joanne3482 June 27, 2014 Share June 27, 2014 One of the things I've never understood in all the years I've watched this show (which has sadly been A LOT) is the logic and strategy these fools employ when deciding things like who goes into the elimination round, who to form alliances with, why form alliances at all, etc. This season, for example, I feel like Bananas or CT should've been voted in every single opportunity (and I love CT). If you want to win, it isn't about going against 'the best' in the final. It is about winning. I would much rather have run a final against Devyn than Laurel. I know that in doing that I would put a target on my back that they would vote me in, but they could only do that if they were still there. And while the odds are good Bananas or CT would beat out whomever drew the kill card, it isn't a guarantee. I also think that if CT or Bananas or Laurel were voted in with the logic of "I'm voting you in because you are the best and I want to win and if I can eliminate you early I increase my odds" they would have more respect of that logic than the "I'm voting you in to prove yourself or because you don't deserve to be here" or some other equally bullshit reason. The three of them, in particular, seem to value the competitive nature of this whole thing more than the other BS. Link to comment
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.