CrazyInAlabama
-
Posts
16.1k -
Joined
Content Type
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Discussion
Posts posted by CrazyInAlabama
-
-
By the way, congratulations to Harley and Jon on their marriage.
I'm watching the new clip episode, (7 pm Central) with part new about moving the little shed or barn for the goats, with clips of season 1 animal scenes, and I love it. I hope the 7 pm Central episode keeps on the same theme. Before the new house episode (8 pm Central) "East Coast Farmhouse West Coast Vibes". (If anyone wants to see the previous week's episode, it's on at 6 pm Central). So, on the 7 pm Central sort of rerun, combines animal clips from past shows, with Jon moving and setting up an old shed or small barn for a goat pen, and playspace. I guess this is the new season with a little of older clips.
Jon is so color blind, he can't tell colors at all, and Kristina tells that his color choices have been rather strange. His mother's house is purple, he painted it, and she doesn't like it. Poor guy can't tell the difference between red and green.
He talks about the dog house he built for Mrs. Marino from last season, and it's all new footage. Only a few scenes are from a past show.
The goat pen turned out so well. I love getting to know the back story of Jon, his project manager, and contractor. The goat house or "New Kids at the Barn" turned out so well. Harley's outdoor play space for the three goats is adorable.
East Coast Farmhouse, West Coast Vibes, Season 2, episode 3 (I think the season 1 clip show last week was Season 2, episode 2). He talks to Lindsay and Leslie from Unsellable Houses, he judged their kitchen on Rock the Block, and called the counter tops basic. The house this week is a farmhouse reproduction from the 1970's. The house is a mess on the outside. The interior is 1970's old and outdated. I'm questioning the quality of the original build. The original house is now down to the studs. There was nothing worth saving inside in my opinion, and I really wonder how structurally safe the house was when it was originally built.
The segment about the rescue for farm animals was so adorable. Also, the cameraman worried about Jon in the pen with the Emu. His rabbit habitat for the homeowners was adorable.
The before on the 70's house was hideous, and the after is adorable.
-
1
-
-
On 8/29/2022 at 11:16 AM, deirdra said:On 7/26/2022 at 8:44 AM, DonnaMae said:
What about that enormous "cottage" they built on the lake in Canada? They sure went overboard with that, considering it was just going to be a vacation home.
They sold that one too, I don't remember the price but they made a healthy profit on it, and also all of the TV income for it. It think they just build spec houses, and live in them until they want to move on, or the market is right
Or else they pitch the next show, and sell the ones they already built and are tired of. It's like the one season show they had about new builds, and two huge remodels that were just for resale, and they were built to sell. They also had partners on one, and sold their part out before the end, claiming no one could cooperate on anything.
I'm over the resort episodes, and the Florida episodes, and the constant talk about they're risking everything, because you know they aren't.
-
1
-
-
14 hours ago, Suzysite said:
Maybe this has been answered before, but whatever happened to Mina's half-sister Kelsey? She used to be shown occasionally working in the office.
She worked there for three years, and since left to be a senior project manager at Studio Science. She also married her boyfriend, who bought the house with her that was shown on the show.
https://www.thelist.com/728967/the-truth-about-mina-starsiak-hawks-sister-kelsy-spaeth/
Tad does call Karen mom, because after his mom died he went to live with her. Trying to figure out the who is related to who, is rather confusing. The articles are so inaccurate.
-
2
-
-
4 p.m. episodes-
First (2014)-
Child Support Sleuth -Plaintiff Destinee Edwards suing defendant Steven Oaks over property he took with him when he moved out. Plaintiff kept a bunch of defendant’s property, and wants property she claims defendant stole from her when he moved out. Defendant took the bedroom set (left the mattress), dining set, washer/dryer, TV, couch, loveseat, and other furniture, but left the baby’s crib. They had a joint bank account.
Defendant admits he took more than half of the furniture, but he claims he sold the stuff he took on craigslist. JJ doesn’t believe defendant sold everything he took with him.
JJ gets plaintiff’s social security number, and employer for the child support proceedings.
Defendant lives with his uncle, plaintiff’s witness is defendant’s aunt, married to the uncle. Aunt throw’s defendant under Officer Byrd’s bus, and says a bunch of stuff was moved into the uncle’s shed, but it’s gone now.
Foolish plaintiff also paid the down payment on defendant’s 2013 Chevy Cruz.
Plaintiff gets $1500 for the stuff defendant took, and sold on craigslist.
Maltipoo Attack! -Plaintiff Toni Carranza suing for damages from defendant/dog owner Mara Foley’s Maltipoo attacking her. Plot twist, defendant brought a black dog to court, and claims that’s the dog that barely touched plaintiff. Plaintiff says it was a white dog that bit her.
Plaintiff says defendant claimed her dogs had their shots. Defendant claims it’s plaintiff’s fault that her dog will be put down after another bite, and says plaintiff put her family through emotional distress.
Plaintiff still has a scar. Three weeks later the puncture wound still hurt. Defendant refused to keep in contact with the plaintiff, or respond. The defendant claims the plaintiff was trespassing on defendant’s property, attacked the dogs, and got bitten.
The attacking animal was just recently adopted, so I’m wondering about a previous attack record? Plaintiff made an animal control report, and biting dog was quarantined.
$1500 to plaintiff.
Second (2014)-
Expert Car Crasher -Plaintiff/car owner Terrea Hardin suing defendant/ex-boyfriend Alan Younger for damages to plaintiff’s car when he allowed another woman to drive it. Defendant is accused of crashing three of plaintiff’s cars.
They were together for three years, and defendant totaled plaintiff’s Lexus, second car was a Chevy Impala, also totaled. Third car was also totaled, it was a Jeep. Defendant driving to get food for plaintiff’s six-year-old, at 11:30 p.m. So, defendant left in plaintiff’s car, to go to McDonald’s, and defendant saw a friend, and picked her up from her house. Plaintiff was asleep, and defendant left a 10-year-old and 6-year-old alone, to go to Mickey D’s. When defendant went to THOT’s house, he claims girlfriend was going to buy it, so he let her drive the car, and she totaled it.
In the police report it says defendant’s friend was driving it, and now he tries to tell JJ he was driving the car. However, defendant’s police statement says girlfriend was driving the car.
Plaintiff and defendant broke up after this. Defendant says he did a lot of Dad Work at the house, and put gas in the car, so that’s just like he owned the Jeep.
Plaintiff gets $4500.
Wedding Rush -Plaintiff/former roommate Chelsea Roberts suing defendant /former roommate Sylvia Jackson, for not repaying a loan to go to defendant sister’s last-minute wedding, car damages, and unpaid rent. The two women were on the lease, with a third roommate, plaintiff and her witness still live in the apartment, defendant moved out early. Defendant owes two month’s rent, $650 each month, and $325 for January and February (so she could vacation in January, and two friends of plaintiff lived in the fourth bedroom). $1950 unpaid rent, total. The loan wasn't a lump sum, so that's dismissed. Defendant was saving up for a vacation, so she shorted the rent.
Plaintiff had friends coming to visit, and defendant offered to be the designated driver, in plaintiff's car. Defendant went driving the manual shift car, drove around to practice, then defendant rammed the parking stop at the apartment, and the oil pan was ripped off.
Sorry JJ, but in my opinion, defendant drove the manual shift for 30 minutes before this happened, she knew how to drive it. I bet defendant mixed up the brake and the gas.
Sister's wedding loan was $98.00 to defendant. Defendant blames the wedding trip on the plaintiff.
Plaintiff receives $1950 for unpaid rent, plus $98, for a total of $2017 with the wedding loan.
5 p.m. episodes-
First (2017)-
Suicide, Sadness, and Life Insurance? - Plaintiff Neva Miller suing her late grandson's former fiance Shelby Morrison for the cost of her grandson's headstone. Grandmother is suing because she wants some hideously expensive, elaborate headstone. The grandmother didn't even see grandson very often. Grandmother took out insurance policies on all of her grandsons, and grandmother paid the premium, with herself as beneficiary. Then grandson became engaged to the defendant, and the grandmother made the defendant the beneficiary.
Grandson died, policy paid $10,000 in the first payment, and two years later there will be $5,000 more. However, fiance received $10,000, and paid for the funeral for $6300. Defendant says the second payment won't be applied for, because there’s too much upset over it. Grandmother wanted defendant to pay for some extra headstone to make grandmother happy.
Grandmother claims she told the defendant that defendant would pay for the funeral, and headstone that grandmother wanted, out of the funeral payout defendant received. Grandmother says the headstone was paid for by a family friend, and misspelled the last name of the deceased. Defendant submits pictures of the original, and the corrected one (Siebenmorgen is the last name, I've never seen that last name before). There is a headstone on the grave now. Grandmother is whining because headstone was gifted by someone. Maybe no one told the Grandmother you don't put the headstone down until the ground settles. Plaintiff denies the tombstone was corrected, but she only went to the cemetery once after the funeral.
The headstone was corrected but and grandmother still wants another one. Grandmother denies the headstone is corrected. Grandmother still wants the headstone corrected, but the mistake was fixed, the full name is one there, but grandmother wants all kinds of additional stuff on there.
Defendant in hall-terview says she's had death threats, all kinds of nasty remarks from the grandmother, and some of her relatives. I hope the defendant is doing better since this case aired.
Case dismissed. Case is pointless.
Move to Ohio Fail! -Plaintiff Sydney Woods suing former boyfriend Sean Smith over move expenses, truck fees, and lease breaking fees for a move to Ohio from North Carolina. The litigants have a baby, and both had good jobs in NC, but moved to Ohio for a better job for defendant, and he had move fees paid to him by the employer ($5,000). Then everything went boom, and they split up. Move costs were $550, but plaintiff claims defendant paid none of it. Plaintiff paid the $300 security deposit, and $250 for the U-Haul.
Plaintiff was only in Ohio for six weeks. With the $5,000 move bonus ($3,000 after taxes), defendant paid first month, security fee, and other costs. They moved in 1 November, officially, and when December came around no one paid the rent. Defendant paid the truck payment, bought a washer and dryer, paid the utility deposits, and paid off another bill he had.
Plaintiff also wanted her own car, and they argued about that. This was so they didn't have to share one car. However, defendant says plaintiff doesn't have a driver's license. Plaintiff says defendant told her to leave, and she arranged with a family friend to take her back to NC. After plaintiff left, defendant moved out because he couldn't afford the townhouse on his salary alone. That leads to the issue over the lease breaking fee.
As JJ says, the lease breaking fee will be garnished from both litigants' wages.
$550 moving fees to plaintiff, and that's it.
Second (2017)- In my opinion this is one of the most bizarre cases ever on this show.
Dial 911 for Murder?!-Plaintiff Ashely Jensen suing defendant / former landlord Eula Compton for unlawful eviction, harassment, one month's rent returned. One time, landlord called police, and said tenant had been murdered. When police came to check, tenant was fine, and landlady was smelling strongly of alcohol. Plaintiff moved in July, and in September landlord claimed plaintiff stole a laptop (iMac) that came in the mail. In November, plaintiff was accused of stealing some Halloween decorations. Landlord says she never asked the tenant about thefts. On December 7 plaintiff's boyfriend stayed overnight. On December 7 they had a minor verbal spat, over Mr. Grady (boyfriend) watching too much porn on his phone. David Ridenhauer, defendant's boyfriend adds nothing to the case.
On December 8, at 7 p.m. defendant called the police, and said tenant was murdered (plaintiff's witness is a Sheriff's Deputy), however, police records say defendant called police about 9:30 a.m., and first officer came at 10 a.m., and witness came second at 1 p.m. Police report says plaintiff hadn't paid her rent for that month, hadn't been seen in weeks, and her boyfriend had killed her, and defendant said there was a lot of blood in the apartment, and a dead body. Police found defendant drunk at the 1 p.m. visit, and the plaintiff was fine, and at work.
Plaintiff moved out after the police visits, and wants her rent back. because of harassment from the landlord. Landlord denies drinking in the morning, which is obviously a lie. Plaintiff submits notes from defendant, after giving her a 30-day notice, and rented to another person that already wanted to move into plaintiff's apartment. Defendant also claims plaintiff's boyfriend broke a chair in the hall, which he denies. Plaintiff didn't get $25 check fee from security deposit.
Plaintiff receives the $30 from security back, and the last month's rent. $425, plus $1450 including $1000 for harassment.
Unfit for Children?! -Plaintiff Erica Prater suing defendant Miranda Grasper for four month’s rent, and property that was destroyed ($3,000). Plaintiff and child or children, moved back in with her mother. Plaintiff left the townhouse, but still paid defendant four month’s rent, but defendant wasn't paying the rent. Defendant was evicted for non-payment of rent. Defendant moved back in with her mother too.
Plaintiff left furniture behind, instead of getting a storage unit. But when defendant was evicted, the furniture disappeared.
Case dismissed for lack of proof, and credibility.
-
2
-
-
I looked on Reddit, and commenters said as long as you have proof of U.S. residency, that you are OK to pass through Canada for a 2 hour layover. However, others said he would need a transit visa. Where did they purchase tickets that didn't mention that?
So either they booked the flight themselves, or they didn't read all of the requirements to transit through Canada. If the plane was only refueling a visa wouldn't be required, but I guess a 2-hour layover, or changing planes would.
I thought about it, and I doubt it was an accident, and I bet Zied did it deliberately.
Even though he has a green card, isn't there a limit on how long he can stay out of the country before he loses status to keep the residency? I seem to recall someone talking about that before, and saying after a year he's toast.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Out of the three Compton properties, she bought the best one for her.
The third one, the townhouse was nice, but the just under $500 a month HOA was horrible, plus the stucco being repainted is a temporary fix. I really bet that there will be major special assessments in the furture to restucco that.
I hated the second one. The first one was the best, and if she wants to, she can eventually extend a bedroom, and add another bathroom for a main suite, and ensuite. The ADU could be fixed up fairly easily, and rented out too, or eventually the mother could move in.
-
4
-
-
Even worse, the design area for MJ was half District Co. storage, and so he was bounced to the area on the second floor, and his sample and design room on the second floor looked tiny, but Mina claimed it was a better space with more light. So, for design meetings he'll still have to haul everything up and down stairs.
Also, any storage on the second floor means that everything will have to be dragged up and down stairs. They needed something like some of the closed businesses on the same block, do a minimal remodel, and just take things in and out of the back door, no stairs. There are plenty of empty businesses on the same block that would work much better for storage. I know the front had several steps to the main door, but maybe the back door entrance didn't?
The huge co-working space confused me, what is the real purpose? It had a huge dining table, sitting area, bar stools at the huge kitchen island, plus a bunch of tables for two. That wasn't co-working space, it was something else. It looked more like an event space.
They needed a real plan by a real design professional. My guess is that soon we'll hear how the business has grown, so they have to put another storage building next door to the warehouse / office HQ building.
-
4
-
-
"Bickering With your Neighbor" Rerun, case 1 is scary, that the cornices could have fallen and killed someone on the sidewalk. Case 3-Stupid decision. Another case where the plaintiff gets screwed over by JM
Case 1-Plaintiff says his neighbor did some construction work, including on the cornice, 2 stories high, for $1,635. The edge stair step brick cornice was 2 stories high, and bricks were coming off. Plaintiff says this home is a rental property, and when neighbor/defendant tore down and rebuilt his side of the house, some work wasn't up to snuff. Construction went on for 12 to 18 months. The cornice looks like a stair step but from the underneath, so a loose brick is very dangerous.
Defendant says it was a duplex conversion, adding a third story to the two story home, The pictures of the two houses, look like row houses, with plaintiff's rental property is two stories. Plaintiff told defendant about the issue, defendant says it was plaintiff's to pay for and fix. Plaintiff called a roofer, and had the cornice taken down, and defendant still refuses to fix it. Defendant also claims the plaintiff's row house is falling down, and everything is plaintiff's problem to fix. Plaintiff says it's a common wall, so a mutual problem to fix.
Plaintiff asked his insurance company for their view of the issue, and insurance company said it was poor construction by defendant's workers.
Defendant claims that in the 1970's the grandfathers had an issues with construction of the two row houses, but only his grandfather fixed it correctly. He blames the cornice issue on the old construction. However, the cornice on the other side of the plaintiff's row house is fine, and the cornice where defendant's construction workers cut defendant's house loose from planitiff's house.
The issue was caused entirely by defendant's construction workers.
$1635 to plaintiff.
After the verdict, the question is when Judge John was presiding over a 14-year-old's stabbing by his best friend, and it was on a true crime show, if he has issues separating the case from his own life. (Defendant was Michael Hernandez, and he was 26 by the time the sentence was decided for the second time). Judge John also added 30 years for Hernandez's assault on another student, the other student survived. The 14 year-old was convicted, and sentenced to life in prison, appealed and received the same sentence. In May 2021, Michael Hernandez died in prison. Both judges say they've had problems with separating themselves from horrible cases.
Case 2-Plaintiff lived in defendant's house for two years, and she says it was hell. Hell is appropriate, because the wall decoration behind plaintiff's head looks like devil's horns. Plaintiff wants her security back, because all of the rug and other water damages were from other tenants flooding her apartment.
Defendant /landlady says there was only one minor issue from the upstairs tenant's kid flushing toys, that happened two or three times, it was fixed and there were no other leaks. Landlady says plaintiff damaged other tenant's cars, and stole checks. Defendant claims the rug was soaked by plaintiff's dog, floors were warped the same way, and she's not returning a penny to plaintiff.
Landlady says walls were full of holes, and damages. Everything was filthy, and apartment was trashed. Plaintiff moved out a few days late, and still claims she didn't have time to clean. Plaintiff had six months notice that her lease wasn't going to be renewed. No move in pictures by landlady, just move out pictures. Plaintiff blames everything on water leaks, including big holes in walls, and a full wall in the bathroom with the drywall surface peeled off. Landlady says water never leaked into son's bedroom, but there certainly are holes and door damages.
Water leak on ceiling looks bad, but is that the same apartment? JM is already saying the $1300 security isn't going to be the landlady's to keep.
Plaintiff gets half of the security back, $650. (Why don't all landlords take move in and move out pictures?)
Case 3-Plaintiff says defendant blew a stop sign, and hit hiscar, and he wants $1468. Defendants say plaintiff keeps changing the story, and after he hit her 14-year-old son, he was mean to him. So, defendant son blew the stop sign, caused the accident, and defendant mother wants $500 for her son's medical bills. Plaintiff says he was going slowly, was hit by defendant on the electric scooter. Plaintiff says he told defendant son to stay still, called an ambulance for him, thought he was clearly concussed. Defendant son and mother claim it wasn't an electric scooter, but a regular one.
Defendant son's ridiculous story is he was going downhill on the electric scooter, the brakes failed, and it wasn't his fault. Plaintiff tried to find a cheaper body shop, but couldn't. However, defendant says it was a regular scooter, not electric.
Plaintiff gets $1468, but from the minor son, so plaintiff will receive nothing. Defendant gets nothing. As JM says, defendant son is lucky he survived.
-
3
-
-
4 p.m. episodes-
First (2014)-
Father Protects Drunk Daughter? – Plaintiff /father Ron Pendley suing defendants daughter Rachel Penley and boyfriend Stephen Latting for unpaid damages, rent, and over an assault. Plaintiff claims daughter was assaulted, and choked by boyfriend. Defendants have a 2-year-old, and a 1-year-old together, during the drinking and argument, grandchildren were with Stephen’s parents. This all happened on boyfriend’s birthday, they were both drinking a lot, and Rachel was drunk. Then, plaintiff father claims defendant boyfriend assaulted the daughter, but boyfriend claims Rachel was very drunk, fell, and he was picking her up, not assaulting her.
Rachel claims she was so drunk that she doesn’t remember the fight, just the father interceding.
Plaintiff put up the security, utility deposits, and other expenses for the rental house defendants live in.
Assault is downplayed by defendant Latting, and plaintiff claims it was a violent assault. Defendant Latting admits to shoving plaintiff, and putting him in a headlock or choke hold. Photos of plaintiff after the assault are awful.
Plaintiff receives $1,000 security deposit, $2500 for the assault, so $3500.
Car-Kicking Tantrum -Plaintiff/driver Scott Mason, and (wife and also on car title) Mary Mason suing defendant Briana Gomez for a fender bender. Plaintiff was driving, parked at a parking garage, defendant was driving a rental car, and defendant didn't take a damage waiver. Defendant claims she was terrified of plaintiff, and plaintiff's little son was there too.
Defendant was backing into the parking space next to plaintiff's car, and when plaintiff returned to his car there were two notes, one from Santa Monica Police department. Plaintiff was cited for parking by backing into the parking space. Defendant also backed into her space, then a passersby told her not to back into the space, or she would get a ticket, so reversed, and parked front way in. Defendant is counter suing saying plaintiff threw a tantrum, and kicked her car.
Defendant says plaintiff started screaming filth at her, in front of another police officer. Defendant only had her Maryland car insurance, so that didn’t cover her in California. Defendant didn’t get the damage waiver for the rent. Plaintiff did receive a ticket for backing into the space, not parking front into the space, which is required.
Defendant claims she didn’t hit the plaintiff’s car, and was terrified for her life, scared of the plaintiff’s tantrum when she returned to the parking lot, and this was all right in front of a Santa Monica police officer. If defendant is so innocent and didn’t hit the plaintiff’s car, then how did the police officer, and plaintiff know she was driving a rental, had no damage waiver insurance, no valid insurance in California, and hit the plaintiff's car? Defendant claims that in front of a police officer, that plaintiff kept calling her the b-word,
Plaintiff receives $1,096. Defendant’s ridiculous claim dismissed.
Second (2014)-
ATV Hit and Run -Plaintiff/home owner Michael Kellem suing defendant/father Donald Reed of two delinquent children for the children hitting plaintiff’s house, garage, and car with their ATV, and took off like little cowards. There were two little boys on the offroad size ATV, and two other kids on a red Barbie car that stayed in the street. The day in question the kids were alone on the ATV, and the others in the Barbie car. Plaintiff was looking out his picture window, kids missed the cul-de-sac turn, slammed into the house right below the window plaintiff saw the event through. Plaintiff was worried about the children being injured. After the children ran the ATV into the house/garage/car, plaintiff saw the father sneaking up to the ATV, and telling the kids that they’re getting away now before they get caught. Defendant dropped his jumper cables in plaintiff’s driveway, and plaintiff brought them to court to give to the defendant. Plaintiff said he saw the defendant’s kids ram his garage door, which damaged the garage door, and the car inside the garage. Then, plaintiff and a neighbor saw the defendant load the ATV into a F-150, and take the ATV away. Garage door is a total loss.
Plaintiff witness Loyce, didn’t know the plaintiff before this, she saw the ATV hit, saw the entire get away with defendant and his kids.
Defendant lies to JJ, and says his kids weren’t home that day, and didn’t do it, he has three boys, ages 7, 6, and 5. Defendant claims the plaintiff is a racist, his kids weren’t home that day, and everyone is out to get him.
$1250 to plaintiff for garage door, and car damages. (I really wish we had a video of this, it would have been so entertaining).
Sugar in the Gas Tank Threat - Plaintiff Tameka Turner, is suing defendant /cousin Aliciea Davis, for repossessing her car. Defendant let her sister-in-law drive her car, no license, and car was impounded. Plaintiff would get car out of impound , and plaintiff would drive the car until defendant paid the impound fees off, but never did.
Defendant took her car back, without paying the impound fees. Defendant says plaintiff sugared her gas tank that night. Plaintiff says car was impounded, and repo'd at the same time, because plaintiff says defendant was behind on car payments. Impound fees, and two payments equaled $1198.
Defendant says because she argued with plaintiff the night before, that plaintiff put the sugar in the gas tank. Defendant's witness is such a liar, and was the accomplice to stealing the car back.
$1198 to plaintiff. For the impound and car payments.
5 p.m. episodes-
First (2017)-
Daisy Duke Spin Out! -Plaintiff Brett Dejong suing his ex-girlfriend Trena Roberts over the damages to his truck, and punitive charges for false charges. Plaintiff painted the defendant's car (while they were still a couple), and he wants $700 for the paint job. Before the car was painted, the two were still in a relationship, and she says he painted the car because he threw rocks at her front and rear window, and chipped the paint with rocks. However, the plaintiff says he threw the rocks, because when she leaves his gravel driveway she hauls out like Daisy Duke, on the Dukes of Hazzard. Defendant filed a domestic battery complaint against plaintiff, which became a protective order. The rock throwing happened months before the repainting. So if she was so afraid of him, why would she want him to paint her truck?
Plaintiff says she sprayed him with gravel from the driveway, and he threw the rocks, and admits he broke her back window. Also, plaintiff says she assaulted him, not the other way around. Plaintiff posted ten flyers around the neighborhood saying defendant is a felon, with her picture. Plaintiff claims the nasty text messages were actually spoofed by the defendant. Plaintiff claims he gave the car buffer back to defendant.
There was an outstanding warrant, so the police arrested the man, right as he finished the paint job.
The stupid cases by both litigants are dismissed, because they're ridiculous.
Vacation Nightmare-Plaintiff Pamela Palitz suing vacation landlords Jack and Michelle Dockery for appliance repairs, the cost of groceries, and lack of peaceful enjoyment of premises. Property is in Ocean City, NJ, and is a vacation rental. Plaintiff says she paid to fix the refrigerator in the rental.
Plaintiff rented for a week, for nine people to stay in the vacation rental. Also, the defendants only own the bottom floor of the duplex, and plaintiff is complaining that the upstairs unit was being remodeled, and ruined her peaceful enjoyment for the week. Plaintiff didn't tell the defendants about the 7 a.m. construction start for the upstairs unit, so how were they supposed to talk to the upstairs owners to please start later in the morning?
Peaceful enjoyment is dismissed, because the upstairs unit construction wasn't known to the defendants, and they had no knowledge it was going on, or control over it (upstairs unit is owned by another family, and they were remodeling it).
Plaintiff says when she went to the unit, she put everything in the fridge, and by the next morning her food was spoiled. Plaintiff called a refrigerator repairman, he said it would come to fix fridge for $416, cash only. Fridge repair was $482 total. Defendant husband finally texted back, and said pay for the repair, and we'll reimburse you.
Also, there was supposed to be another fold out bed (I think it was one of the foldout chair type), and it was missing, so defendant husband told woman to get an air mattress, and he would reimburse her for that. (Do the defendants ever talk to each other?).
$482 for the fridge repair, and groceries. Don't know why JJ didn't give the woman money for the air mattress, unless plaintiff took it with her.
Second (2017)-
Introducing...the Attacking Chiweenie!-Plaintiffs Bridget Mack suing defendants Michelle and Frank (Francisco) Herrera over their Chiweenie (Chihuahua/Dachshund mix) chasing their child, and biting him. This is immortalized on video. However, why was plaintiff's kid in the defendant's yard, and why isn't the yard fenced? Unless the mobile home park doesn't allow fences? Defendant has one Chiweenie, a mutt, and two Chihuahuas. Plaintiff mom's left arm tattoo is blurred.
Plaintiff kid Malick comes to the witness chair of Justice, to tell JJ about the attack, but he doesn't remember the attack.
Defendant's son Skyler Herrera, is testifying, and says he was out with one Chiweenie, and the mutt (he keeps looking to Mom to be coached). Defendant says he was walking the two dogs in the back yard, and the Chiweenie escaped. Video shows three dogs chasing Malick, and chasing him home, and him running, and trying to climb the trash cans by his own porch, then out of camera range a dog bites him, and the kid escapes and runs home.
Defendant also says the plaintiff kid was teasing her dogs, in her yard, and that's why the dog bit him. Defendant mother is such a liar.
Medical bills are submitted by plaintiff. Plaintiff had no health insurance. $821 are the medical bills, and defendant said he would pay the bills, and then refused. Defendant says she never saw the video before, and she's disgusting. I hope the mobile park evicts the defendants.
Plaintiff says defendants never said anything about her son teasing the dogs every day, so maybe if they were so worried about the dogs being teased defendants would have complained to plaintiff. Plaintiff also says her son doesn't go into defendant's yard or around the dogs any more.
Plaintiff receives $821 for the medical bills.
Expensive Hobby, Supportive Wife-Plaintiff Gerrud Greaux suing mechanic John Gonzalez for the money he paid to repair an old VW bus, $6,000. This is his hobby, but it's his money (JJ was saying his wife must be very supportive of his hobby, I bet he makes a bundle on redoing, and flipping vintage vehicles). Plaintiff buys antique VWs, restores them, and sells them.
Plaintiff gave $6,000 to defendant to restore the VW Bus, after seeing the work the plaintiff did (The total bill to restore the outside, sand blast and repaint and other work was supposed to add up to $11,000). Defendant lost his shop, and the VW bus disappeared. VW was sent to sand blaster shop, and defendant claims he told the plaintiff where to pick it up, but he's lying. Defendant's phone was stolen, so he has no proof of anything.
Then the van disappeared, and plaintiff sent out an alert on Facebook, looking for the van, and it had been sold by the sand blaster, because they didn't know who owned it, for $3500. Someone told him who bought the van, and plaintiff had to buy it back for $3500.
Plaintiff receives $5,000 (still short 4500).
-
3
-
-
Rerun, and was on recently, "Customer Crisis"
Case 1-Plaintiff bought Sea Moss (the dried mossy stuff in a ziploc bag, not the stuff in a jar that was on Shark Tank last Friday) and when it finally arrived, after a complaint to Pay Pal about non-delivery, it looked nastier than a competitor product.
Defendant has the Covid/hospital excuse, but I agree with plaintiff, it doesn't look like Sea Moss. Plaintiff claims what he sent her is old, and expired. This lawsuit is over $30 worth of product.
Plaintiff gets her refund.
Case 2-Plaintiff had her applications for a liquor license for her bar denied twice, and hired the defendant to do her application, for $2140. Defendant says plaintiff lied about her past, and that's why her applications were rejected, and for the third time when defendant did her application for her. Turns out plaintiff lied about her criminal record, and her spouse's criminal records on the question about convictions for misdemeanors or felonys, and both have convictions.
Rejection has reasons for first two denials, no employment history, no proof of notification to city, and no proof of financing. Defendant charged her $1100, plaintiff claims she paid defendant $1300 cash, but no receipt.
Plaintiff's spouse actually has a felony, but that was made a lesser charge somehow.
Plaintiff is a total liar, and I don't think that's the defendant's fault.
Plaintiff gets $1100, $240, and $150, adding up to $1490. (I wouldn't have paid this plaintiff a penny)
Case 3-Plaintiff says she loaned her ex money, and he won't pay her back. $455 to plaintiff
-
1
-
3
-
-
I'm guessing Flip to a Million was a one season show, never to return. I had to rewind to see the profit differences, and figure out who won. I like that EJ and Jason from Chicago are staying in Dallas and flipping houses there from now on. Permits and everything else are much easier in Dallas, than in Chicago.
I think both couples did very well, one couple made over $300k profits in 6 months, and the other couple made over $400k, and both sold their final houses for $1 million, or more.
-
21 hours ago, Frozendiva said:
Anny has new highlights.
Kalani - Jenny - is going to break her frickin' hip.
Jenny think's Sumit's parents will come to take him away? They'll drag him to their house?
Interesting that the Pillow Talkers have no idea who is on this season. Wonder if this is real or scripted.
My guess is the PT comments are done from tiny clips, or the producers just say what happened, and tell them who is the good person, and who is the villain this week.
-
2 hours ago, Cloud9Shopper said:
I feel like the show may have started a slight decline even before Mark died, especially since S8 brought us Secrets and Lies and the Third Watch crossover, with the return of Chloe that nobody asked for.
Not only was the Chloe / Third Watch crossover pointless, but it simply ended without resolution. Chloe and daughter just disappeared, and that was it. Awful.
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, poeticlicensed said:
I watched the Mary Kay Letourneau show. I remember when it happened but there were a few things I wasn't aware of. It was pretty disgusting to hear some of her friends, former friends and even attorneys involved describe it as a crime AND a love story.Love story? Seriously? The woman was a pedophile and she groomed that child. It wasn't a love story except in her twisted mind. It was child sexual abuse. Just because they got married doesn't erase what she did. My God if the genders had been reversed and a male teacher of 34 had groomed and had sex witha 13 year old, gotten her pregnant twice and then she ended up marrying her abuser, the villagers would have had pitchforks in their hands. The only people they interviewed who gave her no pity were the two psychologists who tried to work with her. Both said she was a pedophile.
Entertainment Tonight paid the couple a ton of money for the exclusive television rights to air their wedding. That disgusted me so much I've never watched the show since then. It was reported to be $500,000, but E.T. spokesmen say it's much less.
-
4
-
1
-
-
19 hours ago, MrBuhBye said:
I’m confused. Jenny and Sumit are broke but they can afford to rent both a house they don’t live in and an apartment. And Sumit said they had to rent the apartment to be far away from his parents but isn’t the house already across town from his parents? And his parents knew they were living together so how would seeing them at the house expose that they were married? Couldn’t they just take their rings off when the parents came over?
Why was the house so filthy when no one was living there? Why does Jenny hold a broom with one hand?
In the previews Sweaty Jenny proposed moving to the US. Wasn’t it said repeatedly that her Social Security is too small for her to survive in the US but they could both live off it in India where the cost of living is lower?
I seriously doubt Jenny could sponsor Sumit, or whoever he claims to be this week. I don't think she has enough money, and unless her daughter and wife sponsor him, and finance their living costs, they couldn't come here. Also, someone from the visa section must watch this show, and have major heartburn about "Michael Jones" or some of his other Catfish personas coming here. I doubt he's skilled at anything but lying and cheating.
-
2
-
-
4 p.m. episodes-
First (2014)-
Vicious Assault, Broken Jaw -Plaintiff Cory Peer suing defendant Jonathan Attebury over a broken jaw inflicted by defendant at a bachelor party. Plaintiff claims everyone was drunk that night.
Defendant claims plaintiff shoved him twice, wouldn't leave him alone, and so he punched the plaintiff, breaking his jaw.
Case was delayed from two weeks ago, because there was an outstanding warrant in Tennessee against the defendant over this case, but defendant lives in Indiana. Plaintiff dropped the charges between two weeks ago, and court. Plaintiff claims the local D.A. wouldn't pay to extradite the defendant, and he can get money from JJ and Officer Byrd.
Defendant claims they didn't leave the plaintiff behind at the bar, and plaintiff was in the limo, crying and wanted to go home (That would cost $100 more, so they said no). Defendant’s defense is that plaintiff touched or shoved him twice, and he barely hit the plaintiff. (Defendant was previously arrested for aggravated DUI).
Plaintiff says defendant didn’t punch him, but put him in a headlock and broke his jaw in two places that way.
$5,000 to plaintiff for medical bills, and suffering.
Who Wrecked My Truck -Plaintiff/car owner Giavanni Giacalone suing defendant/driver Cheyenne Pratt, over a car wreck of a car driven by defendant, that was owned by plaintiff. Defendant claims his ex-girlfriend grabbed his steering wheel, and caused the accident. Defendant is the nephew of plaintiff's ex-girlfriend Jamaala Karim. Plaintiff didn't have collision insurance on car.
Plaintiff witness Jamaala Karim, was a passenger with defendant in plaintiff's car, and defendant's ex-girlfriend. She claims she told defendant to wait for another car, and defendant went anyway, causing the accident. Defendant claims his then ex-girlfriend grabbed the steering wheel, causing the accident.
Plaintiff was suing for $4,000, KBB is $1100.
$1100 to plaintiff for car
Second (2014)-
Baby Daddy Payback -Plaintiff/mother of child, Rachel and Barbara Fox, grandmother of child, suing defendant/father of child Robert “Price” Ricketts over a credit card bill. The litigants have a child together. Plaintiff won’t let defendant see the child anyway, and says that’s her right as mother of the child.
The three litigants were living together in the same house, and charges were on Barbara Fox’s credit card, while everyone was living together. There is no statement that defendant ever saw showing zero balance on card. The only time defendant had the physical possession of the credit card was when he spent $352 at the dentist for a broken tooth. Every other time, Rachel Fox had the physical possession of the credit card.
JJ rules that there was no contract for defendant to pay the bills, and separate 15 months of credit card statements to see who charged what at Burger King.
Plaintiff Rachel won’t let defendant see their child until he pays the credit card bill. JJ tells plaintiff Rachel to take defendant to court for child support, and that she’s not getting the credit card bill paid.
There is also a dispute over a car motor, so plaintiff bought the motor, and after defendant put the motor in the car, plaintiff wanted to return the motor. There is no contract between the litigants over the car motor.
Litigants never married, so there is no marital debt.
Plaintiff case dismissed.
Car Mileage Fraud? -Plaintiff/car buyer Brittany Jenkins suing defendant/car seller and mechanic, Justin McFalls over a car sale. Plaintiff says ‘as is’ car croaked a few days after purchase, and defendant says that he sold the car for a friend, Ryan. Plaintiff also says mileage was fraud, and car had a lot more miles on it than the odometer showed. Plaintiff says because of the mileage fraud she can’t even register the car. Advertised mileage was 92,000 miles, but plaintiff claims the mileage is many times the advertised mileage. Car is a 98 Honda Civic EX, the ad says 92k miles, for $2500.
Plaintiff says Carfax shows 311k mileage. I’m wondering if that is before an engine change? Since when is Carfax accurate?
Plaintiff gets her $2500 back, and defendant gets the car back if he picks it up in five days.
5 p.m. episodes-
First (2017)-
Take Your Anger Management Classes...or Else!-Plaintiff Crystal Benavidez bailed defendant /ex-boyfriend Richard Grieve for bail repayment, and her windshield. After his arrest for $2815, after his arrest for disorderly conduct (plea bargained down to that). Plaintiff felt sorry for him after his arrest after their fight. Since defendant never took the anger management class, and so plaintiff's bail money is forfeited. Defendant was seen banging on the car hood, and broke the windshield, and this is in the police report.
Plaintiff claims the defendant broke her windshield. Defendant admitted in police report that he grabbed the plaintiff by the shoulder and pulled her hair. Defendant didn't realize that not taking anger management (now said on national TV, in front of 10 million of us), that the judge can issue a bench warrant, and have him arrested. ( I need anger management, I want to take a big pair of pliers and rip that nose ring right out of his nose).
Another witness that was driving by, that neither litigant knows, says he saw the defendant yelling at the driver in the car, pulled her hair, and punched the victim several times in the car, with his fists three to four times. Defendant still says it's all a lie.
Bail is $2815, so plaintiff gets that.
Don't Let Friends Drive Your Car-Plaintiff LaTrae Sarden bought a car, lost his license (either before or after he bought the car, he's very unspecific), and his mother wanted the car gone, so he stored it on defendant's mother's property. Car was never titled by defendant. Defendant Jonathan Williams agreed to have car parked on his mother's property for a while, but defendant was driving the car, had an accident, and paid plaintiff $1300 for the car.
Defendant's mother got sick of car being there, after five or six months, so defendant sold the car for $300 to someone for parts, so he didn't need a title.
Plaintiff gets $300 for the parts.
Second (2017)-
Deployment, a Dead Dog, and a Crash? -Plaintiff Jesse Deleiko rented a car for defendant/ex-girlfriend, Jerrica Duncan because she couldn’t rent a car in her name (bad credit, and I bet, bad driving, plus she's 24, and you have to be 25 to rent a car), and he wants her to pay the lease breaking fee. Plaintiff claims defendant wanted to move in with him so she would pay the break lease fee, but plaintiff says defendant would pay the break lease fee. Defendant claims a miscarriage, that plaintiff's dog killed her dog, and then she moved out of the house right before court. Defendant brought a child into this disgusting excuse for a relationship.
Defendant is still married to her former/current husband, and tried to use the military deployment of her current husband to break the lease (it's legal, but not to lie about it, and the husband never lived in the apartment). So, plaintiff is a disgusting Jody (ask someone who is military about that. It's the guy (or girl) who's boinking your spouse while you're overseas fighting for your country). Rental car dismissed, because plaintiff didn't come to court with clean hands, by leasing the car for someone who couldn't qualify for the car rental. This all happened in St. Louis County, and a few weeks ago, defendant moved to Florida. Defendant owed $2,000 for the break lease fee on her previous apartment, and claims plaintiff would pay it. Plaintiff negotiated the $3700 break lease fee down to $3000, and he paid it. Defendant claims plaintiff broke into the son's toy room window, no police report.
$3,000 for plaintiff.
Good Samaritan or Social Security Thief?!-Plaintiff Cindy Wilde has known defendant Ronald Cupp from grade school and high school, and she's suing him for stealing her social security money. Plaintiff said man would hold her money for her, to avoid government limits on savings. She finally received two lump sums, $2668, $2668, and $1,300, totaling $6500+. Defendant has a letter stating he paid the attorney $500 to help with the process.
Plaintiff gave the defendant $2400 to hold for her, so she could keep her bank accounts below the limit for SS (coming to court with dirty hands for the plaintiff).
Woman was in a recovery center after surgery, then a shelter, then a rented room. Defendant paid an attorney $500 to fight the woman's eviction (eviction happened). Defendant bought a bed for the plaintiff, a computer tablet, a couple of burner phones.
There is a $2,000 CD that will be transferred to plaintiff. Defendant claims the $2400 was for the CD, and for the attorney. Defendant tried to take care of plaintiff, but I think he's also a crook. Defendant is an attorney too. So JJ will give plaintiff money for hiding money from the government to qualify for social security payments. (I'm confused, plaintiff says she's on state social security? Maybe some kind of disability on a state pension system? I never heard of that).
$2,000 to plaintiff from the CD.
-
2
-
-
On 8/28/2022 at 6:38 PM, Prevailing Wind said:
What's the deal with Yummy Cans? I've seen two different commercials featuring gizmos that don't look the same, yet they're both called Yummy Can (one makes baked potatoes & the other bacon, both in the microwave) and they're both quitting. "When they're gone, they're gone." One of 'em limits you to 3 and the other to 4 purchases. Two different products with the same name. I am SO freakin' confused. I think I'll go throw a potato in the nuke to see what happens.
I read some reviews on the Bacon version, more one star than anything else. One one star review said it took longer to clean the device than it took to cook the bacon in a pan, and then clean up. If I'm going to microwave bacon, I'll get the ready to cook microwave version, or completely cooked that only warms up in the microwave.
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
-
That homeowner was lucky the house didn't blow up from the gas leaks, and the bad electrical work.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Funny rerun, except for JM giving the Case 1 plaintiff money for phony damages to an already damaged gate. "Tangle with a Tow Truck"
Case 1-Plaintiff and defendant have had a business relationship for over 20 years, Plaintiff claims defendant wrecked his gate, and fence, all caught on video, when defendant towed his car. Defendant says he's towed uncountable numbers of plaintiff's vehicles over the 25 years.
Defendant owns Tire Empire, and plaintiff says he was notified that defendant was towing the car (it was a loaner), and the car had to be repo'd. Finaceing on care was through Florida United Auto Sales, and defendant's company repos cars for them. Plaintiff claims when his car was being towed, defendant's son and co-worker ruined his gate, and fence, and he wants the defendant to pay for the fence and gate repair. Defendant had a business relationship with the auto dealer, and he says plaintiff pays the car loan up to date about half of the time, as long as the car is still running, plaintiff pays up. I really wonder why the auto company keeps selling cars to the deadbeat plaintiff? Unless they make out very well on repo the car, and reselling?
Defendant says gate post wasn't actually attached, but just leaning on fence. On the video, the gate posts don't move at all, and the gate post looks identically bad before and after the car being towed away. The plaintiff is milking the incident for all it's worth, he gets $350, way too much, when you can see the gate and pole were already damaged.
(I figured out what's going on in the car case (the deadbeat defendant with the phony fence and gate claim). He buys cars from the car lot that defendant repo'd cars for, I bet the interest rate is into the double digits, with a steep down payment too. Then when the car breaks down, plaintiff stops paying for the car, and then defendant repos it. Then the car lot either sells the car at auction if it's not repairable, or repairs it and resells it, so they can get their money several times over for the same car with a few different buyers. I bet the lot buys at auction too, so the cars are super cheap to them, and then fools like plaintiff keep coming back over and over, and the car lot makes out very well)
Case 2-Plaintiff suing mechanic for using after market parts on her BMW, and she is suing $1040, and wants the defendant to fix the car again, with BMW parts. My view, if you don't take your car to BMW, then you won't get BMW parts. Plaintiff actually bought the car used from defendant's company, but their mechanic only works on the sale cars. So, when plaintiff wanted work done, it was done by an outside mechanic.
Plaintiff also didn't get an itemized receipt either. Seals and gaskets don't have a warranty, so she's out of luck too.
The only part of the repair did was to run and charge her credit card for the mobile mechanic (mobile mechanic doesn't take credit cards). Defendant's shop isn't certified to do the mechanic work for anyone outside of their own sale cars. Obviously, JM already decided that plaintiff will win.
THe mobile mechanic probably went out of business after this, a lot of places have, so I don't find it strange that the mobile mechanic is gone.
Plaintiff gets $1043. I hope the plaintiff enjoys her money, because I bet that engine will go boom before too long. If you want BMW parts, and a BMW mechanic go to BMW. Plaintiff in her after interview with Doug, says BMW would charge her three times what defendant does for labor, and she doesn't want to pay it.
(This morning's rerun was the woman who claims she put almost 200 items in for dry cleaning, and left them for two years. Then, when dry cleaner told her to pick them up or he would donate them, she didn't pick them up. Clothes were donated, and now plaintiff wanted $5k for her clothes. Plaintiff case dismissed, and dry cleaner received the dry cleaning fees.)
-
2
-
2
-
-
So, the office isn't finished (and the design there is horrible), the hangar is going quickly, but they can't finish enough of the house to move in?
Sara's finished office is hideous. It looks like the clearance section at a going-out-of-business decor and furniture store. Nothing goes together, nothing is cohesive, it looks awful.
So, Bryan couldn't find an RV closer than Canada? Just an excuse for a long road trip. I have two giant RV centers near where I live, and you can't tell me Florida doesn't have RV sales places everywhere.
Five people living in a giant RV, while remodeling their multi-million dollar home is not making me feel sympathy for any of them.
-
3
-
-
10 minutes ago, Grifter Lives said:
Bile talks about "the entire family" with the ex-wife is an integral part.
I wonder if he's really divorced from wife #2, and Shaeeda is actually a sister wife? Or he civilly divorced wife #2, and spiritually married her again, making Shaeeda and wife #2 sister wives. My understanding is wife #1 (not the poor woman married to Bilal for about an hour), is in charge of the household, and the next wives answer to her.
-
2
-
5
-
-
12 minutes ago, endure said:
who's Whitney?
Whitney Thore, from My Big Fat Fabulous (Fake and scripted) Life.
Remember when Mama and Papa Sumit moved in with Sumit and Jenny, and Mama Sumit stood over Jenny while Jenny swept and cleaned up the kitchen? It was epic.
-
1
-
1
-
3
-
-
If Libby sings on the show, I think I better replace my remote batteries, because the mute button will get a workout.
-
7
-
3
-
-
7 minutes ago, Auntie Anxiety said:
Is Novi still working fixing underwater gas lines or some such thing?
operating underwater drones or robots or something. I guess we'll know when he announces he has to take off for work for a month or two again. Isn't Yara a little young to have the top of her face totally immobile?
-
1
-
5
-
The People's Court - General Discussion
in The People's Court
· Edited by CrazyInAlabama
"Friendship Fireworks" Rerun.
Case 1-Plaintiff suing her old (now former) friend over a car she bought for defendant, and defendant's incarcerated boyfriend, car was in plaintiff's name, but got repossessed for non-payment. Plaintiff says defendant had car for a year, and tickets were in plaintiff's name too, and plaintiff says $1300 worth of tickets. Plaintiff doesn't care about her repo on her name.
Defendant's story is totally different, her boyfriend was only in jail for a little while, defendant needed extra money for boyfriend's fines and bond. So, plaintiff financed car, and defendant and boyfriend would sell the car, and put the money towards boyfriend's bail. Car was $3,000, so it was to rip off for the finance company. Defendant says the guy who was putting up the mail, would get the car instead of payment. Defendant says she never drove the car, or even rode in it once. Then plaintiff claims defendant drove car off of lot.
Now defendant claims ex-boyfriend gave plaintiff $1,000, to go to Miami, and have the fat sucked out of her stomach lard, and put in her butt, and ex went along, and paid for the rest on Care credit. I know this will be heart warming, but defendant's boyfriend beat the case for a potential 25 to life charge (it was a murder case). Why didn't plaintiff sue the boyfriend? Answer is because she's a crook, defendant and boyfriend are crooks.
JM dismisses plaintiff's case on the tickets. Defendant case dismissed, because it's stupid. (I'm not sure I got everything right in this bizarre case. I may have left out a character or two, but it's the worst case of unclean hands by both sides I've seen in a long time).
Case 2-Plaintiff rented apartment from defendant, building was sold, and plaintiff wants her $1,000 security deposit back. Defendant purchased under a program where she had to move into, and live in the building, so she evicted the plaintiff. The loan was a FHA loan, and for residential property, not investment. Plaintiff was given the choice of leaving in two months, but landlord is letting her have 30 days more, for $800. However, plaintiff did not move out on 1 October. Who is the defendant kidding about the loan requirements? They make you sign every part of the loan documents stating it's residential.
Another case like Case 1, where everyone is doing bad things. Plaintiff said she would move anywhere in NJ, but Camden (search city-data forum for "how dangerous is Camden NJ," it's an interesting read), or "what's the most dangerous U.S. city you've been to". Plaintiff threatened to stop paying rent, and because of the pandemic eviction moratorium defendant couldn't evict plaintiff for months.
Plaintiff was a jerk, defendant also was and knows nothing about landlord/tenant laws.
Plaintiff gets $2,000, double the security deposit, because defendant didn't follow the landlord/tenant rules about notifying tenant why they were keeping the security deposit.
My guess is landlords only come on here because they can get the award paid by the court, and keep the money the plaintiff is suing for.