Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

iwasish

Member
  • Posts

    11.0k
  • Joined

Posts posted by iwasish

  1. 17 minutes ago, Suzy Rhapsody said:

    From the little we’ve heard so far, Ash’s seminar sounds like some 12-year-old boy describing why girls are so icky and mean.

    Didn’t some dope already write a book about Men are from Venus, Women from Mars ... or some shit along those lines? 

    • Useful 2
    • LOL 1
  2. 22 minutes ago, Mr. Miner said:

    Rose wants her breath to be bad, she doesn’t want to kiss this hideous pig. He ruined it all by bringing toothpaste.

    Ed is mentally calculating how much he’ll have to spend in medical bills on her ulcer. He might even think she’s only with him for that great health care the US is known for. 

    • LOL 3
    • Love 5
  3. 5 minutes ago, JennyMominFL said:

    think that this week, I may wear a bra

    I’ve been going stir crazy in the house, so I take a ride up and down the highway every morning and get a drive thru coffee. It great that there’s so little traffic. My project this week is to build a small fountain on my new deck. I’m using a copper rain chain and a set of galvanized planters. And plant a bunch of flowers I bought from QVC. I started that last week, but my puppy had an allergic reaction to the lavender plants. Her head and face swelled and her belly was covered in hives. Emergency run to her vet. She’s fine now ,  and I’m out $300. The plants look good in my brother’s  yard though!! 
    The bra? Unless I’m going to be seen below the neck, it will remain in the drawer. 

    • Love 11
  4. Why is she hauling her kid to Cleveland? If daddy wants to see her, let him come get her. Or send her with a nanny, she’s more than comfortable with nannies.

     She and Tristan are not co-parenting. They are two chuckleheads that stupidly had a kid together. My bet is that in a couple years, he’ll pop another one or two out with some random and True will be dragged out for photo shoots. 

     

    • Love 2
  5. 1 hour ago, Kyanight said:

    I thought because of the context of what I wrote above that, that my meaning would be more clear.  I will word my thoughts differently.  If someone was a prostitute in her past, that does not mean that she is not worthy of being loved by someone, especially if she was open about her profession to her significant other.   If he does not care what she did prior to their getting together, than no one else should care, either.

    No reason someone cannot love a former prostitute, or even one still working. 
    I  was only questioning the idea of an entitlement to love. Certainly you would think that every child born will be loved and nurtured  by their parents. But reading headlines and watching TV, sadly too many are abused, abandoned, neglected and worse. Everyone’s idea of what love is differs.  What you or I would seek out in a partner can be entirely opposite. 

    I just find myself shaking my head every time another red flag is thrown into someone’s face, raising serious concerns about someone’s motives or truthfulness and they go on yammering about their “doubts and concerns” about the future with their partner  and inevitably end their remarks with “but l love him/her”.  How can you love someone  you don’t trust, or deep down even like.

    When the relationship starts  with the future pretty much spelled out.... yeah, I think questioning that “love” is a smart thing to do. 

    Neither Rose nor Ed is a prize, but using the entItlement to love  theory,  isn’t Ed equally entitled to love. His physical ailments have most likely attributed to his quirks and idiosyncrasies. If we are to give Rose leeway to allow her to use her sex to get access to a “better” life via Ed’s horniness,  why can’t Ed be allowed the same? 

    Maybe I would feel better about all these couples and their motives if the word “Love” wasn’t thrown around so carelessly. 

     


     

     

     

    • Love 4
  6. On 4/23/2020 at 12:51 PM, Mrs. Hanson said:

    I belong to a FB group that follows these fools are there are few women (of course it is women, lol!) who are really rough on RM while seemingly letting Ed off the hook.  Calling her a golddigger, only wanting a green card, etc.  I am like, (but I don't say it as I don't engage or fight with strangers on the internet)  "Do you not see Ed's douchebag behaviors?"

    Edited to add:  There are also men and women who are seemingly wanting her to apologize for having cell service and a phone if she is so poor.  Again, I do not engage with strangers on the internet but I do want to ask them:  "Why should she have to defend ANYTHING?" Look, I am a sped teacher and I make an income.  Not high, not low, but I make it work.  If I roll into school in my new Cadillac, I should not have to defend it to anyone.  Maybe I got an inheritance, maybe I ate rice and beans for six months, maybe my dad bought it for me - maybe I won it.  I believe it was @mamadrama who wrote a very thoughtful post about people with less than others who have to defend their purchases.

    My mom used to say, “When I ask you to pay my bills, you can comment on what I buy, until then, MYOB’

    • Love 15
  7. 15 hours ago, Kyanight said:

    Barring hurting any innocents, everyone is entitled to love and be loved by someone in return.  

    Is “being loved” an entitlement?  It would be nice to think that everyone would find someone that loves them  and that they love in return.  Sadly in many cases that does not happen. Look at Darcy, she claims all she wants is to be loved, but she clearly has a list of requirements for the person that she is loved by. She looks at a photograph of a young sexy Jessie and says “that is what I deserve to be loved by” and when that relationship doesn’t pan out like she feels it should, she turns it into a rejection of her and she tries to reinvent herself into what she believes a  “Jesse” would love. The Darcys of the world need to love themselves first and foremost. 
     

     

     

     

     

    • Useful 1
    • Love 11
  8. On 4/23/2020 at 12:22 PM, DEL901 said:

    Look at RoseMarie and her family.   Her father lives in a hut made of pallets beside pigs to make a living.   He didn’t turn to crime.  RoseMarie is willing to marry Ed to help her son.  It is distasteful but she is making a sacrifice, not committing a crime.  

    How do we know she‘s looking to better Princes life? Is it because saying that she’s looking to better her own life  by hooking up with a greasy, sweaty American makes her less sympathetic and more like she’s looking out for number 1 (herself)?  She’s barely even mentions  Prince, leaves him with her sister to traipse off with “ugly” Ed  on a nice vacation. And honestly, if Ed told her he had no interest in being a father to Prince and “suggested” leaving him with his aunt , I can see Rose doing just that.  
    All the talk from women on this show about how their children are THE MOST IMPORTANT THING, is so much BS. I can’t think of one that hasn’t eventually tossed out  that “ I  DESERVE LOVE” and how much sacrifice they have made and now it’s “MY TURN”

     

    • Love 4
  9. On 4/20/2020 at 2:56 PM, AZChristian said:

    If Ed ever thought of anything other than what HE wants (regardless of what other people need), he might have said to Rose's sister, "You asked me for money before I got here.  I'm not going to give money away, but I will pay you $____ in exchange for taking care of Prince while I am here so that Rose I can spend time together."

    Why give her money to watch Prince? She’s been doing it for free all this time. He has no intention of supporting her family and no intention of letting her think she’ll be living in any kind of luxury back in the USA. Should he decide to bring her to the USA as his Queen... she will have access to nothing other than what HE decides she has need of, and only he decides when that time is. 
    She obviously wants to come to the USA, I hope she realizes the devil she is hooking her wagon to in order to get here. This is one couple that I find equally unlikeable. 

    • Love 3
  10. 10 hours ago, nutella fitzgerald said:

    Ed is so condescending it makes me physically ill. He couldn’t look at the plane seating arrangement to see if it was a window seat, he had to make sure he announced to as many people as possible that Rose had NEVER been on a plane before!!!

    She steered him around that airport like a pro, she’s flown plenty of times. And she’s very comfortable in a hotel room. Not buying her innocent act. Can’t stomach Ed either but don’t see anything sympathetic about her. 

    • Love 12
  11. On 4/21/2020 at 7:38 PM, FurBabyMama said:

    Omg Ed!! And the toothbrush! I loved when she was walking away and Ed is saying “I love you” and her response in tagalog is “you’re ugly”. He’s just so creepy. And the teddy? Seriously? Giving a teddy the first time you meet someone? I would have punched him in his face. 

    She’s already fucked him and I’m sure she has worn plenty of lingerie in the past. Calling him ugly...(true though it is) says a lot more about her than about him. Not only is she willing to sleep with him) if it was just her I might understand it) but to let some one she finds “ugly”  help raise and influence her son, says a lot about her character. 

     

     

    • Useful 3
    • Love 5
  12. 21 hours ago, Kangatush said:

    It's the modern, "Come up and see my etchings".  It's basically an invitation for some casual intimacy, up to and including, sex.  Slightly classier than a straight up booty call.  

    Shirley MacLaine “Would you like to see my Renoir?”

    Jack Nicholson “ Does  it happen to be in your bedroom?”

    After viewing said Renoir:

    Jack: “I was doing laps when you called, luckily for us, I only did 2”

     

    • LOL 1
    • Love 1
  13. On 3/29/2020 at 8:08 PM, heatherchandler said:

    Are you thinking this is a BS story put in the press by Kris?  I’m with ya, and that actually makes more sense!  Along with the BS story that Kylie was back with Travis.  
     

    Does Kris ever wonder why her “fabulous,” “beautiful,” wealthy daughters cannot hold on to a guy?  And does she feel stupid that she has to plant stories that the guys are trying to get them back?  

    My theory is Kris doesn’t want them in happy relationships. In the non reality world no normal man worth his salt would be content having his mother in law and nosy, intrusive sisters in law all up in his marital business day after day. I can see a young guy like Scott getting caught up in it, and I believe it was a major factor in the issues he and Kourtney had. IMO Kris would have had  lots of problems with Kanye, but his mental situation has limited his interference in her use of his family within the shows context. Lamar, no match for Kris. Travis and Tristan probably too dumb to read the NDA before cashing those checks Kris signs. 

    • Love 3
  14. 1 minute ago, DEL901 said:

    But Stephanie knew all this before she headed to Australia.

     I was speaking strictly for myself. I couldn’t even get into a serious relationship with someone like Ericka. No problem with a friendship, but I do think that after a certain age, that whole cartoon like appearance might possibly be a sign of a deeper issue.

    Stephanie certainly has some emotional baggage, but Ericka doesn’t strike me 
    as all that  together herself. 

    • Useful 2
    • Love 4
  15. I really could never have an in-depth conversation about my feelings with anyone who had pink and purple hair.  I  just couldn’t take anything they said seriously. Between the hair and the cartoon clothing, tattoos and piercings .. I just would find it all too distracting.
     

    • Useful 1
    • Love 5
×
×
  • Create New...