No money for puppy, equals no money for idiot puppy buyer. 

  

Nice Guy or Nasty Drunk?! -Plaintiff Travis Burnett suing defendant Joshua James for injuries sustained during a bar fight, plaintiff lost.   Defendant says plaintiff started the fight, and defendant only defended himself from belligerent plaintiff.

Bar owner says plaintiff deserved what happened, since he's a nasty drunk.   

Case dismissed. 

Car Rental Racket-Plaintiff/ car renter Emanuel Smith, who rented car while his regular car was being worked on, is suing defendant /on-and-off girlfriend Emily Malloy  for stealing car keys, and wrecking rental car.   Plaintiff claims friend never drove a rental car in his name before, but his girlfriend /defendant told JJ the truth.   

Defendant claims plaintiff rented the car for her to drive, and he had rented cars for her to drive before.  Defendant needed car when she came to town, to visit her children.   

 JJ says that defendant wasn't named on the insurance for the rental car, so plaintiff is on the hook for damages. 

5 p.m. episodes-

p. 499, 20 Aug 2021

Pit Bull Mating Mayhem! ; Slashed Tires and Loan Lies?! ; Tijuana Stray Rescue Regret

p. 492, 12 May 2021

When the Aggressor Becomes the Victim?! ; Pit Bull Takes a Bite Out of a Man’s Ear

[CrazyInAlabama]

19 December

4 p.m. episodes-

Headlock Truck Fight!- Plaintiff Adrian Derenzy   suing defendant Michael Robertson for medical bills resulting from a fight, payments on a truck sale. Defendant was buying truck from plaintiff, and plaintiff was buying another truck from defendant at the same time.    They got in a fight, plaintiff supposedly attacked the defendant, and scratched his cornea     Plaintiff claims he owed nothing to defendant, but defendant claims that's wrong.      Plaintiff has medical records, since he won the fight, the defendant had no medical records.     

Truck defendant was buying was $8000, but he wasn't making payments.  Defendant paid $6600, that he can prove.   

Plaintiff was given a truck from defendant, to pay off the first truck.   Plaintiff gets defendant's truck, and couldn't register it, it was a salvage title, and there was a $900 lien owing to defendant for the fees.   Defendant still owed $1400. 

Since defendant has the second truck back, he owes $1400 to plaintiff.   

Then the fight on plaintiff's front lawn happened. There was a police incident report, from when the defendant took the truck, and the supposed assault happened on 2 August.  Medical records say treatment was at the end of July, before the assault happened.       

There are toll ticket fees on defendant's truck from July to August when he repo'd truck.   I'm not only confused,  but I hated both of these fools.  

$1400 to plaintiff, $7.25 to defendant (next time bring proof you fool).

 

Drive-Through of Shame!-Plaintiff Wilie Drake suing defendant Christopher Radcliffe for car damages after plaintiff’s parked car was hit by defendant.   Defendant is alleged to have hit the plaintiff's car, while the plaintiff's car was parked in his driveway.   Plaintiff thought the defendant was injured or dead, but apparently he always looks like he's in distress.   

Early in the morning, the plaintiff's car was parked in his driveway, and there was a huge kaboom, with defendant in his car, draped over the steering wheel.     I don't know what plaintiff does for a living, but I hope it's nothing requiring brains, because he's rather vacant.   

Defendant claims he wasn't driving that day, so I guess the plaintiff doesn't recognize someone he's related to (defendant has kids with plaintiff's sister, and they are shacking up ), and has known for years.    The police caught the defendant's girlfriend driving the car shortly after, ratted out by his girlfriend (cousin of plaintiff).    Defendant got citation for fleeing the scene of an accident, case was heard, and he plead guilty, but plaintiff claims he dropped the charges at his sister's request. 

Defendant had no insurance, what a shock.   

$5000 to plaintiff.

 

p. 517, 3 November 2023

 Lovers or Roommates? ; Dangerous Biker Boy

5 p.m. episodes-

p. 499, 16 August 2021

Mom’s Million Dollar Settlement! ; Stucco Job from Hell!

p. 495, 16 June 2021

Baby Formula for Disaster! ; Police, Fight Aromatherapy Crime!

Edited December 19, 2023 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

21 December

4 p.m. episodes-

p. 516, 24 October 2023

Tortoise Resort Fail ; Puppy Buyer Remorse   (This is mistitled, this was an adult Pekingese dog)

p. 499, 16 August 2021

Catfight at a Custody Exchange!

 

5 p.m. episodes-

Clueless Young Bookkeeper-Plaintiff/ bookkeeper Elizabeth Byrnes suing defendant/deli owner Gary Wallack  for unpaid work.     Young bookkeeper and partner bought accounting company, and were supposed to do accounting, taxes, etc.      Plaintiff claims unpaid bill of $2,288.   

Defendant claims they raised fees, and didn't tell him, screwed up his taxes, and other accounting.   Defendant says they didn't cash his checks for three months, and payments were cashed by the previous accountant business owner, not credited to defendant’s account, and plaintiff had to do catch up work previous owner didn't do.   

Defendant is getting dunning notices for business license fees never paid, federal tax deposits not made correctly, and other screw ups by plaintiffs.     

Plaintiff accountant has no knowledge how to run a business, and doesn't have a clue about what she's supposed to do.      Plaintiff was cashing checks for previous owner of the accounting firm, who now works at the accounting firm again.    Plaintiff isn’t a CPA, only Behar, the business partner and owner/mentor is an enrolled agent (IRS status).  Bills to defendant were from Byerland, and that never changed on the billing, but Byerland was the previous owner who cashed the checks.

From testimony, previous owner was cashing defendant's checks, and plaintiff doesn't know about that either.  I wouldn't trust the plaintiffs to walk my dog, let along do my taxes or accounting.   Defendant switched accounts firms after this.

JJ says defendant needs to sue the previous business owner Byerland, who works at the business again.     Plaintiff claims bills and checks were cashed while previous owner was in the hospital, and in a coma.  So who was sending the bills and cashing the checks?  

Cases are all dismissed, and plaintiff is an idiot.  

 

Mother's Ashes Trade for Car-Plaintiffs (sisters) Dana Bucci and Susan Bucci are suing defendant/former stepfather Thomas Haines, Defendant was married to plaintiff's (2 adult step daughters) mother for 33 years, car was titled in deceased wife's name, with daughter, and $5,864 still owed.   

 Thomas Haines (that's only funny to me for personal reasons. Same last name as mine, but not related.  At least, I hope he's not related to me, because I can't stand him) doesn't to give the car back, but Tommy Boy wants money from benefit to raise money that the daughters received, return of property, and his wife’s ashes.    Daughters get five days to claim car with marshal.         Defendant didn't pay for funeral either, it was paid for by donations.   

When car is received, the show will pay his expenses.    Daughter has ashes of mom, and she'll give them back to Tommy Boy.    Tommy Boy's friend just won't shut up.   Defendant wants his bed back.   He claims the stepdaughters tossed him out.   

Benefit money goes to person who actually cared about the deceased, and daughters keep that.   Beneficiaries are outside the estate, and go directly to the person named on the accounts.   He says the step daughters never liked him, and I like them for that, because I want to slap him repeatedly.    

JJ tells defendant’s buttinsky friend to sit down.

Car to plaintiffs, bed to defendant.   Ashes to defendant.

 

 

Deceased Father's Truck Totaled-Plaintiff Tamara Isom suing mechanic/ defendant Albert Dobson for not fixing her car, and doing more damage.    Plaintiff wrecked her late father's truck, and it was totaled.   

Insurance company let her keep truck for reduced rate, and she wanted it fixed by defendant.    Mechanic had truck from October 17 to August 18, and it was towed home.   Mechanic was paid $2,000 by plaintiff, without an exact schedule to finish the body work and paint job.

He is a hobby mechanic, the parts to repair the truck came from junk yards, and defendant has no receipts.         Defendant drove truck to his shop, and says it was drivable when plaintiff had it towed to her home.      

Plaintiff gets $1,000 back.    

 

Adult Son Break’s Dad’s Rules -Plaintiff/ dad Donald Spusta suing defendant/son Shawn Spusta for truck dad put in son's name, defendant son didn’t finish paying for truck.   Dad loaned him the money for the truck, and said son couldn't drink or do drugs.    Son paid for half, and plaintiff dad wants the rest.   

 Son/defendant paid $750 for the truck, and father wants the rest of the money, $750.      Son paid the first $750 in one month.    Defendant claims dad was going to pay for half of the truck, but JJ doesn't believe it.     

$750 to plaintiff.  

 

That’s a Bunch of Baloney -Plaintiff/horse trailer seller Brandi Burbank suing defendant /deadbeat horse trailer buyer Larry Smithey for the unpaid balance on a trailer. 

Trailer sold for $8,000, defendant gave trailer owner $4,000, a week later he claims he gave her the rest, but has no proof.    Defendant’s claims of bank withdrawals and payments simply don’t add up.

Plaintiff gets $4,000. 

 

 

22 December (25 December no Judge Judy)

4 p.m. episodes-

P 516, 23 October 2023

Exotic Chandelier Scam ; Criminal Car Sale

p. 516, 8 Sept 2023

Child Attacked by Dog ; Marital Property Payback ; Loan vs. Investment 101

5 p.m. episodes-

Stalking Through the Ceiling-Plaintiff Deanne Robinson is suing defendant /downstairs neighbor Aleidia Sanders for harassment, and falsely accusing her of selling drugs.   Defendant is downstairs neighbor of plaintiff.  (This happened in Oakland, CA)

Defendant claims plaintiff was stalking her through the ceiling, waved a gun at her, and defendant scares me to death.   There are repeated police, and housing authority complaints by defendant for noise, she claims there are other unlisted tenants with criminal activities in plaintiff’s apartment, and claims the stalking. Defendant claims plaintiff was listening to her through the wall/ceiling.   Defendant's bizarre claims started after she moved into the same triplex as the plaintiff in 2017.     I hope the plaintiff moved after this. 

Plaintiff is suing for harassment due to repeated police calls from defendant.   Defendant sent the police one time when she claimed the neighborhood drug dealer moved in with plaintiff and her adult daughter.   Plaintiff submits other letters from defendant to housing authority, police, and complex management.   Defendant also claims plaintiff threatened her with a gun, the police report is bizarre. 

Defendant has no photos or proof about the unlicensed tenant.     I bet plaintiff or adult daughter had a friend over, for plaintiff’s birthday, and he refused to identify himself to police (on private property in California, I think he has that right).  I can see that defendant is on leave from her job, trying to get disability.   Defendant claims she's going to move, but hasn't yet.   Plaintiff was granted a restraining order against the defendant.   (Guess who got arrested for twice violation of the restraining order, and once for assault after this case aired?).     

$5,000 to plaintiff, and I really hope the defendant moved, but I'm doubting that.  Then, in the Hall-terview the defendant goes off on the producers, and Judge Judy.  

 

BB Gun Shootout- Plaintiff Gloria Hunt claims defendant Jimmy Griffin threw a hissy fit on her property, and damaged her car by throwing rocks at her car and house, front door, etc.   Defendant claims plaintiff did it herself.   Plaintiff claims that defendant splashed gasoline on her front lawn too.   Plaintiff asked defendant to bring her a gas can, to fill the lawnmower.  Instead, defendant saw the friend mowing the lawn, got angry, and started pouring the gas around the lawn, and started throwing the rocks at the house.

Plaintiff claims defendant was jealous of another man mowing her lawn, and that caused the gasoline splashing incident.    Defendant also claims she shot at him with a BB gun.    There is a police report, but no one was arrested, and plaintiff didn't press charges.     

Plaintiff didn't follow up with the police about criminal charges, but is going to do it in the future, and it would incriminate him to talk in court, so case dismissed.  

 

Sentimental Fence Feud  -  Plaintiff woman Mable Wilcox and her adult granddaughter Michelle Captain are suing defendant neighbors Claire and Darryl McGill Jr for a wire fence that was 40 years old, and failed when the defendants put up a replacement fence.     

The replacement fence was lovely, very expensive, and a great improvement.    The wire fence that came down was 40 years old, and looked rusty, and failing to me.      I guess the plaintiffs were expecting the nasty wire fence to stay there forever, because the woman's late husband put it up 40 years ago. After 40 years, the wire fence must have been decrepit, rusty, and failing.   

There was a scuffle, and defendant wife claims the bully plaintiff granddaughter pushed her down, and I believe it.  There is a video of the fight, but pushing is off camera.  Plaintiff is also upset at the plants the woman planted on her side of the fence on her own property.   

 Defendants put up new fence on their side, and repaired the nasty, deteriorating wire fence.   

Defendant granddaughter claims she was assaulted by the wife, then the husband.  No photos or police report prove anything the granddaughter says, because it didn't happen.  Granddaughter was the obvious bully in this, and the instigator.   

$100 to defendant for the assault.  

Juice-Bar Owner Fail -Plaintiff /Juice Bar owner Keisha Williams suing defendant/former business landlord Ebele Muorah over her former juice-bar, claiming illegal eviction, and stolen property. 

However, plaintiff was using parking and other space that weren’t hers to use, and not included in her lease.   

Defendant claims plaintiff was illegally serving alcohol, didn't pay her rent, and property of plaintiff is still in the space.   Defendant claims plaintiff used the parking lot without permission.   

Actually, if defendant thinks plaintiff is illegally serving liquor, then call the liquor license people, and they will send undercover people in to find out, and the woman will be in serious trouble.  

Plaintiff receives $0, defendant is told to go to housing court.   

[One Tough Cookie]

11 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

The wire fence that came down was 40 years old, and looked rusty, and failing to me. 

You just described my back yard!

11 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Exotic Chandelier Scam ;

ooohhh, I am SO looking forward to that epi!

[One Tough Cookie]

Sneaking out of my kitchen to wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!

[badhaggis]

7 hours ago, One Tough Cookie said:

Sneaking out of my kitchen to wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!

To you too my friend!

[CrazyInAlabama]

26 December

4 p.m. episodes-

p. 516, 27 October 2023

Mother Daughter Custody Fight! ; Sellout Crowd Scam?

p.  515, 23 April 2023

Child Support Roofing Ruckus! (they are called facia boards on a roof edge, not a 'facial' board the way both litigants are talking about) ; Bad News Gym Partners

5 p.m. episodes-

p. 494, 4 June 2021

Kindergarten Teacher Abuse?!  ;  Horse Grazing Ignorance?! ;  Fiance in Legal Trouble!

 

What Are You NOT Suing Me For?!  -Plaintiff  Kirsten Clagnaz is suing old bat/ defendant/neighbor Therese Canavan for fence costs, false report to health department, etc. (Old Bat is appropriate, and I'm an Old Bat too.    I hope JJ looked into local fence statutes for where the litigants came from.)

 Fence was replaced five years ago, this year plaintiff extended the fence further forward to the property line, and then fence was mysteriously ripped down, and defendant (she works at the Health Department), made a report that plaintiff had rats on her property.     Neither side has a survey, or a surveyor in court to testify. 

Defendant never was notified about the fence being built, and claims it damaged her existing electric fence.  The electric fence is an Invisible Fence, for a Jack Russell Terrier.   How could a fence on plaintiff's property bother the invisible fence wire on defendant's property?  Unless the underground wire is actually on plaintiff's property.  Plaintiff will pay $139 to defendant for the electrical fence, so that's already settled.  Defendant refuses to accept the $139. 

Plaintiff's case dismissed without prejudice, so she can get evidence, and sue locally over fence removal.    Defendant is also whining about her gate falling off.   Defendant's case also dismissed without prejudice.   

When Smog Comes Between Friends-Plaintiff/car seller Christy Greer suing former friend/defendantMaureen Evans for unpaid car payments.  Defendant paid $200 down, leaving $700 owed.  Car couldn't smog, then defendant says  it costs way more than $700 she owes to fix the car, and defendant wants the money dismissed, and to keep the car title.   

Defendant has no proof she paid anything to fix the car, so plaintiff gets car back. 

Mother/Daughter Eviction and Child Endangerment-Plaintiff/ mother Patricia Cardenas suing defendant / daughter Yvonne Espinoza for return of property left behind when plaintiff was evicted.  Plaintiff/mother moved in with daughter, and was evicted.   

Plaintiff was homeless, on social security, and another small pension, and claims she was paying daughter most of her income for rent.  Defendant evicted the mother/plaintiff, step dad (he was paid by the state to be caretaker for plaintiff), and a sister in law with kids, and all of them went bye-bye.   

Daughter/defendant gets nothing for harassment from mother, and mother calling CPS.   Daughter also gets nothing for mother putting satellite dish on the roof, putting up some shed, and holes in walls.   

Mother gets her property back if she picks it up in the next five days. 

No money for either side.

[CrazyInAlabama]

27 December

4 p.m. episodes-

Jealous Vigilante Justice? -Plaintiff Jourdan Boothe suing defendant/ex Janae Davis  for vandalizing his car gas tank.  

Plaintiff says he has text messages from defendant and her best friend/witness bragging about the gas tank vandalism.  Plaintiff text messages from defense witness talk about using bleach, soap, and  other su Text messages show defendant poured something in his gas tank, and that was helped by defendant's witness, Helena Mosiman's  help with a 'recipe' to mess up the car.   

Defense witness denies she helped defendant do the vandalism.   There is a voice mail message of defendant and her witness talking about how the car was ruined by defendant.   Defense witness had a relative that dated a relative of plaintiff, so sort-of related, or not really.   

The voice message is between defendant and her witness saying defendant did the damages. 

Car will cost $4,100 to fix, because the altered gas ruined the motor.  

$4,100 to plaintiff to replace his motor. 

 Disabled Mom, Disobedient Daughter -Plaintiff/ mother Karla Kierstead suing defendant/ daughter Kelsy Garett for non payment of rent, and property damages.  Plaintiff wants 13 weeks rent from defendant, and to be paid for daughter damaging property.  

 The litigants and plaintiff's son rented a house together.    Daughter works as a sales agent for Sirius XM radio service.  Adult son works in a low paying job too. Mother is disabled. 

Plaintiff didn't like defendant daughter's boyfriend constant non-paying presence, so she told daughter either boyfriend paid rent or they had to leave.  As JJ says, daughter was a legal tenant, so since lease has nothing about sleep overs.   JJ says plaintiff is suing the daughter as a tenant, not as a daughter.   Damages include a broken Marilyn Monroe portrait/sign.   Plaintiff has no idea how the picture was broken, or who broke it.   Plaintiff actually pouts when JJ explains the ruling to her. 

Defendant is suing for the return of a laptop, and a cat. Plaintiff has five days to return laptop in good condition, and plaintiff will keep the cat, it's been eight months since defendant has had the cat.   

Plaintiff case dismissed.   

p. 516, 18 October 2023

Funeral, Fighting and Drug Abuse?

5 p.m. episodes-

p. 516, 18 September 2023

Oh, How I Wish I Hadn't Taken That Nude Photo of Myself! ; Sushi Day for Judge Judy!

p. 499, 17 Aug 2021

Teens Terrorize Neighborhood?! ; How Many Times Have YOU Been Arrested?!

[CrazyInAlabama]

28 December

4 p.m. episodes-

p. 516, 26 October 2023

Chased Off and Beaten by Neighbors?!

p. 516, 17 October 2023

Liquor License Losers?

5 p.m. episodes-

p. 516, 15 September 2023

Wildest Explanation?!; Drug Possession and Child Custody?!

p. 496, 22 June 2021

Woman Takes Tumble Down Unsafe Stairs?!; Show Car Not Go Car!

 

[DoctorK]

This is an oldie but I enjoyed the heck out of it. The defendant is a crazy delusional old bat. She conjured up (very amateurishly) a lot of evidence about the barbaric and savage attack by the plaintiffs as they descended on her with a plastic dog ball tosser. She felt that her life was in danger and cited her state's "stand your ground law" (this can be touchy because every state that has one differs from all of the others and they all have lots of fine print details that I suspect she didn't bother with, just did a quickie google) and pepper sprayed father, son and dog. She absolutely would not believe her biggest evidence pictures did not show black and blue from bruising even though JJ repeatedly pointed this out. Given that there were no pictures from the first police report and later she called the cops to come back over and take pictures, after she had time to add some minor skin reddening as I suspect. I think if the plaintiffs had asked for the full $5K, JJ would have given it to them. What I really enjoyed was the demeanor of the plaintiff father. It was obvious that he was angry when the defendant made all kinds of terrible accusations about his alleged savage behavior but he never lost control. He kept his mouth shut when it wasn't his turn, didn't talk over anybody and just stayed appropriate for court, something that is so rare that it was memorable. I loved JJ eviscerating the old bat; she is the type of neighbor who can make life hell for normal people.

[CrazyInAlabama]

29 December

4 p.m. episodes-

p. 516, 27 October 2023

Child Slams into Car! ; Truck Driving Mama's Boy?

 

Suicide Shocker -Plaintiff /father-in-law William “Doug” Lamon suing defendant/his son’s widow Ashley Lamon for repayment of a loan to get son out of jail,  and property damage.

Plaintiff uses a gruesome photo of his dead son, Justin Lamon,  against his former daughter-in-law to get her to repay him for loans and property damage.  Defendant also says plaintiff took pictures of her dead husband at the funeral home to harass her.  She also says plaintiff has claimed she killed the son.   Plaintiff is suing for rent and damages to a rental home plaintiff owned, and son moved into alone.   

Plaintiff says he inspected the home after son moved out, but Ashley and her husband and their four children lived in the home for a while after they reconciled.   As JJ says, plaintiff can’t prove who damaged the home, so that’s dismissed. 

Bail was for son, after ex-wife told plaintiff son had been arrested.   Plaintiff claims defendant signed a promissory note for the bail, and he claims he told her about the repayment schedule, but defendant never paid plaintiff.

Defendant says she agreed to repay $250, not $500.   Son never repaid the plaintiff either.  JJ dismisses the bail loan claim. 

(This is a horrible case, don’t search for information about the son’s suicide). 

JJ asks plaintiff why he’s coming to court over the bail money, since it’s been a year since the son died.

Defendant has screen shots of Facebook conversations between plaintiff and son.  This is the son’s admission that he owed the money to plaintiff.   Defendant says she and husband tried to pay the plaintiff but he refused payment.

Plaintiff gets $250 for the bail.   There is no proof of who damaged the house, so that’s dismissed.

Defendant is suing for harassment, defamation of character, and moving costs.   She says plaintiff/father went back to take a picture of husband’s body, and accuse her of causing the husband’s/son’s death.   Plaintiff claims defendant told detectives that late husband took a bunch of blue pills, and walked five miles to the railroad track, and plaintiff claims son couldn’t walk that far with drugs in his system. 

Plaintiff sent the text message and photo of dead son/husband to defendant’s phone.   He called CPS/DHR complaints against defendant.   She moved to get away from the plaintiff.   He claims he only called her twice, but defendant’s phone log shows a lot of calls from plaintiff.   Plaintiff admits he took the photo, and sent it to defendant, because he blames her for the son’s suicide.  Plaintiff says there is no way his son went to the train tracks by himself.  JJ reminds plaintiff he wasn’t even in contact with his son for many months, and apparently their relationship was almost nonexistent.

I feel so sorry for the widow, and the defendant witness, the son’s mother, to have to hear the garbage plaintiff is spouting.  

 

Plaintiff receives $250.  

I would have given the defendant $5,000 because of plaintiff’s bizarre allegations.    JJ thinks plaintiff will stop harassing and defaming defendant, but I doubt it. The hall-terview with both litigants shows me that plaintiff will never stop hating defendant.   The plaintiff keeps saying how close he was to his son, and that they went fishing and other activities, but the son hadn't talked to the plaintiff for many months before he died.   Father is delusional.  

 

5 p.m. episodes-       

Older Woman Mauled by Boxers -Plaintiffs Blanche Dawson and (daughter-in-law) Karen Demar went to tax preparer, and are suing defendant/unlicensed tax preparer Tyres Jones Sr for injuries to mother-in-law from a dog bite, and daughter-in-law suing for trauma from seeing the attack. Plaintiff and daughter in law (DIL) went to unlicensed tax preparer on 31 March,  (hope IRS is watching this), and when they went to his house the entered through the open screen door, the inner door was open.   So, plaintiffs just walked into the house without knocking.

MIL was attacked by Boxers (dogs of course, the other way would have been much more interesting), and MIL was bitten on hand.   Long time later MIL realized she was bitten on breast by dog (not mentioned in medical record until 18 April).   So, it takes three weeks to figure out a boxer turned your breast into a chew toy?   Medicare should have covered it, but MIL had bill sent to defendant.    I suspect that MIL and DIL are soul mates, in the scammer sense.   

Defendant, shady tax preparer, knew the women were coming to his house, man and wife didn't answer the door, and taxes weren't ready. So, defendants didn’t secure the dogs, and plaintiffs just walked into defendants’ home.      DIL Karen claims she was in deep shock about seeing the dog attack, and was also taken to the hospital.  

Defendant says the dogs were never outside where plaintiff claims they were, but plaintiff walked into the house.    Defendant claims the dogs were in cages/kennels, and the bite wasn’t from his dogs. 

Plaintiffs get $1500.     The MIL should have used Medicare, and sued him for the 20%.    DIL should get a life. 

 

(This should be titled Grisly Moving Accident, it has nothing to do with bears).

Grizzly Moving Accident -(Man loses part of finger helping boss move concrete grinder)-Plaintiff Daon Bradley suing former boss/defendant Daquan Smith for medical bills after plaintiff was injured moving defendant’s concrete grinder. Defendant who owns small construction company wanted to ship a concrete grinder, and had employee help him prep it for shipping.     Plaintiff works for defendant 3 to 5 days a week, and they claim it was at the boss's house, and no Worker's Comp claim was filed, because it was not at business.    Not through homeowner's insurance either.    Plaintiff's attorney couldn't find a business or other insurance record of defendant, and JJ sent it back to where they're from, because she found out that everything is in the wife's name.   

Judge Judy advises the plaintiff to find another attorney, and get a lot more than she can award.    I hope the authorities in New Jersey (I guess that's where they're from) watched this, and find out if the shipment happened from the man's house or not, and if Worker's Comp applies.  

p. 495, 14 June 2021

Grandmother Raises Ungrateful Brat ; He Treated Me Like a Queen

Edited December 31, 2023 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

1 January

4 p.m. episodes-

p. 516, 20 October 2023

Unsafe and Sorry Roommate?! ; Angry Father of the Bride

p. 499, 23 August 2021

Small Dog vs. Smaller Baby!

5 p.m. episodes-

p. 516, 11 September 2023

Alcohol Poisoning Brought to You by Beer Pong! ; Detox Cookbook Controversy

p. 495, 9 June 2021

Endangered Children or Jealous Ex-Husband?! ; Stormy Fence Fight!

[One Tough Cookie]

On 12/30/2023 at 6:47 AM, CrazyInAlabama said:

Suicide Shocker

I started watching this last nite and fell asleep--it seemed so sad.  I'm going to finish it this afternoon, but the plaintiff just seemed like a piece of shit so far.

Happy New Year and thanks for all the updates!

[One Tough Cookie]

So I watched the suicide episode.  All I can say is the father is an unmitigated piece of shit; and I would have given the defendant $5,000 just for the harassment and photo.  What a disgusting piece of shit; and I hope he falls down the stairs in an alcoholic stupor.

Yeah, just call me Mary Sunshine.

[CrazyInAlabama]

2 January

4 p.m. episodes-

p. 516, 19 October 2023

Two Tons of Yard Garbage?! ; Scary Homeless Friends?

p. 516, 24 October 2023

VIP Limo Loopiness! ; My Dog is a Mini Me!

5 p.m. episodes-

p. 494, 26 May 2021

Shocking Tree Trimming! ; Ex-Lover Slashing?!

p. 515, 25 June 2021

Mystery of the Missing Altima! ; Ex-Lover Check Fraud Injustice?