Jump to content

Type keyword(s) to search

wendyg

Member
  • Posts

    912
  • Joined

Posts posted by wendyg

  1. 19 hours ago, SanDiegoInExile said:

    The actress is not very strong

    I can only assume you've never seen Beth Hall in anything else. She's *brilliant*. Her best-known turn is as Caroline, Roger Sterling's secretary in MAD MEN. Barely recognizable from that as Wendy. It's completely inexplicable why they don't give her a story on MOM.

    • Useful 3
    • Love 11
  2. It seems clear there's someone in the writers room that really loves the movie ALL THAT JAZZ - this episode had the second call-back to that movie this season (the scene where Sam starts rubbing his left wrist and the sound fades out is a direct knockoff). One homage is fine. Two is...pushing it.

    • Love 3
  3. Going back to the piece about the strippers and molesting him, I think lost in the sexual abuse aspect is the fact of the viciousness of the  timing, which was guaranteed to ensure maximum public humiliation for him as a performer. (That comes across very clearly in ATJ, where the audience laughing at his public shame is the real horror of the whole thing.)

    • Sad 1
    • Love 4
  4. When I lived in Dublin in the mid-1980s, coal fires were still allowed within the city limits. While the resulting smog wasn't nearly as thick as this one (or the 1948 Donora, PA one they reference), it was entirely thick enough to make it difficult to see - and incredibly acrid and uncomfortable to breathe, and if the fog persisted, the smog would stay, sometimes for several days.  I remember remarking on how unpleasant it was to a neighbor, and she looked at me in surprise. "I've never noticed it." A few days later, though, she came back to me and said she noticed it *now*. Sometimes you have to point these things out. I think Dublin finally banned coal fires within the city limits in the early 1990s. It was really tough on anyone's lungs.

    • Useful 4
    • Love 2
  5. What I don't understand is taking bragging rights for something that's *not your achievement*. If you can't make it up the mountain and back down again without the assistance of trained professionals, then *you didn't climb Everest* - they did. When you think about the sherpas climbing that mountain over and over again leading these commercial expeditions, *their* achievement is astounding.

    • Love 12
  6. I think it's always hard to tell how much the person who presents the news is a journalist - and it's very easy for outsiders to attribute more to the presenter than is entirely justified. The New Yorker followed Maddow around a couple of years ago and shows her writing her scripts, and I know she's worked as a print journalist, but *now* a lot of the credit for the spadework and research that makes her possible really has to go to her staff. I bet it was one of her staff who did the searches that surfaced Randall Williams' background and tied his story together. And it's certainly true that while I think Maddow is scrupulous with her facts, she takes an unseemly glee in exposing Republican malfeasance. The giggling and face-palming play well on TV but I can see why the staid New York Times might see them as "not-a-journalist".

  7. To be fair to Barbara Walters, I think it's clear she was just stunned at how far Schlafly was willing to go in lying about what the ERA said. Commonplace, today; shocking, then.

    I first encountered Schlafly's take on things sometime in the late 1970s while driving across the southwest late at night, when skip meant I was picking up a station from, I don't know, Chicago or somewhere. Let me tell you, the rage kept me awake on a long stretch of empty interstate...

    • Love 9
  8. On 6/3/2019 at 3:25 PM, Lantern7 said:

    Of course John would pronounce to “o” in “opossum.” On the other hand, he didn’t bring in Gilbert Gottfried to dub Jared, so I guess things evened out. 

    Why *wouldn't* you pronounce the "o" in "opossum"?

    • Love 1
  9. The waiting for the phone call part, not to mention knowing they were on a shortlist, was the least credible aspect of it to me. Richard Feynmann wrote in his autobiography about being awakened one morning with the call and being annoyed that there wasn't any advance notice - or any chance to say, thanks, but no thanks.

    I don't think it was out of character for Penny to have come around to being excited about the pregnancy. At every step of her relationship with Leonard she's been the one who's been scared of taking the next step forward - the first time he told her he loved her she freaked and left; it took her a long time to say she loved him; etc.

    • Love 5
  10. I think a lot of us are hoping that if Assange gets extradited from the UK it's to Sweden, where he still hasn't faced the sexual assault/rape charges. In the past, the UK has eventually (after a lot of controversy and pressure) declined to extradite people facing hacking charges (which is what Assange is accused of, really) to the US. 

    It's important also to remember that Wikileaks/Assange are being indicted on events that took place in 2009/2010. At the time, Wikileaks was much more credible as a journalism/publishing operation than it is now. There are lengthy descriptions written by witnesses at the time of him and his colleagues working hard to understand the material they'd gotten from Manning and how best to present it and what to select. There's no doubt in my mind that at that time (when he was also much less famous) he was behaving the way a journalist would. The fact that *since* then he appears to have behaved as a partisan in the 2016 US elections isn't really relevant to that.

    The big question for me is whether he collaborated in or directed stealing the material in the first place. I think Manning did act in the public interest, but if you use the Pentagon Papers as a guide, the New York Times and the Washington Post *received* them; they didn't advise Daniel Ellsberg about what to take or where from. I think that crosses a serious line.

    That said, it's odd that Trump has turned so decisively against Wikileaks. He *loved* them in 2016!

    • Love 1
  11. In the world outside the show, I think they'd have really struggled to find time in Laurie Metcalfe's schedule, since she's currently starring on Broadway in a play about the Clintons with John Lithgow. Eight live shows a week doesn't leave you with much time for anything else.

    AIUI, it wasn't CBS that vetoed it but Chuck Lorre and Bill Prady who said they wouldn't consider doing the show without Parsons. Seems reasonable to me - from the beginning the three they thought were indispensable "persons of essence" were Parsons, Galecki, and Cuoco. Now, obviously the show changed a lot over the years, but I suspect they wouldn't have gone on without any one of those three - because then it's a different show and you have to rethink everything. And Lorre knows how hard it is to rethink a show midstream because he had to do it when Charlie Sheen combusted during season 8 of TWO AND A HALF MEN.

    • Love 10
  12. I thought it was a decent finale. Sheldon's speech gave the show the opportunity to give each main cast member their own curtain call, which was nice. The final shot was fine with me; of course in real life Sheldon and Amy wouldn't win the Nobel for another 20 years and everyone would be getting offers and opportunities to move on and out and away, but for this moment in time we and they get to remember them as they were. After 12 years, I'm glad the show got to the end without ever betraying any of its characters.

    Yeah No: Jane Leeves got pregnant and they wrote it into the final season. It wasn't the writers who decided that one. 🙂

    • Love 4
  13. Talk about continuity. After watching the finale, I decided to replay the pilot. And there, in the middle of a discussion about a damaging story that's breaking is this:

    Dan : "It's going to be in the papers tomorrow."

    Mike: "Not necessarily. Let's not make it the story and panic. What if Tom Hanks dies?"

    • LOL 3
    • Love 17
×
×
  • Create New...