@truthaboutluv
Oh, I do agree that the re-hash of previous storylines is tiring, but I'm not expecting much more from these writers, they have proven this past season and a half that their creativity and ability to construct interesting storylines was basically inexistant. So if I have to sit and watch the same story done to the nth degree anyway, I'd rather have it at least portrayed by a capable actor.
Just like when it comes to Blaine's storyline in 5x16, I know that it will end up in him being propped left and right and comforted in the fact that he is Mr Golden boy and that he is fantastic, just like in previous seasons. On the same level, Rachel never seemed to struggle because there were people if not better at least equally as talented as her, but rather because she had a mean dance teacher. She didn't struggle with having an understudy or a difficult director with clashing artistic view, she struggled with Santana being mean to her. I feel like we are bound to see repeated patterns because the writers just don't care anymore, anyway.
Same goes for the characters' interactions: in my wildest hopes, the writers would take the opportunity of the move to NY to shake stuffs a bit, but it seems like we'll have Blam/Klaine/Samcedes/Hummelberry, whereas I wish we could see more of Blaine with Artie, Sam and Kurt, etc. I was disappointed Glee didn't use more Kurt/Santana scenes sans Rachel, for instance.
So I completely side with you when it comes to the point and plot of the episode, I just try to see the "good" side of it, I guess.