PipPop

I really liked the episode quite a lot. I was amused by the way Getty complained about the butter to Bullimore (still my favorite character), after Bullimore helpfully/foolishly pointed out that the morning paper was reporting that Getty III had been kidnapped. Of course Getty noticed and was just ignoring the situation because it annoyed him, and of course he had a press conference to announce that he wasn't going to pay a single cent in ransom. I snickered at him when he blamed the entire situation on Getty II. If Getty II hadn't shown Getty the article in the magazine, then Getty would have given Getty III the six thousand dollars he owed to the mafia and none of this would have happened. As if! Old man Getty wasn't ever just going to hand over six thousand to Getty III. He's such a heartless old bastard. He was more passionate about what the local architectural historical society was going to say about the metal bars he was nailing up over his windows than he was in the fate of his grandson. The episode really belonged to Brendan Fraser, strolling around in his ridiculously huge cowboy hat and swigging milk from little milk bottles while he putters around Rome trying to find clues about the whereabouts of Getty III. I loved the way that he could flip from being amiable good-old-boy 'Mr. Texas' to suddenly threatening to murder Getty III's friend by ramming a pencil through his ear into his brain. Just when you think the character is just a doofus, he does something like this and you're reminded that Fletcher Chase is ex-CIA. Even so, after finding good clues, Chace manages to get things completely wrong and he heads back to LA. But first, he turns to the camera to make a crack about how the story is really only just beginning. If you know anything about the real life Getty III kidnapping, you know that this is true. It seems that Boyle's use the split screen and breaking the fourth wall is kind of divisive for viewers. People either really liked it or it annoyed them. I loved it. Those kind of camera and character tricks can really jazz up a story when they're done well.

Den of Geek posted a largely positive review of episode 2. They mentioned my favorite bit about the episode, which is the way that Fletcher Chace (Brendan Fraser) breaks the fourth wall to talk directly to the audience. http://www.denofgeek.com/us/tv/trust/272244/trust-episode-2-review-lone-star AV Club rates episode 2 as a B+, and has a lot of praise for Brendan Fraser: https://www.avclub.com/brendan-fraser-and-danny-boyle-make-a-winning-team-in-t-1824217856 The New York Times also had a positive review, here: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/01/arts/television/trust-recap-lone-star-fx.html Brendan Fraser and director Danny Boyle discuss why they opted to have Fraser's character break the fourth wall: http://www.indiewire.com/2018/04/brendan-fraser-trust-fx-interview-danny-boyle-1201945880/ Another mainly positive review of episode 2 here: https://www.tvfanatic.com/2018/04/trust-season-1-episode-2-review-lone-star/

I don't think the scene where the swan was hit and run over by cars was real. The scene was meant to show in graphic detail how grotesque and ruthless the super rich really are. They are surrounded by beauty, luxury, and rare creatures and objects, but they really value nothing except their own wealth and power. That scene was symbolic foreshadowing for the fate of young JP Getty III. The director wanted the audience to be repulsed by the Gettys right away and not get seduced by their seemingly glamourous lifestyle.

JP Getty: Meet Teresa.

That's so funny. I couldn't quite make out his name either, so I just took to thinking of him as Voldemort. I'm glad to get his name clarified. He was my favorite character in the first episode. I wonder if Bullimore was real or just a made up character for the show. It doesn't matter, really. He fit the narrative perfectly: grotesquely wealthy oil baron, sumptuous mansion filled with museum class art, a harem of international beauties, and a roomful of disappointing heirs who hate their father but love his wealth. Of course Getty would have a long-suffering butler who tends to the old miser's every needs but then urges the grandson to run far away.

She didn't really spoil anything concrete about Paige's fate in this interview. She repeats Matthew Rhys' long running joke that Paige would become Monica Lewinsky, and then adds that they always said that in 10 years Paige would be a senator, but would she be a good senator or a spy senator? She'd prefer it if Paige ended up as a senator and not just a Monica Lewinsky type, but then said that even as of the start of S6, Paige doesn't know what will happen. It sounded to me that all she did was repeat speculation that's been kidded about in other interviews already. The only actual spoiler that I've heard Holly say about the ending was in a different interview.