AngelaHunter

That could turn into quite a list. No matter how big your heart is: Don't co-sign for losers Don't bail losers out of the slammer Don't pay child support for losers Don't plan a wedding with a loser who is still married to another desperate dingbat. Don't invite losers to live with you Don't pay utility bills for losers Don't pay for your loser to get his grill fixed Don't buy motorcycles/big-screen TeeVees/pricey phones, etc for losers Most importantly: Don't breed with losers.

Oh, my! Trailer Park Riot! Baby daddy mention! Physical assaults and carjacking by old ladies! "Shully" and "Brendal"! All this chaos and contention over a 20-year-old Mazda. Not knocking Mazdas. A friend of mine kept hers until it was 23 and then sold it for $1K. Of course, hers was impeccable and not trashed, which sounds like this one may have been. It wouldn't start when Shully wanted to test drive it, but this Mazda needs to be cooled off for an unspecified amount of time after driving it, preferably with the hood open. I admit I'm not sure about that. It sounds rather inconvenient but Shully wanted it anyway. Why would Shully or Brendal make a written contract, bill of sale, or agreement of terms for this veehickle, even for the most basic thing like the purchase price? No need for all that boring stuff. We all trust each other. Famous court show last words. Thank you, ladies, for proving yet again what I say about no litigants ever wading into battle over cars under 15 years old. At least our litigants are consistent if nothing else. I didn't reach the end of this debacle, so once again, thanks @CrazyInAlabama.

Ugh. That scamming, lying, amoral heffalump was despicable. "I don't want two guys I don't know spending days with my 11-year-old daughter. I was forced to hire them, so why should I have to pay them?" Drive her to work? Run out to get chips for her? Ms. SSMO, I advise against that. One more bag of chips might cause those leather pants to burst wide open over your monumental buttocks. No, she has no proof that they didn't work the hours they said they did. Take her word for it that they deserve nothing. She obviously forgot what she put in her texxes. The shamelessness and entitlement were off the scale. I loved how Judge T rightly smoldered with hatred for the def., even before she started questioning her. I think her disgust grew with every lying, scamming word. Not even Papa could excuse her behavior. Usually, SSMhood gets a pass but not this time. I don't know how she had the nerve to show that face here after the stunt she pulled, but I guess it was worth it to be raked over the coals to get what she wanted in that the services were free. I hope both of these guys do well. They seem to be honest and have a good work ethic. I have a tiny bit of advice for the college student, Mr. Noble: Brush up on basic English grammar.

I was thinking this must have been a serious dilemma for Papa. Here we had two women, approximately the same age, who seemed well-spoken and non-violent. For which one does he take sword in hand and mount his white horse? I could almost see his mental turmoil. On the one hand, P was being stiffed on rent, but on the other hand, Def is a SINGLE MOTHER who had mice in her place, which just might negate the stiffing. Who deserves his bleeding heart more? I guess he couldn't decide so he just went along with the other two.

Okay, I first must say I liked that the defendant wanted to use cruelty-free Havahart traps for the mice. They shouldn't have to die because she likes to leave her door open all the time for the dog. If I left my door open all day, my kitchen would no doubt be full of not only mice, but squirrels, spiders, ants, and maybe even raccoons. But enough of that, since everything else she said was BS. This place was so uninhabitable she stayed for only 6 (or 7?) years. It was awful, so terrible that she stopped paying rent for 4 or 5 months. There was a flood that ruined all her belongings but she shows pictures only of water running down the garage wall, and no pics of ruined property. When the truth is finally wrung out of her, it seems her ex-husband got fed up supporting her in this 3K/month place and cut the alimony in half. She couldn't afford to pay, so she didn't and just squatted. P is another one who says she felt sorry for Def, being a "single mother" ( a single mother whose ex was paying whopping big alimony AND child support). Def looked to be at least 60+, but it seems the single mother sympathy ploy/special exemption never ends.

I got cases today from May 6, 2019(?) and greatly enjoyed them, especially the roly-poly Southern gent, Harley Davidson, who lets his seemingly brain-damaged squeeze skate without paying rent because he feels only those possessed of a penis should pay. It's the manly thing to do! Then the woman who wanted to sell her late husband's "1969-and-a-half to 1970 Camaro" for 15K to the sleazy def, who declared at the DMV he could only pay $500. She lives in Philadelphia and it was hot that day, so she agreed to skip the other $14,500. I guess the hubby took care of finances when he was alive, so she doesn't know what money is. Delightful! These hilarious characters must surely be in the Top 10 TPC morons. https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/6835-the-peoples-court-general-discussion/page/133/

I saw this story and it made me think of so many of our litigants who do the dumbest things imaginable and then act shocked, dumbfounded, and horrified when things go wrong:

Could you believe this circle of dumbness? Judges to Jesus: "Why didn't you pay the tickets and sue them later?" Jesus: "I didn't think of it." Judges: "Why didn't you check and see if the tickets were paid?" Jesus: "I didn't think of it." Judges: "Wouldn't it have been better to pay $500 for the tickets instead of losing $1500 for missed work?" Jesus: "I didn't think about that." Defs were even worse. They bought this car for $500 and never wondered about the ridiculous price. Why didn't they use their money to buy a car that hadn't been rear-ended, the mirror ripped off, and the check engine light on (which Momma knew prevented it from passing the smog test), all of which was going to be of unknown expense to repair? *Crickets* Why didn't they pay for the tickets? Mom had eye surgery, they were on hard times or some such, blah, blah, and the daughter had to go to Vegas to live it up and that costs money, you know. Daughter, who looked plenty big and old enough to handle this business, thought if she ignored P it would all go away. Judges: "Why didn't you tell him you paid the tickets?" Momma: "We don't know anything about court. We didn't understand and we were afraid." The apple didn't fall far from the tree with those two. Momma had no idea how silly that sounded. I really wonder how so many litigants manage to navigate life on a daily basis.

A vile, grotesque beast. If I were the defendant I would have preferred to keep living in a closet with a maniac. And the dumbing down of the population continues. Rent your Airbnb to a 20-year-old on New Year's Eve, or let strangers drive off in your car and then be shocked - shocked, I tell you - when something goes wrong. Even worse, get your car back from said strangers without taking any "Before" pics, and then just not bothering to check it and take pictures the moment they bring it back. He knows he has 48 hours to report damage, but just shrugs and thinks, "A few scratches. So what?" It never occurred to Darrell that anyone might not be totally honest, or be extra careful with property they don't own. Dawn is clueless. The daughter, who weaseled her way out of showing up here is a sneaky, lying hustler who flung her own befuddled Momma under the bus, and the baby daddy, who was not allowed to drive the car but did, is a dull-eyed moron who said nothing that made sense or was truthful. Sure, baby daddy got the car fixed, he says. He paid $1200 at a body shop but has no idea what was done. Suuure he did.🤥 More like he got some touch-up paint and slapped it on. I don't have hopes for that baby with those parents. I wonder if Darrell learned anything. The kind of stupidity so prevalent these days with the Ubers, the Airbnbs, Vrbo, and Turo, finding roommates and/or "significant others" on CL, putting our property and even our lives in the hands of total strangers makes it seem as though people have lost the instinct for self-preservation.

What a coincidence! Just today I told my husband that some woman I met at a store is moving in with us because she living with violence in a closet. He kicked up a fuss but I said tough and moved her in. While I was at it, I also invited some guy who has no control of his bladder and bowels to move into our house and reside in our living room on our sofa. My husband bitched about that too - he's so picky - but I told him if that guy craps or weewees all over, let me know and I'll clean it. Me? Oh, well, I stay home 24/7 and eat, because I'm disabled, except when I'm being a caretaker and running flea markets. WTF did I just watch? 🤯It was like some TLC freakshow. I quit after seeing the pic of that guy installed in the living room. What I really wanted to see was the man who thinks the privilege of being Ms.Horne's boyfriend is worth living in chaos and filth. Maybe she has a split personality? Actually, I kind of liked it!

I agree too. It's probably in appalling shape, despite having a homemaker in residence, but still, I was hoping they would return it to P and leave those two out on their asses. As it stands, they were rewarded for being amoral scammers. Well, the big one is. I feel the little one just goes along with whatever the big one says, or else.

'Homemaker"? The belligerent Ms.Sydor and her gnarly, tatted little wife, Justina, look young and able-bodied, and Ms.Sydor is very well-fed. Work! Get jobs instead of scamming! Hotels are always hiring housekeepers. That should be right up Ms. Sydor's alley, what with all her homemaker skills. The plaintiff was unbelievably foolish to give that hateful behemoth the trailer with only a down payment. At his age, he really shouldn't be so naive and should know by now that once this total stranger has possession of the property they have zero motivation to pay for it. I have a feeling this is how those two grifting defs. live. She had a million excuses not to pay and is probably well-rehearsed at rattling them off. Maybe she broke the floor stomping around on it. So nasty is she that she tells JT, "You're entitled to your opinion", for which she should have been roundly spanked but wasn't. (Too bad this wasn't on TPC. We know what happened to the last ligitant who said that to JM.😄) This to a judge - from someone who can't pay her bills, is too lazy to work, and just squats her large ass here and there, dragging her little familiar behind her. JT tries to educate the surly beast and gets a very snotty, "I don't need an explanation." In the deliberations (and not even Papa could find an ounce of pity for this damsel in distress) Judge Juarez says they don't punish anyone for having shitty, snarky attitudes, but it does help them to see how these people ended up in court. I'm just sorry those two scammers got to keep the trailer while not paying for it. I hope Mr. Alvey learned a lesson, even as late in the day as it is for him. Stop trusting the word of strangers!

I'm no car expert, but I was surprised an 18-year-old Jeep Cherokee is a good choice for racing and is worth spending 12-14K to repair. Would any mechanic work on such an old car that's been so heavily modified and loaded with parts from here, there, and everywhere? I have no idea who should have won. I got too bored to finish this, so thanks @CrazyInAlabama

He came across as a fast-talking hustler playing to the crowd. 😄 To me, it seemed like a scheme to scam the show and get money for a bullet-ridden 28-year-old car with the paint dropping off in sheets. If that's the case, they succeeded. Thanks. I gave up on this.

I missed this when it aired originally, and it was awesome! I know this isn't the first time we hear accusations of satanic devil-worshipping, but is this the first case of "emotional torture" ever seen? The torture seems to consist of Defs trying to evict this squatter. The plaintiff is a flim-flam artist and a bottom-feeding, system-working deadbeat. He proclaims he's totally disabled from a wrist injury, yet JM reels off reams of tasks he's managed to do. For all his hardships, he certainly hasn't been going hungry. Def tells a different story, that this character hasn't paid rent in at least 1 1/2 (or 3?)years. So horrendous are the conditions in this house of horrors where he's been bullied and tortured and subjected to black mold and no electricity, yet his large buttocks remain firmly planted in this terrible place. He also found the fortitude to hustle outside to take pictures of the Def's backside. Maybe he uses them in his satanic rituals? JM is disgusted and wants to know why he hasn't left this horrific place. He starts rambling on and on, and she finally has enough of his silly BS and rules in favour of the Def. Really, why would he leave when he gets to squat for free, unlike the rest of us mere mortals? Doug in the Hall also wants to know why he didn't GTFO after all this time. He gets more non-sensical crap. I wonder if the marshals finally arrived to give him the boot.