Assuming that Kandi is the only investor, she takes on all of the financial risk whereas Todd gets a 50% share of the profits. Thats a damn good deal if you can get it. Typically, the investor takes the financial risk and reaps the financial reward. Todd did risk earning money from another job while working on this project, but Kandi took on the same type of risk as she could have invested in another project that would have yielded the same return without splitting the profit 50/50.
For either of them to make anything, the project has to reach a breakeven point and that risk is soley Kandi's to bear. Based on Todd's staff questions, he knows nothing about producing a stage play, but he gets a 50% share....thats like being an employee of Facebook when they started.
I don't think the prenup is unfair when they share the profits of future ventures if 100% of the capital comes from Kandi. He said he did not want Kandi's money and she codified what he said he did not want. Since her capital is generating the projects, it seems that Todd is getting a really good deal. Without her, he would have to pay for capital to invest in these projects. What if the projects don't generate profit? Kandi's net worth takes a hit while Todd bears minimal risk.
I think her approach was dismissive, but that may be because of Todd being cavalier about the situation. They do things at the last minute, they spoke about the prenup off and on for at least six months and he said he did not want Kandi's money. He waited to get an attorney to look over things. It seems that he took things for granted. I can understand him being hurt, but he contributed to the confusion by not speaking up. Also, he may not understand the impact of the current financial arrangement where he does not take on as much financial risk as Kandi. His feelings are so hurt that he has to vacate her house 30 days after they break up that he completely missed that he gets 50% of profits earned by projects that she finances 100%.