Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

TVSnark

Member
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

Reputation

12 Good
  1. Ha, no. Thomas is probably grateful for that. You have to meet certain elements to be common law married, mainly that you hold yourself out to be married and you intend to be married.
  2. I think even with IVF, a court is not going to rule in favor of Kathryn. Contracting for a child (barring gestational surrogacy) is not allowed here. South Carolina does not look favorably on anything that could look like "buying a baby," which a skilled attorney could probably successfully argue that Thomas was essentially paying Kathryn for the baby. Moreover, there's something called the statute of frauds, which would almost certainly apply if you couldn't get it kicked on public policy--their agreement would have to be in writing. As for promissory estoppel, Kathryn getting pregnant would likely never be considered "detrimental reliance" because it would set a bad public policy example. She's too immature and selfish to see that the best way to get what she wants is not to act like a crazy person. I live here and have heard he offered her much more than $2,500 for an amicable agreement about child support and she went batshit crazy on him so he withdrew the offer. Unfortunately for her, he has the money and thus, the power to control whether he wants to give more than the maximum. The fact that these two don't have a settled child support order is crazy to me and suggests that Kathryn does not have an attorney. Any attorney worth their salt would get in front of judge ASAP.
  3. A court is never going to recognize their agreement because it would be against public policy. You cannot contract for sex in exchange for anything. And that is essentially what they did. Even if for argument's sake that they would, a court in South Carolina is definitely not going to recognize an out-of-wedlock pregnancy in exchange for financial support. She never married him and I can guarantee you a family court judge is not going to be impressed by the fact that she is not working and/or not getting her college degree. She has an obligation to financially support Kensie as well and a judge could find that she should have a certain amount of income and use that imputed income to lower Thomas' financial support. Moreover, Thomas wants to split custody so that $2,500 would be for half of the month, which seems more than fair. It would be in her best interest to stop trashing him all over the Internet if she wants a substantial amount of money from him.
×
×
  • Create New...