The usual suspects -- the Bachelor/ettes, the Honey Boo Boos and their reality brethren, and especially Girls (looking forward to the day Lena Dunham tumbles into the black hole of irrelevance) -- have already been brought up several times, so I won't expound on what's been already said.
With that in mind, Outlander, which has also been mentioned for being a 'rape show', but my annoyance stems more from the discourse surrounding it. I've see it presented as the "feminist fantasy alternative" to Game of Thrones (which is a damn low bar to set in the first place), touted for it's exemplary handling of sexual assault -- but no commentary has presented a compelling argument why. The pieces of the episode I know only leave a worst impression: from what I remember the heroine (Clare?) being bent-over, half-naked, threatened with rape for an extended scene while the male lead barked "get ur paws off mah wife". It seemed exploitative and I doubt that scene is an exception. I'm not opposed to depiction of rape onscreen, but its seems too many series end up displaying this edgy voyeurism in portraying such heinous acts.
Not even going to get into the husband's "punishment" for her "disobedience" (which led to the attempted rape), or the crummy way that dilemma was resolved. Domestic violence is an absolute no-no for me in a 'ship', historical fiction or not -- this aspect would work if it were presented from Clare's perspective of a woman negotiating those waters (especially one from a different time period!), but when the relationship is nonstop pushed as the one true love to be shipped by the audience, it leaves a bad taste in the mouth.
I'll also mention The Tudors. Largely due to over-saturation when it comes to historical fiction and period drama in general, but also because I find Anne Boleyn vastly overrated as 'heroine'. Just doesn't interest me (Natalie Dormer's acting is also fairly cringeworthy).