Detective005

I'm really worried about how people have forgotten all inp's wrongs and badness, how is it possible that he became the king's hand again? Bran is not better than others and has done practically nothing. Furthermore jon was the true heir, who tried to always make the best decisions, which he fought for everyone and for reward he was condemned to exile practically.

If we take apart this episode from the season, then we can say that it is a good one because actors play damnt well (so Kit) , cg and the photograpy are amazing also and i can say that story choices are not all bad (for example , how Drogon behaves) . On these they would had to work hard and they didn't do it. I'm watching again the first season with my girlfriend and the storytelling is too much better. Moreover the real problem is a final like this should be came after six episode as more.

However, leaving out the writing of the story, this episode is technically perfect. Maybe the best of got

This is what they want us to believe...

In this case it would seem a heroic death

Ok but that revelation seemed very huge at moment. We talk about the true heir of the iron throne, this is impossibile to forgot. Instead this information was used to divided jon and dany, using a bad script

I don't really understand many authors' choices. For example, the revelation of the true identity of jon for what is important? For what we've only seen to make dany become mad

think so instead. Every encounter in which your enemies decide in the first place that they don't want to surrender, that kill their hostages and your strategic weapons (dragon) and refuse to ally with you against a common enemy

I'm sorry, I'm simply saying that probably all the ancient kings would have done the same things if they had been suffering like Dany (julius cesar, alexander the great, Saladin etc etc) I am as displeased as you about the development of the character of dany, but i think this is an different argument

Ehm but unfortunately it is. In 1000 dc a city like king's landing would have been destroyed immediately instead of the constant compromises of Tyron and Varys. I don't understand why everyone seems scandalized. This is war, you know. This is what happens when we send our soldiers to war. Showrunner understood this point. They were bold and realistic. The problem for me is the way they developed the story

Sorry guys, but i wish you would know that in medieval times, cities are often destroyed by conquests. Especially if the king does not give up immediately or for a long war

I loved this episode because we have to be honest: it was fantastic, well filmed and played by actors. But there are profoundly wrong showrunner choices. How is it possible that dany went mad in one day? Suddenly a dragon is enough to destroy all scorpions and the entire fleet? Why did the other dragons look so weak? Why did Dany kill everyone indiscriminately? He never made actions like these ...

I can say that: i don’t want to believe

Why? If we talk about the show, this information that john is a targaryen is totally useless

This hypothetical ending is totally crazy, unbelievable. I mean, what was Bran's role in 8 seasons? He was often not present or not very significant. There is no logic. Why did showrunners upset everything? For what reason? To shock people? But this story is crazy and stupid