The Americans - General Discussion

[sistermagpie]

Just watched Darkroom—the one with the wedding, for which I am forever a sucker!

 

THE MORZOVS

Tuan, still feeling ashamed about his moment of weakness, proudly explains how he encouraged a group of bullies to put shit in Pasha’s locker. I feel like Philip, at least, is listening to this story and realizing that his entire job is doing this kind of thing on a larger scale, and how awful that is.

Left to themselves, seems like the Morozov’s would have made it. Kids at school weren’t focused on Pasha. Alexei was starting to admit that he missed Russia, because your life isn’t defined by the terribleness of your national conditions (an idea becoming more relevant by the day…). Evgenia regrets her impulsive affair and sees Alexei trying.

But our heroes will make sure none of this works and the family is separated for good on the off chance Evgenia’s affair will lead to something they can use back in Moscow.  

 

CLAUDIA

Claudia has one of her most pathetic moments in this ep, imo. The Jennings confront her the USSR using the biological weapons they claimed they’d only use in self-defense after a nuclear attack in Afghanistan. Claudia isn’t troubled by it, but she does report that the wheat sample Gabriel brought back was “stolen” from them, because it’s a strain of Russian wheat, or at least partly that.

I mean, that’s pathetic. Scientists are openly working on different strains of wheat. They didn’t have to steal it, and the fact that this strain is Russian doesn’t mean anything besides Russia produces hearty wheat—which only makes the fact they’re relying on imports worse!

 

OLEG

Oleg seems to be preemptively letting his partner know that the state’s suspicion of him is all just because he worked abroad for two years. Damn, he managed to get into a lot of trouble in that short time!

 

STAN

Stan and Adderholt are still working Sofia. Her scenes are more impressive after seeing the actress in Anora playing a very different character.

This ep introduces the bathroom caper that will confuse everyone in S6. Here the main thing I notice is that undeveloped film is important to it, linking it to another scene in the episode.

Stan goes on a double date with the Jennings. Philip is still worried about Renee, saying he doesn’t want Stan to be another Martha—again, I don’t get why anyone would think that Philip isn’t trying to help Stan in the garage by finally telling him his suspicions about her.

Renee mentions going home to see family, but since Philip doesn’t see this as a mark in her favor, we can’t either.

 

ELIZABETH

In a moment of dark foreshadowing, Elizabeth claims with satisfaction that Paige is starting to see Pastor Tim for “what he really is” after reading his diary. Iow, she thinks Paige is beginning to see Tim how she herself does. She’s somewhat right about that, but only in the sense that Paige is starting to agree with everything Elizabeth says whether or not she really believes it. But eventually it will be Elizabeth Paige sees for “who she really is.”

I know some thought it was out of character for Elizabeth to agree to a religious wedding, but to me that’s all the more reason it’s important to understand how it’s not.

The title of this ep refers to a few types of dark room. The actual one where they develop film at the end, and also the dark room the EST leader talks about. I always put a lot of importance on that metaphor for the idea of moving forward instinctively, doing what you know is right for you in the moment without being able to see what’s ahead, but listening to it again I realize how much that idea is buried in EST gobbledybook about being a machine and enlightenment blah blah blah. God, I hate EST talk.

Imo, Elizabeth’s choice to get married this way is revealing something in her character. She is, remember, the one who was touched by Clark and Martha’s wedding back in S1, despite that also being a church wedding. For her, as for most people, it was just about the vows to the other person. Surprising as it might seem, Elizabeth is the real romantic of the couple.

If Elizabeth was someone who would turn down a romantic secret wedding in Russian under her real name to the one person she’s chosen just for herself and her own happiness on the technicality that she’s against religion, then she has very little to her besides the rules of Communism. There is definitely more to her.

 

PHILIP

Philip often gets criticized for not doing or saying the right thing to make Paige happy again, but I think his advice to her is pretty consistently good. The problem is that it’s also honest, so relies to much on her being fully responsible for herself on her own, and she’s not ready to do that.

Inspired by EST, he tells her that whatever Pastor Tim wrote in his diary doesn’t define her. If somebody wrote something about her that she sees as true but doesn’t like, she can change. Paige is completely resistant to this idea. Philip, otoh, seems a little less resistant to Paige’s on advice about how he should let Henry go away to “a better place.”

Btw, I’ve heard a couple of people suggest that Philip’s whole reason for the wedding is the news that there will be “more Tai Chi” in Elizabeth’s future and he’s acting out of jealousy of Stobert, like Elizabeth can’t fall in love with him if she’s married?

This makes no sense to me. We haven’t even seen Stobert for a while (and won’t ever again), and the last time we did see him, Elizabeth was discovering she was just one of many women he was entertaining, which made her think less of him. When Philip told Elizabeth she liked him, he wasn’t accusing her of catching feelings, he was encouraging her to acknowledge her own feelings and deal with them.

I think the wedding’s more obviously another example of him following the EST advice into another dark room with Father Andre. (I love, btw, the moment when Philip takes off his light disguise, because he looks like a peasant doffing his hat to propose.)

Elizabeth’s agreeing to religion in this scene gets more focus, but I think Philip’s own choices about a wedding here are just as important. On a practical level, meeting Father Andre just gave him an opening for a wedding he wouldn’t have otherwise. But I think it’s more than that in a meta sense. It was Elizabeth, not Philip, who was touched by the Martha wedding. The fact that he’s only brought the idea up now when there’s a chance for a Russian wedding—one that even requires somebody “getting to Moscow” for the last step—seems significant to me, and not just because Elizabeth would like that.

A lot of people just insist Philip hates Russia and is totally American, freezing him in the pilot and ignoring anything after that could contradict that. But his development throughout the show has always led him back towards Russia rather than away from it. He’s choosing to get married in Russian (and Church Slavonic) under his real name.

In S6, Philip’s going to remember this wedding and decide to tell Elizabeth about his work with Oleg, bringing Elizabeth and the Russian context of these vows together. The Russian part of this isn’t just something he’s ignoring, like Elizabeth’s ignoring references to Jacob and Rebecca. This is how he envisions a real wedding too, so it’s handy in S6 when the two come together again.

 

PAIGE

The biggest story of this ep is Paige going through another major emotional and psychological change. So as usual, watching it, it seems like she’s the same as always, despite deciding to send Pastor Tim to South America.

The story’s written pretty clearly and efficiently, and most have no trouble interpreting it as her rejecting Pastor Tim when he proves himself a liar. So it surprised me on rewatch how hard it was to follow any real emotional logic on screen. It just feels very surface, like there’s not that much at stake.

Script-wise, the subtext is more clear. When she brings home the diary pages, she highlights passages about how he loved his work in South America, and felt a connection to the people and country. This echoes how, when she was talking to Philip about sending Henry to school, she said Henry knew there was “a better place for him.”

On first watch I sort of dismissed that as Paige dramatically implying there was no real place for her in the world, but now I think it’s more complicated. She does see where she wants to be, and it’s right where she is now, at home with her parents, where she can punish them for ruining her life by blaming them for her own self-destructive choices. That, imo, is why she doesn’t want to hear that she can just not listen to Tim’s view of her. (Not that I think she’s aware of all this.)

Her given reason for sending Tim away is that while she’s not mad at him and he’s been good to her, he hasn’t been good for their family. That sounds like Elizabeth talking. She’s the one who’s always described him that way, and here’s Paige now agreeing with her. But the only way Tim is threatening the family now is pointing out that this situation is screwed up.

Paige only really has 2 people in her life besides her parents. They both represent a life away from them, and now she’s getting rid of both of them. Henry’s living proof that you can be the child of P&E and live your own life, and she thinks he also belongs somewhere else. Of course, it’s also a chance to remind Philip that the longer his children are with them, the more screwed up they’ll be. She says he’s “different” but again it’s not clear what she means. Different from her? Or from her, Philip and Elizabeth that she’s come to think of as the family? She’s shrinking her world to just her and her parents—and even Philip will eventually get somewhat replaced by Claudia.

She talks as if this is about what’s best for Pastor Tim and Henry, but I think the real impulse here is much darker. Unfortunately, it really doesn’t feel that way on screen.

The most obvious example of that, for me, is the scene that imo should be the most important in the story, the one where Pastor Tim, the guy who’s caused the problem, appears in person. Here again, the script seems really clear: at the food bank, Pastor Tim gives Paige a pep talk that’s the opposite of what he said in the diary, so he’s being two-faced—and in the very next scene she rejects him. It’s hard to interpret that scene as anything other than a test he’s failed.

The whole episode sets that scene up to be no-brainer dramatic. It’s one of the Paige scenes that has a twin with Martha. In Martha’s case, it’s the scene where Clark comes over after the pen’s been found. The scene’s way tense because we know that Martha knows something about Clark now that he doesn’t know she knows. In fact, even if one missed the first part of the ep where the pen was found, or even never saw anything but this scene—it would still be tense because you can tell something like that’s happened from Martha’s performance. Even Clark can see it—he just can’t openly ask about it, which makes the scene even more tense.

There’s something similar here with Paige. Except it’s not tense at all. In fact, you could take this scene as performed out and move it to an ep before Paige read the diary and it would play exactly the same way! Paige has basically two lines. She says, “I think about the people that need this stuff, waiting on line for food. Makes me feel pretty lucky.”  

And when Pastor Tim agrees she’s lucky, says she’s grown and is moving in the right direction, she says, “I don’t know. Sometimes I feel like…” That kicks off an even bigger pep talk from him.

There’s many ways different actors might choose to play that, but surely all of them would be about what was in that diary? Is she baiting him to lie? Baiting him to tell the truth? Doing an imitation of her former naïve self? Desperately hoping he’ll try to save her and so show he cares enough to do that? Channeling her anger and hurt over the diary into a too-cheerful cover?

On screen, she’s doing none of that. She’s sighing and staring into the middle distance, as if lost in her own dreary thoughts and barely aware of Tim. She doesn’t seem to have a reason for the line about people at the food bank besides it being in the script, and doesn’t even seem to notice that Tim’s response contradicts the diary entry she’s been obsessing over, because she’s too deeply naval gazing, pausing only briefly to politely glance at him as if she’s listening.

It just comes across like the actress has no idea what Pastor Tim means to Paige or why this scene is the turning point to getting rid of him. It doesn’t feel like she’s made any important decision at all, which is amazing when you think of everything this character represents to hers. So I honestly have no idea how that food bank scene was supposed to make her feel and how exactly it leads to the self-destructive choices she’s going to make. On the page she could be disgusted at him revealing himself to be another liar. She could be devastated that he thinks she’s too far gone—or just not important enough to him—to try saving. She could want to become a spy to prove how wrong he was about her—or how right he was about her. But onscreen what I’m seeing is just that she decided to send him away. Hell, maybe she just did it for an excuse to show her parents the diary. She’s just passively moping her way to the next burden.

 

PASTOR TIM

Since Paige isn’t acting any different in the food bank scene, Pastor Tim doesn’t get a chance to react to her nervously like Clark did with Martha, but again, it still seems like his dialogue is meant to be that. Kelly O’Coin does, imo, inject a little falseness into his lines. But I can’t help but wonder what it would have been like if Paige was more aggressively looking for something from him or in him.

I can imagine  how this kind of scene would feel with Kimmy instead of Paige, for instance, with Pastor Tim’s babbling being a little more sweaty.

Because my interpretation of Tim is that he washed his hands of Paige after coming back from Africa and since then he’s been pushing her toward her parents as their problem. But in private he can’t let go of his role as her savior, so she has to be doomed without him. He gets to be the tragic moral hero even while not getting involved. That might be harder to do if she as challenging him on it, however subtly.

Edited December 3 by sistermagpie

[BlackberryJam]

@sistermagpie

I’m rewatching the show again, mostly because I wanted to relive Elizabeth’s reaction to Reagan and to know that seemingly destructive political choices are survivable. 

I came across these summaries. I haven’t gone back to read them all, just the last five or so. And you really nail the problems with Paige’s scenes. It’s not just the acting, it’s the direction as well. Paige’s “inner monologue” is just a superficial annoying buzz. 

Regarding Deidre and Philip, I really saw such a difference in Philip in how in S1 he was able to work Martha, anticipate her needs and fulfill them, and I don’t just mean the sex. He’s floundering with Deidre not just because she is aggressively independent but because he has lost a feel for the work. He no longer has the energy and will to attune himself to Deidre to get her to bond. The sex with her is perfunctory and barely satisfying for either of them, so different from Clark who took the time to rock Martha’s world.  Philip isn’t Clark anymore, and he has no idea who Gus Alexander is. 

Stobert sucks. So much. He’s just such a self-important douche. It’s easier for Elizabeth to work him because he doesn’t want to know anything about Brenda. He just needs an audience. Elizabeth can do that with her eyes closed.

Each rewatch gives me more. Such a good show. Thanks for these @sistermagpie

Edited December 3 by BlackberryJam

[sistermagpie]

2 hours ago, BlackberryJam said:

@sistermagpie

I’m rewatching the show again, mostly because I wanted to relive Elizabeth’s reaction to Reagan and to know that seemingly destructive political choices are survivable. 

I have been thinking about it that way too a lot!

 

Quote

 

And you really nail the problems with Paige’s scenes. It’s not just the acting, it’s the direction as well.

 

That's true. You really do have to wonder what the directors are thinking there.

 

2 hours ago, BlackberryJam said:

 Philip isn’t Clark anymore, and he has no idea who Gus Alexander is. 

I never thought about it this way but what you said here--and especially this sentence--really sums it up. Exactly right. There is no Gus.

2 hours ago, BlackberryJam said:

Stobert sucks. So much. He’s just such a self-important douche. It’s easier for Elizabeth to work him because he doesn’t want to know anything about Brenda. He just needs an audience. Elizabeth can do that with her eyes closed.

Right? It surprises me that there are people who talk about this guy as if he was a somehow important relationship for her, like a connection and somehow she might have liked as a boyfriend if she was living her real life, but all he does is talk at her and occasionally throw a platitude her way. She would eventually have noticed that!

Edited December 3 by sistermagpie

[BlackberryJam]

19 hours ago, sistermagpie said:

 

Right? It surprises me that there are people who talk about this guy as if he was a somehow important relationship for her, like a connection and somehow she might have liked as a boyfriend if she was living her real life, but all he does is talk at her and occasionally throw a platitude her way. She would eventually have noticed that!

The ease with which she is able to handle Stobert makes her feel confident and powerful, while Philip is clearly floundering. Stobert makes Elizabeth feel that she’s good at her job and that what she’s doing is important. Elizabeth doesn’t like Stobert for who he is, because he’s just a windbag. She likes that she doesn’t have to put in a lot of work to him. 

This is in contrast to how much work she’s having to put into the relationship with Philip. She doesn’t understand his interest in EST. She is frustrated by him questioning the work and his apparent loss of commitment to the cause. 

At the same time, she’s stuck playing happy families with Tuan and Philip while listening to the Alexei. I see her as comparing Philip and Alexei. Alexei likes America. He likes the food, the stuff people have, all of that. Philip “likes it here too much.” The Morozov job feeds into her loss of confidence in Philip while everything about the Stobert job validates her.

Do you have thoughts on Tuan and Paige? 

[sistermagpie]

4 hours ago, BlackberryJam said:

Do you have thoughts on Tuan and Paige? 

So far, I feel iike one the points of the Morozov family is that both Philip and Elizabeth have ideas about how they could possibly hold on to the kids after they grow up. In Philip's case, he imagines going back to Russia with them so they could live as themselves. For Elizabeth, she doesn't have a plan for Henry but is totally fantasizing about training Paige into an agent like her.

With this operation Philip's seeing Alexei's son dragged to another country and he's miserable and he hates his father for it, so maybe that dream isn't so great. He's kind of haunted by split-up families throughout the show, and this one's the most in his face.

With Elizabeth, she's got Tuan playing a kid who's all in on the cause, and it seems like she sees what she wants to see ith that and thinks Paige can totally be like that too. I know in some ways Tuan is like a younger Elizabeth, totally dedicated and not wanting connections to people, but then, Paige wants Paige to be a younger version of herself too so maybe that's a good thing to her? 

I remember that Tuan is going to reject her a bit when he accuses her of being soft and says she ought to have reported him etc. I don't think that's exactly foreshadowing with Paige since Paige rejects her for the opposite reason (and she's really rejecting her, not just blaming her for her own insecurities or whatever Tuan is doing there), but it does feel like it shows how putting the cause before everything else isn't so great for relationships.It always sort of amazes me how Elizabeth just never seems to think about how all her proteges on the show die either by her choice or by her hand when she's training Paige, who's nowhere near on their level.

It's still funny to me how totally confident Elizabeth is this season. She has her moments of doubt, but in general it seems like she feels like she's just got everything under control and getting everyone in line and once she's got everything arranged the way she thinks is great she's going to hate it.

What do you think about them?

[BlackberryJam]

I both disliked and pitied Tuan. I am assuming he was very young looking, but actually early 20s. He grew up in horrible conditions and then with a family of white saviors. He’s holding a lot of resentment and anger. That’s what makes him so dedicated to the cause.

Paige has grown up relatively spoiled and pampered (although Philip and Elizabeth are often absent). 

Elizabeth appreciates Tuan’s dedication, but I don’t think she likes him. She asks Philip if Tuan talks about girls. This is also happening around the time Paige breaks up with Matthew. So we’ve got two “teenage” trainees who are single. (However, I thought that Tuan might be gay?)

After Tuan “turns” on Elizabeth and Philip and say he’s going to report them, Elizabeth cuts him to the bone, telling Tuan that he’s not going to make it. She shatters Tuan’s confidence deliberately and intentionally. I don’t like Tuan, but Elizabeth is deliberately cruel. 

Elizabeth then tells Tuan that he’s needs a partner. And Paige has broken up with Matthew.

It just seems…complicated and layered and I never quite understood if I was supposed to see parallels there. I didn’t feel like it was fully developed. I was hoping there was more insight, something to help me see what I feel like I’m missing. 

Also, can I add in that Stan Beeman is a crap father. Did people really think he was a good dad? He fully admits he doesn’t understand his own son, and hey Stan, maybe it’s because you left him for three years to go undercover. Stan makes his preference for Henry over Matthew abundantly clear. Such a crap parent. 

[Zella]

I can't stand Tuan, but the scene where he tells them he's reporting them for their "petty, bourgeois concerns" cracks me up every time I think of it. He's such an idealogue that I don't see him surviving long in the intelligence field, but his one-upping Elizabeth on communist theory, when she frequently berates Philip for his perceived weakness in this area, is genuinely funny to me. 

[sistermagpie]

3 hours ago, BlackberryJam said:

Elizabeth appreciates Tuan’s dedication, but I don’t think she likes him. She asks Philip if Tuan talks about girls. This is also happening around the time Paige breaks up with Matthew. So we’ve got two “teenage” trainees who are single. (However, I thought that Tuan might be gay?)

Elizabeth then tells Tuan that he’s needs a partner. And Paige has broken )up with Matthew.

I remember that line. Yeah, it is interesting. I don't think Elizabeth had any thought of getting the two of them together. People often thought Hans would be used for that purpose as well (another guy in his 20s) but it seems like the main thing Elizabeth wants to sheild Paige from is anything involving mixing sex and work. Plus i don't think she'd want Paige spending any time with a spy Elizabeth didn't control enough. Who knows what he might reveal, after all.

So I took the line maybe more as Elizabeth just thinking about Paige's situation through Tuan, almost like a substitute she can observe. Or the line could be purely practical, that she's wondering if girls might distract him? I can't remember exactly when he says it. i think it's when she's thinking she should go spend time with him, which feels like a way of her playing out her feelings about really bringing Paige into the work. Like she's got everything under control, the way she's overseeing Tuan and everything's fine there.

 

3 hours ago, BlackberryJam said:

Also, can I add in that Stan Beeman is a crap father. Did people really think he was a good dad? He fully admits he doesn’t understand his own son, and hey Stan, maybe it’s because you left him for three years to go undercover. Stan makes his preference for Henry over Matthew abundantly clear. Such a crap parent. 

This is such a pet peeve of mine, that Stan gets described as this great father because he...ignores the son he's deeply hurt in favor of hanging out with the kid across the street who thinks he's cool and he never has to actually parent him. It's like people want to criticize Philip and Elizabeth so much they pretend they don't know what family is and decide it's the person in your life you have the easiest relationship with. Even when Henry stops hanging out at Stan's and is talking to Philip all the time, it doesn't count. If the kids were hanging out in the empty Jennings house drinking beer it would be more proof of how they neglect the kids, but it somehow reflects well on Stan!

It's especially funny when they also describe Henry as a do-over son for Stan, like Matthew didn't work out. Matthew is still alive! The scene where Matthew returns to him after a long absence hoping to repair their relationship and finds Henry there acting like he owns the place is almost comically insensitive. And then they play a game and Stan leaves Matthew to watch Rocky Horror with a 12 year old while Stan leaves for the entire night. Welcome home, Matthew!

To me, this is a pattern with Stan, that he constantly chooses easy relationships over deeper, more difficult ones. So he prefers Nina, who tells him he's a hero, over Sandra who calls him out. He prefers Henry, who treats him like a hero and goes home after the movie's over, to Matthew who calls him out. Then he marries Renee, who also treats him like a hero, even though she seems totally fake.

3 hours ago, Zella said:

I can't stand Tuan, but the scene where he tells them he's reporting them for their "petty, bourgeois concerns" cracks me up every time I think of it. He's such an idealogue that I don't see him surviving long in the intelligence field, but his one-upping Elizabeth on communist theory, when she frequently berates Philip for his perceived weakness in this area, is genuinely funny to me. 

It is hilarious! You gotta wonder if she or Philip make that exact connection.

 

[BlackberryJam]

16 hours ago, Zella said:

I can't stand Tuan, but the scene where he tells them he's reporting them for their "petty, bourgeois concerns" cracks me up every time I think of it. He's such an idealogue that I don't see him surviving long in the intelligence field, but his one-upping Elizabeth on communist theory, when she frequently berates Philip for his perceived weakness in this area, is genuinely funny to me. 

The look on Philip’s face is like, “you complete and total little shit, who the fuck do you think you’re talking to?” I compare this scene to the later scene of Philip going to see Paige at the apartment and Paige tells him that he’s not like her and Elizabeth. He then spares with her to show her exactly who can be if he chooses. Philip killed Elizabeth’s rapist with his bare hands, and then killed that man in the greenhouse with his bare hands. Philip may care and be questioning himself, but he’s also been absolutely ruthless.

I think Elizabeth tells Philip to give her a minute because she knows Philip can be ruthless when he chooses. She also knows that she can deal with Tuan in a better way.

@sistermagpie I don’t know if I was thinking Elizabeth wanted Tuan and Paige to be a couple as much as she was trying to imagine Paige’s future. Unless Paige married another 2nd Generation Illegal or another spy, Paige is going to end up just as alone as Tuan is. 

As to Paige and sex, Elizabeth is alternately casual about Paige having sex and then instructing Paige not to use sex. At some point later, Elizabeth says to Claudia that if something happens to Elizabeth, Claudia can “finish” with Paige. I always thought that finishing with Paige would mean teaching her how to use sex. The women have already had talks about their first times.

13 hours ago, sistermagpie said:

To me, this is a pattern with Stan, that he constantly chooses easy relationships over deeper, more difficult ones. So he prefers Nina, who tells him he's a hero, over Sandra who calls him out. He prefers Henry, who treats him like a hero and goes home after the movie's over, to Matthew who calls him out. Then he marries Renee, who also treats him like a hero, even though she seems totally fake.

 

I had no idea anyone thought Stan Beeman was a good father. Sandra is the good parent in that set. I always found Stan’s relationship with Henry borderline creepy. Clearly Henry is looking for parenting and guidance that he’s not getting at home. Stan enjoys spending time with someone who doesn’t remind him what a deeply flawed human he is.

I agree that Stan always chooses the easy relationship. And WOW is Renee making it easy for him.  I think Philip thinks Renee is an illegal/spy based on the fact that Stan brings almost NOTHING to the table, so it’s weird that Renee is making it that easy.

I do, however, love Renee’s Jane Fonda Workout clothes. Haha. 

[sistermagpie]

 

I do agree about that Philip scene--it's so funny the few times he really allows himself to get fully annoyed at somebody. And both Tuan and Paige come across as so insufferable and arrogant respectively in those scenes. (That's another scene where going by my memory of it, I feel would play much more interestingly if Paige could do subtext!

On 12/5/2024 at 1:11 PM, BlackberryJam said:

@sistermagpie I don’t know if I was thinking Elizabeth wanted Tuan and Paige to be a couple as much as she was trying to imagine Paige’s future. Unless Paige married another 2nd Generation Illegal or another spy, Paige is going to end up just as alone as Tuan is. 

Yeah, I think she's got to be thinking of Tuan and imagining Paige in some way. But I also wonder if Elizabeth is more thinking that would be fine for Paige to not have a true partner, since she's imagining Paige having a very different job than she has. Plus, at that point she might be just imagining her having her mother. For instance,

On 12/5/2024 at 1:11 PM, BlackberryJam said:

As to Paige and sex, Elizabeth is alternately casual about Paige having sex and then instructing Paige not to use sex. At some point later, Elizabeth says to Claudia that if something happens to Elizabeth, Claudia can “finish” with Paige. I always thought that finishing with Paige would mean teaching her how to use sex. The women have already had talks about their first times.

I get the opposite impression. I think she's convinced herself Paige will just photocopy things at the state department and never have to use sex. In the scene where they talk about their first times, Claudia does introduce thte idea of sex in exchange for something--and Paige rejects the idea. But I can't believe Elizabeth's "first time" story is true at all. She was definitely telling the truth to Philip when she said she'd never had a boyfriend. I don't think she was trying to have sex with a rando whose name she doesn't even remember just to do it.

So to me it seems like she goes back and forth because she's so conflicted about it. She blatantly lies about sex work being part of her job even when Paige knows it's true (until Paige really pushes her), but she's also so freaked out about the idea of Paige ever doing it that she makes it totally obvious that she's lying about it being a thing.

On 12/5/2024 at 1:11 PM, BlackberryJam said:

I had no idea anyone thought Stan Beeman was a good father. Sandra is the good parent in that set. I always found Stan’s relationship with Henry borderline creepy. Clearly Henry is looking for parenting and guidance that he’s not getting at home. Stan enjoys spending time with someone who doesn’t remind him what a deeply flawed human he is.

It's very strange, because Stan is obviously not able to do what he needs to do as a father, but somehow people think he can make up for it by entertaining the kid across the street That's so not parenting!

I have a theory about Henry, too, there, where people assume that since he hangs out with Stan it means he's specifically lacking a father, when to me it seems like the reason Henry has a series of older male role models and mentors and male friends in his life (Stan, Matthew, his guidance counselor, Chris's dad, dads of his friends at school, the hockey coach...) is in part because he's so comfortable with men because of his father's always been warm and nurturing.

Meanwhile, his history with women is a string of girls he can't have, whether it's Sandra Beeman, his science teacher, Brooke Sheilds, Chris (who never seems to become his actual girlfriend) and some girl at school he says dumped him for reasons he doesn't understand in S6.

It's almost too perfect how he's recreating his parental relationships to me. He loves his Dad, but maybe senses he doesn't really know him so fills that with men who are fully themselves and want to guide him. He loves his mom, but...

On 12/5/2024 at 1:11 PM, BlackberryJam said:

I agree that Stan always chooses the easy relationship. And WOW is Renee making it easy for him.  I think Philip thinks Renee is an illegal/spy based on the fact that Stan brings almost NOTHING to the table, so it’s weird that Renee is making it that easy.

I do, however, love Renee’s Jane Fonda Workout clothes. Haha. 

She does wear them well! But yeah, compare her to Sandra and she just seems barely real.

Edited Saturday at 05:01 AM by sistermagpie

[BlackberryJam]

The Paige storyline could have been so much better with a better actress and better direction. There is a scene of Paige relatively early in the series where she’s complaining about her “entire crazy mixed up life” and I just want to giggle. Like, girl, you’re 15, you’ve barely lived enough to call your life crazy. That scene was so silly and not believable.

I found Elizabeth very confusing in S6 when it came to Paige. She’s teaching her self-defense but acts like Paige will never have to use it. Elizabeth kills the guy who got Paige’s ID. She’s livid with Paige for running into the Colonel’s suicide. She’s telling Philip how good Paige is doing. 

I know that it’s showing us how the work is getting to Elizabeth, but she’s so waffle-y. 

Speaking of S5 Elizabeth, I wondered if they intended an HIV or herpes storyline with her.  Keri Russell has a mole on her lip which was much more prominent in some episodes. They have her looking so rough at times. An STI would make sense for her or Philip. 

There’s a scene in S1 when Henry says Shit and Philip says something like, “language” and Paige says she was grounded for 2 weeks for cursing. I think Philip was definitely more warm and nurturing towards Henry, but also that Henry tended to get away with more, as younger children sometimes do. Then again, Henry was literally breaking into someone’s home and hanging out, but Paige got punished for going to church.

Just other thing from my rewatch(es), Philip and Elizabeth have three garages but only seem to use one, right?

 

 

[Domestic Assassin]

9 hours ago, BlackberryJam said:

Just other thing from my rewatch(es), Philip and Elizabeth have three garages but only seem to use one, right?

 

They only had the one, but sometimes the show forgot to hide or CGI out the other two.

[sistermagpie]

On 12/8/2024 at 10:40 PM, BlackberryJam said:

The Paige storyline could have been so much better with a better actress and better direction. There is a scene of Paige relatively early in the series where she’s complaining about her “entire crazy mixed up life” and I just want to giggle. Like, girl, you’re 15, you’ve barely lived enough to call your life crazy. That scene was so silly and not believable.

Yeah, I cringe at that line. It sounds like Paige has no idea what she means or why she's saying it, but I can't blame the actress on that one.

On 12/8/2024 at 10:40 PM, BlackberryJam said:

I found Elizabeth very confusing in S6 when it came to Paige. She’s teaching her self-defense but acts like Paige will never have to use it. Elizabeth kills the guy who got Paige’s ID. She’s livid with Paige for running into the Colonel’s suicide. She’s telling Philip how good Paige is doing. 

I haven't gotten to S6 yet in my rewatch, but when I think about it, it seems like a lot of the time Elizabeth is trying to convince herself that everything's going well when it obviously isn't. Like when Paige screws up with losing her ID Elizabeth just assures her that that's normal (which it isn't), then randomly tells Philip that Paige is good at this stuff even after she realizes that not only did Paige lose her ID, she got the guy's name totally wrong. She even tries to tell Philip that she did that, but makes it seem much less important than it was.

Then over the season she seems to get more freaked out by the problems so she's more aggressive about telling her she did wrong, but still acts like it's fine. So I tend to take as her just really trying to believe things are the way she wants them to be, if she just makes some adjustments like cleaning up after Paige's mistakes or getting her into a desk job where she's "safe?"

It's maybe a bit harder to buy given that Paige always seemed to come across as so arrogant and clueless!

On 12/8/2024 at 10:40 PM, BlackberryJam said:

Speaking of S5 Elizabeth, I wondered if they intended an HIV or herpes storyline with her.  Keri Russell has a mole on her lip which was much more prominent in some episodes. They have her looking so rough at times. An STI would make sense for her or Philip. 

I remember people thinking that at the time--especially when I think she uses a birthmark on her face at one point that people thought seemed like it was real.

On 12/8/2024 at 10:40 PM, BlackberryJam said:

There’s a scene in S1 when Henry says Shit and Philip says something like, “language” and Paige says she was grounded for 2 weeks for cursing. I think Philip was definitely more warm and nurturing towards Henry, but also that Henry tended to get away with more, as younger children sometimes do. Then again, Henry was literally breaking into someone’s home and hanging out, but Paige got punished for going to church.

Oh yeah, I think he definitely gets treated as the younger kid who got away with more. Although Paige also often objected more to everything, so that might have played into it too.Like when he's breaking into houses we know that Henry already felt really bad about it...but you can definitely still see it from Paige's pov as the big sister.

[BlackberryJam]

I started back on S1. I had forgotten that in the episode where Claudia has Philip beaten up to determine if he’s the mole (it’s Nina), that Paige and Henry end up hitchhiking home with a total creeper. Henry ends up bashing the guy in the back of the head with a beer bottle. They don’t tell Elizabeth and Philip.

Later in the series, Philip remembers beating up (killing?) the boys that were bullying him. I would have liked to have seen some call back to Henry there as I’d forgotten.

Also, DRINKING GAME:  “what happened to Amador”, take a shot. We’d be wasted very quickly. Stan’s murder of Vlad is just horrific in retrospect. Not that Philip stabbing Amador was acceptable, but Amador came at Philip. Vlad was just jogging and then eating some fast food. Stan is so NOT a good guy. I love the character, but I have no illusions about him.

 

[Zella]

8 hours ago, BlackberryJam said:

Also, DRINKING GAME:  “what happened to Amador”, take a shot. We’d be wasted very quickly. Stan’s murder of Vlad is just horrific in retrospect. Not that Philip stabbing Amador was acceptable, but Amador came at Philip. Vlad was just jogging and then eating some fast food. Stan is so NOT a good guy. I love the character, but I have no illusions about him.

I also felt so sorry for Vlad! 

Though I will also admit there was a part of me that was already so attached to Arkady that I was relieved he burned his hand on a capitalist potato and was not available to be kidnapped. Leave Arkady alone! 

[sistermagpie]

10 hours ago, BlackberryJam said:

Later in the series, Philip remembers beating up (killing?) the boys that were bullying him. I would have liked to have seen some call back to Henry there as I’d forgotten.

Yeah, on rewatch there's a lot of parallel stuff between Henry and Philip that doesn't get underlined, but is there. Henry's life echoes Philip's a lot even without each one knowing about the other one. It took me a long time to connect these two things too!

10 hours ago, BlackberryJam said:

Also, DRINKING GAME:  “what happened to Amador”, take a shot. We’d be wasted very quickly. Stan’s murder of Vlad is just horrific in retrospect. Not that Philip stabbing Amador was acceptable, but Amador came at Philip. Vlad was just jogging and then eating some fast food. Stan is so NOT a good guy. I love the character, but I have no illusions about him.

I really appreciate how many repercussions that act had--and such a stupid act it was. It's one of the many things that damages Gaad's career, and Gaad even reminds Stan of it, but Stan never really stops wanting support from Gaad (or his widow). LOL!

[BlackberryJam]

14 hours ago, Zella said:

I also felt so sorry for Vlad! 

Though I will also admit there was a part of me that was already so attached to Arkady that I was relieved he burned his hand on a capitalist potato and was not available to be kidnapped. Leave Arkady alone! 

Oh YES, I was ridiculously attached to Arkady. When he got PNGed, I was so pissed. Arkady never even had his own storyline, but I adored him. After Vasili and his gross relationship with Nina, I appreciated Arkady not fucking her, and also not fucking Tatiana when she came along. I always wanted more Arkady.

13 hours ago, sistermagpie said:

Yeah, on rewatch there's a lot of parallel stuff between Henry and Philip that doesn't get underlined, but is there. Henry's life echoes Philip's a lot even without each one knowing about the other one. It took me a long time to connect these two things too!

I really appreciate how many repercussions that act had--and such a stupid act it was. It's one of the many things that damages Gaad's career, and Gaad even reminds Stan of it, but Stan never really stops wanting support from Gaad (or his widow). LOL!

They could have cut so much of the Paige crap and given us more Henry and Philip. UGH. Paige ruins everything. 

You’re right about the repercussions. Stan was a one man wrecking machine. For as many people as Philip and Elizabeth killed, Stan’s cold-blooded murder of Vlad always stood out. I think it ranks up there with Philip in the greenhouse and Elizabeth killing the Teacups for viciousness. 

And Stan thinks he’s a good guy. I loved Mrs. Gaad putting him in his place. 

[Zella]

5 hours ago, BlackberryJam said:

Oh YES, I was ridiculously attached to Arkady. When he got PNGed, I was so pissed.

I was beside myself with rage on his behalf and also utterly delighted when he popped back up in season 6!

[sistermagpie]

4 hours ago, Zella said:

I was beside myself with rage on his behalf and also utterly delighted when he popped back up in season 6!

 

9 hours ago, BlackberryJam said:

Oh YES, I was ridiculously attached to Arkady. When he got PNGed, I was so pissed. Arkady never even had his own storyline, but I adored him. After Vasili and his gross relationship with Nina, I appreciated Arkady not fucking her, and also not fucking Tatiana when she came along. I always wanted more Arkady.

And when he shows up again he basically becomes the big damn hero, figuring out the plot and choosing Oleg and Philip for his team to save Gorbachev. Couldn't have asked for better for Arkady--the guy who came up with the abort signal on the cars back in S1!

9 hours ago, BlackberryJam said:

They could have cut so much of the Paige crap and given us more Henry and Philip. UGH. Paige ruins everything. 

I really did find it frustrating, I admit. I remember saying something about wanting more Philip/Henry scenes on Twitter and one of the Joel's either replied or liked it, making me think one was coming up...but then it didn't.

9 hours ago, BlackberryJam said:

You’re right about the repercussions. Stan was a one man wrecking machine. For as many people as Philip and Elizabeth killed, Stan’s cold-blooded murder of Vlad always stood out. I think it ranks up there with Philip in the greenhouse and Elizabeth killing the Teacups for viciousness. 

And Stan thinks he’s a good guy. I loved Mrs. Gaad putting him in his place. 

That scene's like the quintessential Stan--right up there with having Henry there acting like he owns the place when Matthew finally comes back to visit him. "Hey, just wanted to make it clear that I've got plenty of time to hang out with kids, I'm just avoiding you."

Then when he sees Mrs. Gaad she talks about none of the FBI guys coming to see her and Stan, who seems to have worked pretty closely with the guy, has only come to get her blessing to protect some random KGB guy after the KGB killed her husband. 

[BlackberryJam]

 

4 hours ago, Zella said:

I was beside myself with rage on his behalf and also utterly delighted when he popped back up in season 6!

Arkady with his shirt sleeves rolled up, spray painting cars, did things for me. I own it. The conversation with Arkady and Oleg in Moscow about Philip and Elizabeth, how Philip is different. So much to unpack there. And then Arkady played chauffeur to Philip and Elizabeth at the end. Loved it. 

I have often wondered, when Philip and Elizabeth were crossing the border, what they said to the guard and who he called. I would have loved a silent scene of Arkady picking up the phone, giving the go ahead and then him closing a file, standing and grabbing his coat, making the choice to meet them himself rather than send a lackey. Ahhh…Arkady Ivanovich. He was so far superior to Gaad as a character.

27 minutes ago, sistermagpie said:

That scene's like the quintessential Stan--right up there with having Henry there acting like he owns the place when Matthew finally comes back to visit him. "Hey, just wanted to make it clear that I've got plenty of time to hang out with kids, I'm just avoiding you."

Then when he sees Mrs. Gaad she talks about none of the FBI guys coming to see her and Stan, who seems to have worked pretty closely with the guy, has only come to get her blessing to protect some random KGB guy after the KGB killed her husband. 

I despised Matthew’s hair but loved it when he said to Stan, “it’s a drag show, every one wears makeup, doesn’t mean I’m gay.” Matthew just knows how to read his father. Stan did draw in Henry as an easy to handle replacement son. 

I always got the feeling that Mrs. Gaad got no visitors because she was Vietnamese. Like she’d have something the FBI guys would see as weird, foreign grief that must be avoided. 

Thinking about it, we saw so many female KGB operatives and pretty much no women other than secretaries at the FBI. Elizabeth, Kate, Leanne, Claudia, Irina, Annalise, Nina, Aunt Helen, Tatiana, Lucia (although she was a Sandinista), Marilyn, the blonde woman at the call center who makes borscht and let’s not forget Renee. No wonder the FBI kept getting fooled by women. 

Edited 6 hours ago by BlackberryJam

[Zella]

16 minutes ago, BlackberryJam said:

He was so far superior to Gaad as a character.

I actually really enjoyed Gaad too. I didn't love him like I did Arkady--who's like an all-time top 5 TV character for me--but I did find him entertaining. Even him beating the shit out of the poor innocent Mail Robot, another fave of mine, cracks me up every time I think about it. 

Particularly love when he asks Stan if Nina ate him for breakfast with this expression and tone that suggests that, yep, he already knows that Stan has lost that battle. 

The little random drop-in scenes he and Arkady do to each other are some of my favorite moments in the whole show. 

Edited 6 hours ago by Zella