AngelaHunter

Nothing about this convoluted wheeling and dealing made sense, or I just couldn't understand it. Def says P didn't have the money to pay the Def his sec. deposit, but she DOES have the money to buy this 21-year-old BMW from him, pay him to repair it, sell it, make a killing from it, and then give him his sec. dep? The car looked to be in a junkyard, probably where it belonged. At first, I was totally on P's side. The Def seems to be a typical, mealy-mouthed, shady POS, a big, hulking, blobby con artist who was so scared of the dainty little P that he did things under duress due to her threats or harassment. But then when we got to her saying he "sweet-talked" into things, I thought, Hmm. Maybe these two deserve each other. That she also called Def's 86-year-old daddy to grouse at him was a major turnoff. I just bet poor ol' Dad has had more than one call complaining about his sonny boy.

4K in cash, carted around in a backpack? The shoe entrepreneur should have thought of that before asking Granny to wash his clothes. I didn't get too far enough into this. Granny permitted to scream at the judges, her fake wailing, the mysterious 4K, Granny's daughter who "had got drunk" and Granny not speaking to any of her kids - Sorry, Mr. Rockwell. Your family ideals did not match up here. Papa? Were you kidding? Oh, please.

I still can't believe that a woman married to a cop could be so naive, or maybe she has a savior complex, enough of one that she would go behind her husband's back to bankroll those bloated parasites. How tragic they have children.

Whackadoodles. I'm so glad the young P doesn't work so has plenty of time and is healthy enough to go on trips and to Disney - a heck of a lot of walking there in the heat - with Pinky, World's Best Walmart Cashier, buy all kinds of Disney junk, AND have enough spare cash to lend to Pinky to buy her dream car, a 31-year-old Volkswagen Beetle (with no key?). And what was with the husband? Sounds like an odd marriage. P is a lot smarter than I was when young and on my own. I worked full-time and still couldn't afford Disney until I got a major promotion and got married. Fool was I. Amen! I don't even want to hear Dr. Phil playing Dr. Phil. Knock it off, Papa. Ugh. I got as far as the video where the ghastly Def admits that sure, she was Hulking it up and overturned the table, but so what? Isn't that the way disputes should be settled?

Def admits she has no clue about being a landlord, and simply puts P's $2,000 deposit in her own checking account. What's wrong with that? So she spent it. What of it? Go get it from "Leo". I liked this case, even though both litigants seemed too old to be this clueless, because there were no texxes loaded with misspelled profanities or threats, no vandalizing of property, no mention of SSMhood, no videos showing one or both acting like wild animals and not a single challenge to fight. And both admitted in the hall that they did learn something. Refreshing! Yes, she got it back. I was hoping the interest would be added on. That wasn't mentioned but maybe it was done.

Can you imagine that mouth - she talked so damned fast she was leaving the ends off of some words - all the way home? No wonder Def said, "Screw this!" and left. Yes, very trim but her umbilicus needn't be displayed in court, even a TV court. 😄 Considering that Krazy Kanye's "wife" is now parading around Italy in public naked (we won't mention the vile sex acts, also in public 🤢) the belly button shouldn't be a problem! Yes! Male and female.

I watched MotorMouth in the hall this time when Doug asked why her husband refused to come out and join her for this case since she claimed he's the one who paid Def. Well, he couldn't possibly back up his wife because he had a cold! He was coughing!

I didn't recall this one, and kept thinking that JM should have told the def who obviously didn't know any better to go outside and find something to cover up her freaking belly button. I can only assume it was hidden from JM by the podium. How many places are there where it's appropriate to wear a short, cropped top like that? No one is interested in your innie, lady.

Me too! Thanks again to @Bazinga and @CrazyInAlabama for all your hard work catching us up!

I could be wrong but from what I've heard, IVF is rather costly. Thank you. I see I was right to quit this trash. Despicable is right, and another grown man in the "There should be more things in place to protect people (morons/idiots/big babies) like me" camp.

I SO wanted to come here after I watched these two kooks but my memory faded during the long time-out. I just know that the def. in her "cold shoulder" gown was like a stereotypical, pushy, irritating next-door neighbour in a sitcom. As always when watching these cases, I try and imagine myself inviting a strange man - virtually off the street - to come and live with me, share my bathroom, etc. (and hope he won't steal everything I own, destroy my property, or murder me in my bed) but I just can't visualize such a thing. Usually, I have a very good imagination, too.

I got the former "Fuck buddies" (their charming words) today. Picturing them - he looked like someone let him out of his crypt for this case and she, so bloated she couldn't smile and keep her eyes open - mindlessly rutting put me right off.

We got a ringside seat to how the dregs of society live. HE goes to the slammer for some type of crime he committed. SHE takes his car to care for and answers all the judges' questions in a snotty, insolent way. "I just never thought about insurance! I just didn't!" *shrug* Her tone indicates she thinks the questions are stupid. She gets piss drunk with her marginal boyfriend and, like all of their ilk, they start fighting, naturally. She takes his keys, she says. SHE says her drunken yahoo loverboy steals the jailbird's keys and proceeds to immediately total the heap. Gee, people who like to get drunk and fight just warm my heart. P., a low-rent ZZ-Top with revolting head tats, could have avoided all this trouble had he only refrained from criminal behaviour. I guess he couldn't help himself or maybe it wasn't his fault. I saw some hugging when I was FFing. I shut that shit down right then. Ugh.

I think I got that one today, although the description on my DVR matches the "Bail Bond Blowup." Blowout, Blowup - The Levin seems to like those "Blow" words nearly as much as he likes "stinky" and "leaky". Now I'm confused. I got former g/f and baby momma, she of the massive mauve lips and seemingly very heavy fake eyelashes, suing baby daddy for all kinds of shit. He says she's pissed off he got another girlfriend, but I'm on his side. Look at him. Who could expect him to keep all that he's got for just one woman? Lawdy! No, he doesn't see the baby he and P carelessly whipped up, because she won't let him. JM rips him a new one for that BS. Then I got the customer suing the plumber for some deal they made - nothing in writing of course (probably because there may have been something shady about it) - until they both started playing canis mas macho although neither of them looked equipped for that particular game. Malarkey and boring balderdash.

Here we go. Two professional "ladies" fancy themselves as business people in a partnership, but, as so often happens it ends in police being called, restraining orders, screaming fits, $100,000(?)calling out of name (*b-i-t-c-h*), and - my favorite statement on these shows, and ALWAYS from women - "She wanted to fight me." 😆 Of course, nothing at all is in writing for this partnership and def. was never given receipts for the money she spent or paid to workers in cash. I assume all these cash payments were under the table. No pesky taxes. P is sure D "conceived" of the expenses. They were right there! Yes, all very professional and they lasted a whole three months. Here, judges. We have no idea or any proof of who spent what, but YOU figure out our dumb mess. Thanks! I quit this but figured that would be the outcome. I swear I could write this stupid nonsense in my sleep. Even Papa, who usually swoons over women in business was not inclined to fawn over these litigants.

On re-watch I couldn't help wondering - how does someone whose rent is paid by Byrd ( they always announce "I'm Sec8" as though that should give them special privileges) afford $500/month to store a $600 car? It's a mystery. Oh, never mind. I just answered my own question.

Thank you for the verdict, @CrazyInAlabama I just could NOT take any of them - not the toothlessness, the huge, odd bulges on all of them, or the sweet tales of familial love. That was bad enough, but when Jessica, with her rode-hard/put-away wet persona started piping up about Eric's "traumatic brain injury" (even Papa got slightly irritated at her), I had to quit. All of them seemed to have had traumatic brain injuries. I didn't take the time to find out if Jessica was Eric's caretaker or his squeeze. What a gang.

Gotta love an 11-year-old with zero respect for authority and who has no problem snickering as she lies to a judge. Was there always a rule that moms appearing here must be of the SS variety? We rarely see a mother who is not single. I wondered what the dads thought of giving expensive phones to kids to play with and break since - as P momma said, her 12-year-old cannot live without the latest and best phone - but alas, I had to assume they're not in the picture. I could be wrong, since I'm living in the past and finding it increasingly hard to adjust to the way of things today. On another topic, why was I never given a subscription to this magazine when I was renting? It would have helped me immensely. Maybe I need to sue someone.

OH, mah gawd. She ruined his "pristine" reputation as a bouncer at a strip joint and a lot of people told him about it (none of whom are here), so of course, he doesn't owe her the money for the truck he wrecked. Maybe she wouldn't have defamed you if paid what you owed. Duh. He didn't see "a big white truck"? Maybe instead of getting more scribbly loser tats, he should get his eyes checked. Or maybe, like so many other litigants he just doesn't give a rat's ass about someone else's property, since we know he never intended to pay for it? 7K in his pocket when a bear tore his jacket off him? Sounds like a big lie to me or maybe a drug-fueled hallucination. What an asshole. He says he doesn't know anyone who hasn't tried to commit insurance fraud. I'm sure that's true, considering what his friends must be like - a bunch of petty, grifting, marginal, lying losers just like him. I was not at all surprised to hear he had a girlfriend. So many women are willing to settle for nothing at all. 😆 "Speciesphobia"! That tatted-up fool couldn't come up with a better lie to weasel his way out of a debt than blaming a bear?

I don't recall these, although I must have seen them. It must have been Clown Day on TPC. First clown, who appeared to be auditioning here, maybe for a job as a carnival barker, is suing his friend of 30 years for 5k for a job he claims he was not paid for. Both of them opening admit to being tax cheats - P being paid under the table, and Def paying under the table. It's tradition. Def, who is countersuing for 8K for the P libeling him, refuses to admit he got nabbed doing this and tries to make seem as though he had a moral epiphany. "It's the law!" he states. Yeah, a law he ignored probably for 40 years. P gets $600. Goodbye! Then we had shaved-headed little scammer, Ozod, suing the tow company for damaging his 2006 Mercedes when they towed it while it was illegally parked. JM informs P that this model Mercedes was on a recall list for the very problem the P is accusing the Def of causing - the undercarriage something or other dropping. JM wants to know why the tow guy doesn't take pics of damages already on the cars they tow. Who has time for that? You know how long it takes to hold up a phone and snap a pic? That Ozod waited a month to take the car to a mechanic and then tried to pin the blame on Def really cooked his goose and put an end to his little scheme. Both of them were seriously evidence-deficient. P, of course, gets nothing. I think I do vaguely recall the last case of the landlord suing def for damages. He doesn't believe in taking pictures of the damage for which he's suing, but trust him - he's honest! Well, sort of. He claimed he needed to replace 3/4 of the laminate flooring due to Def's daughter spilling hot wax all over. Then he changed it to maybe half. When JM saw the bill, it was actually two boards for $150. The Def made me uneasy as I wondered if she had a great big goiter that seemed to go up to her right ear. P gets paid for the couple of things he could prove.

I thought Yogi only stole picnic baskets. 🤔 Got some catching up to do, I see.

Marcos, P, is suing his cousin, Fernando for rent and car payments. Fernando is a mature man old enough to have 3 kids but was living in a packed house with Mommy and Daddy, so Marcos invited him to come live in his townhouse. Rent was $150/week and Fernando paid for a while, then had financial difficulties, of course. Another cousin gave him a roofing job but then his car got repossessed. Marcos sold him his 2010 Mazda, payments to be another $150/week, hoping that F. would work, but seems he just didn't bother showing up on the job. Marcos seemed to think being very strict with this grown man would somehow make him act like a responsible adult. Uh, no. Marcos knew what he was like. Why would he think Fernando would change for him? Marcos boots him out and texts him to come and get his stuff. Fernando says he ignored the texts so his stuff got thrown out. The judges ask Fernando where this car is that he didn't finish paying for. "It doesn't work anymore," he says, so why should he pay for it? He's not in the habit of paying for his cars. Everyone else should fix his problems. While I thought Marcos was prissy and nit-picky (and how did he expect F. to pay all that money when he barely works?) the Def has obviously skated along, mooching and getting other people to pay his way. I feel sorry for his kids, but that he had one woman who actually chose to have 3 kids with this immature slacker, and now has a new sadsack girlfriend - who I bet is either fully or partially supporting him - boggles my mind. Everyone needs to stop supporting him and giving him jobs. 4K for Marcos. Maybe he can use some of it to buy a jacket that fits him.

I wish I knew what JM found so utterly charming about these two: she never stopped smiling even while listening to tales of passive-aggressive behavior, belongings thrown out, a window smashed, and two adults playing tug-of-war with a TV that may or may not have been pawned. I saw nothing cute at all. She never said a word about the big no-no - people playing house and buying a home together, without looking past the ends of their noses to what might happen if the big love affair ended. I bet had this couple been m/f, she would have had fewer smiles and plenty to say. Even when briefly scolding them, she still had a big smile as though they may be naughty, but still adorable, like little kids. I actually wrote "pawnded" at first. Maybe I've watched too much court TeeVee.

Either the plaintiff, in a pretty bad wig-hat, looks very young for her age, or the Def is prematurely aged. To me, they looked the same age. I just knew some sexual innuendos, and/or accusations had to enter into this eventually. Vincent Winston II (Who is such a desirable hot property, on hard times or not, that I'm sure many ladies would spend thousands on a cruise just to be in his vicinity for the duration, yearning for him from afar) could hardly be blamed for casting an eye around, considering that his beloved is a ranting, lying, incoherent, ignorant grifter who rips off her pretend Mother. Why should she pay back the money to this husband stealer after saying she would? Attempted husband stealing, much like SSMhood, automatically negates all debts. Thank goodness I turned this off before it reached that point! JT to Def. "So you saw them there?" Def: "Yes, I seen them." Whatever. Thanks for the verdict, @CrazyInAlabama!

Colour me disappointed. I got my popcorn and beer, all ready to cheer on my favorite bowler, but got TPC instead. It said it was from April 11, 2012, but it wasn't from then.