The People's Court - General Discussion

[CrazyInAlabama]

9 May-“Exes Phone Battle” Season 23/ Episode 52, 11/26/2019 Cases-Being A Phony - Who's Dog Bit First - Not Paying Her Fair Share (Case 1 another stupid phone case with a desperate plaintiff. Both litigants swear the other still has the phones and iPads.   Also, p. says everything was stolen from d.s car , but he says he only had one phone. She also claims her kids were take away from her and him because of one missed slap.  Case 2-Dogs owned by idiots. D. claims both dogs were off leash and p.'s dog attacked first.  P. says her leashed dog was attacked by d.'s dog.   A letter from a neighbor who had attacks on her dogs by d.'s dog twice, both off leash seals the case for p.    Case 3-Deadbeat roommates. After 3 of days of meeting d., p. moved d. and her 1 and 2 year old with her, and things were immediately worse.)

p. 146, https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/6835-the-peoples-court-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=5777395

 

12 May-"Unsatisfied Customer Confrontation” Season 23 / Episode 53 11/27/2019 Cases-Stiffing The Tailor - A Phoney Baloney - Bilking A Biker

Case 1-Stiffing the Tailor-P. suing D. for not paying for custom alterations on three suits.  Suing for $500 balance.  D. says he took in three suits but only wanted one altered as a test, and instead p. altered all three suits and ruined them. P. brought all three suits to court.   D. claims he brought in three suits to get a deal, and claims he can't get the pants on.   D. tries on the suits and models them for Judge M, and they look great in my opinion.   D. says pants are too tapered, the jacket is too short and shows his tiny crotch.  His jacket he wore to court is almost as short, and shows his miniscule crotch too.  I hate that bright blue suit, the color glows in the dark.    There's maybe an inch in the length of the jackets.  D. doesn't have the actual suit receipts from the manufacturer.   $1670 to defendant. How can Judge M give d. that amount of money for suits that he has no receipts for? 

Case 2-A Phoney Baloney-P. suing d. for cell pnone plan p. paid for, d. was caught dating his ex-wife, so she shut the phone off. P. suing for $1310.  D. is suing p. for $399 for who knows what.    P. is suing for the user charges by d., and a leased iPhone for his daughter, who had to return the iPhone at the end of the lease. D. wants his phone number from her account back, not happening. She also paid for some items to help d. start his lawn service. P. only turned the two phones off for d. and his daughter when they didn't pay the bills, and they were warned.  P. gets $780, and property back.   D. case dismissed. 

Case 3-Bilking a Biker-P./Harley owner suing d./mechanic for $5,000 back for repairs on the bike.  P. says everytime the bike needed work it cost more.  D. just explained why everything wore out on the bike, and I understood nothing of it.  Other Harley dealerships did the same repairs the d.'s shop recommended.  P. loses.  

p. 146, no discussion, at least I don't think there was. 

 

 

(For no apparent reason, this Thursday starts Season 23 Episode 1, have no idea why they started Season 23 with  episode 51.  I wonder if the show will repeat the 50-later episodes when they get to it?). 

Edited May 12 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

13 May--“My Neighbors Spy on Me” 11/ 28/2019, Season 23 / Episode 54 Cases-Nosy Neighbors - Holding On To Security - Not Caring Enough

Case 1-Nosy Neighbors-P. says neighbors spy on him, and call him a terrorist, and wants $5,000 for wall repairs. D's say wall is cracked because of age, say they don't care about neighbor, and he harassess them.   P. claims d.s have harassed him from the first day he moved in.   He says he was jogging, and Diana chases him with her dog, with dog on a leash, but admits dog never touched him.   Another day p. says husband chased him with the dog too. Decision is made to build a joint cinder block wall on the property line, and p. is suing for damages to the wall from D. husband taking the mortar between the blocks so he could spy on plaintiff.  THe picture shows missing mortar, and cracked cinder blocks, repointing the mortar would fix the fence.  My sympathies are with the defendants, because p. sounds like a paranoid PITA.  D. husband says the wall settled since 2014, so the cracks happened.   THe next year d.s received a lawyer's letter threatening to sue them because p. is blaming everything on the contractor d. hired to build the wall. Judge M tells d's to watch Youtube videos to see how to repoint the wall, and do it themselves.  Why would white supremacists move to Little Manila like the p. says of the defendants? 

Plaintiff case dismissed because it's ridiculous.

Case 2-Holding Onto Security-P. suing d. /landlord for return of her $3,000 security deposit.  D. says plaintiff and her kids destroyed the apartment, and he's suing for damages above the $3,000 security deposits. $2354.   As always, Judge M demands the landlord prove he could enter the apartment. She's suing for one month rent back $1500, and $1500 security.   After moveout she left furniture on the porch, and some furniture inside the rental after she moved out.  Landlord says his property manager/sister received a text saying 'we moved out from p.'    Landlord will now get slammed by the judge, but since the show pays the award, landlord won't lose a penny.  There are huge stickers on the fridge that won't come off without removing the paint from the doors.  (My guess, d. will have to give the rent back, and maybe the security). Plaintiff husband apparently has no knowledge of anything. P. wife knows nothing about the horribly stained rugs. The carpets look like garbage. P. wife's video is awful marks on the wall.  Apparently they played pinata with the hanging porch light, and trashed the one in the back yard. P. gets $750 rent back, plus $474, $1,224 to despicable plaintiffs. 

Case 3-Not Caring Enough-P. suing d. for her Husky getting a large hole in her paw while at d.s doggy daycare. $4,000 for vet bills.  D. says dog had a small cut, not a big hole.   Plaintiff says the hole took seven stitches to close, and the entire leg is bandaged.   Because p. signed the waiver in the contract, no vet bills.  Defendant wins. 

Edited May 13 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

14 May-“You Ruined My Perfect Reputation” 11/29/2019, Season 23 / Episode 55 (No source describes the cases) 

Case 1-P suing D. for training her French Bulldog, but not doing the work, and she wants her money back. Suing for $2142.   P. paid $1142 for the training, and d. promised to train the dog in his home, including lifetime support.  DOg was only there for a one week stay at d.'s house. P. claims d. put a shock collar on her dog, and claims d. wanted her to drive him around, and she claims he reeked of alcohol. 

D. is suing for $2500, for defamation. D. has a suspended license, for speeding, six unpaid tickets, and he had an injured leg too. He says p. refused to come to his home for training the owner to work with the dog. 

P. claims d. was drunk, talked about having a sex act just performed on him, and other bizarre claims.   

We all had to suffer through Judge M saying she never used a shock collar on her dog, how her dog loves her more than anyone else, but then says shock collars are a useful training tool, unless you're Judge M's dog. 

P. claims she couldn't take her kids to d's house, because of the guns and weed laying around, and d. being drunk, but she left the dog with d. anyway for 4 days.

P. also sent "laughting" emoji to answer a FB group message from d. she claims offended her, and it sounds pretty nasty.  D. is not getting defamation, no proof of where or what p. posted, and that he lost clients. P. also didn't go to any sessions to learn how to training the dog to keep the learning going correctly. 

Judge M says p. is impatient.   P. has to be consistent with the dog housebreaking and other training. 

Plaintiff gets $571, and that's all.

Case 2-P. is suing d/ex for not returning his belongings, and paying him back on their mutual apartment, suing for $5,000.  D. says they split the bills 3 ways when her boyfriend lived with them for a short time.  D. is suing for $931 for unpaid rent and utilities.    However, d. illegally locked p. out, and Judge M yells at her for bypassing the eviction process for that. D. claims p. moved out without notice, and refused to pay rent or utilities.   

One day the plaintiff came home from work and all of his clothes and his dresser were out in the apartment hallway, and the locks were changed. 

Judge M goes through all of the bills, and won't pay after the illegal lockout. Judge M orders that p. can pick up his TV's and other items d. kept.  He gets money for renting two U-Hauls.  Plaintiff gets $284, and his property back.

 

(Tomorrow restarts Season 23 with episode 1, however lots of shows were preempted for a few weeks then). 

[CrazyInAlabama]

15 May- “You Destroyed My Reputation”  9/9/2019, Season 23 / Episode 1, Cases-Spreading Lies - Harboring A Vicious Animal - You Put My Life In Danger (Case 1- Where Judge M's husband is mentioned. Plaintiff ran a To Catch a Predator routine in Israel, when he left after threats, D. was hired by a predator to phony up photos, and postings saying horrible things about p.   P. gets $5,000, Case 2-Another dog attack case Case 3-As Is car case)

p. 137, https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/6835-the-peoples-court-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=5587833

16 May-“Exes Battle It Out “ 9/10/2019 Season 23 / Episode 2, Cases-Being A Nasty Ex - Not Following The Rules - Taking Too Much Money

p. 137, https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/6835-the-peoples-court-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=5590649

 

Edited May 16 by CrazyInAlabama

[AngelaHunter]

I haven't been able to catch the reruns lately due to an equipment problem, but I found out about a streaming service (previously I didn't know nothing about no  streaming) called Pluto. They have old TPC every night for hours, many of which I'd never seen.

It also has 24/7 JJ.

I'm probably the only person who didn't know about it, but just in case:

Pluto TV

Edited May 17 by AngelaHunter

[CrazyInAlabama]

19 May--“You Served Me a Rock in My Food” 9/11/2019 Season 23/Episode 3, Cases-A Dental Dilemma - Taking But Not Returning - Stealing Juice

(Case 1-Yes, a rock in food leads to traumatic dental work, but did the p. actually have a rock in his food, and the tooth was already rotting..  Case 2-Unpaid loan causes neighborhood feud Case 3-15 year tenant suing landlord for electricity he used that tenant paid for.  

p. 137, https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/6835-the-peoples-court-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=5593450

 

[AngelaHunter]

Oh, and by the way, all the episodes of JJ on Pluto are from the 90s. I never saw these, and I'm astonished at how lenient and permissive she was back then. She let litigants rant and fight with each other, go off on long autobiographical soliloquies, and she spent time trying to counsel them.

[CrazyInAlabama]

20 May--“Customer Crisis" 9/12/2019, Season 23 / Episode 4. Cases-Getting It Wrong - Pocketing Funeral Money (Case 1-Car wrap failure, where on video plaintiff dog groomer shows how not to behave.  P. was getting her work vehicle wrapped, a Mercedes Sprinter van for mobile grooming, suing for $6,000.  She claims the dark blue is purple, but it shows blue on TV, and she also claims she wanted gold embellishments she didn't get. She wanted a total refund, d. says she made nasty remarks about his Arab ethnicity, and was nasty.   Case 2-Two siblings fighting over Mom's insurance pay out. P. says d. sister had a $7,000 funeral policy, and says sister spent only $3500 on a cheap funeral.  D. says she was the trustee, that she had a relationship with the mother, and p. never visited.  It all hit the fan when p. says he walked into the funeral and didn't recognize the person in the casket, and he claims it was another person in the casket.  D. is actually a second cousin.  Cousin had been taking care of the mother for years. )

p. 137, https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/6835-the-peoples-court-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=5595832

21 May-"Shortchanging a Daughter!” " Season 23/Episode 5. Cases-Weaseling Out On A Wife - Flushing A Guy The Wrong Way - Taking It All.

Case 1-Weaseling Out on a Wife-P. suing d. for dance lessons for their daughter, $1,000.   Litigants are divorced, and all custody goes on the app, and they're supposed to split the kid's bills.  Defendant says he paid for cosmetic surgery for plaintiff. and she never repaid him for that.  D. is suing for $7,000 for an unpaid loan. . Judge in family court told defendant the dance lessons were not his responsibility.  Judge M rules no dance lesson $1,000 to p. and d. will not get the plastic surgery money back either. 

Case 2-Flushing a Guy the Wrong Way-P. suing d. for not fixing one of the four toilets he hired d. to fix.  $315.00 is what plaintiff wants back.  D. says p. only wanted 3 fixed, and so she only fixed three of them, and not the fourth toilet. P. claims he paid $150 each for 4 toilet repairs, and claims he paid $600.   So, why is he suing for $315.00.  Plumber who did the job sent his wife to court in his place.  Then d. wife got a phone call from p. that was very demeaning and insulting,  P. had the toilet fixed for $165 by another plumber. Judge M gives the plaintiff money, because d.'s husband said he would fix the toilet. P. gets $165, and court costs.  

Case 3-Taking it All-P. suing d. for security deposit back, suing for $2,000.   D. landlady says the place was a wreck, only one week's notice before moveout, claims p. broke the stove, and washer. P. claims the top loader washer crud all over the top of the tub and gasket is from laundry detergent, but it definitely isn't.  P. was a month-to-month tenant, with a $1950 security deposit.  Property is a three-story town home.  D. has before and after photos on her phone. There are huge gouges in the stairway wall, blinds are broken, part of stove is missing, the photo of the washing machine is revolting. other big wall gouges too, fridge is trashed, cabinets have a lot of dirt.  carpet ripped up, and badly stained. electric outlets were missing or broken. Then d. says multiple children not on lease, and p.s husband lived there, and were not on the lease. Judge M says the damages cover the $1950 security deposit. So nothing for plaintiff. 

Edited May 21 by CrazyInAlabama

[CrazyInAlabama]

22 May-“My Family Heirlooms Were Destroyed” 9/16/2019 Season 23 / Episode 6. Cases-Ignoring A Tenant - Shortchanging A Breeder - Take This Truck Back (Case 1 Tenant suing for $10k in damages to her 'valuable antique heirlooms'. Case 2-Dog breeder case over a $5,000 Pit Bull puppy. Case 3-the usual Hooptie sale with no mechanic inspection before purchase). 

p. 138,  https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/6835-the-peoples-court-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=5605217

 

23 May--“ Taking an Ex for All He’s Worth” 9/17/2019, Season 23 / Episode 7. Cases-Taking A Guy - Copping Out On A Cousin - Denting A Co-Worker Relationship (Case 1-Briefly married couple suing over a loan Case 2-Failed house flipping business between cousins Case 3-Parking lot dent case.)

p. 138, https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/6835-the-peoples-court-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=5615210

 

Edited May 23 by CrazyInAlabama

[AngelaHunter]

9 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

“My Family Heirlooms Were Destroyed

Ooh! I never saw these. I just loved the plaintiff! She wants 3k... make that 6k.... NO! She wants 10K for all the destruction and horrors she's endured!

Her heirloom "antique" dresser from Levitz Discount Furniture Emporium, passed down from her momma at least 20 years ago, is worth 3K, she claims.

The P was amusing as she attempted to be so erudite, didn't know how, and it all sounded a bit "off":

"I have obtained this dresser since I was 16."

"This dresser has sustained, you know, through time and duration, and it has stored my things sufficiently."

"I took diligence with this dresser, one -  because it was from Levitz..."

She believes this is a high-end store.

"You can't get a dresser like that anymore," she informs JM, who responds that she's not surprised, since the Levitz store no longer exists. Another reason could be that few people want yellow pine bedroom discount furniture anymore. If they do, they might pay $100 for it. Maybe.

IIRC, JM gave her $500, which I thought was generous. Considering the many thousands of dollars she's saved by having Douglas pay her rent (for some strange reason), she should stop complaining, and the landlord should give her the boot.

10 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

the usual Hooptie sale with no mechanic inspection before purchase

This was so annoying that I bailed before the end. 20-year-old truck for $1500, no test drive, has problems and all that usual crap.

He should be exempt from the "As is" law because he and his wife just had their THIRD child, which they can't afford. Congratulations.

"Yeah, I heard you the first 20 times," JM tells him as he repeats the 3rd child plea yet again, as though a stranger should be responsible for their decision to keep having kids when he makes very little money. Cue the violins. 

I have a feeling the Defs haven't heard the last of this. I advise them to get security cameras.

Here's a place where the first plaintiff can buy new pine furniture.

Each piece for $73!

[AngelaHunter]

On 5/22/2025 at 7:54 AM, CrazyInAlabama said:

Taking A Guy

New cases for me! The defendant, who appeared, both by testimony and facial expressions, to be a Professional Victim, marries two men, and both are abusive to her, physically and mentally. She signed the promissory note, but under duress. JM wants to know how the gun was that he held to her head. Maybe he was channeling The Godfather and told her that either her brains or her signature would be on the note.

He wins on the promissory note, and in the hall, the victim tells Doug that big meany P threatened to break her son's wrist or something. Go find another man, lady. Maybe you can get more out of the next one when he starts abusing you.

On 5/22/2025 at 7:54 AM, CrazyInAlabama said:

Copping Out On A Cousin

I love these examples of people who watch some scripted house-flipping show (with a team of expert contractors behind the scenes) and think, "Why sure! I can do that!" The plaintiff buys a broken-down house and has zero idea how to rehab it other than with a sledgehammer. 

She watches  YouTube videos so she can pretty up the place superficially with some cosmetic work. Let's just paper over the cracks! Wiring? Plumbing? Don't think so. She can't even read the label on a bag of grout to know enough not to use it in very low temperatures, which happened because the furnace broke down.

I saw a couple of YT videos, with inspectors touring these houses flipped by people who don't know or don't care what they're doing. Some of them are downright terrifying near-deathtraps.

I've done a few jobs around here with the help of YouTube: Changed ceiling fixtures, tiled a backsplash, did demo in a bathroom, changed faucets, etc., but I would never EVER think that qualifies me to renovate an old house. Oh, well. Good luck to her. I hope no one sues her.

Oh, and JM? You think it's fun to smash shit up with a sledgehammer? I did it, and it's not nearly as enjoyable as you might think.

 

[CrazyInAlabama]

26 May--"Bitter Bride" 9/18/2019 - Season 23 /Episode 8. Cases-. Bumming Out A Bride - Bugging Out - Messing With A Musician

p. 138, https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/6835-the-peoples-court-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=5616281

 

27 May--“Exes' Vindictive Battle” 9/19/2019, Season 23/Episode 9. Cases-I Want My Stuff - Cutting Off An Aunt - Pay Up or Else

Case 1-Plaintiff suing Defendant ex of 10 years, and is suing for her property she abandoned $4,438.   Defendant says she moved right in with her new boyfriend that she barely knew, taking the 6 and 8 year-old kids to live with new guy too.  P. claims he's being vindictive, he says she's just as bad.  She claims he was supposed to put her name on the deed to the rental properties that d. bought and paid the mortgage on.  She was supposed to pay rent to him.  P. claims he kept everything.   She has teens from prior relationships.   D. claims when p. left for the new guy she left the two teens, and small kids with him and her brother behind with him.   

The new guy is d.'s former roommate, and she's rather pregnant with the new guy. The lovebirds moved into a rental property owned by d., leaving her four kids behind. 

They go down the boring list of property left behind, but she has a lot of property back already.  She wants $3500 for closing costs for the house in his name, tough it was a gift, and there is written proof of the gift. 

D. wanted a $17k line of credit on the other house to pay off bills, each got $6,000, plus mutual bills for $5,000. 

She's suing for remaining tools she left behind, and Judge M will arrange for her to pick up her property with a police standby.   

Judge M says everyone gets their own property back.  Closing costs were a gift, and not being considered. 

Nothing to anyone.P. claims d. is still evicting her and love muffin.  

Case 2-Cutting off an Aunt-P. suing d. nephew for money she loaned him to get his barber license after he got out of prison.  D. says he repaid her for the first loan, but she didn't say the second money was a loan.  (Nephew is 25 but was in prison for 10 years, yes since he was 15.  I can only guess what for, hope he turned his life around)

He's now a licensed commercial plumber with a union job, is paying his student loans, but not his aunt. 

Aunt gets her $4,283 from the loan. 

Case 3-Messing with a Musician.-P. suing d. for hitting his car.  P. suing for $5,000.   P. says d. ran into his car.  D. claims p. ran a stop sign, and he hit her car.  D. suing for $500 for deductible.  

P. was driving on Christmas Day, says he stopped at the stop sign, stopped fully, saw no cars coming, and says d.'s 17-year-old daughter hit him broadside and totaled his car.  There was a van parked in the way blocking the view of d.'s car coming.   D. hit his car in the back, but she had right of way.     Couldn't d. see him?  He was almost across the street, and she hit the back passenger side of his car's rear end. 

I still think d. should have seen the p.'s car.   D. had no stop sign or signal.  D's daughter says she saw him at the stop sign, but he blew through the stop sign. P. claims d. was speeding.  His car was totaled out.    

However, d's daughter only had a permit, not a full license.  D. claims p didn't have insurance either.  

P. case dismissed because it was his fault. He went even though his view was blocked by a parked van.  

D. gets $500 for her deductible.   Judge M says Geico, d's insurance company, will probably sue p. for the damages they had to pay on d.s car damages. 

 

Edited May 28 by CrazyInAlabama

[AngelaHunter]

On 5/26/2025 at 8:42 AM, CrazyInAlabama said:

-“Exes' Vindictive Battle”

I never saw this either, and before long, I was wishing I hadn't seen it this time.

Hated the fertile breeder Plaintiff. She spreads, squats, and squirts out babies with different guys - 3 of them so far. She's 35 here and is knocked up with her latest stud. She's suing her former boyfriend and father of two of her offspring for a charger and some other crap. She had no problem living with Def, who wouldn't marry her, buying property, etc, and putting everything in his name until she again found True Love. Brilliant. I'm assuming she can't have anything in her name. She needs to find a part of her anatomy other than her reproductive organs that works properly.

She leaves the kids with Def, telling him she'll visit them, I guess, between bedroom wallowing with her latest paramour. She even dumps her brother, who I'm assuming is not a child, on Def, who, for some reason, tolerates this. The very last thing anyone involved in this case needs to be doing is breeding! Poor kids.

ETA: "BREEDER? He hardly knew 'er!!" Probably accurate in this sordid case.

On 5/26/2025 at 8:42 AM, CrazyInAlabama said:

Case 2-Cutting off an Aunt-P

Auntie wants to move heaven and earth to aid her nephew, who at the tender age of 15, committed a crime so violent and vicious that he was locked up for 10 years. Auntie tries to downplay it as possession of a weapon. As if anyone "goes away" for 10 years for that. Of course, as soon as he's sprung from the slammer, he has the great idea to get some girl pregnant, but he's here with his sappy wife, who probably thought he was a great catch. When he started on his school "intuition", I could take no more.

Edited May 27 by AngelaHunter

[CrazyInAlabama]

28 May-"I Was Carjacked by Your Son” 9/20/2019, Season 23/Episode 10. Cases-Get Outta My Car - Refusing A Fee - Letting The Cat Out Of The Bag.

p. 138, Not posted (Maybe preempted when it first aired?  Some also seem to be renamed too). 

(Case 1 is certainly interesting, and a big change for the show). 

Case 1-Get Outta My Car-P. suing ds for their son carjacking her vehicle.  P. is suing for $5,000.   P. was at a gas station when defendants' son stole the car, but their son was an innocent passenger, his friend was the carjacker.    P. was also hit by the car when it was jacked.   She was going to the convenience store at the gas station, got out of her car, and two teens ran up and grabbed her arm threw her to the ground, and then the carjacker hit her with the car.  Judge M says p. should have stayed away, because the cat isn't worth dying for.   She went up on the hood, fell to the ground.  Police found her car three days later, after car was chased by police, and teens fled, and when the police caught them the male teen threw the car keys to p.'s car away.  

Defendants say son was never in trouble before.   He was charged with theft/jacking, and possession, and eluding, but plea bargained it down.  Mom Nathan (D.) claims he didn't know the car was stolen, which is a lie.  P. identified the son from a six person photo array, as one of the robbers.  Son was sentenced to three years in a detention center, and two more years probation.   

P. says car was damaged, and had to be towed. The way they do it isn't the usual six pack, there were six separate folders, and she identified two as the robbers.   Mama Nathan is a liar.   Nathan claims her son just looks similar to the robber. Under the felony rules, being a participant is being guilty of the robbery too.   

There was another incident as Mama Nathan says, which is what she calls another stolen car.  Wisconsin has a statute that parents are legally and financially responsible for damage from crimes committed by their minor children. Mama Nathan claims victims of her felon son received restitution, and p. got $1800 restitution. 

P. receives $3,726, minus $1800, $1926.  for her car, and pain and suffering, minus restitution.  She couldn't prove her back treatments were from the carjacking.   

Case 2-Refusing a Fee-P. Suing d. for finder's fee helping d. locate a house to buy, she wants $1,600.  D. says p. claimed she was a licensed broker, but wasn't licensed so is not entitled to a commission.   She isn't licensed in Connecticut, but d. is, and was looking for cash buys for other clients.  

D. presents ads from p. stating she's a licensed broker in CT, but she's not. She's only licensed in NY.  D. claims p. was not licensed in NY at the time of the house transaction, and there was no reciprocity between the two states on licensing.  D. shows proof that her license was revoked by NY before the transaction, but she was never licensed in CT, and couldn't get a commission.  D. says it was a referral fee, because she was licensed, but she wasn't licensed at all. CT law says no commission or referral fee to a person without a legal real estate license. It would put d.'s license in jeopardy if he paid p. anything.  

P. case dismissed. 

Case 3-Letting the Cat Out of the Bag-P. suing d. for letting his cats out during installation, and one cat almost died. He's suing for. $1733 for vet bills.   D. says he told p. to lock the cats up safely and he did on the first day, but day two p. let the cats run free in the house, and p. said they'd be fine.  So, d. says p.'s cat getting out the window isn't his fault. 

Judge M points out the installers had one job, to install carpeting in the final bedroom.  P. had one job, to keep his cats locked up safely. 

P. case dismissed, because p. is full of cat poopie. 

Edited May 28 by CrazyInAlabama

[AngelaHunter]

9 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

P. identified the son from a six person photo array,

I was puzzled at that. If he's such a good boy, never in trouble, and just an innocent bystander in this violent crime, and didn't understand what was happening, how did the cops have his photo? I'm pretty sure the cops around don't have my photo in a book. Maybe I missed something in this case. 

I read about two elderly people, one of them just last week, being dragged to their deaths by carjackers. Maybe time for seriously harsh penalties for this. Yeah, I know. Not going to happen. I don't understand this crime. It's always the same - jack a car, maybe/maybe not injure or kill the driver, then crash the car within minutes and get caught right away like the fools they are. The point of this is what? Double-digit idjits, I guess. 

The plaintiff attempts to pursue the chiropractor claim, after consulting a lawyer, I assume. It's not JM's first rodeo with that, so it's a no-go. 

 

[CrazyInAlabama]

34 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:

I was puzzled at that. If he's such a good boy, never in trouble, and just an innocent bystander in this violent crime, and didn't understand what was happening, how did the cops have his photo? I'm pretty sure the cops around don't have my photo in a book. Maybe I missed something in this case. 

I read about two elderly people, one of them just last week, being dragged to their deaths by carjackers. Maybe time for seriously harsh penalties for this. Yeah, I know. Not going to happen. I don't understand this crime. It's always the same - jack a car, maybe/maybe not injure or kill the driver, then crash the car within minutes and get caught right away like the fools they are. The point of this is what? Double-digit idjits, I guess. 

The plaintiff attempts to pursue the chiropractor claim, after consulting a lawyer, I assume. It's not JM's first rodeo with that, so it's a no-go. 

 

Good catch about the photo.   I bet Mama Nathan's innocent son has a long rap sheet, and she thinks since he's a juvenile that it won't come out.    Then how the mother tried to hide that there was a second stolen car confirms her son is a career criminal.   

[AngelaHunter]

2 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Then how the mother tried to hide that there was a second stolen car confirms her son is a career criminal. 

She'll still be in denial when he's arrested for murder and will blame someone else. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

29 May-“Ripped Off by Your Sister” 9/23/2019, Season 23/Episode 11 Cases-Bothering A Brother - Fouling Up On Some Frames - Not Helping A Tenant (Case 1-Brother and sister cheating insurance company to get DUI p. coverage, but she was ripping him off too.  Case 2-Yes, eyeglass case, wanted Gucci frames for nothing, and over $4K in pain and suffering Case 3-Landlord illegally renting out a basement, and deadbeat tenant wants security back)

p. 138, https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/6835-the-peoples-court-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=5623749

 

30 May-“You Ruined My Car with This Horrible Paint Job” 9/24/2019, Season 23/Episode 12 Cases-Being Sloppy - Ticking Off a Tenant - Being A Gold Digger (Case 1-Bad paint job on classic car Case 2-10 year tenant wants security back, but no proof she ever paid security Case 3- Bro loaned d. bro his chain and never got it back, but can he prove what it was worth?)

p. 138, https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/6835-the-peoples-court-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=5626741

 

[AngelaHunter]

12 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

“Ripped Off by Your Sister

I keep getting cases I've never seen. Boe-nanza! Brother, who seems to be particularly slow-thinking, has no idea how much his insurance was, never test-drove the bike he had to have, and has at least one DUI, but still managed to find a woman who was so smitten with him that she wanted him to climb aboard and make a baby. It took three tries for him to be able to answer JM's simple question as to whether he'd ridden the bike before buying it. I hope the poor child didn't inherit his intellect.  Sister rips off dim-witted brother, and Mama - who can't keep her big mouth shut - loves him dearly, but agrees he's an asshole. Lovely family. 

12 hours ago, CrazyInAlabama said:

Case 2-Yes, eyeglass case, wanted Gucci frames for nothing

Silly little scammer, whose pain and suffering over not getting the designer frames she wanted was worth over $4,000. JM was nastier to the defendant than she was to the scammer. 

[CrazyInAlabama]

2 June-"Tenant Tantrum” Season 23/Episode 13, 9/25/2019. Cases-Tossing Out A Tenor - Staining a Deal - No Returns (Case 1-Opera singer booted after irritating other tenants with constant, loud practicing..  Case 2-Money owed for washer/dryer sale Case 3-Another failed hooptie sale.)

p. 139, https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/6835-the-peoples-court-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=5630131

3 June--“You Pocketed the Insurance Money and Didn’t Fix My Car” Season 23/Episode 14, 9/26/2019 Cases-Taking A Woman For A Ride - Not Giving It Back - Not Taking Responsibility (Case 1-Ridiculous car repair case Case 2-Tenant wants double security back. Case 3-Big dog attacks little dog, a case to skip). 

p. 139, https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/6835-the-peoples-court-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=5632212

4 June-”Taking Advantage of a Grandma” Season 23/Episode 15, 9/27/2019. Cases-Letting A Granny Down - Lousy Landlording - Quiet Down (Case 1-Grandma put grandson's girlfriend on her cell phone plan, no surprise it went down the drain.  Case 2-Rotten tenants want double security back Case 3-Tenants suing each other over constant noises). 

p. 139, https://forums.primetimer.com/topic/6835-the-peoples-court-general-discussion/?do=findComment&comment=5634853

 

Edited 15 hours ago by CrazyInAlabama