Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

WarnerCL45

Member
  • Posts

    1.3k
  • Joined

Posts posted by WarnerCL45

  1. 21 minutes ago, rickhurst3186 said:

    What a wasted opportunity. Anna Navarro would have injected new life to The View.  Instead, we get boring Abby.

    Ana didn't want to do it.

    45 minutes ago, TheGreenKnight said:

    I actually agree with Whoopi's theory that the anonymous source in the New York Times could just as easily be a fake plant by Trump and co. trying to give him ammo to act like he's a victim.

     

    37 minutes ago, Apprentice79 said:

    I don't think that he would allow himself to look bad. Image is everything to him.

    I also seriously doubt it!  Just too convoluted. 

    • Love 6
  2. 12 hours ago, Ohwell said:

    Hoda alert!  The mayor of Washington, DC will be on the Today show Thursday morning because she just adopted a baby girl.  She's a single mother just like Hoda so, of course, Hoda will do the interview.  Have your vomit bucket handy.

    Oh, good lord.  Will give that a miss.

    • Love 1
  3. Seeing as how she's barely been on this show, I am inclined to wait & see before jumping all over her.  AND, it's quite pleasant to have a not-screaming, not-foaming opinion.  She's more Jed than Meghan, which is fine with me.  

    • Love 9
  4. 1 minute ago, TV Diva Queen said:

    the kids want what's hot...Nike is the brand, I can't see this campaign having a negative impact.  Nike is Jordan and Lebron, I see maybe 10 people that will boycott the shoes.   

    I don’t think this will hurt them.  The sweat shops didn’t.

    • Love 7
  5. 1 hour ago, Wings said:

    For the record I am an old white woman and know many more.  We are not burning our Nikes, no one is burning their damn shoes.  

    Wasn’t Nike in trouble years ago for their labor practices?  Sweat shops, low wages.  A lot of people stopped buying their products at that time.

    • Love 4
  6. 17 minutes ago, CheezyXpressed said:

    Maybe it's because I'm not familiar with Abby's work at Fox, but I don't mind her. She speaks calmly, states her points without shouting or throwing a tantrum. It's almost like she's having a conversation instead of viewing this as a debate. Despite who her father is, Abby doesn't seem like she has anything to prove. I may not agree with her on everything, but she's a massive improvement from Meghan. We'll have to see how she does on Friday and when Meghan comes, but so far she seems fine.

    For sure!  I don't know what the beef is.

    • Love 6
  7. 42 minutes ago, RHJunkie said:

    I'll be impressed if she continues to maintain this kind of composure even when she's got another voice there to back her up because in my mind, professionalism isn't overrated and after Meghan, I'll welcome someone who can have and listen to dissenting points of view without throwing a tantrum and pouting.

    Absolutely!  So far, I have no problem with her.  Early days, but MM grated from the get-go

    • Love 4
  8. 1 hour ago, blondiec0332 said:

    I don't care for Abby but I don't get a mean hateful vibe from her like with Meghan.  I didn't agree with most of what she said yesterday concerning Colin Kapernik and the kneeling but at least she didn't scream and pout when someone disagreed with her.  

    She is married with a young child and her husband isn't in politics.  She doesn't seem to live and breathe politics the way Meghan does.  

    Time will tell if she is a full fledged member of Meghan's tribe. She did leave the Church of the Latter Day Saints because of their stance on women's equality and LGTB issues.

     

    Maybe people know her better than I do, but I don't have a strong opinion about her as yet.  She seems fine to me so far.  This is only her second day, how about some slack?  Her lips?  Jeeze, give me a break!

    • Love 9
  9. 5 minutes ago, jennblevins said:

    Please tell me I’m not the only one who spends too much time in the “Across the Pond” thread and wondered how in the world Meghan Markle* was going to manage running for Congress on top of everything else she already has to do ...

    (*Yes, I know that’s not the proper way to refer to her.)

    She would be DOS (Duchess of Sussex). LOL

    • Love 1
  10. On 2018-09-03 at 11:50 AM, Ohwell said:

    If you read my post you could see that my point was the media focus on her.  

    Also, regarding fashion at funerals (Ariana Grande), I thought that the low back on Meghan's dress was too much.  I know she was grieving but she seemed to want the focus to be on her.  I wouldn't be surprised if she made a run for Congress in the next couple of years.*

    *I am not a fan either.  

    Regarding MM running for Congress.  Hope she doesn’t start to take the praise for her eulogy seriously.  I don’t believe that was all her work.  She doesn’t strike me as being a particularly bright person.

    • Love 8
  11. 1 minute ago, longobongo said:

     When talking about the Nike "controversy" Abby said ...."inalienating your brand..." I guess I'm tired of people on national TV gigs misusing the language and making up words. It just shows people are hired more for their looks, or connections than for their brains.  Since I'm on my soapbox---I'm sick of people saying "I'm from a military family so...."  NOT ALL people in the military think alike!  Sorry for the rant. I missed the Sotomayor interview due to the Chicago mayor's announcement not to run for reelection so I'm not a happy camper!

    The Sotomayor interview wasn’t that interesting.

    • Love 4
  12. 16 minutes ago, Cindyluwho said:

    I think I will give her a chance to fit in. She is probably dealing with some first day jitters.  So far, she is not as annoying as Meghan. However, I worry about the 2 of them together. 

    I didn’t mind this episode.  No screeching over each other.  Actually, I think four works better than five.  Yes, we will see how new girl & MM interact.

    • Love 5
  13. 2 hours ago, PamelaMaeSnap said:

    ETA: Did a little nosing around and apparently ... dramatic pause ... they've simply yanked the show. No dance team. No nothing. It's off the air and there is nothing about it on the TLC site or anything. It was on the schedule/guide and now it's not and they're airing other shows in its place. 

    Interesting!  I had seen a few positive comments about the new format, but not very many.  I think TV Guide is indicating that older episodes are being shown.  

    Maybe they can do something about Say Yes to the Dress!

    • Love 1
  14. 3 hours ago, bannana said:

    I wonder how it felt for Meggie to face "I hate Crooked Hillary".

    I really thought she came across has immature with her eulogy, but I get why people like it, for the content.

    Yes, it was the content, for sure.  She's not really a good speaker.

    • Love 5
  15. On 2018-09-01 at 8:14 AM, Patrizio said:

     My interest in this show is waning-never thought I'd feel that way. Thank God for DVR. I can fast forward through the interminable stories. When is the wealthy, tacky group gonna show up? Can't bring the snark because it would be meanspirited. The show is too long- a ruthless editor is needed. The concept of strangers rating your wedding was key to the success of the previous shows. It's now too easy to skew the results for each other. This season has been a failed experiment- too bad.

    Same here! I really enjoyed the old version.  I don’t care about their backgrounds or personal stories.  Show me the weddings!   ?

    • Love 1
×
×
  • Create New...