mittsigirl
-
Posts
841 -
Joined
Content Type
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Discussion
Posts posted by mittsigirl
-
-
-
39 minutes ago, Kid said:
I agree completely. He is sanctimonious and he is a gaslighter. He was BLAMING the nine women who contacted him for his recent transgressions . If the sanctimonious little shit was so outraged that they contacted him, don’t respond!!!
But, but, but those evil HARLOTS in immodest or no attire sent me notes and pictures and I had to respond with my snakelike tongue!!! (He obviously does not understand that size not does not matter but it’s how you USE it that matters.)
He probably acts like such a Casanova because of his size, which is likely itty bitty! Afterall, he does send tongue pics instead of the usual d-pics! The guy has to compensate somehow.
-
8
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, treeofdreams said:
So who does everyone think will wind up on Happily Ever After?
Who does everyone *want* to see on Happily Ever After?
It sounds like Jenny and Sumit will be there, but I don't know what their storyline would be once they have told the parents they are married. Is that enough to build a whole season around?
The one I would be most entertained by would be Steven and Alina. Would he continue with his slimy ways? Would Alina continue to put up with him? What is going on in Alina's head? Is this just about the money and exposure from the show?
Enquiring minds want to know...
Well all I know is that I doubt very much that Jenny & Sumit will end up on Only Fans!
-
13
-
-
3 minutes ago, peppergal said:
Even if the router logs kept data that long (mine only keeps about a rolling 60 day log before it runs out of room and writes over older entries), any data found on the router now could have been altered by anyone in the last 2 years since it was not confiscated and kept under control like the computer was.
As for the cloud, while Windows 10 and newer have default applications running on them that back up data to the cloud (if you pay for the storage), a default Linux installation would not have this. Yes you could buy a subscription to the compatible cloud of your choice for backup, but that's not something that is there without you intentionally putting it there, and if you are going to go around hunting for bad things on the dark web (or even just use TOR for privacy sake on the legit web), you likely aren't going to intentionally put something on the machine to backup what you are doing.
Thanks for explaining it so well:)
5 minutes ago, questionfear said:Probably not at this point, since it's been almost 2 years AND a federal investigation. The prosecution could argue the defense could have tampered with the router, and the defense could argue there's no way the prosecution is getting anything usable off it from then. Neither side would trust what they found on it most likely.
Thanks, that makes sense:)
-
2
-
-
Please don't throw rotten tomatoes at me, but I am just a mom, wife and dog nutritionist, my law knowledge comes from Law and Order SUV. Because so much has been said about not having that router to examine, can the router be taken now to be examined, or is that just wishful thinking and it's far too late to bring that in now? And I am just new to learning about the CLOUD, but would there not be any information about what he was accessing stored there? Forgive me for being so dumb:)
-
2
-
-
I just wish they wouldn't have left that darn router behind, that's what is making me very nervous. And there sure could be a doppelganger of Josh on that jury who thinks they are the same kind of know-it-all and could influence the rest of the jury. Ugh, it's far from being 5 o'clock here, but my wine glass has found me early today.
-
8
-
-
2 hours ago, Dianaofthehunt said:
That is a SHARP dress! That would look good on ME.
‘Course, I prefer a bit of a plunge in my neckline, to show off my godly charms…
Derek my man, use a blade in your razor next time.LOL, godly charms! The dress is very slimming on her with the black lines placed where they are. I would also love this dress, but with a much lower neckline, because I am a heathen.
-
10
-
7
-
-
On 11/24/2021 at 12:00 PM, essexjan said:
In the UK we call them "Rylan teeth" after a celebrity, Rylan Clark-Neal (who is actually one of the loveliest, nicest people on earth). He had his teeth done a few years ago and, although he has a big personality, his teeth were even bigger. But in the last couple of weeks he's had them re-done and now has teeth which, although still quite bright white, are somewhat smaller. This is his 'before' picture. They look like tombstones.
In my neck of the woods here in Canada, we call overly whitened teeth 'Chicklet Teeth', after the gum. I lost all of my straight, very white teeth after taking so many meds for so long. When I got dental posts put in, I specifically asked for Chicklet Teeth, because if I was going to have to have fake teeth, I wanted to have them like how my own teeth had been.
His teeth are very straight, lots in the UK have very crooked teeth, his are just huge!
-
3
-
-
32 minutes ago, MrBuhBye said:
I wish Shawn had asked Jenny about the morality of pretending to be interested in Krishna just so she could keep getting the d.
Just imagine how much better it would be if we got to ask the questions on these Tell All shows!
-
1
-
12
-
-
9 minutes ago, emmawoodhouse said:
Uncivil Law discusses the Rule 414 (admission of prior acts into evidence). He's not a Duggar expert at all, but he certainly doesn't like Smuggar.
Thank-you!
-
1
-
-
14 minutes ago, treeofdreams said:
My sister is 73, and getting married next year. It happens!
That's amazing, I am so happy for her!! Thanks for giving me some much needed hope. When you have been mistreated for decades, it's so difficult to have that hope. I just don't want to have to die without ever being loved. But now I do have some hope:)
-
6
-
-
3 minutes ago, Lady Jane said:
Cases aren't even typically won during the evidence-presentation part. Numerous studies over the years have consistently found that 80% of jurors make up their minds during opening statements, and do not change.
I think there are a few human behavior/psychological reasons for this, the first being that human beings are HORRIBLE at being able to hold two distinct thoughts/feelings/responses in mind. We like conclusions. It is unnatural for a human being to sit with two opposing ideas -- this guy is guilty or he's not guilty--without extreme (psychological discomfort). The problem is confounded by our tendency to confirmation bias -- 80% of jurors make up their minds at opening, and they tend to listen only for evidence that supports their belief. If a juror has decided already that the defendant is not guilty, they will be extremely difficult to sway because they're literally not listening to or valuing information that contradicts the narrative they've bought in to.
Also we should keep in mind that the things stated in the opening statement are not facts. They are theories and a story, but they're not evidence. They're a roadmap they hope the jury adopts. You tend to phrase everything as "the evidence will show . . . "
If you recall the Casey Anthony case, in the opening statements her lawyer just said HORRIFIC things about Casey's dad -- that he was molesting and raping her, etc., and it was really disturbing to hear. They didn't introduce one shred of evidence to support that theory at trial. Nothing. They never spoke of it again, really. Closing statements is where you tie all the threads together at the end, referencing the specific exhibits and testimony that were introduced into evidence.
Finally, even in the absence of surprising testimony or an unexpected argument, or even a witness you didn't expect, every lawyer working on this case will be working 18+ hour days, including weekends, for the duration of trial, and just slightly less than that for weeks and weeks before the trial.
Wow. Thanks so much for explaining all of that, it now makes more sense to me. It's confusing to hear that it is so soon that the jury makes up their mind about a case, but I understand because of how our brains work things through. It's just much easier to be on this side and have my own mind made up and wonder why the jury can't see things the way I see them, the way that we on this board see them. But they never sat and watched every show on TLC, or discussed things with others who have watched this circus over the years, so they won't have the same insights that we would have. Here I was really hoping that closing arguments could fix things if they were going in the wrong direction. Time will tell. Thanks again:)
4 minutes ago, Jeanne222 said:Personally I’d like to know if you find anything. TIA
Yes, I will let you know!
-
4
-
-
2 minutes ago, emmawoodhouse said:
It was rumored that CPS tried to meet with the kids, but they were prevented from doing so. I'm not sure where I heard this, but I do remember seeing it in multiple places.
How can anyone prevent them from doing their job, when it comes to those types of sick minds living with children? I had no idea that anyone could stop them. I will be spending time on google before bed, see if I can find something out about that. Just so very sad.
-
1
-
2
-
-
On 11/30/2021 at 2:42 PM, essexjan said:
I absolutely LOVED Kenny and Armando's wedding. I thought the way they entered the venue, each walking down the side to illustrate their separate journeys, until they met at the arch, was beautiful. I, too, teared up when Kenny talked about the friends he'd lost and how the world has changed. I'm a little older than Kenny, and lost many friends in the 80s. I also have a few friends who have lived with HIV for 25 years, thanks to medical advances, and other than needing to take extra care to avoid infection, you'd never know they had the virus.
I fast-forwarded through Cory and Evelyn's segments. Never liked either of them.
Ari has such a punchable face, and she's such a manipulative little minx. Having been told it will help Bini's chances of success if she's present at the Embassy in Ethiopia, she decides to sabotage his interview by refusing to go. Awful woman.
I thought Steven and Alina's wedding was lovely, in the circumstances. They are an odd couple, him more so than her, but maybe they'll make it work. I think he'll find life in Russia much harder than he's probably expecting it to be, particularly with Alina's family around. Oh, and for anyone wondering, in Russia they wear the wedding rings on the right hand, which is why they didn't put them on their left hands.
I thought Jenny looked absolutely beautiful in her wedding sari, jewellery and makeup, and Sumit looked so very happy when he first set eyes on her. I really hope Jenny doesn't get hurt. We all want to be loved, I'm Jenny's age and doubt I'll ever find love again, so I wish her the very best of luck.
Yes, I think that Jenny just wanted to find love and security. But please don't say that you will never find love again, it will find you when you aren't even looking! I am getting ready to divorce after 41+ years of marriage, and am the same age. He has never loved me, has financially and emotionally abused me for all of these years and I really hope to be truly loved before I leave this earth. I just won't be accepting love from a man half my age, but I do understand how much she wanted to be loved and to feel secure in that love. I do hope it works out for them, I guess she will find out when she gets to be a lot older and will see how committed he is in taking care of a wife who is so much older than he is. Because our bodies do drastically change as we age, and I don't think that he fully understands how different she may be 20 years from now. I mean his own mother is younger than his wife is, so the only comparison I see that he may have with much older women is his grandmother at her age. Only time will tell.
-
5
-
-
18 minutes ago, Quilt Fairy said:
The rationale for the remote access defense confounds me. I mean, I understand they are trying to convince the jury that it was anyone but Josh, but what would someone doing this remotely gain? They'd go to that effort to put CSAM on Josh Duggar's computer? Really? I guess I'm glad they struck the potential juror who said he didn't trust the government.
I agree with you, plus there is his sick past that will be brought up, it's not like he never showed any interest in his sickness before! I could see the case being iffy if he had never been in trouble with this before, but he has been! I don't see how anyone on that jury could say he wasn't guilty and that somebody just set him up. But that's just the way my mind would work if I was a jury member.
-
6
-
-
19 hours ago, hathorlive said:
They literally hope that juror number 1, who agrees with Mark Meadows that the Chinese used thermostats to hack election servers, will think Josh needed a secure application from the gubment. Or that juror number 2 had a homeschooled neighbor who was dumb as a box of hair. Or that Juror 3 thinks the dark web is something spiders get caught in. There will be jurors who think just like you did, that it's contradictory arguments. Better yet, the AUSA needs to do a closing argument that shows clips of Josh on TV with his high tech gadgets and computer equipment to show them that the defense is full of air.
Its a defense that has something for every conspiracy nut you know!
Can the prosecution ever fix anything in closing arguments, or is it too late to bring up anything that the defense would consider new evidence? Are cases ever won by the prosecution with their closing arguments?
-
19 hours ago, hathorlive said:
They do have a lot of resources, but each of us have our own specialty. Some are great at working servers, others specialize in cell phones or Macs. There's a lot of stuff to know! The weird thing about this guy is that he's a 19 year experienced MANAGER. My managers don't do active forensics anymore. I don't know if they had the top guy do the work because of his experience testifying and working cases or what.
I really wish that it was you in that court room, and not anybody else. You have taught all of us so much and have lots of experience. Plus-you are a woman, and I know you are smarter than most men, because women think with both sides of their brain, and men with just one side at a time. Don't kill me everyone, that's just a fact.
-
2
-
12
-
-
2 hours ago, hathorlive said:
They've got the jury. I know it only takes one, but it's really early for the jury to be doing head nods.
Boy, I sure hope so, because if Pest gets off on some dumb technicality, my low faith is the justice system will never recover again.
-
16
-
-
20 hours ago, endure said:
My late husband was Ukrainian, born in Canada to Ukrainian immigrants via Austria who homesteaded in Sask. I believe there are a few dialects too. I def agreed when Natalie said Ukrainians are hard working, and they're a hearty lot too....and good looking!
My younger brother and I spoke Ukrainian and English until we started kindergarten, then over the years forgot most of the Ukrainian we had spoken for so long. These days when I listen to somebody speaking Russian, there are many words that I can understand because they are the same as Ukrainian words. And yes, Ukrainians are very hard working people. And though I also have Irish and German in me, I am not too hard on the eyes, or so I have been told!
-
7
-
-
On 5/30/2021 at 10:57 AM, EllaWycliffe said:
Why not? Seems silly to have multiple bathrooms but to insist the two people living in the house share one and leave the others unused.
Once the kids moved out, my husband took over the basement bathroom and I took the one upstairs, and it works very well for us, since I am neat and organized, and he is not. I don't have to nag about his bathroom being a mess and he doesn't have to keep mine as clean as I like it. Why not have our own bathrooms since the kids have all moved out? When we have company over, they use my spotless bathroom and never have to see his downstairs. Works very well for us!
-
1
-
4
-
-
1 hour ago, Emmeline said:
Garrick’s Linkedin
Well, well, well, he sure does think he is something special by the way he posed in this picture. I have had 2 businesses, and not on either business card did I ever pose like this. You are just not this special Ick, only in your own little mind!
-
10
-
-
18 hours ago, Joan of Argh said:
I just re watched it on YouTube it’s s12e03 “Farm Fresh Duggar’s”
Jim Bob only takes the boys over to watch him shove his arm up a pregnant heifer and while he’s digging around up inside her he’s giving the boys a sex lesson grinning and smirking as he tells them “that’s where babies come from” and the boys are all snickering and talking about their dads sex lessons... John David is the oldest boy along with all the younger ones watching JB with their eyes bugging out..... giggling and laughing about their dad shoving his whole arm up her hole 😑
earlier in the episode we see a married Josh kissing his kids and Anna goodbye as he
goes off to diddle a prostituteooops I mean goes to work 🙄the girls aren’t allowed to view the sex lesson .. it’s only for the boys...the girls go tend to the chickens in their skirts and weed a garden or something with Michelle
Wow. Poor cow. I wish that poor cow would have just up and kicked JB in his little marble sack, what a pervert to act that way while probably hurting that poor innocent cow. So JB equates the cow as being the same as his wife, wonder how she felt about it at the time!
-
3
-
-
9 hours ago, Normades said:
Also their choice of living in a small home with too many children while they were busily making more children (I can't imagine there was lots of privacy), posting Michelle's cycle so that it was common knowledge, and flaunting their physical relationship in front of their pubescent kids (we can do this, but you can't) definitely makes them complicit in my mind. They weren't raised in a cult and they had enough outside exposure to know it was not right. Maybe being quiverfull was not an intentional contribution, but throwing their physical relationship in their kids face was intentional.
It began to sicken me the way JB and Michelle would constantly do their PDA's in front of the kids, then tell them that they could act that way but the kids couldn't! What kind of parents act like that, say things like that, to their own kids?? To me, it seemed like they were just taunting those kids by behaving that way! Then punishing any of their kids who were found to be masturbating by tying their hands together and marching them around in public that way! I don't know if the 'public' consisted of only family members, or if this was done in front of the church members. Either way, being punished for doing something that becomes natural with getting older is just plain sick! I bet that JB did his fair share-if not even more than the usual amount, being the creep that he is-of masturbating, because he was acting like any NORMAL teenager, then when his own kids do it, then all of a sudden it is from Satan and wrong! It was okay for him to grow up normal as a teen, but not his own kids! My parents were very young when I was born and became the oldest of 6 kids, and they never kept their love secreted away from us, but they sure never acted like the Duggar parents act in front of us, then tell us that we can't act the same way with our boyfriends/girlfriends. I am pretty sure my Mom knew that it was me who found her vibrator and burned it out from over-using it, but she never once doled out any punishment over it because I was just a normal maturing, curious teenage girl! Double standards just don't seem fair or normal, except in the Duggar cult. Do as I say, not as I do, only works for so long.
-
1
-
22
-
-
23 hours ago, libgirl2 said:
Another example of his sadism and depravity.
I would much rather be the Mother of a special needs child that be the Mother of pervy Josh, 1000 times over.
-
8
-
Josh & Anna Smuggar: A Series of Unfortunate Events
in Counting On