MarkHB February 25, 2016 Share February 25, 2016 They're all Doctor Who references. I looked at the answer after I got that far, so I'll withdraw from this one beyond that. Link to comment
SnideAsides February 26, 2016 Share February 26, 2016 Do the weird line breaks have anything to do with it? It seems weird that sometimes a line is two short word and other times it's an entire sentence. Link to comment
MuuMuuChainsmoker February 26, 2016 Share February 26, 2016 Do the weird line breaks have anything to do with it? It seems weird that sometimes a line is two short word and other times it's an entire sentence. It's got to, right? In the spirit of Lisin and her lovely love of order, a chart: Historical Person Historical Period Doctor Companion Episode Lucius Caecilius 79 AD 10th (Tennant) Donna Noble 190: The Fires of Pompeii Nero 64 AD 1st (Hartnell) Susan Foreman 12: The Romans Ian Chesterton Barbara Wright Marco Polo 1289 1st (Hartnell) Susan Foreman 4: Marco Polo Ian Chesterton Barbara Wright William Shakespeare 1599 10th (Tennant) Martha Jones 180: The Shakespeare Code Cyrano de Bergerac [1655] 2nd (Troughton) Jaime McCrimmon 45: The Mind Robber Zoe Heriot Charles II [1660] 11th (Smith) Amy Pond 214: The Impossible Astronaut Rory Williams River Song Henry Avery 1699 11th (Smith) Amy Pond 215: The Curse of the Black Spot Rory Williams Madame de Pompadour 1753-1794 10th (Tennant) Rose Tyler 171: The Girl in the Fireplace Mickey Smith Napoleon Bonaparte 1794 1st (Hartnell) Susan Foreman 8: The Reign of Terror Ian Chesterton Barbara Wright George Stephenson 1822 6th (Baker) Peri Brown 139: The Mark of the Rani Charles Dickens 1869 9th (Eccelston) Rose Tyler 159: The Unquiet Dead Queen Victoria 1879 10th (Tennant) Rose Tyler 169: Tooth and Claw Louis Pasteur [1850?] 7th (McCoy) Melanie Bush 144: Time and the Rani Wyatt Earp 1881 1st (Hartnell) Steven Taylor 25: The Gunfighters Dodo Chaplet Vincent Van Gogh 1890 11th (Smith) Amy Pond 210: Vincent and the Doctor HG Wells 1885 6th (Baker) Peri Brown 141: Timelash Agatha Christie 1926 10th (Tennant) Donna Noble 407: The Unicorn and the Wasp Richard Nixon 1969 11th (Smith) River Song 214: Day of the Moon Barack Obama 2009 10th (Tennant) Wifred Mott 202: The End of Time 1 Link to comment
SnideAsides February 26, 2016 Share February 26, 2016 If those are accurate, then the line spacing is just the lengths of the words in the title - a single eight-word line for Timelash, 3/7/3/3/4 for The Unicorn and the Wasp, and so on. Link to comment
MuuMuuChainsmoker February 26, 2016 Share February 26, 2016 If those are accurate, then the line spacing is just the lengths of the words in the title - a single eight-word line for Timelash, 3/7/3/3/4 for The Unicorn and the Wasp, and so on. I've fixed Nixon to fit the pattern. (He was in a two parter.) Maybe you need to do something with the relevant Doctor's number? If you pair the relevant doctor's number with the words in the description you get: Living, The, People, With, Me, When, Had, Mechanic, Two, Almost, Her, On, When, That, Ridiculous, American, Knew, A, Who Link to comment
SVNBob February 26, 2016 Share February 26, 2016 I had the thought we needed to do something quite un-Doctor-y; go in actual chronological order. Doing that changes the word list to: TheLivingPeopleWithMeWhenHadMechanicTwoAlmostWhenHerOnThatAmericanRidiculousKnewAWho Starts off promising, but fails quickly. Link to comment
SVNBob February 27, 2016 Share February 27, 2016 For the record, sorting chronologically according to the Doctor (ie, by episode number) does no better. Link to comment
Fukui San February 29, 2016 Author Share February 29, 2016 This is the point where my team got stuck as well. I can offer a hint, but only if people want me to. Link to comment
MuuMuuChainsmoker March 2, 2016 Share March 2, 2016 I gave up and looked at the answer, since I am apparently unable to delay gratification. I won't spoil it, but I will say that my theory on matching Doctor number to word was not the right one. Link to comment
SVNBob March 6, 2016 Share March 6, 2016 Looking at the word list, that makes sense. Indexing the Doctor number into the name of the person might be the way to go. Link to comment
Fukui San December 25, 2016 Author Share December 25, 2016 Hi all. If any puzzle geeks want to sign up for a casual MIT Mystery Hunt team, send me a PM and I'll forward you contact information. It's on the weekend of January 13-15 this year. You can solve remotely if you're not in the Boston area. Link to comment
SVNBob March 1, 2020 Share March 1, 2020 Anyone up for trying another one of these? Here's one from the 2019 Hunt that fits into our wheelhouse. http://www.mit.edu/~puzzle/2019/puzzle/battle_of_the_network_stars.html Link to comment
The Crazed Spruce March 4, 2020 Share March 4, 2020 Not even sure where to start with this one. Do we go by actors, or characters? Or both? Link to comment
SVNBob March 6, 2020 Share March 6, 2020 Given the title, I think we need to go by character, then show, then network. Based on a quick once-over, there's regions of stars from shows on the same network: Fox near the upper left corner; BBC along the right edge near the bottom, etc. Link to comment
Fukui San April 8, 2020 Author Share April 8, 2020 So I'm completely unspoiled as to this puzzle's solution, so I'll join in. Typically, the first step is identifying who's who and the extra info that SVNBob suggested. I set up a google spreadsheet that we can use. Every image is saved with its number as the title, so go by that to fill this out. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1liFVcCTZw3ZKe0pLhjg_nTkTtqnnIV24PkrAP-Q9cR4/edit?usp=sharing Link to comment
Fukui San April 10, 2020 Author Share April 10, 2020 Trying the link again. As far as I know, anyone with the link SHOULD be able to edit it. Let me know if that's not the case. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1liFVcCTZw3ZKe0pLhjg_nTkTtqnnIV24PkrAP-Q9cR4/edit?usp=sharing Link to comment
SVNBob April 11, 2020 Share April 11, 2020 I've already added a little more. The hard part is going to be identifying most, if not all, of these stars. The tedious part is going to be transforming the columns back into grids. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.