Something that has bothered me about many of these episodes is that the participant will often point out that a "food addiction is the worst addiction to have," because "food is something you have to have." Well, yes, you need the nutrition from food to survive but the way these subjects refer to it is as if they are just passive participants in life; they can't help that there are bags of Doritos and buckets of fried chicken just waiting to be eaten; I mean, someone's got to eat it, right? It's a matter of survival, right? Our ancestors were hunting for animals and living off nuts and berries; THAT'S food for survival. These people have done this to themselves over a lifetime, tricked their stomachs into thinking they need multitudes of calories to survive. I know what they're trying to say; I just feel that the "I need food to survive; that's why I have an addiction" is a cop-out.
Toward the end of the episode, when Teretha's husband had cooked dinner for them, she said, "Oh, this has more noodles than I thought," and her plate looked to have a rather large portion size on it. Her attitude seemed to be, "Aw, shucks, this has too many noodles, what can you do." For one, you can just NOT eat the noodles, or have a smaller, more appropriate portion size. And her husband said something like, "Looks like too many VEGETABLES to me, hardy har!" These people won't be successful if they can't change the basic way in which they think/talk about their food. Vegetables are not the enemy, and neither are noodles if consumed in smaller, healthier portion sizes.