Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

CrazyInAlabama

Member
  • Posts

    16.1k
  • Joined

Posts posted by CrazyInAlabama

  1. I'd like to know about the Pasadena three bungalow one too.   I bet that one is in similar condition to the Eagle Rock property, it will never be finished.  

    Eagle Rock-I suspect they didn't want an ADU, but mom and dad or whoever was financing it, would live upstairs, and the couple would be in the ADU with their future kids.    I don't think they ever had any intention of selling that property.  

    • LOL 1
  2. Today's 2018 rerun, (Thanks to Bazinga, the real title is Steaming Mad Over a Sideswipe" on Page 108). 

    Plaintiff says defendant sideswiped his car, and fled.    Plaintiff says it took two months for the adjuster to even look at his car.   Defendant says plaintiff has no license, registration or insurance, Plaintiff says his car was totaled, he wants $5k for damages on his totaled car, storage fees. etc.   

    Plaintiff was waiting for a specific parking space, was backing into it, and he claims that's when defendant sideswiped his entire car side.     Defendant says he was worried he hit the stopped police car.   It's so funny when the tiny model car for the accident recreation loses a tire.    Defendant says plaintiff was stopped in the middle of the street, and they only scrateched each other.  

    However, photo of driver's side of plaintiff's car is smashed.   However, defendant says the accident damages don't match up to plaintiff's car side, his bumper height is different.    I wonder if there were very minor damages, and plaintiff had another accident?   Then, when the two litigants met at Auto Zone, defendant was smashed in the head with a wooden object, and plaintiff was arrested. 

    Later defendant's gas tank was sugared, but no proof plaintiff did it.  

    Adjuster says car was totaled, and it was worth $2500.     Car was stored, and defendant couldn't pay it, so car was scrapped.    Also, receipt from storage facility doesn't look right to JM. 

    $2900 to plaintiff.   PLaintiff was still going to have to go to court for the assault.  

    Case 2-Plaintiff Brett who wanted a Goofy tattoo, girlfriend wanted a starfish tattoo, and a third one, the plaintiff and girlfriend paid for all three tattoos, but only received 2.   But the third tattoo couldn't be done, because plaintiff paid $150 to tattoo artist who was fired, and was an independent operator, and so defendant doesn't want to supply the tattoo free.   Queen City Tattoo is the shop.    The Goofy tattoo on plaintiff's wrist looks like good work. 

    However, tattoo shop claims that plaintiff was a no show for the appointment for the third tattoo, and shop policy says no refunds on missed appointments.   $150 back to plaintiff. 

    Case 3-Plaintiff is former tenant and wants her security back, and really wants $5,000 in damages.   Plaintiff was a Section 8 tenant, do they pay their own security deposit?   1 Year lease.   Either way, apartment sounds nice before tenant moved in, lots of granite, laminate floors, lots of tile.   

    However, plaintiff claims apartment was disgusting when she moved in, but as usual doesn't have photos.   Plaintiff claims landlord ratted the boyfriend out to Section 8 Housing office.  

    Defendant /landlord says Section 8 prohibts moving in tenants not on lease, so plaintiff moved her boyfriend in, also had lots of 'traffic' in and out of her apartment,  Defendant has move in/move out photos, and place looks very nice. 

    Plaintiff gets half of her deposit back, but certainly not the $5000 she sued for.   I hope her next landlord saw this case, and took the appropriate photos at move in, and kept a close head count on the number of tenants moving into their property.   

    • Like 1
    • Love 4
  3. No one saw the invasion by the in-laws though, so I'm wondering if it happened.   Actually, I believe nothing Sumit the catfish scammer says, after all he lied to Jenny and his parents a lot of times, lied to the first wife, and his former in-laws, to quote Judge Milian of The People's Court, " I wouldn't believe Sumit if his tongue was notarized".   

    Did Mama Sumit have some over the top acting lessons for this episode? 

    • Applause 1
    • LOL 2
    • Love 2
  4. On 9/11/2022 at 2:46 AM, Soapy Goddess said:

    I don't believe it's a matter of finding a lottery winner as it is for the lottery winner to come forward (applying to the show and wanting to be on TV).

    On the 100th episode the episode was an hour, and they gave a lot of behind the scenes information.    I think it was the New Jersey episode, with the retired police officers.   They were filming on the front lawn, and people kept honking and waving, and David says that happens a lot. 

    Also, they have a staff that have lists of lottery winners (some states let you stay anonymous) and contact information, so most people are contacted by the show.   The daughter of the Cape Cod woman, with two daughters, where they all worked at gas stations, and the mother later sold the house, and bought another on another episode, is one of the staff members.  At that time I think they contacted winners of various jackpots.   I imagine the other people who have settlements or windfalls apply.  

    Tonight's new one (16 Sept.), "Bangor Bucks"  Jessica, in Maine wins the lottery for $500k, but she already lives in her dream home.   She buys a ticket from the machine at the grocery store.  So, she decides to find a home for her daughter, Josie, and grandkids in Bangor, Maine.    Bangor has a casino also, and Stephen King's house is there, and David drives by. 

    Wish list is $250k, 3 bed,1-2 bath, prefers move in ready, and a nice deck.   Josie's fine with a project.  House is for her, husband, and three kids. 

     (Anyone who follows the Bangor Maine PD FB page will be hoping they visit the Duck of Justice, in the police station museum, and hoping David doesn't end up in the "Got Warrants" visiting TV star edition for stalking Stephen King).

    House 1-Hermon Meadow in Bangor , 4 bed,1  bath, $219k , 1088 sq ft, Cape Cod, story and a half, lovely first floor. nice kitchen for someone who doesn't cook much.   needs work in kitchen, 2 bedrooms on first floor, with a bathroom, upstairs 2 bedrooms and one is big for a main bedroom. great deck, very private backyard,.

    (Then David drives by Stephen King's house, and meets a tour group) 

    House 2-Peabody Pond in downtown Bangor, no front yard, 3,  bed, 1.5bath, $220k , 1500 sq ft first floor is nice, with hardwoods, kitchen needs better countertops, with the half bath off the kitchen. and a playroom.    All bedrooms are upstairs, bath is nice size, 2 nice bedrooms, huge and nice back yard, great deck, lots of room to do an addition is they want to.   

    House 3-Granger Ridge , 3 bed, 1.5 bath, $259k , 1344 sq ft, 2 story, Oldest at 1900, first floor is spectacular, and the kitchen is newly redone, nice and open, 1/2 bath on 1st floor, and laundry, Bedrooms are upstairs, main is huge, upstairs bath is fantastic,   great back deck and yard. propane heat with two big tanks, 

    She picks #2 .   I would have picked #3.

    • Love 2
  5. I was watching MSNBC yesterday and today (then I found out I do have BBC News channel), and I really want to know what that scraping noise was through a lot of the coverage?   It was so irritating.   And could they at least have a proof reader on the information captions at the bottom of the screen.  

    • Useful 1
  6. 22 hours ago, chediavolo said:

    I agree it looked better before. I also don’t like having a huge island with those ugly upholster chairs in the kitchen. Walk 3 feet to your dining room to sit down and eat . And I’m really against taking out the back staircase sounds like idiocy to me really they couldn’t of worked around it with all the renovation that they did? Besides that back staircase would’ve been very handy in case of an emergency.

    I think it looked fine after, but agree the kitchen didn't fit the overall theme of the house.   However, I suspect that the homeowners have a ton of things they want, and I don't think the hosts, or decorators really have a free hand with designs or colors.  I think in some cases they have a folder of colors, styles of cabinets, or appliances, granite or other materials they like, and the host just supervise the remodel with almost everything already picked out.      I think a lot of people barely use the formal dining room, and use the kitchen islands for everything but holiday dinners. or adult dinner parties.   

    The homeowners this week said they had several doors that went to nowhere, so I'm wondering if the stairs from the kitchen weren't really accessible.    I really like having more than one way out of a house in an emergency.  

    Chediavolo kindly updated me, so apparently the stairs were possibly useful, from the upstairs hall by the parents' bedroom, but with all of the shoes and everything on it, it might have been interesting to try to get down the stairs safely.     I also agree, a vintage kitchen would have been more appropriate, but the homeowners (I really think they have a lot more say in the design, colors, and everything else) apparently wanted a modern, trendy kitchen.   

    • Love 1
  7. I think David was so over the top last week on the Tri-State episode because he was zonked on allergy medicine.    You could tell he was really out of it.  

    New episode, "Must Love Goats"  Joe, a single man, looking in California's Central Valley.  You have to admit, the title is certainly different.  Joe lives near Sacramento, in Madera or Fresno area.   $500k, windfall. not lottery, but a windfall and we're not discussing that.  2,000 sq ft, 3-4 bedrooms, maybe on land, maybe a fixer.  His budget is $500k.  Central Valley is $400k to $500k for a 3 bed 2 bath, with maybe some acreage.   

    House 1-Bronson's Bend, 1/3 acre,  in Madera , $477k , 3bed, 3 bath 1742 sq ft.  Single story ranch, with a curved fireplace in the living room. Large, fenced pool, guest bath, main suite is huge, the ensuite has a weird sunken tub/ shower.    covered patio is nice.   I would leave the tub in the guest bath for visitors, and if he has a family that will be useful.  Needs a lot of work

    House 2-Dragonfly Drive in town, turnkey,  $525k, 3 bed, 2.5 bath, Spanish style, single story,  2029 sq ft. great kitchen lots of granite, smaller back yard.   Much smaller than first house property and yard. 

    House 3- Greenhorn Grove , $495k , 4 bed, 3 bath, over 2 acres, There's a main house, and a guest house.  bedrooms are nice, 3 guest bedrooms, and main bedroom is huge, with a giant closet, great shower and very nice, kitchen is fantastic.   Guest house has big kitchen, bath, huge bedroom.    Property 2.14 acres, garden, firepit, and the goats come with the property.  

    He chose #3 , I would have chosen #3.  The 'goats come with the property' was a total clue that even I caught. 

    There coastal prices are usually $800k to $900k and up, so in Central Valley the same place, or even better is $400k to $500k. 

    I wish they would change the name of the show to : My Dream Home.  

    • Like 2
  8. She did have two update shows.    She actually had a part 1 and part 2 Where are they now, apparently filmed right after the initial episode.   The WATN is a 2 hour update,  part 1 is 60 minutes, and part 2 is 60 minutes, and apparently filmed right after the initial episode.   

    The update thread tells you more about her.  

    • Like 1
  9. OK, so the children are in the U.S., Karine is in the U.S., and Paul is in Brazil?     He had an accident at the beach (no, unfortunately not with a penis fish swimming up you-know-where).    Apparently he was having fun at the beach, and some rogue wave knocked him down.    Taking a vacation to Brazil is certainly now showing you care about seeing your own kids. 

    • Love 2
  10. 44 minutes ago, AngelaHunter said:

    Just today?

    I hated her all over again, just as much as I hate the Levin. She took her eyes off the road! P stopped in the street! She had a situation with her insurance company! None of this was her fault! She was so caring, so kind, she actually asked the elderly Ps if they were all right! Her airbags didn't deploy so how hard could she have smashed them? JM came very close to telling her to shove her excuses up her ass. Shameless bitch with her stupid cartoon eyebrows stencilled halfway up her head deserved a much worse smackdown.

    "Wasn't looking at the road! Didn't know I had no insurance! NOT MY FAULT!"

    eyesL.jpg.4239af593e285da34ea8083a82546b6f.jpg

    Good point, I always dislike Levin, but especially today.   And the defendant in the car case was rotten to the core. 

    • Love 2
  11. 4 p.m. episodes-

    First (2014)-

    Hair Stylist Wars -Plaintiff Sharon Haynes (salon owner) is suing defendant Kamika Parker over unpaid rent, damaged property, and the return of belongings.    Litigants were classmates at beauty school.  Plaintiff opened a salon, wanted defendant to move into her studio apartment, with a child, and serve as manager without a salary.   Defendant moved from Victorville to Los Angeles.

     Defendant received no salary, but was on commission, later chair rent, and later left for another salon.  The studio apartment was too crowded with three people, so they got a larger apartment.  

    Plaintiff says defendant broke apartment lease, that’s dismissed.   Plaintiff claims defendant and defendant’s aunt assaulted plaintiff.    Plaintiff claims defendant owed her booth rent, and after defendant moved out of the apartment, so plaintiff withheld defendant’s hair tools, license copy, and hair products.  

    Plaintiff had defendant and her aunt arrested because of the assault, and claims after the release from jail defendant stole TV, and other items from the salon.  There are no witnesses or proof about who stole the TV, and other items.   Plaintiff claims defendant called the police on herself.

    Plaintiff has a restraining order against defendant, and defendant claims she never pled the assault case out.  However, defendant did plead the assault case out, as a lower offense, and consented to the protective order for six months.

    Defendant’s false arrest is dismissed, since defendant pled guilty.

    Everything dismissed.

    Daddy’s Good Deed Punished?  -Plaintiff Rick Fugate suing defendants Tonya Fugate (plaintiff's daughter) and Joshua Smith, (fiance) for damages to his RV.   Daughter graduated a year early, and worked full time, and moved out the day she turned 18.     Plaintiff bought an RV to remodel, and sell, for $1500.   Plaintiff let defendants live in the motor home, and he claims the trashed it.   Defendants moved after they say plaintiff unplugged the electricity, and defendants claim that forced them to move.  

    Defendants did damage the mattress, and a few other parts of the RV.   Defendant claims the plaintiff slapped her.  Defendant daughter claims the dogs that damaged the RV weren’t her dogs.  So, daughter is claiming some other dogs did it?    I guess I should start worrying about marauding packs of dogs breaking into my house, and trashing it?

    $1100 to plaintiff, defendant claim dismissed.  (In the hall-terview daughter says dad’s been married seven times, and lost nine children to estrangement).

    Second (2014)-

    Dream Car Rip-Off -Plaintiff Jared Sandoval suing defendant David Williams because defendant had a title loan on the Trans Am he sold plaintiff, plaintiff wants the title loan paid, and to register the car.  Car is a ‘99 Convertible Trans Am.  Plaintiff saved $3200 to pay defendant for the car, and defendant claims car was worth $8,000.    Plaintiff couldn't register car, because of the title loan.  

    Lien is more than what plaintiff paid for the car, but lien company won't tell anyone but defendant what the lien is.   Plaintiff wanted a refund on car, but defendant had spent the money already.    JJ says plaintiff has to give back the car, to get his $3500 back, but plaintiff still wants the car, and he'll have to pay the lien off somehow.  Defendant says he sold car very cheap to plaintiff, and says paying the title loan is a bargain.    Car is worth $8,000, and was sold for $3200.   Lien company told plaintiff that lien on car is more than what plaintiff paid for the car. 

    Defendant keeps saying he’ll only take car back if it’s in the same condition as when he sold it, JJ sets him straight.

    Plaintiff gets $3200, and car goes back to defendant.  (I think plaintiff was just hoping there is a way he could keep the car.   However, I'm glad the title loan company couldn't tell him how much the lien is for, or he would probably have tried to round up the money). 

    Scammer Denial  -Case of plaintiff David Williams (defendant in the previous case) against defendant/ex-girlfriend Ms.  Morris is dismissed, over the title loan on Trans Am plaintiff sold to plaintiff in previous case.   He's trying to say he didn't know his live-in girlfriend did the title loan.  

    Plaintiff case dismissed.

    Christmas Day Hit-and-Run-Plaintiff  Michael Copeland, car owner, and witness/fiance Andrea Jackson, are suing defendant Christopher Bailey  (car owner is his wife, Pennie Langston) over a hit-and-run accident on Christmas Day.  Plaintiff witness heard a collision about 9 p.m., and says she was looking at their car damage (Ford Taurus), when defendant climbed out of his ‘99 Ford Explorer SUV, looked at his car damage, and climbed back in his car, and left.   Plaintiffs got the license plate number.    When plaintiffs were still looking at the car damage defendant cruised by staring at the car and driving slowly, and then went by again.  Plaintiffs were talking to 911, and gave them the license number, and a description of the driver.

    Defendant didn't get a ticket for leaving the scene of an accident.    Plaintiffs said defendant seemed to be impaired too.   

    Defendant's wife, and car owner swears her husband, and car didn't do this.  Police report is submitted. 

    (In the state I live in, hit-and-run auto is a total of 12 points, the same number of points needed to suspend your license, and where litigants live he didn't even get a ticket?) 

    Police saw fresh snow tracks leading to defendant's garage, and no one answered the door at defendant's house.  JJ says defendants are a perfect match for each other.   (This happened in Muskegon, MI).

    Plaintiff receives $3791. 

    5 p.m. episodes-

    First (2017)-

    Man's Fuzzy Memory of Assault?!-Plaintiff Thomas Davis suing his ex-girlfriend/defendant Loretta Alexander for credit card fees, legal fees. and the return of property.   However, defendant claims plaintiff attacked her, and she claims she didn't attack him.   Defendant claims plaintiff's pastor is actually his side piece.    They have been in a relationship since 2013, shacked up 2015, and separated in December 2016.    Plaintiff claims they never lived together.   Plaintiff gave defendant a second card for his credit card account.     Plaintiff claims defendant made unauthorized charges on his credit card, after they separated (anything before that time is not unauthorized).   As usual. plaintiff has no bills to prove anything, but claims defendant went online and changed the billing address to her address, so he never saw the bills. 

    Plaintiff wants legal fees over the credit card issue, and he's not getting that.  Property plaintiff wants back includes an old air conditioner.  Plaintiff also wants an old fridge/freezer he stored in defendant's garage.   Freezer is gone, dismissed.    Defendant wants items stored in plaintiff's shed.   Plaintiff claims everything he was storing for defendant is gone into thin air.  There is a storage unit that was mutual, but has been emptied.    The shed defendant is talking about is on plaintiff's property. 

    No police report about defendant's assault, but medical record is submitted.    Plaintiff claims there was no assault by him.

    The argument was plaintiff talking to his pastor girlfriend/fiance, so the couple split up, and defendant moved out.   That's when defendant does the dramatic explanation of the violent assault on her by the geezer boyfriend.   If her description was true, she would have been in ICU, not moving out.  Defendant claims she called the police, but didn't file the report.    I don't believe the defendant at all.    

    Counter claim $2500 to defendant, and nothing for plaintiff.

    Second (2017)-

    Broken Jaw Party Foul!-Plaintiff Scott Richie, Jr suing defendant Jordan Nielsen for breaking his jaw, and choking him, for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.      Plaintiff went to a party at defendant's house, but was invited by the defendant's roommate, Dakota who plaintiff assaulted, but claims it was mutual combat.    Plaintiff went to pick up two other party goers, and when the plaintiff arrived at the party, he says everyone at the party was drunk.    Plaintiff was leaving to go home, when defendant assaulted him, and claims defendant's witness also punched him repeatedly.   

    Police report is submitted by plaintiff.    Plaintiff says he met with police later too, but there is no further report, and no one was arrested over this assault.   Defendant witness Drew Manning was also in the fight. 

    Defendant claims plaintiff wasn't invited to party, and was drunk.    Defendant claims plaintiff wanted to fight him, and he was only defending himself.    Defendant says plaintiff's witness is also his witness, Skylar.   However, the mutual witness says plaintiff, defendant, and defendant's witness were all drunk and fighting.   Start of the issue is that plaintiff had slept with a previous party host's girlfriend, and the boyfriend was at the defendant's party.    

    The fight happened in Iowa, but plaintiff didn't go back there to finish filing charges, so police charges were never filed. 

    Everything dismissed.   

    Quick!  Hide the Pontiac?!-Plaintiff Charlene Moore suing ex-boyfriend Brian Theard, for money she invested in a car, stolen property, and punitive damages.   Defendant is counter suing for the return of a stolen car.     They lived together, and bought a Pontiac and a Mercedes.   Defendant says he paid for both cars, and plaintiff paid nothing for the cars.     When they broke up the plaintiff stayed at the original apartment, and kept the Pontiac, and she would take over the payments.     Defendant took the Mercedes.    Defendant was getting notices that plaintiff wasn't paying the last $2,000 on the car loan, and called the finance company, found there was actually only $500 more on the loan. 

    Plaintiff had paid $1500 on the car, leaving the last $500, which defendant paid off.      When he went to take the Pontiac back, defendant found that plaintiff had changed the locks on the car.    Defendant claims plaintiff was paying on car, but fell behind, and plaintiff kept hiding the car with friends, in various locations.   Defendant claimed he paid for both vehicles, except for $1500 she paid on the car.   (This is obviously not plaintiff's first time hiding a car from the repo men).

    Plaintiff gets the Pontiac back, and defendant gets $500 for the car loan he paid off.

    • Love 1
  12. 2018 rerun "Diamond Earring Disaster"

    Case 1 Plaintiff Toye Taveres suing defendant, co-workers,  and former friend  Julius and Sharon, for stealing her heirloom earrings, she wants $2400.   Theft was blamed on defendants' 28 year-old son, so why would defendant parents have to pay for them.    They all lived together when this happened .   Earrings were in plaintiff's closet, inside a jewelry box, and when plaintiff went to stay with her grandmother, and for a few months only plaintiffs lived in the apartment.   When plaintiff finally realized earrings were gone, she asked Sharon if she had seen them, and Toye decided the defendant's 28-year-old son stole them.  Then Toye demanded the earrings back, or for defendants to pay for the earrings, $2400 and throw in a bedroom set. 

    Sharon also mentions that Toye regularly loses items, including a set of keys for two years.  Toye says she never believed the defendant's son stole the earrings, but then Toye says Sharon stole the earrings, and Sharon looks above for either divine help, or a better light for her appearance on TV.   Toye says defendant Sharon knew exactly where the earrings were stored. 

    Defendants also sell and replace their furniture every year (in January to be exact), (or is it they go to rent to own, and when they don't pay their furniture gets repo'd?).   Plaintiff's witness is Toye, and Julius's supervisor. 

    (Is there a photo of her wearing the earrings?  Or any other proof the earrings actually existed?)

    Plaintiff case dismissed, defendant wins.  (Levin and his street Gerbils chime in)

    Case 2-Plaintiff Richard Crespo and wife rented an apartment from defendant when boiler broke, and they didn't have heat or hot water for a month, and want $3500.  Helen Theodore, is the despicable landlady who didn't care about a month without heat or hot water in the middle of a New York winter.  (Levin dubs this "Boiler, he hardly knew her", I really loathe him today.)   

    Helen the despicable was on vacation in a warm place, for this part of the winter, and nothing was done.  The plaintiffs were always up to date on rent.   Plaintiffs had a 7 and 13-year-old living in the apartment also.   Heat didn't get fixed until first of February, when Helen came back.   

    Landlord Helen the despicable claims the boiler was under warranty with Sears, and Sears couldn't fix the boiler during six visits.   19 degrees in the house, and it doesn't get fixed for a month.   

    $1500 of rent, and $118 for the space heaters, $1618 total  to plaintiffs. Doug's right, defendant is a terrible landlord.   In the hall-terview, plaintiff says he's approved to buy a house, and I hope they got it. 

    Case 3-Plaintiff Gregory DiBennedetto slammed into by defendant Dawn Rella.   And plaintiff wants $1582 for damages, car rental, etc.   Defendant slammed into the rear of the plaintiff's car, and blames it on plaintiff not driving fast enough to get out of her way.  Defendant says someone was turning in front of plaintiff, and says plaintiff should have gone around turning car, and then defendant could go around too.    Defendant plowed into the back of the car.    

    Not a surprise, defendant's insurance had lapsed, and Geico refused to cover the plaintiff's damages.   Defendant wanted plaintiff to sign a release in return to pay for the damages, and cab. 

    Plaintiff rats companion out for being 77, after she says she's 70. 

    Defendant says her autopay screwed up.  

    $1582 to plaintiff (he's 82 also). Car damages were over $7,000, so $1582 was for deductible and cabs.. 

    • Like 1
    • Love 4
  13. Mina did say during the NBA player remodel that she wanted to do more remodeling of upscale homes like the player's house.   Since he had moved so many times, and then was traded twice after the show aired, it's essentially more expensive flipping.    I really disliked that remodel, everything was so trendy, and things like lighting improved nothing in that house.   

    I'm wondering if Mina bought the house with the remodel included, and it's all in the price?  Or because she doesn't have experience with long term, major builds like that?    Or if it was a flip, and she bought it before the remodel started with the construction and remodeling included, so the seller's crew did the work, and she picked finishes?    

  14. The books turned backward is also a way not to show the titles, it's a way not to have publishers complain about the items showing, and not paying to show them, plus they want a cohesive look so it doesn't take attention away from the other colors.    There are also people who buy clearance books just to fill a bookshelf.   When I worked with a friends of the library group booksale, people would come in and buy bags full of books as background decoration.   The buyers didn't care about the title, just the size and the color. 

    • Like 1
    • LOL 1
  15. 2 hours ago, chessiegal said:

    Thinking of the times I've stayed in B&Bs, I don't remember HVAC controls in the rooms.

    I suspect the controls are central, and controlled by whoever operates the B & B whole house rental. 

    It's a good policy to control it centrally.  My community pool house air conditioner was ruined by people using it for events, and they would turn the air conditioning down to 60 or 62, to cool the room down quickly, and leave it.   It killed the air conditioning/heat pump and it will cost over $6k to replace.    

    I wouldn't stay there, I don't care how nice they make it.   I would rather have an event at somewhere with a lot of parking, and without neighbors complaining a lot about noise.

×
×
  • Create New...