Old Man Neil

This site offers free episodes of the TV series and many others. Thanks to it I was able to watch The Case of the Substitute Face. https://solie.org/alibrary/PerryMason.html

I don't know. You cited a couple of exceptions. The rule seemed to be that she was well liked by the secretarial staff.

But the Mohawk Meredith incident didn't happen until Season 5 and there were extenuating circumstances. I remember she came down pretty hard on the secretary who sent her the flowers intended for Lane's wife in The Good News but wasn't that deserved? As for Scarlet, she needed reprimanding. In the early seasons, I remember her counselling Peggy to be nice to the switchboard operators, and trying to give good advice to Peggy in general, even if it was a bit snarky. She and Jane exchanged words, but Jane started it. Of course, you are right about the department store sales person. You make it sound like she sucks up to the guys and their wives. I don't see anything other than charming professionalism.

You are the second person to say this recently, but that wasn't my impression. Can you give some examples?

I just watched The Guitar, an episode from the first season of Gunsmoke. It was written by Sam Peckinpah, best known for The Wild Bunch, and featured a down and out guitar picker. At one point the patrons of The Long Branch took up a collection for him. The actor who played the impoverished guitarist was Aaron Spelling.

Allison falls in love with a good man. They get married and are very happy together, until the day her husband says, "Honey, have you seen my keys?"

Peggy flies to Paris, looks out her hotel room window, and sees a couple of French poodles humping on the sidewalk.

Thank you!

What episode was that in and what was the context? I remember it being said, but that's all I remember. Did we get any examples?

Could be. I like your sunny optimism.

Umbelina, the thing is, you were on your way up in the world; Paul was on his way down. Sure, he could have turned his life around. Moved to LA, found a roommate, a place to live and a job, if he did all the right things, and didn't do anything foolish. But that doesn't sound like Paul to me. Paul was looking for a writing job and he probably would have wasted time trying to catch on at one of the studios. I'm not saying it wasn't nice of Harry to give him $500. But I think it might have been more of an act of friendship to level with him about his screenplay and lack of prospects for success in the business.

You and Umbelina make some really good points Sister Magpie. I especially like this. I continue to think that Harry, Ken and Paul went off the rails in the later seasons, but I don't have the energy to discuss it at any greater length.

It doesn't sound like it would go that far for someone without an income. At most that would have given him two or three months of rent, but no car, and he would have had to buy groceries, and a television. And bell-bottoms. I loved Ken as a writer, and hated that he gave it up. It didn't seem realistic to me that he had that kind of talent and traded it for the rat race. It seemed to me like Weiner manipulated his character to make a point rather than letting the character naturally evolve. Midge was realistic in that heroin was the drug of choice for beatniks. It made sense for her to become an addict. But it would have been equally realistic to portray her as continuing on as a free spirited working artist, or marrying and raising a family. It seemed that Weiner wanted to make a point about the counter culture and dragged us through the mud with her. He didn't have to make Midge an addict.

You may be right, but I think the same points could have been made without the over the top characterizations. As an example of someone who was presented more realistically, I give you Stan Rizzo. I saw so many people like Stan in the sixties. They started out as straight arrow types but became well rounded under the influence of marijuana. His growth as a character felt more natural to me than the arcs of Ken, Paul and Harry.

You make some great arguments and almost have me convinced. My take has always been that the secondary characters from the early seasons were shabbily written as the series went on. Ken with his eye-patch and over the top vindictiveness, Paul as a Hare Krishna, Midge as a junkie, Harry as a scurrilous lech. In season five, the joke about Zou Bisou Bisou was organic. but propositioning the bosses wife in New Business was unbelievably crass and stupid. If he cared enough to help save Don's job, you'd think he'd care enough to leave the man's wife alone. He's never depicted as having new ideas. His contributions in that regard are limited to saying all the other companies have one. And notice in the episode Shoot, it's Pete's bright idea to buy up all the ad space for Secor Laxatives to keep Kennedy off of television where he had a clear advantage over Nixon. If they wanted to foreshadow the idea that Harry was a media whiz, that would have been a great opportunity. I think they could have made the same points with his character, and others, without the cartoonish exaggerations. Did he really do all that much to help Paul? He didn't level with him that the script was terrible. Five hundred dollars would last about a month in California. I guess at least it got him away from the Krishnas.