DittyDotDot
-
Posts
13.2k -
Joined
Content Type
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Discussion
Posts posted by DittyDotDot
-
-
-
12 hours ago, BoxManLocke said:
I could have said I was disappointed they didn't take the opportunity to attach the ep to the main plot (Jack or Gabriel theoretically could have had the power to send the brothers to scooby land)
They wrote and recorded the dialog a year ago, I don't think they knew enough about what was happening in S13 yet to be able to do this.
-
4
-
-
It's so sad to hear that Allison ended up in a cult. I don't know what she did or what was done to her--and TBH I don't really want to know; cult behavior is extremely unsettling to me--I just hope she, and everyone else who found themselves in the cult, can find themselves in a better place in the future.
-
2
-
-
Jinkies indeed!
Well, that was fun. I don't think it matters if you're a Scooby fan or not as I can't say I'm a fan particularly, but really enjoyed this. I think they found a perfect balance between the two shows and got in an old fashioned ghost hunt too boot. What more can you ask for? It was a fun break from all the taking-themselves-far-too-seriously they've done lately.
Kudos to both Scooby Doo and Supernatural teams!! They really pulled out a win here.
-
11
-
-
14 minutes ago, Iju said:
paris acted better than i thought she would have. interesting. also her death was pretty violent, even my brother was surprised that they allowed her severed head and headless body to be shown on TV.
Apparently, you just can't show the actual cutting off the head, but can show the gruesome remains. Standards and Practices makes no sense.
-
I think we'll pick up some viewers just for the nostalgia and out-of-the-box factor, but it's spring and ratings don't usually pick back up until the final few episodes. So, I'm also guessing a 0.6 with a slight up tick of viewers. I think the DVR and social media numbers will be really good, though.
BTW, I'm excited for the episode. I'm ready for a lighthearted and fun break, myself.
-
2
-
-
12 hours ago, Iju said:
....i just said if sam was successful like in dean's situation
What makes you think Sam wasn't successful in his situation? Didn't seem to me he was unsuccessful. He didn't get a memo from the ghost. It seems to me he was unsatisfied with the job--just as Dean was in his job--but that doesn't mean he was unsuccessful. Success isn't determined by whether you have an office or not.
ETA: It seems clear you think tech support is a lowly job that's beneath Sam--which you're entitled to your opinion; I'm of the opinion that there are no lowly jobs, just lowly employees--but have you considered some of your fellow posters may work in tech support? Just something to consider.
-
4
-
-
6 hours ago, Iju said:
i did hear him call the car baby, but i just thought he nicknamed it, i didn't know that it was the official name.
Well, actually, Dean first called her Baby in S2, not S1, but the fans had already dubbed her Metallicar by then. I wouldn't say there is an "official" name. In show, she's called "The Impala" far more than anything--Dean calls her his baby from time to time, though--but fans have really glammed on to "Baby" in recent years.
-
2
-
-
41 minutes ago, DeeDee79 said:
Given the context of the post it seemed like the writer decided throw that in just to placate the Dean fans that may have been reading. How can she state that while also stating that Dean is the favorite to write for? Isn't that a tad contradictory?
I'm not going to read that post, but I don't find it contradictory. Storylines change, get dropped or don't get the resolution a writer wants for many reasons, doesn't mean they hate or prefer the character. Sometimes things just don't work out.
-
3
-
-
52 minutes ago, Iju said:
you're misunderstanding me. it's not about who's job is better or worse, i don't think sam fit that job as his personality. dean's job fit his character, not sam's. that's my opinion. if sam was placed in a different footing in the building he still would have been unsatisfied, just like dean. that wasn't my point, making them happy about their jobs. for example, if sam had dean's job, i still would have said something because that's not according to his character.
It was you who said Sam had the loser job, so I think there was an element of whose job was better or worse for you, but I don't think I am misunderstanding you. I just happen to disagree that Dean's job fit his personality any more than Sam's fit his. And, IMO, that was the point; they weren't supposed to fit their personalities.
TBH, I think Dean would've been more satisfied in tech support where there were people to interact with and he was part of a team instead of being stuck behind a desk by himself all day. And, I think Dean would've found worth in helping people with their technical problems even if their technical problems weren't all that difficult since a big part of Dean's personality is his need to help people. That's not to say they both would've been totally satisfied if their jobs were reversed, but IMO, the angels put them both in positions that would ensure they would find their way out of those jobs and back to hunting which is what the angels wanted.
-
6
-
-
10 hours ago, Iju said:
i had a bit of a small pouty rant because of dean's job placement compared to sam's. sam is basically a loser with his position and i wasn't happy about that at all, sam is not a loser! he is very capable of perhaps not reaching dean's position but definitely being higher than a cubicle job. ew. my mother pointed out that sam's job makes sense since he is helping people, and that's what he does best. i conceded, but at least make the man a firefighter, policeman, something that is worth his character. well at least he wasn't a fast food employee. i would have thrown chairs.
I don't think Dean's job was really any better than Sam's. They were both repetitive and boring corporate jobs. Sam's was tech support where he answered the same questions everyday and Dean's was sitting behind a desk, alone, filing out paperwork everyday. I think they purposely put them in jobs that would make sure they both were unsatisfied in some way so they would start questioning what was going on around them as a way to engage themselves in the hunt. Basically, the angels stacked the deck to make sure they got the outcome they wanted. But, I wouldn't say that Sam was in a "loser" job. At least he had a job.
-
4
-
-
40 minutes ago, Ziggy said:
I think they like to spread out the casting announcements. So it's quite possible she simply hasn't been announced yet. But now that I think about it, is Lizzie crucial to the plot? She certainly is an interesting character (especially in when she gets married), but I think I could see them deciding that her story line could be dropped. I hope not, but it has to be hard to condense those books!
She's really only key to the stupidity of getting Jamie and Ian all worked up and thinking that Roger raped Brianna. But, I'd be pretty pleased if they reworked that whole sequence. Other than that, she's more just someone for Brianna to talk to on her trek across the ocean, more than anything.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, scribe95 said:
Well Dabb is saying in here the show will go past Episode 13 and Jensen/Jared seem to be agreeing so there is no reason to not have announced a pickup yet.
I think they're simply holding out to make the announcement a big deal. I don't think it's about stringing fandom along, but about turning it into an event of some sort this time. I could be they're planning a two-year and done renewal or it could have to do with the fate of Wayward Sisters and them wanting to announce them both together? I really don't know, but I don't feel like I'm being strung along for ratings purposes. I'm not sure how a renewal would affect ratings anyway.
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, SueB said:
Pulled this off Jess' tumblr feed:
I wonder if the Angels kick out Lucifer?
One can only hope! They're pretty dumb to have embraced him in the first place, if you ask me.
-
2
-
-
2 hours ago, sarthaz said:
Opinions: God. One per universe? Or one Chuck to rule them all? Same with Amara and Death. Go.
I think it's a God/Amara/Death for every universe. I think the multi-verse sets up infinite universes of infinite possibilities. I imagine there's a universe out there where God didn't lock up his sister, but the reverse happened and a universe where God doesn't exist at all. I also imagine there's a universe where God never left Heaven and a universe where God and Lucifer worked out their differences so there are no demons...and etc.
-
14 hours ago, andromeda331 said:
Murderers who plan to kill via a syringe will always end up being the one who gets poked and die with that syringe.
Serves them right. If they can't come up with something more clever than a syringe, they deserve to get the syringe themselves. ;)
-
2
-
-
3 hours ago, MysteryGuest said:
The entire concept of Michael confuses me and I think that's mainly because they've never bothered to flesh him out. He was there for the big showdown, then conveniently became a babbling idiot in the cage. He appeared to be as strong as Lucifer when they both entered the cage, so why did Michael fare so poorly? If Michael is in the cage at full angel power, then why couldn't he heal himself, emotionally? And if his grace is not fully intact, then what does possessing Dean do to improve that? Is he going to say yes to Michael so he can take down Lucifer, or can Lucifer be trusted in the fight against AU Michael? And I didn't necessarily get the impression that this character Dean is going to portray is necessarily "good". So many questions...
For me the difference between Michael and Lucifer is that Lucifer had already been locked in the cage for centuries and Micheal wasn't prepared for the experience like Lucifer was. Plus, imagine if you've spent centuries preparing for the a fight only to be ushered off the field before it ever started and locked in a cage. I think it'd be a pretty crushing blow to one's ego. Remember, Micheal has really only been in the cage for a few years. I imagine the first few years Lucifer was in the cage the first time weren't pretty either--but he had centuries to pull himself together. Micheal may not be as bad off as Chuck led us to believe, he just might need the right motivation to pull himself together.
-
The only reason I can't see it being AU Yellow Eyes or any of the other big time demons is that Jensen says Dean steps up in a big way...which, to me, means consent and demons don't need consent to possess someone. Plus, I don't see any demon being able to take out AU Michael at this point. He's way too powerful. If an AU demon could've taken out AU Michael, I think they would've done it long before now. Asemodeus is the most powerful demon in our universe and I would doubt even he could stand toe to toe with AU Michael.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, gonzosgirrl said:
I was going to say, but.. but.. Azazel is dead, lit up and sparked out, dead. Then I remembered we're talking about Dabb-era Supernatural. There is literally nothing in canon we can count on as a baseline of what's possible. I hate that.
I believe we they were discussing AU Azazel.
-
7 hours ago, Wayward Son said:
If it isn’t Michael, I actually think @DittyDotDot‘s suggestion that it could be AN AU azazel could be a pretty interesting one.
Oh, I don't know whose spec that is, but it definitely wasn't mine. It could work, but I'm not sure I see it happening, myself. Micheal is the only one I see it happening with, but then I think it's also too obvious. I have no other spec who it could be, though.
-
7 hours ago, Iju said:
exactly. i thought she just knew they were just kicking it just for fun. she was expecting way too much tbh.
If you ask me, I think they both had misaligned expectations of what their relationship was. I think she really wanted to relationship to go somewhere and Dean, on the other hand, just wanted to have fun knowing that they would be leaving soon anyway and he'd probably never see her again. I think he set up the make out session in the closet purposely because she was getting too serious--wanting him to meet her parents and such--and thought this would be a way to cool things off. I think he thought it would be easier for her to think of him as a jerk than to just be honest with her that he didn't want the same things she did. But then she embarrassed him in the hallway instead of slinking away quietly, so he had to stand up for himself. It's kinda typical teenage drama, IMO, but I think it's a time that Dean looks back and isn't proud of himself in how he handled the situation. Which we all have those moments we didn't handle things as well as we'd have liked to and look back on it with regret, but that's how we learn and grow.
-
2
-
-
Full Paleyfest panel:
-
1
-
-
For those of you who missed it, Jensen on Jimmy Kimmel:
-
3
-
-
7 hours ago, SueB said:
I must admit, any version of Michael seems like it’s both being set up and yet too obvious. So, I don’t know where to land on this.
Yeah, that's my thinking too. While I never wanted to see Michael-in-a-Dean and I had hoped the show had moved on from either Winchester being possessed by egotistical archangels, I can't decide if it means something completely different or not because it seems way too obvious. But, sometimes that's how the show rolls, so... .
-
1
-
S05.E06: I Believe The Children Are Our Future
in Supernatural
· Edited by DittyDotDot
Just to expand on @AwesomO4000: There's an old cautionary tale adults used to tell boys of a certain age that they'd grow hair on their hands if they touched themselves inappropriately. It's another lie adults told children to scare them so they wouldn't engage in certain activity. I don't think it gets much play these days, but was fairly well known back in the '80s.
These first few seasons of this show has a sort of time warp quality/timeless quality about it. The music, a lot of the pop cultural references and such are from the mid-'80s--which is the childhood of the show creator, Eric Kripke--but yet it still feels like a show of it's time. It's a really interesting duality to the show that I really like.