Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

Crossbow

Member
  • Posts

    316
  • Joined

Posts posted by Crossbow

  1. What I would like to know is what the hell happened to Olivia and Roman's mind control powers? Those were pretty much in constant use throughout Season 1 and involved in a major plot point (Nadia's birth) and then....never again. Did the writers think this was too convenient? But seriously, there was never an explanation why that was just suddenly dropped.

     

    Yeah, they could at least TRY. Say it's Olivia's cancer that made her lose it or something.

  2. She's also gotten a foot shorter. She used to fill a doorway.

    (Edit: At a distance she's played by Amazon Eve, who is 6'8", but up close they have her being about eye-level with whoever she's talking to if it's a man.)


    Here's the first time we see her whole face. Currently, she has a right ear, hair on the left, the eye is up higher, the growth over the nose is gone, and the marks on the neck are gone.

     

    276f80175c3f2ef4d524fc8924ad055b.jpg

  3. I am far more horrified by your average nightly news broadcast than by anything in "Hannibal."

     

    I made my mom watch "American Horror Story" and she said, "How can you SLEEP?"

     

    Me: "After this? Fine. This is just pretend. If you want to keep me awake all night, talk about gerrymandering or HMOs."

    • Love 2
  4. I don't know if this counts as a spoiler or not because although it was attributed to GRRM I'm starting to suspect people just make stuff up and attribute it to him, but apparently

    Myrcella and Tommen both definitely bite it in Winds of Winter, which will make 5 dead Lannisters.

     

    Tyrells: I feel like Loras and Margery are both marked for death.

     

    If I were writing it: The winning triumvirate would be Dany as queen, because she makes a good figurehead, with the dragon thing and all; Tyrion as Hand, because he's awesome; Jon putting together all the silly private armies and building a national force to defend against the Others.

     

    Of course, if I were writing it, I woulda killed Sansa two books ago. She bores me.

     

    ETA: "Dead Lannisters" will be the name of my Paul & Storm cover band.

    • Love 1
  5. Well, I could go on about sociopathic traits he does and doesn't have, but he's a fictional character he'll never add up completely. Risk-taking is the hallmark of a sociopath, because the true sociopath has a malformed amygdala and can't feel fear. Frank does feel fear, so what I think he's got is learned sociopathic traits. His amygdala seems to work just fine. They're also not able to feel guilt, which he does (look at Freddy) but he denies and suppresses it.  

  6. About Tyrion and Sansa: Yes, he saw her as nothing but a pretty highborn girl but he only ever tried to protect her in his own way. He had the whole kingdom crashing around him and she was far from his biggest problem. He was just like, "Oh, leave the poor girl alone. Okay, FINE, I'll marry her if I really have to." He was forced to marry her and give up the woman he loved, and I think he was a lot kinder to her than most people would be in that situation. I know if I were forced to marry someone I would resent them no matter how innocent they were.


    Okay...so what does that leave as overall endgame story for Sansa? I think it's set up so she could be a tragic death right now because her function in the overall story is small.

     

    I've been expecting that she will end up being the wardeness of the North. Hopefully she will acquire some leadership ability from somewhere.

     

    I think GRRM is done killing Starks for now. He killed three and turned one into a tree. I think he's going to prune the Lannister tree some more next.

    • Love 1
  7. I expect him to get through the whole series. He's been one of the major plot lines. He's also the reader's view of the Others, the free folk, and the Wall, and it would be silly to kill him off at this point. And

    I personally think he's going to be one of the heads of the dragon, along with Danerys.

    • Love 1
  8. Actually there several candidates for Jon's mother. I don't know if you have them all yet; I'm not sure when they are each introduced. They're listed here if you want to know. I think there should be a betting pool.

     

    I get confused over who was who in the stories about the past too. The first time I read it I just skimmed over all the past stuff like I do in "Lord of the Rings," but it's turning out to be important. :(


    PS. You think being called the Unsullied is bad? What about us Bookwalkers - named after the ultimate evil in the books!

    • Love 3
  9. Hmm, I need to read SotL again some time. I don't remember much of the victims' characters. In the movie, I think they did a good job considering it was only a movie and you can't explore every character, but Clarice going though Frederica's bedroom made us think of Frederica at least as a real, complex person.

     

    The book Hannibal was over the top, and I liked things about it - I liked Hannibal's whole Italy story. But Clarice was so well-drawn in SotL, she was a real let-down in Hannibal. I would have liked to see one more sequel where she came back to herself and killed him or turned him in or just ran for it.

    • Love 1
  10. I just finished watching this last night. I have to wonder what Claire expected from all this. Did she think the first lady has the same power as the president?

     

    I'm glad she asked "What's all this for," but I wish she'd questioned his answer, "The White House." That's meaningless. He wants power but power to do what? What's the objective? Nothing: Frank sees power as an end in and of itself, and Clair has been married to him 28 years and should have understood that. In fact I thought she was the same. That legislation she introduced seemed to be all about getting herself in the public eye and establishing her influence. Her objective in being UN ambassador seemed to be being the UN ambassador. If she was re-evaluating that whole outlook, why didn't she talk to Frank about it instead of just walking out?

    • Love 1
  11. Re-reading this book, I am really struck by how abusive Cersei is towards Jaime. There are so many people with so much motivation to strangle her. TV Cersei is downright cuddly compared to Book Cersei. And Tywin was right, she's not half as smart as she thinks she is.

    • Love 5
  12. Somehow I think "When your tears have drowned you" refers to a specific time, as it's in the future perfect tense. "When your tears have drowned you." After your tears have drowned you, then the vaolonquar will choke the life from you.

     

    I'm at the point in the book where we just met Kevan Lannister. Tywin's younger brother.


    However, as for tears have drowned you - it seems like that could have a lot of meanings but they seem to all relate to death.  I mean, the poison she had ready at the Battle of the Blackwater was "tears of" something so it could be a play on words related to that.  But I do think it's more than just sadness over the shame and humiliation of what the FM have done to her or her loss of power.  Tears drowning you seems like a total loss of everything - her children, Jamie, her family name, etc....

     

    Tears of Lys. But they're fatal, so if she took it no one would need to choke her.

×
×
  • Create New...