Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Lord of the Rings: The War of the Rohirrim (202?)


Anduin
  • Reply
  • Start Topic

Recommended Posts

On 12/11/2024 at 2:27 AM, Harvey said:

It's predicted to hit streaming in January, for now it is in cinemas. I would say it is worth seeing it on the big screen though - the visuals are better than the poorly made trailer will have you believe.

I'm not shelling out money for it.  If it ends up streaming on a service I already have, I might watch it then.  Otherwise, when it hits cable.

  • Like 2

I saw it today. In a word: no.

A longer review: full of people being too arrogant or dumb for their own good, and coming to stupid ends. Terrible writing. Pointless on every level. I doubt I'll ever watch it again.

Furthermore, can we please stop adapting Tolkien? I haven't been happy since ROTK at the most generous take.

  • Like 2
On 12/12/2024 at 2:07 PM, proserpina65 said:

I'm not shelling out money for it.  If it ends up streaming on a service I already have, I might watch it then.  Otherwise, when it hits cable.

Unsurprisingly, a lot of LOTR fans agreed with you.  On the plus side, its lackluster performance will probably be overshadowed by Kraven's dud of an opening.

On 12/13/2024 at 3:19 AM, Anduin said:

Furthermore, can we please stop adapting Tolkien? I haven't been happy since ROTK at the most generous take.

Rings of Power is flat out ridiculous as a Tolkien adaptation, and it sounds like this misses the mark too, although I haven't seen it.  I will check it out on cable if it comes.  But I've started to accept that these movie franchises that are adapted from source material that is highly regarded by me, are not going to be treated with the kind of respect that I have for them.

  • Like 1
5 minutes ago, iarwain said:

Rings of Power is flat out ridiculous as a Tolkien adaptation, and it sounds like this misses the mark too, although I haven't seen it.  I will check it out on cable if it comes.  But I've started to accept that these movie franchises that are adapted from source material that is highly regarded by me, are not going to be treated with the kind of respect that I have for them.

I'm prepared to accept that the creators of these adaptations mean well, but that doesn't always translate into success. I may want to lift a hundred tons, but I can barely do 50 kg!

  • Like 2

Some gripes that just popped into my head. Unless you're an olympic high jumper, you aren't leaping over a fully grown man. Even then, you aren't landing in fighting position.

Further, real siege towers were coated in animal hides soaked in water to prevent fire attacks. Just the gaps in logic were really offputting.

Then there's the obligatory fanservice. Orcs voiced by Merry and Pippin are looking for rings, you see. And for some reason Saruman turns up. They must have put Christopher Lee's voice together from other samples, because it didn't sound right. Yes, the timeline was right. Still didn't need it. Finally, they namedrop Gandalf. I don't like fanservice. It's distracting.

That's all for now. Maybe more later.

  • Like 1
23 minutes ago, DoctorAtomic said:

You do in anime. That's a low level move. 

I see. Not being a fan of anime, I don't know the tropes. Perfectly valid form of entertainment, just not my thing.

17 minutes ago, iarwain said:

I thought this movie was set well before the events of the Lord of the Rings?

Yep, 200. I can see it from Sauron's POV. Even though the the ring was lost, who knows where it may have turned up. Still, it's fanservice for the point of fanservice.

12 minutes ago, baldryanr said:

Saruman shows up because Tolkien said he went to Frealaf's coronation.  That's not fan service, that's canon.  Now, if Gandalf had shown up at some point, that would have been fan service.

Right, must have missed that. Anyway, Gandalf is namedropped at the end. I groaned internally, possibly externally.

I saw it today and it is ok I guess if you don't have expect much. What bothered me most was the animation. Not the anime style but the smoothness of the moves, it looked often as some frames were missing in scene.

Story was kind of ok but I expected more from Helm during his raids. In books it was described much better. Here it was reduced to one raid unless I confuse it.

Weakest character was certainly Wulf who just doesn't work as main antagonist.

Some easter eggss were ok, some were just bad(watcher in the water).

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...