Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

stagmania

Member
  • Posts

    758
  • Joined

Posts posted by stagmania

  1. 7 minutes ago, screamin said:

    I don't think she's supposed to be 'insane.' I expect she'll have an explanation that won't be stereotypical Hollywood "the voices told me to do it." It will be a hard-nosed, cold explanation that the city had to pay for its refusal to surrender to her, that Aegon the Conquerer had done the same to Harrenhal and made sure that every kingdom he took thereafter surrendered bloodlessly.

    Yeah I’m not seeing the contradiction here. Of course she’s not going to say “yo, I went crazy.” She’s going to have some rationalization for it, but the entire frame that the show has given us is that she was emotionally wounded and distraught to the point where just winning wasn’t enough. That’s why it matters that she went ham on innocents after the bells of surrender were already rung - she decided in that moment that she wasn’t satisfied, and she was going to take out her anger and desire for revenge on the civilians of KL.

    • Love 1
  2. 1 minute ago, Raachel2008 said:

    You say she was hysterical and lost her mind, I say she knew exactly what she was doing. She said so: “Let it be fear”.

    They literally showed her going crazy and deciding to burn everyone after the bells rang. You can tell yourself that’s not what happened if it makes you feel better, but it’s what the show depicted.

    • Love 2
  3. The thing I keep coming back to re: this ending for Dany is how entirely not subversive it is. A powerful woman becoming hysterical and losing her mind (especially over issues of motherhood and love) is a classic trope and about as conventional as it gets, especially when paired with the orphan boy with the destiny being the one to save the realm from her. It’s hard to fathom that this is really GRRM’s big subvert-the-genre ending. Or maybe it’s not, because I don’t expect many older white male writers have enough awareness to avoid this kind of misogyny in their storytelling. 

    • Love 5
  4. 3 hours ago, ulkis said:

    Yeah. I was going to wait until next week to talk about this, but on the show, so far, it seems like it was pointless. Dany could have felt just as threatened by him if he were just King in the North and they could have accomplished this plot anyway. I blame Martin partially though for killing off most of the characters that would have cared about Jon's parentage.

    Nothing that’s happened to Jon on the show since his death - the resurrection, the parentage reveal, his attempts in battle - has mattered. He’s like a ghost wandering through his own story, disconnected from any real consequences or narrative momentum. I imagine this is because the show has decided to forego all the prophecies and give the big moments that are clearly meant to be Jon’s to other characters for shock value. So yeah I don’t think this one is on GRRM.

    2 hours ago, AuntieMame said:

    Having Bran do more than stare would be a really good start. Subsequent storytelling steps might include explaining the history and powers of the Three-Eyed Raven and how the knowledge and power of the 3ER might help or hinder the players in the game. As of now, Bran's entire arc has been pointless, especially if he ends as king. 

    Can’t wait for the King Bran memes. The finale is going to suck but at least we’ll have fun. 

    • Useful 1
    • Love 5
  5. 1 hour ago, Kate47 said:

    I definitely think, even though the writing has been terrible, the production, directing, and acting for this episode was top notch.

    I honestly feel bad for the production teams who put so much work into episodes 3 and 5, only to have the writing undermine them so badly that it distracted the audience from appreciating their work. Hopefully they’ll win some Emmys as a comfort. 

    • Love 7
  6. 4 minutes ago, Minneapple said:

    But I cannot imagine how bad this would have gotten over 10 seasons. Look at all the complaining we're doing. Over 10 bloody seasons? It would have been a tragedy. It's not like the show SUDDENLY GOT BAD this season. 

    The major reason it's so bad is that they tried to cram about 4 seasons worth of plot into 13 episodes, so no I don't think it would have been as bad as this. The real ideal would have been for D&D to hand off the show to writers who were still interested in it.

    • Love 15
  7. 1 hour ago, Helena Dax said:

    I can't say I've read tons of fantasy books, but I can't remember any story of the sort.

    What's hilarious about all the people trying to make the argument that this ending is a great subversion of fantasy tropes is that really it's just the opposite. All the empowered women falling to pieces and ending in emotional ruin while the Heroic Men ride in to save the day and end up in power is about as conventional as it gets.

    • Useful 1
    • LOL 1
    • Love 12
  8. 37 minutes ago, QuinnM said:

    There was discussion and industry gossip about the number of episodes total, the number of seasons etc.  Was there a reason this had to be the last season?

    Benioff and Weiss wanted to be done and move on to other projects, so they chose to end the story in a limited number of episodes. HBO wanted 10 full seasons. Imagine how much better it would have been with show runners who were actually committed to seeing it through.

    • Love 10
  9. Quote

    "Our problem with this turn, aside from its rather dreary inevitability and how un-Game of Thrones that written-in-stone sort of plotting is, was how it was presented. Dany committed genocide after she got everything she wanted. The city had fallen, the people rang the bells, surrender was at hand. This was an absolutely terrible moment for the writers to have her snap and start killing people. Even worse, director Miguel Sapochnik made the choice to have her wordlessly go mad on camera, in a bit of painfully cliched facial acting complete with eye-twitches – and then never showed her again through the rest of the episode. Once Dany snapped, she stopped being a character and became a faceless force that all the other characters reacted to. She went from a person to an act of nature, leaving the audience with no choice but to watch her emotional downfall from afar, after having spent eight seasons by her side. What was Dany thinking or feeling as she murdered tens of thousands? Who knows? She’s CRAZY."

    Good overview of the writing problems with this episode, while still giving props for the few things they did well. https://tomandlorenzo.com/2019/05/game-of-thrones-burns-it-all-down-after-eight-seasons/

    • Love 3
  10. 8 minutes ago, Heathrowe said:

    How did she save them all from the NK? Arya jumped out of a tree and killed him. They were losing before that. My big problem is I don't even know what the point was of bringing Dany and the dragons into that fight. Agree though-she should have moved on KL earlier and bypassed the North.

    In the end, it seems like the only point was to delay her taking out Cersei until episode 5. Compelling stuff!

    • Love 3
  11. 15 minutes ago, Affogato said:

    note that Cersei has lost, if anything, more than Dany and dealt with it longer and yet no one uses it as an excuse for her evil ways.

    This is not true. Cersei lived the vast majority of her life in extreme privilege with massive power over others that she used as cruelly as possible. She lost her children due to her own actions. Dany grew up in exile, impoverished, abused, sold like chattel, raped, always on the lookout for people trying to kill her. People seem to forget that because she's had her own hard won power for the last few seasons, but she had to claw her way there. And now her story is ending with the men she put her faith and trust in gaslighting and betraying her. 

    12 minutes ago, ElizaD said:

    I always preferred Theon's redemption arc to Jaime's because he felt actual remorse for the suffering he had caused and wanted to atone by helping those he had hurt, but wow, I didn't expect Jaime to relapse to this degree. Now that we're almost finished, I feel pretty safe in saying that Theon was the only character who was around from season 1 to season 8 and never disappointed me: even when he was being a screwup, Alfie played him excellently and his arc was heading in a logical direction towards a satisfying conclusion. So that's something that I can remember even more positively when I contrast it with the dumpster fires the remaining characters are turning into.

    I have to say, I never expected Theon Greyjoy to have the only coherent character arc in the whole damn story. Good job subverting my expectations on that one, show!

    • LOL 3
    • Love 16
  12. 7 hours ago, Leila6 said:

    More detail from the accurate spoilers:

    On Jon killing Dany, he tone of it is very tragic. It's kind of like she's completely consumed by madness and he's saying how much he loves her and he's loyal to her, then he stabs her when he gets close enough. It's obviously traumatizing for him to do because he does love her. 

    So they're going for the Buffy/Angel tragedy - sacrificing his love to save the world. Except they've written the romance so poorly that it's not going to land. I don't feel sad about this, I just feel angry.

    6 hours ago, Umbelina said:

    By the way, the episode title was "THE BELLS" so I guess us spoiled folk know why they withheld it.

    Remember a week ago when we all laughed ourselves silly at the idea that she went mad at the sound of bells? Turns out it's a totally fair read on the scene. 

    6 hours ago, Couver said:

    That's my issue with it. Also the Targaryen legacy is always used against Dany. But people will be fine with a Lannister, son of Tywin and brother of the most recently Queen on the council.

    If you want to really do something different then there shouldn't be any one from a major house on this council. And certainly not someone who is a corrupt person.

    THIS. The council of fan favorite bros is straight out of bad fanfiction. 

    6 hours ago, Lemuria said:

    Besides, the ending to the series is totally not bittersweet. It’s hugely tragic. 

    I guess the "sweet" part is that all the remaining Starks survive in some capacity. Pretty weak.

    50 minutes ago, anamika said:

    But the show's narrative seems to not allow Jon and Arya (last season) to get rightfully pissed off at all the shit Sansa does. And the showrunners trying to justify Sansa's nonsense. Last episode David Nutter was saying that Sansa did not really tell Tyrion about Jon's parentage and that she just implied it and Tyrion put 2 and 2 together, when in this episode Tyrion clearly states that Sansa told him.

    Jon's complete non reaction to learning Sansa had immediately betrayed his trust was so frustrating. And you're right, it does feel like the show artificially constrains characters from reacting reasonably to Sansa's manipulations. 

    41 minutes ago, anamika said:

    I would have enjoyed this ending more if he did not destroy Dany's entire campaign that she build up painstakingly over 6 seasons with his moronic advice to her over two seasons and his nonsensical trust in Cersei.

    This is what's driving me nuts about Tyrion's arc and why his ending ultimately does not sit right with me. He's been wrong about everything and proven to be a terrible strategist for the last three seasons. Where are the consequences for that? 

    • Love 17
  13. 5 minutes ago, rmontro said:

    Okay, I wanted to say this in a different thread, but it involves spoilers so I will say it here. 

    If the message here is that power corrupts, the ending with Bran elected king doesn't work.  Because unless they go with a council ruling Westeros, there will still be throne around to corrupt those who pursue it.  Now you can argue that Bran is a magical, near immortal creature who can fend off all threats to his power, and that Bran cannot be corrupted.  But even if that is so, how is that of any practical use to us in this non-magical world?

    Is it possible there is a council to lead Westeros, but Bran is made king of the north?

    I think they’ll use Bran not being fully human, not “wanting” as the justification and just leave it at that. After the last few weeks I wouldn’t expect them to lay out any kind of coherent argument for this. 

  14. 7 minutes ago, jeansheridan said:

    I get those too but I think the ambivalence is he still wants her but can't bring himself to ignore their blood tie. I mean, I know they don't generate much sexual chemistry. You can't write that unfortunately. I mean I felt he had more chemistry with Tormund. Kit is great at bro chemistry.

    If they’d had him say a few comforting words to her, or attempt to take care of her even as just a friend in this ep, they could have gotten it across. But he just seems wary of her, not worried about her.

    1 minute ago, rmontro said:

    I don't doubt this was the gist of what GRRM had planned, but he would have hopefully had the skill to get to that ending without it all feeling like a giant bait and switch.  This episode just felt like over the top nonsense, and next episode Dany looks like she's presiding over the Gestapo and the Brownshirts.  It's like Game of Thrones took a left turn into a different series.  

    I'd like to think Martin has the skill as an author to avoid these pitfalls.

    I think if GRRM ever finished writing the books, this ending would be different not only in the lead up and character arcs but also in the execution of the key moments. No way in GRRM’s version does Dany just decide to kill women and children without us thoroughly understanding her motivations.

    • Love 12
  15. 36 minutes ago, SeanC said:

    I've often thought that Clarke was a decent actress but rarely exceptional, but she's absolutely been killing it this season, even as the writing for her character has collapsed.

    Seems like she really upped her game to try to elevate the material where she could.

    10 minutes ago, jeansheridan said:

    I wish they had given him some more dialogue there. Explain to her that he just couldn't overcome his culture. And that they are family and he loves her as such. I mean he's her family! That could have been something. Something for her to hold on to. Tyrion and Jaime have proven family love matters a lot. And so have the Starks. They could be the Targaryens, together. Sexual feelings can fade with time and space. 

    Oh well. They went in another direction.

    It doesn’t seem like Jon actually does love her, as family or otherwise. If they mean for us to think he does, it’s another storytelling failure. All I get from him is ambivalence and exhaustion.

    • Love 16
  16. 1 minute ago, BitterApple said:

    I always figured Jon would sacrifice himself to save a pregnant Dany and she'd end up on the Throne. That would be in alignment with everything we've been building up to, but not a totally picture-perfect ending. 

    I thought Jon dying so Dany/their baby could live was a lock - it’s definitely what season 7 seemed to set up with the love story + quickening womb anvils + frequent reminders of his resurrection. But season 8 has in many ways felt very discordant with where season 7 left off, like they didn’t really have the whole trajectory figured out back then. 

    • Love 6
  17. Here's a theory that pulls some of the leak threads together and offers a reason for Jaime to kill Euron that actually makes sense: "Euron will find out that Jaime is the father of the child, he will be the one who stabs Cersei. Jaime tries to save Cersei and is mortally wounded in the process but kills Euron. Jaime dies in Cersei's arms and they both die together."

    • Love 3
  18. 1 minute ago, galaxygirl76 said:

    Jealous because of Euron having sex with his sister? With these writers it could be anything. 

    You're probably right and GOOD GOD. He killed Rhaegal! That is Dany's revenge to take, or maybe Yara's. But apparently Dany will be too busy going randomly insane and killing innocents for no reason.

    • Love 1
×
×
  • Create New...